Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Exploring the environmental benefits of 3D printing technology in concrete construction; a review

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Progress in Additive Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a novel exploration of the potential of 3D printing technology to address the significant environmental impact and waste generation associated with the construction industry. The construction sector profoundly affects global resource consumption, waste generation, and material inefficiency. Innovative approaches are needed to address these challenges and work towards a sustainable future. 3D printing technology has emerged as a promising solution for reducing the environmental footprint of construction. This article provides a comprehensive review of the environmental benefits of 3D printing, particularly in waste reduction, material optimization and enhancing energy efficiency within construction practices. The research articles selected for this study were gathered from online web databases such as Google Scholar, Scopus, MDPI, and Web of Science. This study reviews the latest publication trends in the discipline by exploring publications from 2006 to 2023. The findings highlight the urgency of tackling pollution caused by the construction industry, which acts as a significant contributor to global greenhouse gas emissions. Buildings consume a significant amount of global energy supply and deplete resources such as water, wood, sand, and gravel. The integration of 3D printing technology in the construction industry offers potential solutions to mitigate these negative impacts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig.2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Mpofu TP, Mawere C, Mukosera M (2014) The impact and application of 3D printing technology. Int J Sci Res 150:2014

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lu B, Li D, Tian X (2015) Development trends in additive manufacturing and 3D printing. Engineering 1(1):085–089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Shahrubudin N, Lee TC, Ramlan RJPM (2019) An overview on 3D printing technology: technological, materials, and applications. Proc Manuf 35:1286–1296

    Google Scholar 

  4. De Schutter G, Lesage K, Mechtcherine V, Nerella VN, Habert G, Agusti-Juan I (2018) Vision of 3D printing with concrete—Technical, economic and environmental potentials. Cem Concr Res 112:25–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. REN21 (2022) Renewables 2022 global status. REN21, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dixit MK (2019) 3-D printing in building construction: a literature review of opportunities and challenges of reducing life cycle energy and carbon of buildings. IOP Conf Ser 290:012012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Uher TE (1999) Absolute indicators of sustainable construction. RICS Research Foundation, London

    Google Scholar 

  8. Žujović M, Obradović R, Rakonjac I, Milošević J (2022) 3D printing technologies in architectural design and construction: a systematic literature review. Buildings 12(9):1319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mohammad M, Masad E, Al-Ghamdi SG (2020) 3D concrete printing sustainability: a comparative life cycle assessment of four construction method scenarios. Buildings 10(12):245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Faleschini F, Trento D, Masoomi M, Pellegrino C, Zanini MA (2023) Sustainable mixes for 3D printing of earth-based constructions. Constr Build Mater 398:132496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhao Y, Gao Y, Chen G, Li S, Singh A, Luo X, Du H (2023) Development of low-carbon materials from GGBS and clay brick powder for 3D concrete printing. Constr Build Mater 383:131232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Agustí-Juan I, Müller F, Hack N, Wangler T, Habert G (2017) Potential benefits of digital fabrication for complex structures: environmental assessment of a robotically fabricated concrete wall. J Clean Prod 154:330–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mohamed AF (2019) Economic evaluation of renewable energy systems, case study: an eco-house powered by nano-crystal PV in New Aswan. Egypt IOP Conf Ser 397:012010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mbala M, Aigbavboa C, Aliu J (2019) Reviewing the negative impacts of building construction activities on the environment: the case of Congo. Springer International Publishing, Orlando, FL

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Lima L, Trindade E, Alencar L, Alencar M, Silva L (2021) Sustainability in the construction industry: a systematic review of the literature. J Clean Prod 289:125730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dräger P, Letmathe P (2022) Value losses and environmental impacts in the construction industry–Tradeoffs or correlates? J Clean Prod 336:130435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vanegas JA, DuBose JR, Pearce AR (1996) Sustainable technologies for the building construction industry. In Proceedings, Symposium on Design for the Global Environment, Atlanta, GA

