On ‘the Ethics of Theorizing’ in the Cracked Mirror: Some Comments

Abstract

The Ethics of Theorizing: the Problem:

This paper examines the question of the ethics of theorizing with respect to the claim made by the authors that one, there is excessive dependence on theoretical structures produced in the West which employ terms that purport to be translations of non-Western concepts and two, that there is an asymmetry between the representation of the non-West by Western scholars and of the West by non-Western scholars. These questionsare embedded in the larger question of theoretical representation itself. Guru argues that only theory can produce unified knowledge which the Dalit community at present, lacks. Thus the ‘empirical sudra’ must aspire to be like the ‘theoretical Brahmin’ and develop a theoretical understanding of his situation.

The Question of Theory:

I argue against the assumption that theory can out the inner experience of the Dalit. I further argue that modern understanding of theory in the West is a historical phenomenon dating back no further than the Scientific Revolution which separated theory from experience.

On the Asymmetry of Representation:

The distinction between ethical rightness and epistemological correctness drawn by Sarukkai is examined and found wanting. Finally, the question of the asymmetry of representation is put under the lens. I conclude that it is not a coherent notion.