Skip to main content
Log in

Towards an Enhanced Understanding of Caste-Based Residential Segregation in Indian Cities: Reflections from Kolkata and Bengaluru

  • Published:
Spatial Demography Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As India urbanizes, residential patterns in her towns/cities have become progressively more complex in terms of caste, religion, income and other socioeconomic attributes. Many have conventionally used the Dissimilarity Index (an aspatial measure) to decipher such segregation patterns, yet seldom investigated the vital role of spatial scales and local geographies in shaping them. Utilizing neighborhood-level caste and demographic data for the cities of Kolkata and Bengaluru, this paper unravels the intricacies of caste-based residential segregation patterns and compares their respective trends, using spatially sensitive segregation indices to examine the interactions among different caste groups at varying spatial scales. The decomposition of these indices into local spatial segregation indices allowed examination of the intra-city segregation patterns existing within these urban spaces more thoroughly. Findings reveal that, in 2011, Kolkata exhibited a greater degree of caste-based residential segregation than Bengaluru. In terms of their respective decadal trends (1991–2011), caste primacy still played a crucial role in molding residential patterns across Kolkata's neighborhoods, since an almost negligible improvement was discerned in its global indices. The local segregation patterns, however, revealed a complex geography of caste-based residential patterning in these cities, thereby underscoring the necessity of considering scale-dependencies and spatial relationships in such studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Source: Authors' own

Fig. 2

Source: Prepared by the authors using base layers and datasets available from NASA SEDAC and ArcGIS repositories

Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Source: Based on authors' own computations. Note: Neighborhood radii of 500 m was used to estimate the indices. The ranges for each map were chosen based on the natural breaks classification scheme. The ranges for Kolkata have not been kept uniform across its three maps to better highlight the internal variations in each year examined. Appendix-B contains the same maps prepared using uniform ranges, for better comparison across years

Fig. 8

Source: Based on authors' own computations

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Appadurai, A. (2000). Spectral housing and urban cleansing: Notes on millennial Mumbai. Public Culture, 12(3), 627–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A. B. (1970). On the measures of inequality. Journal of Economic Theory, 2, 244–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, A. J. (2009). Population geography: Lifecourse matters. Progress in Human Geography, 33(3), 407–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee-Guha, S. (1997). Medium towns or future cities. In J. Diddee (Ed.), Indian medium towns: An appraisal of their role as growth centres. New Delhi: Rawat Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barros, J., & Feitosa, F. F. (2018). Uneven geography: Exploring the sensitivity of spatial indices of residential segregation. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytic and City Science, 45, 1073–1089.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, W. (1954). A probability model for the measurement of ecological segregation. Social Forces, 32, 337–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertorelli, E., Heller, P., Swaminathan, S., & Varshney, A. (2017). Does citizenship abate class? Evidence and reflections from a South Indian city. Economic and Political Weekly, 52, 47–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bharathi, N., Malghan, D., & Rahman, A. (2018). Isolated by caste: Neighborhood-scale residential segregation in Indian metros. In AEM working paper no. 2018-08. New York: Dyson School of Applied Economics and Management, Cornell University.

  • Cantey, G. (2017). The complex geographies of ethnic residential segregation: using spatial and local measures to explore scale-dependency and spatial relationships. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 43, 137–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheshire, P. (2007). Segregated neighborhoods and mixed communities: A critical analysis. . York Publishing Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G., & Landes, D. Z. (2010). Caste versus class: Social mobility in India 1870–2010 compared to England 1086–2010. . University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowell, F. A. (1977). Measuring inequality. . Philip Allan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, S., Curtis, S., Diez-Roux, A. V., & Macintyre, S. (2007). Understanding and representing “place” in health research: A relational approach. Social Science and Medicine, 65(9), 1825–1838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datta, S., & Pathania, V. (2016). For whom does the phone (not) ring? Discrimination in the rental housing market in Delhi, India. In: WIDER working paper 2016/55. Available at: https://www.wider.unu.edu/sites/default/files/wp2016-55.pdf. Accessed 24th November 2018.

  • Dittrich, C. (2007). Bengaluru: globalization and fragmentation in India’s High-tech capital. Asian, 103, 45–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, O. D., & Duncan, B. (1955). A methodological analysis of segregation indexes. American Sociological Review, 20, 210–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupont, V. (2004). Socio-spatial differentiation and residential segregation in Delhi: A question of scale? Geoforum, 35, 157–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feitosa, F. F., Camara, G., Monteiro, A. M. V., Koschitzki, T., & Silva, M. P. S. (2007). Global and local spatial indices of urban segregation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 21, 299–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firebaugh, G., & Acciai, F. (2016). For blacks in America, the gap in neighborhood poverty has declined faster than segregation. PNAS, 13(47), 13372–13377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fossett, M. (2011). Generative models of segregation: Investigating model-generated patterns of residential segregation by ethnicity and socioeconomic status. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 35(1–3), 114–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghatak, I., & Chatterjee, S. (2018). Statelessness, citizenship and social boundaries: A narrative inquiry of Chinese population in Kolkata. American International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 23(1), 84–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goli, S., Maurya, N. K., & Sharma, M. K. (2015). Continuing caste inequalities in rural Uttar Pradesh. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 35, 252–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorard, S. (2000). Education and social justice: The changing composition of schools and its implications. . University of Wales Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, K., Arnold, F., & Lhungdim, H. (2009). Health and living conditions in eight Indian cities. In National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), India, 2005–2006. Mumbai: International Institute of Population Sciences; Calverton, Maryland: ICF Macro.

  • Haque, I. (2016). Discriminated urban spaces: A study of spatial segregation in urban West Bengal. Economic and Political Weekly, 51, 40–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haque, I., Das, D., & Patel, P. P. (2018). Spatial segregation in Indian cities: Does the city size matter? Environment and Urbanization Asia, 9, 52–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haque, I., & Patel, P. P. (2015). Socioeconomic and cultural differentials of contraceptive usage in West Bengal: Evidence from national family health survey data. Journal of Family History, 40, 230–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haque, I., & Patel, P. P. (2016). Assessing Hindu–Muslim fertility differentials in West Bengal: Insights from the national family health survey–3 data. Journal of Family History, 41(2), 192–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haque, I., & Patel, P. P. (2018). Growth of metro cities in India: Trends, patterns and determinants. Urban Research & Practice, 11, 338–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haque, I., Rana, Md. J., & Patel, P. P. (2020). Location matters: Unravelling the spatial dimensions of neighbourhood level housing quality in Kolkata, India. Habitat International, 99, 102157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, D. R. (1999). Property values drop when blacks move in, because…: Racial and socioeconomic determinants of neighborhood desirability. American Sociological Review, 64(3), 461–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horschelmann, K. (2011). Theorising life transitions: Geographical perspectives. Area, 43(4), 378–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakubs, J. F. (1981). A distance-based segregation index. Journal of Socio-economic Planning Sciences, 15, 129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jargowsky, P. A. (1996). Take the money and run: Economic segregation in U.S. metropolitan areas. American Journal of Sociology, 61, 984–999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeon, G., & Jung, G. (2019). Comparative analysis of residential patterns of foreigners from rich and poor countries in Seoul. Sustainable Cities and Society, 47, 101470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khairkar, V. P. (2008). Segregation of migrants groups in Pune City, India. Anthropologist Journal, 10, 155–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kok, J. (2007). Principles and prospects of the Life Course Paradigm. Annales de Demographie Historique, 113(1), 203–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, M.R. (2018). Residential segregation and health. In: D. T. Duncan and I. Kawachi (Eds.), Neighborhoods and health (Chapter 12), https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190843496.003.0012

  • Krysan, M. (2008). Does race matter in the search for housing? An exploratory study of search strategies, experiences, and locations. Social Science Research, 37(2), 581–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krysan, M., Couper, M. P., Farley, R., & Forman, T. (2009). Does race matter in neighborhood preferences? Results from a video experiment. American Journal of Sociology, 115(2), 527–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kundu, A. (2013). Making Indian cities slum free. Economic and Political Weekly, 48, 15–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, B. A., Farrell, C. R., Reardon, S. F., & Matthews, S. A. (2019). From census tracts to local environments: an egocentric approach to neighborhood racial change. Spatial Demography, 7, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, B. A., Reardon, S. F., Firebaugh, G., Farrell, C. R., Matthews, S. A., & O’Sullivan, D. (2008). Beyond the census tract: Patterns and determinants of racial residential segregation at multiple geographic scales. American Sociological Review, 73, 766–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J. R., & Alba, R. D. (1993). Locational returns to human capital: Minority access to suburban community resources. Demography, 30(2), 243–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J. R., Alba, R. D., & Zhang, W. (2002). Immigrant enclaves and ethnic communities in New York and Los Angeles. American Sociological Review, 67(2), 299–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macintyre, S., Ellaway, A., & Cummins, S. (2002). Place effects on health: how can we conceptualise, operationalise and measure them? Social Science and Medicine, 55(1), 125–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. S. (1985). Ethnic residential segregation: A theoretical synthesis and empirical review. Sociology and Social Research, 69(3), 315–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (1988). The dimensions of residential segregation. Social Forces, 67, 281–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (1998). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. . Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, S. (1969). Pattern of residence in Poona, India, by caste and religion: 1822–1965. Demography, 6, 473–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miklian, J., & Sahoo, N. (2016). Supporting a more inclusive and responsive urban India. In PRIO Policy Brief 03. Oslo: Peace Research Institute. Retrieved November 24, 2018 from https://files.prio.org/publication_files/prio/Milkian,%20Sahoo%20-%20Supporting%20a%20More%20Inclusive%20and%20Responsive%20Urban%20India,%20PRIO%20Policy%20Brief%203-2016.pdf.

  • Monkkonen, P., & Zhang, X. (2013). Innovative measurement of spatial segregation: Comparative evidence from Hong Kong and San Francisco. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 47, 99–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, B. S. (1975). The segregation of socioeconomic groups in urban areas: A comparative analysis. Urban Studies, 12, 47–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, B. S. (1983). An alternative approach to the development of a distance-based measure of racial segregation. American Journal of Sociology, 88, 1237–1249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrill, R. L. (1991). On the measure of geographical segregation. Geography Research Forum, 11, 25–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munshi, K., & Rosenzweig, M. (2006). Traditional institutions meet the modern world: Caste, gender, and schooling choice in a globalizing economy. American Economic Review, 96, 1225–1252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, D., & Wong, D. W. S. (2007). A surface-based approach to measuring spatial segregation. Geographical Analysis, 39, 147–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olteanu, M., de Bezenac, C., Clark, W., & Randon-Furling, J. (2020). Revealing multiscale segregation effects from fine-scale data: A case study of two communities in Paris. Spatial Demography, 8, 255–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osypuk, T. L. (2013). Invited commentary: Integrating a life-course perspective and social theory to advance research on residential segregation and health. American Journal of Epidemiology, 177(4), 310–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pal, G. C. (2016). Caste and access to public services: ‘Intensified’ disadvantages. Economic and Political Weekly, 51, 102–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, S. F., & Firebaugh, G. (2002). Measures of multigroup segregation. Sociological Methodology, 32, 33–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, S. F., Firebaugh, G., O’Sullivan, D., & Matthews, S. (2006). A new approach to measure socio-spatial economic segregation. In Paper presented at the 29th General Conference of The International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, Joensuu, Finland, August 20–26. Retrieved November 24, 2018 from http://www.iariw.org/papers/2006/reardon.pdf.

