Abstract
This paper examines persistence in tax revenues in a set of 21 OECD countries over the period 1965–2021 using long-range dependence techniques based on fractional integration. The results imply that there are only a few cases of mean reversion: one for total revenue (Switzerland); three for VAT (Belgium, Italy, and Spain), and six for tax on income (Austria, Belgium, Finland, Spain, Sweden and USA). The analysis is also carried out for inflation in the same set of countries. Again the I(1) hypothesis cannot be rejected in most cases, mean reversion only occurring in Korea, Iceland, Norway and Sweden. However, stronger evidence of mean reversion is found for the differences between the three original tax series and inflation compared to the tax series themselves, which points to the existence of a linkage between taxation and inflation, especially in the case of VAT and tax on income.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
This paper analyses the time series properties of tax revenues over the period from 1965 to 2021 in a set of 21 OECD countries. For this purpose we use a fractional integration framework which is more general than the standard one based on the stationary I(0) versus non-stationary I(1) dichotomy. In particular, it allows the differencing parameter d to take any real value, including fractional ones, as opposed to integers only. As a result, it allows for a much wider range of stochastic processes. Moreover, the estimated parameter d measures the degree of persistence of the series and sheds light on whether or not it is mean reverting. This provides useful information on whether the effects of shocks to the series will be transitory of permanent which cannot be found in other studies using different methods such as unobserved components (Koopman and Ooms 2003).
Given the recent surge in inflation, we also examine whether there exists a long-run relationship linking this variable to taxation. For instance, Patoli et al. (2012) found that they are positively correlated in Pakistan; Sunday (2015) also found a long-term association in the case of Nigeria; Wang and Han (2018) provided evidence of unidirectional causality running from taxation to inflation in China. In the present study, we test for mean reversion in the differences between the tax series and inflation to establish whether they are linked.
The layout of the paper is the following: Sect. “Methodology” outlines the methodology; Sect. “Data” describes the data, Sect. “Empirical Results” reports the results, and Sect. “Conclusions” offers some concluding remarks.
Methodology
As mentioned before, we use fractional integration or I(d) techniques. These belong to a broader category called long-memory processes, which are characterised by a spectral density function which is unbounded at one or more frequencies in the spectrum. Alternatively, they are defined in the time domain as processes for which the infinite sum of the autocovariances is infinite. Within this category, a process is said to be fractionally integrated or integrated of order d, denoted by I(d), and where d can be any real number, if can be expressed as
where L is the backshift operator (Lx(t) = x(t–1)) and u(t) is short memory or integrated of order 0, also denoted as I(0). For such a process the spectral density function is positive and bounded at all frequencies; this category includes the white noise and the stationary Auto Regressive Moving Average (ARMA) class of models. However, if d > 0 in (1), x(t) becomes long memory because its spectral density function, f(.), tends to infinity as the frequency (λ) approaches zero, i.e.,
Fractional integration was originally introduced in Granger (1980) as a result of the observation that many aggregated data displayed a periodogram (which is an estimator of the spectral density function) with a very large value around the zero frequency, suggesting that the series should be differenced; however, after differentiation, the periodogram of the differenced series shows a value close to zero at such frequency, which is an indication of over-differentiation. Thus, the order of integration should be an intermediate value between 0 and 1. In an earlier study, Robinson (1978) had justified the existence of this type of processes by means of aggregation of heterogeneous autoregressive (AR) ones, and similar arguments (based on aggregation) have been made by many other authors, including Taqqu et al. (1997), Chambers (1998), Parke (1999), Souza (2008), Hassler (2011), Shi and Sun (2016), etc. Nowadays, fractional integration is widely used in the analysis of aggregated time series data (see, e.g., Gil-Alana and Robinson 1997; Gil-Alana and Moreno 2012; Abbritti et al. 2016; 2023; etc.).
The estimation of the differencing parameter is carried out here by means of the Whittle function, which is an approximation to the likelihood function of a stationary Gaussian time series in the frequency domain, using a version of a testing approach developed by Robinson (1994). This procedure has a number of appealing features, namely it has a standard null limit distribution, and it allows to consider any real value d, including those outside the stationary region (d ≥ 0.5); in addition, it is the most efficient method against local departures from the null hypothesis that d is a given real value.
