Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Numerical analysis and preliminary design of topside of an offshore platform using FGM and X52 steel under special loads

  • Technical paper
  • Published:
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigates the behavior of the topside of an offshore platform under hydrocarbon explosion and wind. Topside is designed for a combination of loads arising from types of equipment, fixed and rotating machinery, and cranes, apart from the gravity loads. While the wind loads are calculated using a gust factor and applied at different levels of the deck, a preliminary analysis is carried out using SAP2000 nonlinear. The design check carried following the code confirmed that the chosen sections satisfy the design requirements, both in strength and serviceability criteria. The topside of a typical offshore platform is highly vulnerable to fire and hydrocarbon explosion, causing extreme pressure and temperature in the confined areas. Pressure caused by the hydrocarbon explosion is rapid and results in an impulsive force of short duration. It damages the structural components and affects the overall performance of the topside considerably. The blast load is applied as an overpressure on the beams and columns and analyzed using ABAQUS explicit. The current study investigates the structural adequacy of members, constructed with X52 steel and functionally graded material (FGM). A comparison of the results showed that FGM offers more resistance to the displacement of beams and columns. Under the action of blast overpressure, members with FGM showed a significant reduction in both the plastic stain and Von-Mises stress at the beam–column connections in comparison with that of X52 steel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chandrasekaran S (2014) Advanced theory on offshore plant FEED engineering. Changwon National University Press, Changwon, p 237. ISBN 978-89-969-7928-9

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chandrasekaran S (2015) Advanced marine structures. CRC Press, Florida. ISBN 978-14-987-3968-9

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Chandrasekaran S, Bhattacharyya SK (2012) Analysis and design of offshore structures with illustrated examples. Human Resource Development Center for Offshore and Plant Engineering (HOPE Center), Changwon National University Press, Changwon, p 285. ISBN 978-89-963-9155-5

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chandrasekaran S, Nagavinothini R (2020) Offshore compliant platforms: analysis, design and experimental studies. Wiley, Hoboken. ISBN 978-1-119-66977-7

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Chandrasekaran S (2019) Advanced steel design of structures. CRC Press, Florida. ISBN 978-036-72-3290-0

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Chandrasekaran S, Nagavinothini R (2019) Tether analyses of offshore triceratops under ice loads due to continuous crushing. Int J Innovat Infrastruct Solut 4:25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-019-0212-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nagavinothini R, Chandrasekaran S (2019) Dynamic analyses of offshore triceratops in ultra-deep waters under wind, wave, and current. Structures 20:279–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2019.04.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kishi N, Chen WF, Goto Y, Matsuoka KG (1993) Design aid of semi-rigid connections for frame analysis. Eng J 30(3):90–107

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kulkarni RB, Patil VA (2011) Design aids of flexural members and beam-columns based on limit state method. Int J Sci Eng Res, Vol 2, Issue 10, ISSN 2229-5518

  10. Torkamani MA, Sonmez M, Cao J (1997) Second-order elastic plane-frame analysis using the finite-element method. J Struct Eng 123(9):1225–1235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ngo-Huu C, Kim SE, Oh JR (2007) Nonlinear analysis of space steel frames using fiber plastic hinge concept. Eng Struct 29(4):649–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Azizinamini A, Bradburn JH, Radziminski JB (1987) Initial stiffness of semi-rigid steel beam-to-column connections. J Constr Steel Res 8:71–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee SS, Moon TS (2002) Moment–rotation model of semi-rigid connections with angles. Eng Struct 24(2):227–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Garlock ME, Quiel SE (2008) Plastic axial load and moment interaction curves for fire-exposed steel sections with thermal gradients. J Struct Eng 134(6):874–880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Vishnuraj K, Janardhanan S, Sandeep TN (2018) Design optimization of water injection module of topside facility of an FPSO. Int J Struct Mech Finite Elements 4(1):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  16. Henriksen LO (2008) Structural design and analysis of FPSO topside module supports. In: Annual meeting and expo. Society of naval architects and marine engineers

  17. Ocel J, DesRoches R, Leon RT, Hess WG, Krumme R, Hayes JR, Sweeney S (2004) Steel beam-column connections using shape memory alloys. J Struct Eng 130(5):732–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chandrasekaran S, Hari S, Amirthalingam M (2019) Wire-arc additive manufacturing of functionally-graded material for marine riser applications. Proceedings of I-OCEANS 2019, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Terengganu, Malaysia, 5–7th Aug 2019

  19. Srinivasan H (2020) Dynamic analysis of marine risers with functionally graded material, Ph. D Dissertation submitted to IIT Madras

  20. Gardner L, Wang F, Liew A (2011) Influence of strain hardening on the behavior and design of steel structures. Int J Struct Stab Dyn 11(05):855–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Naughton DT, Tsavdaridis KD, Maraveas C, Nicolaou A (2017) Pushover analysis of steel seismic-resistant Frames with reduced Web section and reduced Beam section connections. Front Built Environ 3:59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wilkinson S, Hurdman G, Crowther A (2006) A moment-resisting connection for earthquake resistant structures. J Constr Steel Res 62(3):295–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chandrasekaran S, Srivastava G (2017) Design aids for offshore structures under special environmental loads, including fire resistance. Springer, Singapore. ISBN 978-981-10-7608-4

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chandrasekaran S, Nagavinothini R (2019) Parametric studies on the impact response of offshore triceratops in ultra-deep waters. Struct Infrastruct Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2019.1680707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chandrasekaran S, Nagavinothini R (2019) Response of triceratops to impact forces: numerical investigations. Ocean Syst Eng J 9(4):349–368. https://doi.org/10.12989/ose.2019.9.4.349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Louca LA, Ali RM (2008) Improving the ductile behavior of offshore topside structures under extreme loads. Eng Struct 30(2):506–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sabuwala T, Linzell D, Krauthammer T (2005) Finite element analysis of steel beam to column connections subjected to blast loads. Int J Impact Eng 31(7):861–876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Schleyer GK, Campbell D (1996) Development of simplified analytical methods for predicting the response of offshore structures to blast and fire loading. Marine Struct 9(10):949–970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Krauthammer T (1999) Blast-resistant structural concrete and steel connections. Int J Impact Eng 22(9–10):887–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kang KY, Choi KH, Choi JW, Ryu YH, Lee JM (2017) Explosion induced dynamic responses of blast wall on FPSO topside: blast loading application methods. Int J Naval Architect Ocean Eng 9(2):135–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kang KY, Choi KH, Choi J, Ryu Y, Lee JM (2016) Dynamic response of structural models according to characteristics of a gas explosion on the topside platform. Ocean Eng 113:174–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Louca LA, Pan YG, Harding JE (1998) Response of stiffened and unstiffened plates subjected to blast loading. Eng Struct 20(12):1079–1086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Chandrasekaran S, Nagavinothini R (2017) Analysis and design of offshore triceratops under ultra-deep waters. Int J Civil Environ Struct Constr Arch Eng 11(11):1520–1528

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ocean Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, 600036, India

    Srinivasan Chandrasekaran & S. Pachaiappan

Authors
  1. Srinivasan Chandrasekaran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Pachaiappan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Srinivasan Chandrasekaran.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors do not have any conflict of interest in the present study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chandrasekaran, S., Pachaiappan, S. Numerical analysis and preliminary design of topside of an offshore platform using FGM and X52 steel under special loads. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 5, 86 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-020-00337-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-020-00337-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation