Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Labour Market Institutions and New Technology: The Case of Employment Service in India

  • Article
  • Published:
The Indian Journal of Labour Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper traces the evolutionary history of labour market intermediation in India, culminating in the introduction of the National Career Services, an Information Technology-based career service ecosystem. Further, it analyses the performance of the NCS and the challenges therein. Traditional labour markets functioning under asymmetric information had worked under institutional norms and practices that reduced the search-and-match costs in the labour market. While these norms solved the problems of search, these were neither efficient nor just outcomes. Formal institutional interventions in the colonial period were aimed at the need for war exigencies. Post-independence, an elaborate and decentralised system of labour market intermediation was established through employment exchanges across the country. However, employment exchanges, after their initial successes, gradually weakened. Structural infirmities associated with employment exchanges, alternative agencies, both public and private for meeting the intermediation needs, declining role of government as a key employer and changing nature of labour market were key factors that affected the performance of employment exchanges. A major restructuring of the employment service, through the NCS ecosystem, promises a revival of the public-funded labour market intermediation services. However, the challenge lies in the NCS becoming an efficient intermediary that is both inclusive and accountable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. As per the CNV Act, the provision for not complying with the Act was a penalty of Rs. 500 for first offence and Rs. 1000 for repeated offences. This provision remains unchanged to this day.

  2. As mentioned in ‘The Employment Exchanges (Compulsory Notification of Vacancies) Amendment Bill, 2013, Standing Committee on Labour (2013–2014), Fifteenth Lok Sabha, Ministry of Labour and Employment, Lok Sabha Secretariat, February 2014’.

  3. TeamLease, with over 1200 employees (www.teamlease.com), regional offices across India and claiming to have 1.2 million job requirements http://www.teamlease.com/about-us/about-teamlease/.

  4. TeamLease Service Limited, a prominent PrEA in India, established the TeamLease Skill University (TLSU) through its TeamLease Skill Foundation.

  5. See Fig. 1 in “Appendix” for a graphical depiction of the working of the NCS.

  6. From Government of India 2015.

References

  • Chandra, Ashoka, M.K. Khanijo, and R.P. Mamgain. 2006. India: National Employment Services: Perspectives on Development. New Delhi: ILO, Sub-Regional Office for South Asia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenberg, Ronald G., and Robert S. Smith. 2006. Modern Labor Economics: Theory and Public Policy, 9th ed. Boston: Pearson Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India. 2015. Employment Exchange Statistics 2015. Shram Shakti Bhawan: Ministry of Labour and Employment, Directorate General of Employment and Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Labour and Employment. 2016. Annual Report 2016–17. New Delhi: Ministry of Labour and Employment, Government of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of External Affairs. 2017. Annual Report 2016–17. New Delhi: Government of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Career Service. MIS reports (www.ncs.gov.in) refreshed on 28th February and 31st March 2017. New Delhi: Ministry of Labour and Employment, Government of India.

  • Panakal, J.A. 1950. Employment Exchanges. The Indian Journal of Social Work 11 (2): 160–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Commission on Labour in India. 1931. Report of the Royal Commission on Labour in India. London: H.M. Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samantroy, Ellina. 2013. ILO Convention 181: Issues and Challenges in the Context of Private Placement Agencies in India. NLI research studies series no. 109/2013. Noida: V.V. Giri National Labour Institute.

  • The World Bank. 2017. World Development Indicators, The World Bank.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper draws from our work on ‘Good practices in using partnerships for effective and efficient delivery of employment services and active labour market policies in India, Employment Working Paper No. 233, ILO’. We express our sincere gratitude to Mr. Michael Mwasikakata, for his comments on an earlier draft of the working paper. We are grateful to Ms. Vidya Viswanathan, Ms. Neeha Jacob and Mr. Balakrushna Padhi for providing research assistance and relevant inputs.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vinoj Abraham.

Appendix

Appendix

See Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Source: NCS website

Structure of the NCS.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abraham, V., Sasikumar, S.K. Labour Market Institutions and New Technology: The Case of Employment Service in India. Ind. J. Labour Econ. 61, 453–471 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41027-018-0144-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41027-018-0144-1

Keywords

Navigation