Abstract
Constant generation of industrial waste has taken a massive toll on the environment, and therefore, many researchers are continuously looking for ways to utilize these by-products effectively to mitigate the problems associated with it. Moreover, the amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) emission has also increased dramatically due to the massive generation of cement, creating a serious threat to the environment. Geopolymer concrete (GPC) has been introduced as a better alternative to replace Ordinary Portland Cement-based concrete. The introduction of a new geopolymer material that can replace the traditional cement plug for upstream carbon capture and sequestration is the unique aspect of this research. Research findings reveal that as compared to conventional concrete, GPC exhibits excellent durability, higher compressive and flexural strength, faster setting time, low CO2 emission and high temperature resistance, etc. This paper presents a comprehensive review of geo-engineering properties and microstructural behaviour of geopolymer concrete and mortar. Physical properties, chemical compositions, mechanical properties and microstructural changes of both the geopolymer concrete and mortar have been peer reviewed, with a focus on compressive strength, setting time, water absorption, durability, permeability and leaching of heavy metals. It has also been discussed how different chemical admixtures such as calcium sucrose, glucose, acetic acid solution, sodium sulphate and sodium hydroxide affect its characteristics. The effect of calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H), and calcium aluminium silicate hydrate (C-A-S-H) phase matrix in geopolymer concrete and mortar has been discussed. Moreover, GPC with various secondary industrial waste materials with its prospective applications in the building industry, has been briefly addressed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data or research articles used to support the findings of the study are included in this review article.
Abbreviations
- AAS:
-
Alkali activator solution
- Al2O3 :
-
Aluminium oxide
- BDL:
-
Below detection level
- CaCO3 :
-
Calcium carbonate
- CaO:
-
Calcium oxide
- CLS/GB:
-
Catalytic liquid system to geopolymer binder ratio
- CO2 :
-
Carbon dioxide
- CP:
-
Container glass
- FA:
-
Fly ash
- Fe2O3 :
-
Ferric oxide
- GGBS/GBFS:
-
Ground granulated blast furnace slag
- GLSS:
-
Granulated lead smelter
- GPC:
-
Geopolymer Concrete
- GRAC:
-
Geopolymer recycled aggregate concrete
- ITZ:
-
Interfacial transition zone
- MIP:
-
Mercury intrusion porosimetry
- MPCM:
-
Micro-encapsulated phase change materials
- Na2SiO3 :
-
Sodium silicate
- NaOH:
-
Sodium hydroxide
- NASH:
-
Sodium alumino-sulphate hydrate
- NS:
-
Nano-silica
- OPC:
-
Ordinary Portland cement
- PC:
-
Precast concrete
- PCC:
-
Portland cement concrete
- POFA:
-
Palm oil fuel ash
- RA:
-
Recycled aggregate
- RCA:
-
Recycled concrete aggregate
- RFFG:
-
Red mud-class F fly ash-based geopolymers
- RHA:
-
Rice husk ash
- RM:
-
Red mud
- SEM:
-
Scanning electron microscope
- SF:
-
Silica Fume
- Si/Al:
-
Silicon/Aluminium
- SiO2 :
-
Silicate oxide
- SS/SH:
-
Sodium silicate/sodium hydroxide
- w/b:
-
Water/binder
- W/GPS:
-
Water to geopolymer ratio
- XRD:
-
X-ray diffraction
- XRF:
-
X-ray fluorescence
References
Adak D, Sarkar M, Mandal S (2014) Effect of nano-silica on strength and durability of fly ash based geopolymer mortar. Constr Build Mater 70:453–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.093
Albitar M, Ali MM, Visintin P, Drechsler M (2017) Durability evaluation of geopolymer and conventional concretes. Constr Build Mater 136:374–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.056
Al-Majidi MH, Lampropoulos A, Cundy A, Meikle S (2016) Development of geopolymer mortar under ambient temperature for in situ applications. Constr Build Mater 120:198–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.085
Amran YM, Alyousef R, Alabduljabbar H, El-Zeadani M (2020) Clean production and properties of geopolymer concrete: a review. J Clea Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119679
Andrejkovicova S et al (2016) The effect of natural zeolite on microstructure, mechanical and heavy metals adsorption properties of metakaolin based geopolymers. Appl Clay Sci 126:141–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clay.2016.03.009
Arioz E, Arioz O, Kockar OM (2012) Leaching of F-type fly ash based geopolymers. Proced Eng 42:1114–1120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.503
Assi L, Ghahari S, Deaver EW, Leaphart D, Ziehl P (2016) Improvement of the early and final compressive strength of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete at ambient conditions. Constr Build Mater 123:806–813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.069
Azarsa P, Gupta R (2020) Durability and leach-ability evaluation of K-based geopolymer concrete in real environmental conditions. Csae Stud Constr Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2020.e00366