Data
The series used for the analysis are total tax revenue, VAT, and tax on income (both personal and corporate) in 21 OECD countries (Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Geermany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, tSpain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, UK, US) at an annual frequency over the period 1965–2021. We also construct inflation series as the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) over the same period. All series are taken from the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) database (https://data.oecd.org/). Since the original tax series are denominated in their national currency, to make them comparable they have been converted into euros for the countries with a different currency using the following exchange rates:
-
Canada: 1 CAD = 0.68 EUR
-
Denmark: 1 DKK = 0.13 EUR
-
Japan: 1 JPY = 0.0068 EUR
-
New Zealand: 1 NZD = 0.57 EUR
-
Norway: 1 NOK = 0.087 EUR
-
Sweden: 1 SEK = 0.088 EUR
-
Switzerland: 1 CHF = 1.02 EUR
-
Türkiye: 1 TRY = 0.047 EUR
-
United Kingdom: 1 GBP = 1.14 EUR
-
United States: 1 USD = 0.91 EUR
Figure 1 plots the total tax revenue, the US having the highest one.
Figure 2 displays instead the Value Added Tax (VAT) series. This source of tax revenue is highest in Germany.Footnote 1
Figure 3 plots income tax revenue, with the US again having the largest one.
Empirical Results
For our purposes, we examine the following model:
where y(t) refers to the observed data, β0 and β1 are the coefficients corresponding respectively to the intercept and a linear time trend, and x(t) is assumed to be I(d), where d is another parameter that is also estimated from the data. The error term u(t) is assumed to be a white noise process with zero mean and constant variance.
We estimate the differencing parameter d using three different model specifications:
i) With β0 and β1 being unknown and estimated alongside d,
ii)With β1 = 0 a priori, thus including an intercept only in the model, and
iii)With both β0 and β1 equal to zero a priori, thus not including any deterministic terms.Footnote 2
The best specification is chosen by testing with t-values the significance of the respective coefficients.
Tables 1, 2, and 3 display the estimates of d along with the confidence bands corresponding to the non-rejection values of d at the 95% level for total, VAT, and tax on income revenues respectively. For each series, the coefficients in bold are those from the selected specification.
For total revenue (Table 1), the time trend is significant in all cases except for Greece and Turkey, where the constant is also insignificant. For VAT (Table 2), the only series with an insignificant trend is insignificant is the Netherlands. Finally, in the case of tax on income (Table 3), there are no significant deterministic term in the model for Japan, and the time trend is insignificant in Greece, New Zealand, and Turkey.
The values correspond to the estimates of the differencing parameter. In parenthesis, the 95% confidence intervals for the values of d. In bold, the values corresponding to the selected model for each series
aIndicates evidence of mean reversion at the 5% level
Regarding persistence as measured by the differencing parameter d, it can be seen that for total revenue the unit root null hypothesis, i.e., d = 1, cannot be rejected for most of the series, this hypothesis being rejected in favour of d > 1 only for Greece (d = 1.39), Italy (1.25), Luxembourg (1.31), and Portugal (1.25). Moreover, evidence of mean reversion (d < 1) is found only in the case of Switzerland (0.80). For VAT, the values are generally lower, and mean reversion now takes place for Belgium (d = 0.72), Italy (0.69), and Spain (surprisingly with a large negative value, − 0.64Footnote 3); for New Zealand, d is found to be significantly higher than 1, while for the rest of the cases, the values of d are in the I(1) interval. Concerning the tax on income, evidence of mean reversion is now obtained for Austria (d = 0.74), Belgium (0.41), Finland (0.54), Spain (0.59), Sweden (0.32), and USA (0.51). Evidence of d above 1 is found for Greece (1.35), Luxembourg (1.29), and Turkey (1.56). For the rest of the cases the unit root null hypothesis cannot be rejected.
Table 4 summarises the results obtained so far; there are a few cases of mean reversion: one for total revenue (Switzerland); three for VAT (Belgium, Italy, and Spain), and six for tax on income (Austria, Belgium, Finland, Spain, Sweden and USA).
Next, we incorporate inflation into the analysis. Figure 4 shows that Turkey has the highest rate among the 21 countries considered.
