Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Labour Contractors (Thekedaars) to Human Resource Companies: Labour Market Intermediaries in India

  • ARTICLE
  • Published:
The Indian Journal of Labour Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Labour market intermediaries (LMIs) are gaining prominence in forging employment relations with principal employer and labour in a tripartite setting. In this article, we underpin the current literature situating LMIs in the global value chains (GVCs) and global production networks (GPNs) to its historical provenance that of the Indian labour contractor (thekedaar) by studying the role of the labour contractor in three globally pegged Indian colonial sites: the Indian Railways, the Bombay cotton mills, and the tea plantations. This historical analysis helps us understand the morphing nature of LMIs in India, post-2000, in the form of human resource companies (HRCs). For the latter, we use a novel dataset—companies registered under the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, to extract those established to serve the purpose of LMIs. This data are juxtaposed with the theoretical framework that classifies LMIs into a typology of matchmakers, information providers and administrators. Given the long history and phenomenal diversity in practices of LMIs in India, we conclude that it is difficult to capture them within the existing classificatory frameworks and thus offers opportunities for theory extension. We conclude that though the thekedaars are evolving into a more sophisticated and formalised versions of human resource companies or Staffing Solution Companies, there has not been much change in their core functions as labour market intermediaries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Source: Author’s compilation

Fig. 2

Source: Author’s compilation

Fig. 3

Source: Authors’ visualisation of the data

Fig. 4

Source: Authors’ visualisation of the data

Similar content being viewed by others

Declaration

Conflict of Interest

There is no conflict of interest in the research undertaken in this paper.

Notes

  1. This article understands Labour Market Intermediaries (LMIs) as the collective for all organisations serving the purpose of labour market intermediation irrespective of their HR function and organisation structure whereas human resource companies (HRC) refer to specific LMIs that are registering themselves in the format of a company under the Companies Act, 2013 of India.

  2. A system in which a managing agent who could be an individual, partnership firm, or a company would be appointed to manage and govern a joint stock company during the colonial times in India (Varottil 2016).

  3. Private limited companies are registered under the Companies Act of 1956, and LLPs are registered under the Limited Liability Partnership Act 2008. It is argued that LLPs are easier to incorporate with fewer formalities, whereas private companies require higher compliance requirements. https://ebizfiling.com/blog/llp-vs-pvt-ltd-company/

  4. PSARA 2005 was enacted with the aim of regulating security agencies operating while ensuring that they do not intrude upon the duties of law-and-order enforcement mechanisms.

References

  • Abraham, K.G. 1990. Restructuring the Employment Relationship: The Growth of Market-Mediated Work Arrangements | ECON l Department of Economics l University of Maryland. In New Developments in the Labor Market: Toward a New Institutional Paradigm, ed. K.G. Abraham and R.B. Meckersie, 85–119. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adduci, M. 2017. Neo-Liberalism, Mining and Labour in the Indian State of Odisha: Outlining a Political Economy Analysis. Journal of Contemporary Asia 47 (4): 596–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agarwala, R. 2013. Inventory of Informal Worker Organizations: India. Unpublished Working Paper for EOIW.

  • Apitzsch, B., Wilkesmann, M., Ruiner, C., Bassyiouny, M., Ehlen, R., and Schulz, L. 2022. Labour Market Collectivism: New Solidarities of Highly Skilled Freelance Workers in Medicine, IT and the Film Industry. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 44 (4): 1149–1175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X221120534.

  • Barrientos, S. 2008. Contract Labour: The ‘Achilles Heel’ of Corporate Codes in Commercial Value Chains: Contract Labour and Corporate Codes. Development and Change 39 (6): 977–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrientos, S.W. 2013. ‘Labour Chains’: Analysing the Role of Labour Contractors in Global Production Networks. The Journal of Development Studies, 49 (8): 1058–1071.