Babaee M, Castel A (2016) Cement and concrete research chloride-induced corrosion of reinforcement in low-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Cem Concr Res 88:96–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2016.05.012
Bellum RR, Muniraj K, Madduru SRC (2020) Investigation on modulus of elasticity of fly ash-ground granulated blast furnace slag blended geopolymer concrete. Mater Today Proc 27:718–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.299
Benhelal E, Zahedi G, Shamsaei E, Bahadori A (2013) Global strategies and potentials to curb CO2 emissions in cement industry. J Clea Prod 51:142–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.10.049
Bhikshma V, Koti RM, Srinivas RT (2012) An experimental investigation on properties of geopolymer concrete (no cement concrete). 13:841–853
Cao VD, Pilehvar S, Bringas CS, Szczotok AM, Rodriguez JF, Carmona M, Al-Manasir N, Kjoniksen AL (2017) Microencapsulated phase change materials for enhancing the thermal performance of Portland cement concrete and geopolymer concrete for passive building applications. Ener Con Man 133:56–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.11.061
Chindaprasirt P, Chalee W (2014) Effect of sodium hydroxide concentration on chloride penetration and steel corrosion of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete under marine site. Const Build Mat 63:303–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.010
Chindaprasirt P, Silva PD, Crentsil KS, Hanjitsuwan S (2012) Effect of SiO2 and Al2O3 on the setting and hardening of high calcium fly ash-based geopolymer systems. J Mater Sci 47:4876–4883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-012-6353-y
Chun LB et al (2008) A study on the fundamental properties of concrete incorporating pond-ash in Korea. In: The 3rd ACF international conference ACF/VCA
Colangelo F, Cioffi R, Roviello G, Capasso I, Caputo D, Aprea P, Liguori B, Ferone C (2017) Thermal cycling stability of fly ash based geopolymer mortars. Compos B Eng 129:11–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.06.029
Danda UK, Kumar HY, Kumar CB (2020) Experimental study on reinforced geopolymer concrete columns using GGBS. Mat Tod Proc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.607
Das B, Prakash S, Reddy PSR, Misra VN (2007) An overview of utilization of slag and sludge from steel industries. Resour Conserv Recycl 50:40–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.05.008
Das S, Yang P, Sudhanshu SS, Mertens JCE, Xiao X, Chawla N, Neithalath N (2015) Effective properties of a fly ash geopolymer: Synergistic application of X-ray synchrotron tomography, nanoindentation, and homogenization models. Cem Concr Res 78:252–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.08.004
Davidovits J (1994) Geopolymers: man-made rock geosynthesis and the resulting development of very early high strength cement. J Mater educ 16:91–91
Davidovits J (2015) False values on CO2 emission for geopolymer cement/concrete published in scientific papers. Geopolymer Inst Libr Tech 24:1–9
Dimas D, Giannopoulou I, Panias D (2009) Polymerization in sodium silicate solutions: a fundamental process in geopolymerization technology. J Mater Sci 44(14):3719–3730. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-009-3497-5
Duan P, Yan C, Zhou W, Luo W, Shen C (2015) An investigation of the microstructure and durability of a fluidized bed fly ash–metakaolin geopolymer after heat and acid exposure. Mater Des 74:125–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.03.009
Duan P, Yan C, Zhou W, Ren D (2016) Fresh properties, compressive strength and microstructure of fly ash geopolymer paste blended with iron ore tailing under thermal cycle. Constr Build Mater 118:76–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.059
Duxon P, Fernandez-Jiminez A, Provis JL, Luckey GC, Palomo A, Van Deventure JSJ (2007) Geopolymer technology: the current state of the art. J Mater Sci 42:2917–2933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0637-z
Duxson P, Fernández-Jimenez A, Provis JL, Lukey GC, Palomo A, van Deventer JS (2007a) Geopolymer technology: the current state of the art. J Mater Sci 42(9):2917–2933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0637-z
Duxson P, Provis JL, Lukey GC, Van Deventer JS (2007b) The role of inorganic polymer technology in the development of ‘green concrete.’ Cem Concrete Res 37(12):1590–1597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2007.08.018
El MA, Nehme SG (2017) Utilization of industrial waste perlite powder in self compacting concrete. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.103
Farhan NA, Sheikh MN, Hadi MN (2019) Investigation of engineering properties of normal and high strength fly ash based geopolymer and alkali-activated slag concrete compared to ordinary Portland cement concrete. Constr Build Mater 196:26–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.083
Fernandez-Jimenez AM, Palomo A, Lopez-Hombrados C (2006) Engineering properties of alkali-activated fly ash concrete. ACI Mater J 103:106–112
Gunasekar C, Law DW, Setunge S (2016) Long term permeation properties of different fly ash geopolymer concretes. Const Build Mat 124:352–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.121
Guo X, Shi H, Dick WA (2010) Compressive strength and microstructural characteristics of class C fly geopolymer. Cem Concr Comp 32:142–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.11.003
Gupta A (2020) Investigation of the strength of ground granulated blast furnace slag based geopolymer composite with silica fume. Mater Tod Proc 44:23–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.06.010
Gupta N, Gupta A, Saxena KK, Shukla A, Goyal SK (2020) Mechanical and durability properties of geopolymer concrete composite at varying superplasticizer dosage. Mat Tod Proc 44:12–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.646
Habert G, De Lacaillerie JDE, Roussel N (2011) An environmental evaluation of geopolymer based concrete production: reviewing current research trends. J Cle Prod 19(11):1229–1238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.03.012
He P, Jia D, Wang M, Zhou Y (2011) Thermal evolution and crystallization kinetics of potassium-based geopolymer. Ceram Int 37(1):59–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2010.08.008
Heah CY, Kamarudin H, Al Bakri AMM, Binhussain M, Luqman M, Nizar IK, Ruzaidi CM, Liew YM (2011) Effect of curing profile on Kaolin-based geopolymers. Phys Proc 22:305–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2011.11.048
Hoy M, Horpibulsuk S, Rachan R, Chinkulkijniwat A, Arulrajah A (2016) Recycled asphalt pavement–fly ash geopolymers as a sustainable pavement base material: strength and toxic leaching investigations. Sci Total Environ 573:19–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.078
Izquierdo M, Querol X, Davidovits J, Antenucci D, Nugteren H, Fernandez-Pereira C (2009) Coal fly ash-slag-based geopolymers: microstructure and metal leaching. J Haz Mat 166(1):561–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.11.063
Jang JG, Lee NK, Lee HK (2014) Fresh and hardened properties of alkali-activated fly ash/slag pastes with superplasticizers. Constr Build Mat 50:169–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.09.048
Joseph B, Mathew G (2012) Influence of aggregate content on the behaviour of fly ash based geopolymer concrete. Sci Iran 19(5):1188–1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scient.2012.07.006
Kabir SA, Alengaram UJ, Jumaat MZ, Yusoff S, Sharmin A, Bashar II (2017) Performance evaluation and some durability characteristics of environmental friendly palm oil clinker based geopolymer concrete. J Clean Prod 161:477–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.002
Kani EN, Allahverdi A (2009) Effects of curing time and temperature on strength development of inorganic polymeric binder based on natural pozzolan. J Mater Sci 44:3088–3097. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-009-3411-1
Karthik A, Sudalaimani K, Kumar CV (2017) Investigation on mechanical properties of fly ash-ground granulated blast furnace slag based self curing bio-geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mat 149:338–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.139
Katz A, Kovler K (2004) Utilization of industrial by-products for the production of controlled low strength materials (CLSM). Was Manag. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-053X(03)00134-X
Komnitsas KA (2011) Potential of geopolymer technology towards green buildings and sustainable cities. Inter Conf Gr Build Sus Cit Proc Eng 21:1023–1032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.2108
Kumar S, Kumar R, Melhotra SP (2010) Influence of granulated blast furnace slag on the reaction, structure and properties of fly ash-based geopolymer. J Mater Sci 45:607–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-009-3934-5
Kusbiantoro A, Ibrahim MS, Muthusamy K, Alias A (2013) Development of sucrose and citric acid as natural based admixture for fly ash based geopolymer. Proc Environ Sci 17:596–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2013.02.075
Lee NK, Lee HK (2013) Setting and mechanical properties of alkali-activated fly ash/slag concrete manufactured at room temperature. Constr Build Mater 47:1201–1209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.107
Lee WH, Wang JH, Ding YC, Cheng TW (2019) A study on the characteristics and microstructures of GGBS/FA based geopolymer paste and concrete. Constr Buil Mate 211:807–813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.291
Li C, Sun H, Li L (2010) A review: the comparison between alkali-activated slag (Si+Ca) and metakaolin (Si+Al) cements. Cem Concr Res 40:1341–1349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2010.03.020