  18. Wu P, Wang J, Wang X (2016) A critical review of the use of 3-D printing in the construction industry. Autom Constr 68:21–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen D, Heyer S, Ibbotson S, Salonitis K, Steingrímsson JG, Thiede S (2015) Direct digital manufacturing: definition, evolution, and sustainability implications. J Clean Prod 107:615–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pan Y, Zhang Y, Zhang D, Song Y (2021) 3D printing in construction: state of the art and applications. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 115(5–6):1329–1348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen J, Wu P, Bu F, Gao Y, Liu X, Guan C (2023) 3D printing enhanced catalysis for energy conversion and environment treatment. DeCarbon 20:100019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Panda SK, Rath KC, Mishra S, Khang A (2023) Revolutionizing product development: the growing importance of 3D printing technology. Materials Today Proc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.10.138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tabassum T, Mir AA (2023) A review of printing technology-the future of sustainable construction. Mater Today Proc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.08.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hager I, Golonka A, Putanowicz R (2016) 3D printing of buildings and building components as the future of sustainable construction? Proc Eng 151:292–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gebler M, Uiterkamp AJS, Visser C (2014) A global sustainability perspective on 3D printing technologies. Energy Policy 74:158–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tay YWD, Panda B, Paul SC, Noor Mohamed NA, Tan MJ, Leong KF (2017) 3D printing trends in building and construction industry: a review. Virt Phys Prototyp 12(3):261–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Panda BN, Bahubalendruni RM, Biswal BB, Leite M (2017) A CAD-based approach for measuring volumetric error in layered manufacturing. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci 231(13):2398–2406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hamid Q, Wang C, Snyder J, Zhao Y, Sun W (2013) Biofabrication: a digital microfabrication-based system for the fabrication of cancerous tissue models. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  29. Daroonparvar M, Kay CM, Yajid MM, Bakhsheshi-Rad HR, Razzaghi M (2022) Tribology of additively manufactured materials. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  30. Khasreen MM, Banfill PF, Menzies GF (2009) Life-cycle assessment and the environmental impact of buildings: a review. Sustainability 1(3):674–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Shuaib M, Haleem A, Kumar S, Javaid M (2021) Impact of 3D Printing on the environment: a literature-based study. Sustain Operat Comput 2:57–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. IOF Standardization (2006) Environmental management: life cycle assessment: principles and framework. ISO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  33. Serres N, Tidu D, Sankare S, Hlawka F (2011) Environmental comparison of MESO-CLAD® process and conventional machining implementing life cycle assessment. J Clean Prod 19(9–10):1117–1124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tang Y, Mak K, Zhao YF (2016) A framework to reduce product environmental impact through design optimization for additive manufacturing. J Clean Prod 137:1560–1572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Thomas A, Mishra U (2022) A sustainable circular economic supply chain system with waste minimization using 3D printing and emissions reduction in plastic reforming industry. J Clean Prod 345:131128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hossain MA, Zhumabekova A, Paul SC, Kim JR (2020) A review of 3D printing in construction and its impact on the labor market. Sustainability 12(20):8492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Cheniuntai N (2018) What is construction 3D printing: perspectives and challenges. Apis Cor, Melbourne, FL

    Google Scholar 

  38. Perkins I, Skitmore M (2015) Three-dimensional printing in the construction industry: a review. Int J Constr Manag 15(1):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  39. Garg M, Rani R, Meena VK, Singh S (2023) Significance of 3D printing for a sustainable environment. Mater Today Sustain 23:100419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Baumers M, Tuck C, Bourell DL, Sreenivasan R, Hague R (2011) Sustainability of additive manufacturing: measuring the energy consumption of the laser sintering process. Proc Instit Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf 225(12):2228–2239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Griffiths CA, Howarth J, De Almeida-Rowbotham G, Rees A, Kerton R (2016) A design of experiments approach for the optimisation of energy and waste during the production of parts manufactured by 3D printing. J Clean Prod 139:74–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Olawumi MA, Oladapo BI, Ikumapayi OM, Akinyoola JO (2023) Waste to wonder to explore possibilities with recycled materials in 3D printing. Sci Total Environ 905:167109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Agustí-Juan I, Habert G (2017) Environmental design guidelines for digital fabrication. J Clean Prod 142:2780–2791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Nadal A, Pavón J, Liébana O (2017) 3D printing for construction: a procedural and material-based approach. Inf Constr 69(546):e193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Kiani Mavi R, Gengatharen D, Kiani Mavi N, Hughes R, Campbell A, Yates R (2021) Sustainability in construction projects: a systematic literature review. Sustainability 13(4):1932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Adaloudis M, Roca JB (2021) Sustainability tradeoffs in the adoption of 3D Concrete Printing in the construction industry. J Clean Prod 307:127201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Robayo-Salazar R, de Gutiérrez RM, Villaquirán-Caicedo MA, Arjona SD (2023) 3D printing with cementitious materials: challenges and opportunities for the construction sector. Autom Constr 146:104693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Simioni F, Rangel B, Campos N, Teixeira J (2023) 3D printing for construction: a systematic review of its sustainability. Springer International Publishing, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  49. Allen M, Dube OP, Solecki W, Aragón-Durand F, Cramer W, Humphreys S, Kainuma M (2018) Special report: global warming of 1.5 C. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Geneva

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Architectural Engineering and Environmental Design Department, Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime Transport (AASTMT), Cairo, Heliopolis, P.O.2033, Egypt

    Rania Abdelrahim Mohamed & Abdelaziz Farouk A. Mohamed

Authors
  1. Rania Abdelrahim Mohamed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abdelaziz Farouk A. Mohamed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rania Abdelrahim Mohamed.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that there is no conflict of interest in this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohamed, R.A., Mohamed, A.F.A. Exploring the environmental benefits of 3D printing technology in concrete construction; a review. Prog Addit Manuf (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-024-00622-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-024-00622-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation