Skip to main content
Log in

Field and numerical studies on bearing capacity of helical screw piles in Caspian Sea coast soil

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The installation of driven piles in urban areas encounters various challenges due to several installation requirements concerning vibration, noise pollution, adjacent structure protection, and access to heavy traffic areas. Novel helical piles resolve these challenges and reduce soil disturbance. The present study conducts a field study of helical, self-expanded, drilled displacement steel piles, and driven piles with an embedment depth of 3.2 m. The piles were subjected to static compressive loading tests. It was found that the helical and self-expanded piles had approximately 70% higher bearing capacities than the driven pile at a displacement as large as 5% of the pile diameter and can be efficient and effective alternatives to driven piles in urban and coastal constructions. Then, numerical simulations were performed using the finite element method to explore the effects of soil layers on the bearing capacity of helical piles and the soil failure mechanism. It was found that soil layers significantly affected the bearing capacity of a helical pile and would change the cylindrical failure mechanism into the individual failure mechanism. Furthermore, a rise in the clayey soil depth could substantially influence the bearing capacity of a helical pile.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Perko HA (2009) Helical piles: a practical guide to design and installation. Helical Piles A Pract Guid Des Install. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470549063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mitchell A (1848) On submarine foundations; particularly the screw pile and moorings. Min Proc Inst Civ Eng 7:108–132. https://doi.org/10.1680/imotp.1848.24220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Di Bernardo G (2012) Helical pile Deck foundation. New Jersey Deck Boulder, USA

    Google Scholar 

  4. Spagnoli G (2017) A CPT-based model to predict the installation torque of helical piles in sand. Mar Georesour Geotechnol 35(4):578–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/1064119X.2016.1213337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. de Hollanda C, Tsuha C, Aoki N (2010) Relationship between installation torque and uplift capacity of deep helical piles in sand. Can Geotech J 47(6):635–647. https://doi.org/10.1139/T09-128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hambleton J, Stanier S, Gaudin C, odeshkejoei K (2014) Analysis of installation forces for helical piles in clay. Aust Geomech J 49(4):73–79

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nabizadeh F, Choobbasti A (2017) Field study of capacity helical piles in sand and silty clay. Transp Infrastruct Geotechnol 4(1):3–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40515-016-0036-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Elsherbiny Z, El Naggar M (2013) Axial compressive capacity of helical piles from field tests and numerical study. Can Geotech J 50(12):1191–1203. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2012-0487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tang C, Phoon K (2020) Statistical evaluation of model factors in reliability calibration of high-displacement helical piles under axial loading. Can Geotech J 57(2):246–262. https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2018-0754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sakr M (2011) Installation and performance characteristics of high capacity helical piles in cohesionless soils. J Deep Found Inst 5(1):39–57. https://doi.org/10.1179/dfi.2011.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Malik A, Kuwano J, Tachibana S, Maejima T (2017) End bearing capacity comparison of screw pile with straight pipe pile under similar ground conditions. Acta Geotech 12(2):415–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-016-0482-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Li W, Deng L (2019) Axial load tests and numerical modeling of single-helix piles in cohesive and cohesionless soils. Acta Geotech 14(2):461–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-018-0669-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Livneh B, El Naggar M (2008) Axial testing and numerical modeling of square shaft helical piles under compressive and tensile loading. Can Geotech J 45(8):1142–1155. https://doi.org/10.1139/T08-044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sprince A, Pakrastinsh L (2010) Helical pile behaviour and load transfer mechanism in different soils. In: 10th modern building materials, structures and techniques pp 1174–1180

  15. Nowkandeh M, Choobbasti A (2021) Numerical study of single helical piles and helical pile groups under compressive loading in cohesive and cohesionless soils. Bull Eng Geol Environ 80(5):4001–4023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-021-02158-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Alwalan M, El Naggar M (2020) Finite element analysis of helical piles subjected to axial impact loading. Comput Geotech. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shojaei E, Eslami A, Ganjian N (2021) Self-expanded piles: a new approach to unconventional piles development. Mar Georesour Geotechnol 39(1):115–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/1064119X.2019.1679924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ahmadi H, Eslami A, Arabani M (2015) Characterization of sedimentary Anzali Sand for static and seismic studies purposes. Int J Geogr Geol 4(10):155–169

    Google Scholar 

  19. ASTM D1143/D1143M-07. Standard. Test methods for deep foundations under static axial compressive load. ASTM International

  20. Eslami A, Fellenius B (1997) Pile capacity by direct CPT and CPTu methods applied to 102 case histories. Can Geotech J 34(6):886–904. https://doi.org/10.1139/t97-056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Randolph M (2003) Load transfer analysis of axially loaded piles, RATZ

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arash Nayeri.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal content is not required.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seifi, S., Nayeri, A. & Lajevardi, S.H. Field and numerical studies on bearing capacity of helical screw piles in Caspian Sea coast soil. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 8, 54 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-022-01019-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-022-01019-z

Keywords

Navigation