Skip to main content
Log in

An Adaptive Line Sampling Method for Reliability Analysis

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rare event probability estimation imposes serious difficulties to the conventional simulation methods like crude Monte Carlo. Several methods have been put forward to address this issue. Line sampling, directional simulation, importance sampling and subset simulation are more known among other methods. This paper aims at improving the line sampling method. The proposed method iteratively adapts the line sampling procedure to the limit state surface and at the end yields an estimation of the failure probability with the required coefficient of variation. The proposed method is compared to the conventional line sampling via well-known academic problems. The results show considerable improvement over the conventional line sampling method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Au SK, Beck JL (2001) Estimation of small failure probabilities in high dimensions by subset simulation. Probab Eng Mech 16(4):263–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Au S, Beck J (2003) Important sampling in high dimensions. Struct Saf 25(2):139–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjerager P (1990) On computation methods for structural reliability analysis. Struct Saf 9(2):79–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Der Kiureghian A (2008) Analysis of structural reliability under parameter uncertainties. Probab Eng Mech 23(4):351–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ditlevsen O, Bjerager P, Olesen R, Hasofer AM (1988) Directional simulation in Gaussian processes. Probab Eng Mech 3(4):207–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ditlevsen O, Melchers RE, Gluver H (1990) General multi-dimensional probability integration by directional simulation. Comput Struct 36(2):355–368

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Engelund S, Rackwitz R (1993) A benchmark study on importance sampling techniques in structural reliability. Struct Saf 12(4):255–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley J, Handscomb D (1964) Monte Carlo methods. Methuen & Co Ltd, London

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jahani E, Shayanfar M, Barkhordari M (2013) A new adaptive importance sampling Monte Carlo method for structural reliability. KSCE J Civ Eng 17(1):210–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaveh A, Massoudi M, Ghanoonini Bagha M (2014) Structural reliability analysis using charged system search algorithm. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng 38(C2):439

    Google Scholar 

  • Koutsourelakis PS (2004) Reliability of structures in high dimensions. Part II. Theoretical validation. Probab Eng Mech 19(4):419–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koutsourelakis PS, Pradlwarter HJ, Schuëller GI (2004) Reliability of structures in high dimensions, part I: algorithms and applications. Probab Eng Mech 19(4):409–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz N, Song J (2013) Cross-entropy-based adaptive importance sampling using Gaussian mixture. Struct Saf 42:35–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu Z, Song S, Yue Z, Wang J (2008) Reliability sensitivity method by line sampling. Struct Saf 30(6):517–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melchers RE (1989) Importance sampling in structural systems. Struct Saf 6(1):3–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metropolis N, Ulam S (1949) The Monte Carlo method. J Am Stat Assoc 44(247):335–341

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mirzaie F, Mahsuli M, Ghannad MA (2016) Probabilistic analysis of soil-structure interaction effects on the seismic performance of structures. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 46(4):641–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patelli E, Panayirci HM, Broggi M, Goller B, Beaurepaire P, Pradlwarter HJ, Schuëller GI (2012) General purpose software for efficient uncertainty management of large finite element models. Finite Elem Anal Des 51:31–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradlwarter HJ, Schuëller GI, Koutsourelakis PS, Charmpis DC (2007) Application of line sampling simulation method to reliability benchmark problems. Struct Saf 29(3):208–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shayanfar MA, Barkhordari MA, Ghanooni-Bagha M (2015) Estimation of corrosion occurrence in RC structure using reliability based PSO optimization. Period Polytech Civ Eng 59(4):531–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song S, Lu Z, Qiao H (2009) Subset simulation for structural reliability sensitivity analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94(2):658–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao H, Yue Z, Liu Y, Gao Z, Zhang Y (2015) An efficient reliability method combining adaptive importance sampling and Kriging metamodel. Appl Math Model 39(7):1853–1866

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zuev KM (2021) Subset simulation method for rare event estimation: an introduction. In: Beer M, Kougioumtzoglou IA, Patelli E, Au IS-K (eds) Encyclopedia of earthquake engineering. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohsen Ali Shayanfar.

Appendix

Appendix

Here we present the proof of Eqs. (9) to (11). It is evident that changing the important direction does not affect the probability estimation, so averaging the reliability results derived from different important directions in different iterations also delivers an estimation of the failure probability [Eq. (9)]. We choose the averaging weights so as to minimize the coefficient of variation for the averaged estimation. Assuming the independence of estimations drawn from different iterations, the standard deviation of the averaged estimation is:

$$\sigma = \sqrt {\mathop \sum \limits_{i = 1}^{k} w_{i}^{2} \sigma_{i}^{2} }$$
(15)

Dividing both sides by P f produces Eq. (11). By application of the Lagrange multiplier method and applying the constraint of \(\mathop \sum \limits_{i = 1}^{k} w_{i} = 1\), the optimal weights will be derived as Eq. (10).

Derivation of Eq. (7).

We know that for identically distributed and independent random variables X i , the variance of their arithmetic mean \(\bar{X}\) is:

$${\text{Var}}\left( {\bar{X} = \frac{1}{N}\mathop \sum \limits_{i = 1}^{N} X_{i} } \right) = \frac{1}{N}{\text{Var}}\left( X \right)$$
(16)

The variance of all the Xi random variables is equal to each other and is denoted by the term Var(X). By definition of Var(X) as \({\text{Var}}\left( X \right) = E\left[ {\left( {X - E\left( X \right)} \right)^{2} } \right]\), it can be estimated as:

$${\text{Var}}\left( X \right) \approx \frac{1}{N}\mathop \sum \limits_{i = 1}^{N} \left( {X_{i} - \bar{X}} \right)^{2}$$
(17)

Thus, we get an estimation for the variance of \(\bar{X}\) as:

$${\text{Var}}\left( {\bar{X}} \right) \approx \frac{1}{{N^{2} }}\mathop \sum \limits_{i = 1}^{N} \left( {X_{i} - \bar{X}} \right)^{2}$$
(18)

To derive the Eq. (7), it is sufficient to replace \(X_{i}\) by \(\varPhi \left( { - \left| {c_{i} } \right|} \right)\).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shayanfar, M.A., Barkhordari, M.A., Barkhori, M. et al. An Adaptive Line Sampling Method for Reliability Analysis. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng 41, 275–282 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-017-0070-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-017-0070-3

Keywords

Navigation