  • Beck, U. 1999. World Risk Society. Cambridge: Polity Press

  • Benner, C. 2003. Labour Flexibility and Regional Development: The Role of Labour Market Intermediaries. Regional Studies 37 (6–7): 621–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bidwell, M., and Fernandez-Mateo, I. 2008. Three’s a Crowd? Understanding Triadic Employment Relationships. In P. Cappelli (Ed.), Employment Relationships (1st ed., pp. 142–178). Cambridge University Press.

  • Bonet, R., P. Cappelli, and M. Hamori. 2013. Labor Market Intermediaries and the New Paradigm for Human Resources. Academy of Management Annals 7 (1): 341–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyatzis, R.E. 1998. Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development (pp. xvi, 184). Sage Publications, Inc.

  • Breman, J. 1985. Of Peasants, Migrants and Paupers: Rural Labour Circulation and Capitalist Production in West India. Goulds Book Arcade. Sydney: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarti, D. 2000. Rethinking Working-Class History: Bengal 1890–1940. Princeton University Press. https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691070308/rethinking-working-class-history

  • Chandavarkar, R. 1985. Industrialization in India before 1947: Conventional Approaches and Alternative Perspectives. Modern Asian Studies 19 (3): 623–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandavarkar, R. 2002. The Origins of Industrial Capitalism in India: Business Strategies and the Working Classes in Bombay, 1900–1940. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coe, N.M., Jones, K., and Ward, K. 2010. The Business of Temporary Staffing: A Developing Research Agenda: The business of temporary staffing. Geography Compass 4 (8): 1055–1068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, H., and Meyer-Ohle, H. 2018. Brokers and the Organization of Recruitment of ‘Global Talent’ by Japanese Firms—A Migration Perspective. Social Science Japan Journal 21 (1): 67–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czaban, L., and Henderson, J. 1998. Golbalization, Institutional Legacies and Industrial Transformation in Eastern Europ. Economy and Society 27 (4): 585–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Neve, G. 2014. Entrapped Entrepreneurship: Labour Contractors in the South Indian Garment Industry. Modern Asian Studies 48 (5): 1302–1333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FICCI. 2018. Private Security Industry Report Job Creation and Skill Development (p. 40). https://ficci.in/spdocument/23012/Private%20Security%20Industry%20Report.pdf

  • Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J. and Sturgeon, T. 2005. The Governance of Global Value Chains. Review of International Political Economy 12 (1): 78–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goyal, Y. 2022. Responsibilization through Regulatory Intermediaries in Informal Markets: Examining the Governance of Prostitution in India. Regulation and Governance 16 (3): 858–874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J., P. Dicken, M. Hess, N. Coe, and H.W.-C. Yeung. 2002. Global Production Networks and the Analysis of Economic Development. Review of International Political Economy 9 (3): 436–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houseman, S., Kalleberg, A., and Erickcek, G. 2003. The Role of Temporary Agency Employment in Tight Labor Markets. ILR Review, 57(1): 105–127.

  • Iqbal, B.A., and S. Sami. 2017. Role of Banks in Financial Inclusion in India. Contaduría y Administración 62 (2): 644–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JCB, A., and Pratap, S. 2012. Worker Voices in an Auto Production Chain Notes from Pits of a Low Road- I. Economic and Political Weekly, XLVI I (33): 47–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, I.J. 1995. Building the Railways of the Raj 1850–1900 (Paperback ed., 1997). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

  • Lerche, J., Mezzadri, A., Chang, D.-O.,  Ngai, P., Huilin, L., Aiyu, L., and Srivastava, R. 2017. The Triple Absence of Labour Rights: Triangular Labour Relations and Informalisation in the Construction and Garment Sectors in Delhi and Shanghai. Centre for Development Policy and Research: SOAS, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund-Thomsen, P., L. Riisgaard, S. Singh, S. Ghori, and N.M. Coe. 2021. Global Value Chains and Intermediaries in Multi-stakeholder Initiatives in Pakistan and India. Development and Change 52 (3): 504–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mamgain, R.P. 2018. New Forms of Recruitment Processes and Discrimination in Urban Labour Market in India. Journal of Social Inclusion Studies 4 (1): 131–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mezzadri, A. 2016. The Informalization of Capital and Interlocking in Labour Contracting Networks. Progress in Development Studies 16 (2): 124–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosse, D., Gupta, S., Mehta, M., Shah, V., Rees, J. fnms, and Team, K.P. 2002. Brokered Livelihoods: Debt, Labour Migration and Development in Tribal Western India. Journal of Development Studies 38 (5): 59–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osterman, P. 2008. Improving Job Quality: Policies Aimed at the Demand Side of the Low-Wage labor Market. In A Future of Good Jobs? America’s Challenge in the Global Economy, ed. T.J. Bartik and S.N. Houseman, 203–244. W.E. Upjohn Institute.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J., and Theodore, N. 1998. The Business of Contingent Work: Growth and Restructuring in Chicago’s Temporary Employment Industry. Work, Employment and Society 12 (4): 655–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J.A., and Theodore, N. 2002. Temped Out? Industry Rhetoric, Labor Regulation and Economic Restructuing in the Temporary Staffing Business. Economic and Industrial Democracy 23 (2): 143–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J.A., and Theodore, N. 2007. Flexible Recession: The Temporary Staffing Industry and Mediated Work in the United States. Cambridge Journal of Economics 31 (2): 171–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J., Theodore, N., and Ward, K. 2005. Constructing Markets for Temporary Labour: Employment Liberalization and the Internationalization of the Staffing Industry. Global Networks 5 (1): 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peltokorpi, V. 2022. Here Today, Gone Tomorrow: A Mixed-method Study on Headhunter-intermediated Recruitment Practices. British Journal of Management, 34(2): 709–726.

  • Picherit, D. 2009. Workers, Trust Us!’ Labour Middlemen and the Rise of the Lower Castes in Andhra Pradesh. In Editors, J. Breman, and I. G. A. Prakash (Eds.), India’s Unfree Workforce: Of Bondage Old and New (pp. 259–283). Oxford University Press.

  • Raman, R. 2009. Global Capital and Peripheral Labour The History and Political Economy of Plantation Workers in India. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203869819

  • Roy, T. 2008. Sardars, Jobbers, Kanganies: The Labour Contractor and Indian Economic History. Modern Asian Studies 42 (5): 971–998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samantroy, E. 2015. Regulating Private Placement Agencies in India: Issues and Challenges in the Context of ILO Convention 181. Indian Journal of Labour Economics 58 (1): 169–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sein, M.K. 2011. The “I” Between G and C: E-Government Intermediaries in Developing Countries. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries 48 (1): 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.K. 2002. Mode of Labour Control in Colonial India. Economic and Political Weekly 37 (38): 3956–3966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, S. 2010. Commercial Recruiting and Informal Intermediation: Debate over the Sardari System in Assam Tea Plantations, 1860–1900. Modern Asian Studies 44 (1): 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, R., and R. Mishra. 2017. Investigating the Role of Intermediaries in Adoption of Public Access Outlets for Delivery of e-Government Services in Developing Countries: An Empirical Study. Government Information Quarterly 34 (4): 658–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobral, F., Ng E.S., Castanheira, F., Chambel, M.J., and Koene, B. 2019. Dealing with Temporariness: Generational Effects on Temporary Agency Workers’ Employment Relationships. Personnel Review 49 (2): 406–424. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-02-2018-0071.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, R.S. 2005. Bonded Labour in India: Its Incidence and Pattern. Working Paper for International Labour office.

  • Standing, G. 1999. Global labour flexibility: Seeking distributive justice. Vol. 287. London: Macmillan. https://link.springer.com/book/9780333776520

  • Tankha, A. 2002. Self-help Groups as Financial Intermediaries in India: Cost of Promotion, Sustainability and Impact. New Delhi: Sa-Dhan, study prepared for ICCO and Cordaid, The Netherlands, 1–17.