McLellan BC, Williams RP, Lay J, Riessen AV, Corder GD (2011) Costs and carbon emissions for geopolymer pastes in comparison to ordinary Portland cement. J Cleaner Prod 19(9):1080–1090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.02.010
Mehta A, Siddique R (2018) Sustainable geopolymer concrete using ground granulated blast furnace slag and rice husk ash: Strength and permeability properties. J Clean Prod 205:49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.313
Mehta A, Siddique R, Ozbakkaloglu T, Shaikh FUA, Belarbi R (2020) Fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace slag-based alkali-activated concrete: mechanical, transport and microstructural properties. Constr Build Mate 257:119548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119548
Nasvi MM, Gamage R, Jay S (2012) Geopolymer as well cement and the variation of its mechanical behaviour with curing temperature. Greenhou Gas Sci Tech 2(1):46–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.39
Nath P, Sarker PK (2014) Effect of GGBFS on setting, workability and early strength properties of fly ash geopolymer concrete cured in ambient condition. Constr Build Mater 66:163–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.080
Nematollahi B, Sanjayan J (2014) Effect of different superplasticizers and activator combinations on workability and strength of fly ash based geopolymer. Mater Des 57:667–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.01.064
Oderji SY, Chen B, Ahmad MR, Shah SFA (2019) Fresh and hardened properties of one-part fly ash-based geopolymer binders cured at room temperature: Effect of slag and alkali activators. J Clean Prod 225:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.290
Okoye FN, Durgaprasad J, Singh NB (2016) Effect of silica fume on the mechanical properties of fly ash based-geopolymer concrete. Ceram Int 42(2):3000–3006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.10.084
Olivia M, Sarker P, Nikraz H (2008) Water penetrability of low calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete. Proc ICCBT 46:517–530
Palomo A, Grutzeck MW, Blanco MT (1999) Alkali-activated fly ashes: a cement for the future. Cem Conc Res 29(8):1323–1329. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(98)00243-9
Pani A, Singh SP (2018) Effect of temperature on the strength of lime-stabilised fly ash. Environ Geotech 7(3):189–199. https://doi.org/10.1680/jenge.17.00050
Pani A, Singh SP (2019a) Leaching of major and trace elements from ash beds treated with chemical columns. J Hazard Toxic Radioact Waste 23(2):04019003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000438
Pani A, Singh SP (2019b) In-situ stabilization of sedimented ash deposit by partial penetrating chemical columns. J Environ Manage 231(2):21–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.013
Pani A, Singh SP (2020) Strength and compressibility of sedimented ash beds treated with chemical columns. Soils Found 60(3):573–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2019.09.007
Pani A, Singh SP (2021) Reclamation of sedimented ash deposit by chemical columns. J Hazard Toxic Radioact Waste 25(4):04021031. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000638
Pavithra P, Reddy MS, Dinakar P, Rao BH, Satpathy BK, Mohanty AN (2016) A mix design procedure for geopolymer concrete with fly ash. J Clea Prod 133:117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.041
Perera DS, Uchida O, Vance ER, Finnie KS (2007) Influence of curing schedule on the integrity of geo-polymer. J Mater Sci 42:3099–3106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0533-6
Phoo-ngernkham T, Chindaprasirt P, Sata V, Hanjitsuwan S, Hatanaka S (2014) The effect of adding nano-SiO2 and nano-Al2O3 on properties of high calcium fly ash geo-polymer cured at ambient temperature. Mater Des 55:58–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.09.049
Phoo-ngernkham T, Maegawa A, Mishima N, Hatanaka S, Chindaprasirt P (2015) Effects of sodium hydroxide and sodium silicate solutions on compressive and shear bond strengths of FA–GBFS geopolymer. Constrr Build Mater 91:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.05.001
Pilehvar S, Szczotok AM, Rodriguez JF, Valentini L, Lanzon M, Pamies R, Kjoniksen AL (2019) Effect of freeze-thaw cycles on the mechanical behaviour of geo-polymer concrete and Portland cement concrete containing micro-encapsulated phase change materials. Constr Build Mater 200:94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.057
Provis JL, Van Deventer JSJ (2009) Geo-polymers, structure, processing, properties and application. Woodhead Publishing Limited, UK
Prusty JK, Pradhan B (2020) Multi-response optimization using Taguchi-Grey relational analysis for composition of fly ash-ground granulated blast furnace slag based geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mater 241:118049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118049
Puligilla S, Mondal P (2013) Role of slag in microstructural development and hardening of fly ash-slag geopolymer. Cem Concr Res 43:70–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2012.10.004
Rafeet A, Vinai R, Soutsos M, Sha W (2017) Guidelines for mix proportioning of fly ash/GGBS based alkali activated concretes. Constr Build Mater 147:130–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.036
Ranjbar N, Mehrali M, Alengaram UJ, Simon H, Metselaar HSC, Mohd Z, Jumaat Z (2014) Compressive strength and microstructural analysis of fly ash/palm oil fuel ash based geopolymer mortar under elevated temperatures. Constr Build Mater 65:114–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.064
Ranjbar N, Mehrali M, Mherali M, Alengaram UJ, Jumaat MZ (2016) High tensile strength fly ash based geopolymer composite using copper coated micro steel fiber. Constr Build Mater 112:629–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.228
Rao AK, Kumar DR (2020) Comparative study on the behaviour of GPC using silica fume and fly ash with GGBS exposed to elevated temperature and ambient curing conditions. Mater Today Proc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.789
Rashidian-Dezfouli H, Rangaraju PR (2017) A comparative study on the durability of geopolymers produced with ground glass fiber, fly ash, and glass-powder in sodium sulfate solution. Const Build Mat 153:996–1009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.139
Ravitheja A, Kumar NK (2019) A study on the effect of nano clay and GGBS on the strength properties of fly ash based geopolymers. Mat Tod Proc 19:273–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.06.761
Reddy DV, Edouard JB, Sobhan K (2013) Durability of fly ash–based geopolymer structural concrete in the marine environment. J Mater Civ Eng 25(6):781–787
Robayo-Salazar RA, de Gutierrez M, Puertas F (2017) Study of synergy between a natural volcanic pozzolan and a granulated blast furnace slag in the production of geopolymeric pastes and mortars. Const Build Mat 157:151–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.092
Rovnanik P (2010) Effect of curing temperature on the development of hard structure of metakaolin-based geopolymer. Constr Build Mater 24:1176–1183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.12.023
Sanawong C, Chalee W (2010) Water permeability in fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. J Civ Eng Arch 4(3):15–19
Sarker PK, Kelly S, Yao ZT (2014) Effect of fire exposure on cracking, spalling and residual strength of fly ash geopolymer concrete. Mater Des 63:584–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2014.06.059
Shahrajabian F, Behfarnia K (2018) The effects of nano particles on freeze and thaw resistance of alkali-activated slag concrete. Const Build Mat 176:172–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.033
Shi CJ, Fernandez-Jimenez A, Palomo A (2011) New cements for the 21st century: the pursuit of an alternative to Portland cement. Cem Concr Res 41:750–763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2011.03.016
Shukla A, Gupta N, Gupta A (2020) Development of green concrete using waste marble dust q. Mater Tod Proc 26:2590–2594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.548
Siddique R (2014a) Utilization (recycling) of iron and steel industry by-product (GGBS) in concrete: strength and durability properties. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 16:460–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-013-0206-x
Siddique R (2014b) Utilization of industrial by-products in concrete. Procedia Eng 95:335–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.192
Sofi A, Phanikumar B (2015) An experimental investigation on flexural behaviour of fibre-reinforced pond ash-modified concrete. Ain Shams Eng J 6(4):1133–1142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2015.03.008
Sofi M, Van Deventer JSJ, Mendis PA, Lukey GC (2007) Engineering properties of inorganic polymer concretes (IPCs). Cem Concr Res 37:251–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.10.008
Sumajouw DMJ, Hardjito D, Wallah SE, Rangan BV (2007) Fly ash-based geo-polymer concrete: study of slender reinforced columns. J Mater Sci 42:3124–3130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0523-8
Sun Z, Vollpracht A, Vander Sloot HA (2019) pH dependent leaching characterization of major and trace elements from fly ash and metakaolin geopolymers. Cem Conc Res 125:105889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.105889
Swanepoel JC, Strydom CA (2002) Utilisation of fly ash in a geo-polymeric material. App Geochem 17(8):1143–1148. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-2927(02)00005-7
Tho-In T, Sata V, Boonserm K, Chindaprasirt P (2018) Compressive strength and microstructure analysis of geopolymer paste using waste glass powder and fly ash. J Clean Prod 172:2892–2898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.125
Tho-in T, Sata V, Chindaprasirt P, Jaturapitakkul C (2012) Pervious high-calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete. Constr Build Mat 30:366–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.028