  • Reardon, S. F., Matthews, S. A., O’Sullivan, D., Lee, B. A., Firebaugh, G., Farrell, C. R., & Bischoff, K. (2008). The geographic scale of Metropolitan racial segregation. Demography, 45, 489–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, S. F., & O’Sullivan, D. (2004). Measures of spatial segregation. Sociological Methodology, 34, 121–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RGI (Registrar General of India) (2011). Houselisting and Housing PCA: Table HH-14: Percentage of households to total households by amenities and assets. Retrieved December 5, 2018 from http://www.censusindia.gov.in/2011census/HLO/HL_PCA/Houselisting-housing-Kar.html.

  • Roberto, E. (2015). Measuring inequality and segregation. Retrieved November 24, 2018 from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1508.01167v1.pdf.

  • Roy, D., Lees, M. H., Pfeffer, K., & Sloot, P. M. A. (2018). Spatial segregation, inequality, and opportunity bias in the slums of Bengaluru. Cities, 74, 269–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakoda, J. (1981). A generalized index of dissimilarity. Demography, 18, 245–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saroj, S. K., Goli, S., Rana, M. J., & Choudhary, B. K. (2019). Availability, accessibility, and inequalities of Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH) Services in Indian metro cities. Sustainable Cities and Society, (in press), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101878.

  • Schelling, T. C. (1971). Dynamics models of segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1, 143–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta, U. (2010). The hindered self-help: Housing policies, politics and poverty in Kolkata, India. Habitat International, 34, 323–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidhwani, P. (2015). Spatial inequality in big Indian cities. Economic and Political Weekly, 50, 55–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, G., Vithayathil, T., & Pradhan, K. C. (2019). Recasting inequality: Residential segregation by caste and over time in urban India. Environment and Urbanization, 31, 615–634. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247818812330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Susewind, R. (2017). Muslims in Indian cities: Degrees of segregation and the elusive ghetto. Environment and Planning A, 49, 1286–1307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorat, S., Banerjee, A., Mishra, V. K., & Rizvi, F. (2015). Urban rental housing market: caste and religion matters in access. Economic and Political Weekly, 50, 47–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorat, S., & Newman, K. (2010). Blocked by caste: Economic discrimination and social exclusion in modern India. . Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobler, W. R. (1979). Smooth pycnophylactic interpolation for geographical regions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 519–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Rooyen, M. J., & Barros, J. (2017). Spatial measurement of residential segregation in Metropolitan Cape Town. Retrieved November 24, 2018 from http://www.geocomputation.org/2017/papers/35.pdf.

  • Vithayathil, T., & Singh, G. (2012). Spaces of discrimination: residential segregation in Indian cities. Economic and Political Weekly, 47, 60–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M. J. (1983). The measurement of spatial segregation. American Journal of Sociology, 88, 1008–1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. R., & Collins, C. (2001). Racial residential segregation: A fundamental cause of racial disparities in health. Public Health Reports, 116(5), 404–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, D. W. S. (1993). Spatial indices of segregation. Urban Studies, 30, 559–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, D. W. S. (1998). Measuring multiethnic spatial segregation. Urban Geography, 19, 77–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, D. W. S. (2003). A comparison of traditional and spatial measures of segregation: some empirical findings. In J. W. Frazier & F. Margai (Eds.), Multicultural geographies: Persistence and change in US racial/ethnic patterns. (pp. 247–262). New York: State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, D. W. S. (2005). Formulating a general spatial segregation measure. The Professional Geographer, 57, 285–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, D. W. S. (2008). A local multi-dimensional approach to evaluate changes in segregation. Urban Geography, 29, 455–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ismail Haque.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no potential conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 349 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Haque, I., Das, D.N., Patel, P.P. et al. Towards an Enhanced Understanding of Caste-Based Residential Segregation in Indian Cities: Reflections from Kolkata and Bengaluru. Spat Demogr 9, 187–211 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40980-021-00085-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40980-021-00085-8

Keywords

Navigation