Skip to main content
Log in

Both Environment and Genetic Makeup Influence Sexual Behavior of House Mouse

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions A: Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examined changes in behavioral elements of Mus musculus musculus and Mus musculus domesticus while encountering with conspecific, allospecific animals. To do this, pure (senso lato) M. m. musculus and pure (senso lato) M. m. domesticus were obtained from the north east and the west of Iran, respectively, and mating experiments were conducted for both sub. Our study of the behavioral elements of opposite sex as the mate preference factors, within and between the two subspecies, showed that females represent more specific behavior than males in all the test groups. Also both females and males showed non-social behavior during inter-subspecies opposite sex encounters, but the aggressive behavior was just observed more when females encountered the other subspecies males. Although further studies on recognition signals (soiled bedding and urine) as a subspecies recognition system will be necessary to show inter-subspecific behavioral differences that may shape pre-mating isolation between subspecies in Iran.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barton NH, Hewitt GM (1985) Analysis of hybrid zones. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 16:113–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boursot P, Auffray J-C, Britton-Davidian J, Bonhomme F (1993) The evolution of house mice. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 24:119–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boursot P et al (1996) Origin and radiation of the house mouse: mitochondrial DNA phylogeny. J Evol Biol 9:391–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christophe N, Baudoin C (1998) Olfactory preferences in two strains of wild mice, Mus musculus musculus and Mus musculus domesticus, and their hybrids. Anim Behav 56:365–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne JA, Orr HA (2004) Speciation, vol 37. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Darvish J, Orth A, Bonhomme F (2006) Genetic transition in the house mouse, Mus musculus of Eastern Iranian Plateau. Folia Zoologica-Praha- 55:349

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant EC, Mackintosh JH (1963) A comparison of the social postures of some common laboratory rodents. Behaviour 21(3–4):246–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer Ø, Harper D, Ryan P (2001) PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis palaeontol. Electronica 4:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashemian N, Rajabi-Maham H, Edrisi M (2017) Genetic vs environment influences on house mouse hybrid zone in Iran. J Genet Eng Biotechnol 15:483–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurst JL (1990) Urine marking in populations of wild house mice Mus domesticus rutty. I. Communication between males. Anim Behav 40:209–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laukaitis CM, Critser ES, Karn RC (1997) Salivary androgen-binding protein (ABP) mediates sexual isolation in Mus musculus. Evolution 51:2000–2005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackintosh J (1981) Behaviour of the house mouse. In: Symposia of the Zoological Society of London, pp 337–365

  • Piálek J et al (2008) Development of unique house mouse resources suitable for evolutionary studies of speciation. J Hered 99:34–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajabi-Maham H, Orth A, Bonhomme F (2008) Phylogeography and postglacial expansion of Mus musculus domesticus inferred from mitochondrial DNA coalescent, from Iran to Europe. Mol Ecol 17:627–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajabi-Maham H, Orth A, Siahsarvie R, Boursot P, Darvish J, Bonhomme F (2012) The south-eastern house mouse Mus musculus castaneus (Rodentia: Muridae) is a polytypic subspecies. Biol J Lin Soc 107:295–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siahsarvie R et al (2012) Patterns of morphological evolution in the mandible of the house mouse Mus musculus (Rodentia: Muridae). Biol J Lin Soc 105:635–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singleton GR (1983) The social and genetic structure of a natural colony of house mice, Mus musculus, at Healesville WildlifeSanctuary. Aust J Zool 31:155–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smadja C, Ganem G (2002) Subspecies recognition in the house mouse: a study of two populations from the border of a hybrid zone. Behav Ecol 13:312–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talley HM, Laukaitis CM, Karn RC (2001) Female preference for male saliva: implications for sexual isolation of Mus musculus subspecies. Evolution 55:631–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terranova ML, Laviola G, Alleva E (1993) Ontogeny of amicable social behavior in the mouse: gender differences and ongoing isolation outcomes. Dev Psychobiol 26:467–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been partially supported by the Center for International Scientific Studies & Collaboration (CISSC) and the French Embassy in Tehran.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hassan Rajabi-Maham.

Appendix

Appendix

The percentage of contribution of each female in studied behavioral factors (referable to Table 1) in paired group segregation (described in Sect. 2).

