Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental study on seismic behavior of damaged unreinforced masonry walls retrofitted by vertical concrete ties and bed rebar with and without shotcrete

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Building Pathology and Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present article describes experimental procedures to investigate the seismic retrofitting techniques used for damaged unreinforced masonry (URM) walls. In total, three tests were performed on a full-scale wall under constant vertical load, along with lateral loading according to the loading protocol. The unreinforced wall was tested as a reference sample. Then, the damaged sample was retrofitted with two vertical concrete ties and bed rebar on one side and retested. Finally, the damaged sample was strengthened with shotcrete on two sides and tested. The experimental results showed that strengthening the damaged unreinforced wall with the vertical concrete ties and bed rebar not only restored most of the original seismic characteristics of the wall but also significantly improved the seismic behavior of the wall. Moreover, improving seismic characteristics, the retrofitting by vertical concrete ties, bed rebar, and two-side shotcrete increased wall energy absorption capacity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Elgawady M, Letuzzi P, Badoux M (2004) A review of conventional seismic retrofitting techniques for URM. In: 13th international brick and block masonry conference, Amsterdam

  2. Wilding B, Beyer K (2017) Force–displacement response of in-plane loaded unreinforced brick masonry walls: the critical Diagonal Crack model. Bull Earthq Eng 15(5):2201–2244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-0049-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shabdin M, Zargaran M, Attari NKA (2018) Experimental diagonal tension (shear) test of Unreinforced Masonry (URM) walls strengthened with textile reinforced mortar (TRM). Constr Build Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Toranzo LA, Restrepo JI, Mander JB, Carr AJ (2009) Shake-table tests of confined-masonry rocking walls with supplementary hysteretic damping. J Earthquake Eng 13(6):882–898. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460802715040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Code 376 (2012) Instruction for seismic rehabilitation of existing unreinforced masonry buildings. Management and Planning Organization Office of Deputy for Technical Affairs, Iran ((in Persian))

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shedid TM, El-Dakhakhni WW, Drysdale RG (2010) Alternative strategies to enhance the seismic performance of reinforced concrete-block shear wall systems. J Struct Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943541X.0000164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kasparik T, Tait MJ, El-Dakhakhni WW (2014) Seismic performance assessment of partially grouted, nominally reinforced concrete masonry structural walls using shake table testing. J Perform Constr Facil. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tso WK, Rutenberg A, Heidebrecht AC (1975) Cyclic loading of externally reinforced masonry walls confined by frames. Can J Civ Eng 2(4):489–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kazemi MT, Hoseinzadeh Asl M, Bakhshi A, Rahimzadeh Rofooei F (2010) Shaking table study of a full-scale single story confined brick masonry building. Scientia Iranica 17(3):184–193

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gouveia JP, Lourenço PB (2007) Masonry shear walls subjected to cyclic loading: influence of confinement and horizontal reinforcement. In: 10th North America masonry conference, St. Louis, Missouri, USA

  11. Sarrafi B, Eshghi S (2012) Behavior of clay brick confined masonry walls under cyclic loads. TMS J 30(1):7–19

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hori N, Inoue N, Purushotam D, Nishida T, Kobayashi J (2006) Experimental and analytical studies on earthquake resisting behavior of confined concrete block masonry structures. Earthq Eng Struct Dynamics 35(13):1699–1719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yekrangnia M, Bakhshi A, Ghannad MA (2017) Force-displacement model for solid confined masonry walls with shear-dominated failure mode. Earthq Eng Struct Dynamics 46(13):2209–2234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. ASTM C-67-00 (2002) Standard test methods for sampling and testing brick and structural clay tile. ASTM International, USA

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shabdin M, Attari NKA, Zargaran M (2021) Experimental study on seismic behavior of Unreinforced Masonry (URM) Brick walls strengthened in the boundaries with Shotcrete. J Earthq Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2019.1577763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. ASTM C109/C109M-16a (2016) Standard test method for compressive strength of hydraulic cement mortars (using 2-in. Or [50 mm] cube specimens). ASTM International, USA

    Google Scholar 

  17. ASTM C1314–02A (2002) Standard test method for compressive strength of masonry prisms. American Society for Testing and Materials, USA

    Google Scholar 

  18. ASTM C39/C39M-99 (2000) Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. ASTM International, USA

    Google Scholar 

  19. ACI 374.1-05 (2019) Acceptance criteria for moment frames based on structural testing and commentary: an ACI standard: an ACI report. American Concrete Institute, USA

    Google Scholar 

  20. FEMA-356 (2000) Pre-standard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington (DC)

    Google Scholar 

  21. ASCE (2007) Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings– SEI/ASCE 41–06. American Society of Civil Engineers, USA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Darbhanzi A, Marefat MS, Khanmohammadi M (2013) Investigation of in-plane seismic retrofit of unreinforced masonry walls by means of vertical steel ties. Constr Build Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2013.11.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors express great gratitude to the Structural and Earthquake Research Center of Islamic Azad University- Taft Branch for providing access to its experimental facilities.

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MRJ, BR, and AM wrote the main manuscript text, and BR prepared figures and tables. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Reza Javaheri Tafti.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rismanian Yazdi, B., Javaheri Tafti, M.R. & Mirjalili, A. Experimental study on seismic behavior of damaged unreinforced masonry walls retrofitted by vertical concrete ties and bed rebar with and without shotcrete. J Build Rehabil 8, 87 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41024-023-00331-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41024-023-00331-0

Keywords

Navigation