Tsakiridis PE, Papadimitriou GD, Tsivilis S, Koroneos C (2008) Utilization of steel slag for portland cement clinker production. J Hazard Mater 152:805–811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.07.093
Turner LK, Collins FG (2013) Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e) emissions: a comparison between geopolymer and OPC cement concrete. Constru Build Mat 43:125–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.01.023
Van Jaarsveld JGS, Van Deventer JSJ, Lukey GC (2002) The effect of composition and temperature on the properties of fly ash and kaolinite based geopolymers. Chem Eng J 89:63–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1385-8947(02)00025-6
Verdolotti L, Iannace S, Lavorgna M, Lamanna R (2008) Geo-polymerization reaction to consolidate incoherent pozzolanic soil. J Mater Sci 43(3):865–873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-007-2201-x
Wang J, Xie J, Wang C, Zhao J, Liu F, Fang C (2020) Study on the optimum initial curing condition for fly ash and GGBS based geopolymer recycled aggregate concrete. Const Build Mat. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118540
Wongsa A, Boonserm K, Waisurasingha C, Sata V, Chindaprasirt P (2017) Use of municipal solid waste incinerator (MSWI) bottom ash in high calcium fly ash geopolymer matrix. J Clean Prod 148:49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.147
Xie J, Wang J, Rao R, Wang C, Fang C (2019a) Effects of combined usage of GGBS and fly ash on workability and mechanical properties of alkali activated geopolymer concrete with recycled aggregate. Compos Part B-Eng 164:179–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.067
Xie J, Wang J, Zhang B, Fang C, Li L (2019b) Physicochemical properties of alkali activated GGBS and fly ash geopolymeric recycled concrete. Constr Build Mater 204:384–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.191
Xie T, Ozbakkaloglu T (2015) Behaviour of low-calcium fly and bottom ash-based geopolymer concrete cured at ambient temperature. Ceram Int 41(4):5945–5958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.01.031
Yang KH, Song JK, Song K (2013) Assessment of CO2 reduction of alkali-activated concrete. J Clean Prod 39:265–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.08.001
Yasaswini K, Rao AV (2020) Behaviour of geopolymer concrete at elevated temperature. Mat Tod Proc 33:239–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.833
Ye J, Zhang W, Shi D (2017) Properties of an aged geopolymer synthesized from calcined ore-dressing tailing of bauxite and slag. Cem Concr Res 100:23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.05.017
Yusuf MO, Bashar II, Kabir SMA (2017) Influence of source materials and the role of oxide composition on the performance of ternary blended sustainable geopolymer mortar. Constr Build Mater 144:608–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.178
Zhang HY, Kodur V, Wu B, Cao L, Wang F (2016a) Thermal behavior and mechanical properties of geopolymer mortar after exposure to elevated temperatures. Constr Build Mater 109:17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.01.043
Zhang M, Zhao M, Zhang G, Mann D, Lumsden K, Tao M (2016b) Durability of red mud-fly ash based geopolymer and leaching behavior of heavy metals in sulfuric acid solutions and deionized water. Const Build Mat 124:373–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.108
Zhao R, Yuan Y, Cheng Z, Wen T, Li J, Li F, Ma ZJ (2019) Freeze-thaw resistance of class F fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Const Build Mat 222:474–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.166
Zheng L, Wang W, Shi Y (2010) The effects of alkaline dosage and Si/Al ratio on the immobilization of heavy metals in municipal solid waste incineration fly ash based geopolymer. Chemo 79(6):665–671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.02.018
Zhu H, Liang G, Xu J, Wu Q, Du J (2019) Surface-modification of fly ash and its effect on strength and freezing resistance of slag based geopolymer. Const Buil Mat 199:574–580
Zhuang XY, Chen L, Komarneni S, Zhou CH, Tong DS, Yang HM, Wang H (2016) Fly ash-based geopolymer: clean production, properties and applications. J Clea Prod 125:253–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.019
Acknowledgements
We, the authors would like to acknowledge the researchers whose research findings we have referred in this review paper.
Funding
No funding information has been done in this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
There is no conflict of interest by the authors with anyone whosoever is connected with this research.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tushar, D., Das, D., Pani, A. et al. Geo-Engineering and Microstructural Properties of Geopolymer Concrete and Motar: A Review. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng 46, 2713–2737 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-021-00756-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-021-00756-y