DD × MM

DD × Dom-M

DD × Mus-D

MM × Dom-M

MM × Mus-D

Dom-M × Mus-D

D

11.07

N

23.48

K

16.83

N

22.27

D

18.21

N

35.91

K

9.17

B

6.94

B

13.01

D

12

B

17.14

S

6.41

B

5.94

K

6.48

N

6.62

B

10.61

A

9.23

O

5.77

A

5.42

S

5.95

D

5.25

S

5.93

H

5.85

K

4.45

N

3.99

O

5.46

S

4.57

A

5.59

C

5.4

Q

3.68

C

3.65

D

3.32

M

3.51

O

4.42

S

4.41

R

3.5

H

3.42

R

3.12

O

3.45

H

3.83

F

4.4

B

1.98

O

3.23

Q

2.98

A

3.16

C

3.57

E

4.2

M

1.67

E

3.16

M

2.1

F

3.1

R

3.17

O

3.79

A

0.97

F

2.74

F

1.71

L

3.03

F

2.92

G

2.76

P

0.83

G

2.36

L

1.69

G

1.99

E

2.91

R

2.54

D

0.78

L

1.53

A

1.64

H

1.99

K

2.82

M

2.52

E

0.4

S

1.5

G

1.12

R

1.96

Q

2.53

N

1.7

G

0

R

1.08

H

1.12

C

1.62

G

1.79

K

1.1

F

0

I

0.22

C

0.88

E

1.09

M

1.72

L

0.63

C

0

P

0

P

0.61

P

0

P

0.49

I

0.27

L

0

M

0

E

0.55

I

0

L

0.42

P

0

I

0

Q

0

I

0

Q

0

I

0.19

Q

0

H

0

The percentage of contribution of each male in studied behavioral factors (referable to Table 1) in paired group segregation (described in Sect. 2).

DD × MM

DD × Dom-M

DD × Mus-D

MM × Dom-M

MM × Mus-D

Dom-M × Mus-D

A

7.21

A

13.19

A

14.42

B

15.19

B

17.22

O

17.9

B

6.81

O

13.04

O

12.09

O

11.05

A

10.49

Q

9.9

E

5.46

B

10.04

B

11.81

A

9.95

O

7.97

N

9.03

D

4.73

E

8.16

E

8.57

Q

6.16

N

5.52

M

4.72

O

4.17

Q

7.43

D

7.57

D

5.01

D

5.3

B

3.49

N

3.2

N

7.36

M

6.13

N

4.94

M

5.2

R

3.15

F

2.9

D

6.8

N

4.84

F

3.73

F

3.88

D

2.4

S

1.98

M

2.85

F

2.58

M

2.45

S

2.46

A

2.11

H

1.37

F

2.46

R

2.21

S

2.37

R

2.06

P

1.15

J

1.21

P

0.95

S

0.84

E

1.81

E

1.88

S

0.85

R

1.19

S

0.79

Q

0.7

H

1.55

H

1.62

G

0

Q

0.96

R

0.67

L

0.61

J

1.41

J

1.48

F

0

G

0.92

L

0.59

G

0.46

R

1.38

Q

1.17

C

0

K

0.82

G

0.44

K

0.31

G

1.05

G

1.11

L

0

L

0.77

K

0.29

P

0

P

0.99

K

0.89

K

0

C

0.48

C

0

C

0

K

0.86

C

0.55

E

0

P

0.23

J

0

J

0

C

0.53

L

0.54

J

0

M

0

H

0

H

0

L

0.52

P

0.27

H

0

The first three principal components (PCs) for female and male.

 

Eigenvalue

%variation

Cumulative %variation

Female

 PC1

106.77

56.65

56.65

 PC2

37.52

19.91

76.56

 PC3

14.21

7.54

84.11

Male

 PC1

50.38

46.67

46.67

 PC2

24.45

22.65

69.32

 PC3

12.71

11.77

81.09

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Edrisi, M., Rajabi-Maham, H. & Hashemian, N. Both Environment and Genetic Makeup Influence Sexual Behavior of House Mouse. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Sci 42, 1761–1769 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40995-018-0483-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40995-018-0483-2

Keywords

Navigation