  • Tariff Commission, India. 1927. Report of the Indian Tariff Board: Cotton Textile Industry Enquiry (Volume 1; p. 263). Government of India. https://dspace.gipe.ac.in/xmlui/handle/10973/24396

  • Varottil, U. 2016. Corporate Law in Colonial India: Rise and Demise of the Managing Agency System. In Colonial Adventures: Commercial Law and Practice in the Making (pp. 245–278).

  • Yao, N., Q. Guo, and C. Tsinopoulos. 2022. The Bright and Dark Sides of Institutional Intermediaries: Industry Associations and Small-firm Innovation. Research Policy 51 (1): 104370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R.K. 2017. Case Study Research and Applications. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zafar Sheikh, A., Saleem, Butt, Hussain, B. and  Timmons, S. 2021. Dodgy Labour Market Dichotomy: The Repercussions of Sneaky Labour Intermediaries on Employees’ Constitutional Rights. Labor History 62 (1): 91–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The author did not receive any funding to conduct this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lakshmi Parvathy.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Methodology Appendix

Methodology Appendix

The companies in India are registered under the Companies Registration Act (1956) by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA), Government of India. The MCA releases monthly data of companies registered across India under a) Indian companies, b) foreign companies, and c) limited liability partnerships. They give information on the fields such as company name, date and location of registration, company type, authorised capital, paid-up capital, and activity code and description as per National Industrial Classification (NIC) 2004 and 2008. We began by looking at the standardised activity code and description of the published data, which used NIC 2004 coding for Indian Companies and NIC 2008 coding for limited liability partnerships and foreign companies for the most recent six months. The activity code of 78 in NIC 2008 and the 5-digit code of 74,910 in NIC 2004 was helpful for us. Notably, the activity code of 78 in NIC, 2008, as given in the table below, has notable similarities with the framework of Bonet et al. (2013) see Table 3.

Table 3 Similarities between Activity Code 78 of NIC 2008 and Bonet et al., (2013) on the classification of LMIs

Further, NIC 2004 used a 5-digit code, and the following codes were helpful for us.

  1. 1.

    74910 under NIC 2004 is labour recruitment and provision of personnel.

  2. 2.

    74920 is Investigation and security activities.

  3. 3.

    74930 is Building-cleaning and industrial cleaning activities.

We derived the keywords from the names of companies registered under the activity description of NIC Code 2004 and 2008. However, the data on activity code/description for new company registered was not marked by MCA before March 2022. Thus, we had to arrive at a list of keywords from the data during March 2022 and September 2022. We compared these with the kinds of LMIs in the (Bonet, et al. 2013) framework and got the final list of keywords as in Table 4.

Table 4 First Order Keywords for screening HRCs

These keywords were then applied for the whole period of 2016–2022 to screen for the companies established for serving the purpose of an LMI to arrive at a final list of companies that have been established with the purpose of being a human resource company.

Exceptions: Amongst the keywords, “career” and “skills” were included initially owing to their presence in the names of companies under activity code 78. However, upon further enquiry, it was found that these companies may have job-seeking candidates as their clients rather than any company/organisation as the client, as in the case of an HRC. Additionally, skilling is a fast-growing industry in India today, which may or may not have the intention of being an LMI that ensures jobs. Thus, for these reasons, we drop the keywords of career and skill in our analysis. The difference between keywords from the framework in column one and the data in column three in Table 4 gives insights into the developing country experience of LMI expansion and offers opportunity for further theory extension.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Parvathy, L., Kamath, R. Labour Contractors (Thekedaars) to Human Resource Companies: Labour Market Intermediaries in India. Ind. J. Labour Econ. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41027-024-00477-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41027-024-00477-6

Keywords

JEL numbers

Navigation