Tables 5 and 6 report respectively the estimates of d from the three specifications being considered and the corresponding estimates from each regression model. Again, the coefficients in bold are those from the selected specification.
It can be seen that the time trend is significant only in the case of Korea, with intercept being the only significant deterministic term in most cases. Concerning the differencing parameter, d, only for Korea (d = 0.48), Iceland (0.75), Norway (0.63), and Sweden (0.89) the unit root null hypothesis is rejected in favour of mean reversion. In all the other cases, the estimated order of integration is within the unit root interval, the highest values being estimated for Italy (1.02), France (1.04), and Luxembourg (1.05).
Next, we focus on whether there is a relationship linking the tax series and inflation. Table 7 shows the correlation coefficients for each of the 21 OECD countries considered. It can be seen that all the values are positive and close 1, which indicates a very strong correlation.
To test more rigorously for the existence of a long-run relationship between tax revenues and inflation one could use fractional cointegration methods. Engle and Granger (1987) defined cointegration in a bivariate context as a situation where the two individual series are integrated of order d, i.e., I(d), but there exists a linear combination of the two which is integration of a smaller order, say, d – b with b > 0. Though they define this concept for any real values, d and b, most of the empirical analysis carried out since then, however, has been conducted for the integer case, i.e., with d = b = 1, or, in other words, with I(1) individual series, and I(0) cointegrating errors. Engle and Granger (1987) proposed a two-step approach, testing first the order of integration of the individual series, and then, in a second step, the order of integration of the cointegrating residuals (see also Cheung and Lai 1993, and Gil-Alana 2003). However, this approach has the disadvantage of using estimated values rather than observed ones in the second step. To avoid this, we test instead for mean reversion in the difference between the tax revenue series and inflation.
The values correspond to the estimates of the differencing parameter. In parenthesis, the 95% confidence intervals for the values of d. In bold, the values corresponding to the selected model for each series
aIndicates evidence of mean reversion at the 5% level
In the case of the total revenue-inflation differential (Table 8), the time trend is found to be significant in all countries except one (Greece), and mean reversion is only statistically significant in Austria, with an estimated value of d of 0.66. For the rest of the countries, the unit root null hypothesis cannot be rejected, which implies lack of reversion to the mean. Thus, cointegration between total revenue and inflation only occurs in the case of Austria.
For the VAT-inflation differential (Table 9), we find evidence of mean reversion in a number of cases: UK (d = 0.37), for which the I(0) hypothesis cannot be rejected), Austria and Belgium (d = 0.50), Canada (0.51), and Italy (0.69). This represents evidence of a long-run equilibrium relationship, except for Italy, where the order of integration is the same as for the VAT series itself.
The values correspond to the estimates of the differencing parameter. In parenthesis, the 95% confidence intervals for the values of d. In bold, the values corresponding to the selected model for each series
aIndicates evidence of mean reversion at the 5% level
Finally, for the tax on income-inflation differential (Table 10), the mean reversion hypothesis cannot be rejected in the cases of Austria (d = 0.42), Portugal (0.73), and Switzerland (0.78), where this differential exhibits a lower degree of integration compared to the tax series itself.
A summary of the results for the three differentials is presented in Table 11. To sum up, mean reversion is found only in Austria in the case of deflated total revenues; in Austria, Belgium, Canada, Italy and the UK in the case of deflated VAT; in Austria, Portugal and Switzerland in the case of deflated tax on income.
Conclusions
This paper examines the stochastic behaviour of tax revenues in 21 OECD countries over the period 1965–2021 using a fractional integration approach. More specifically, the fractional differencing parameter d is a measure of persistence; it also sheds light on whether or not mean reversion occurs and shocks have transitory or permanent effects. The results indicate that most of series exhibit long memory. Also, in most cases the selected model specification includes a time trend, the exceptions being the Netherlands in the case of the VAT series, Greece and Turkey in the case of both total tax revenue and tax on income, Japan and New Zealand in the latter case only. In most cases the unit root null hypothesis cannot be rejected, and in a few cases such as the Netherlands and New Zealand d is even above 1.
As for the inflation series, the I(1) hypothesis cannot be rejected for the majority of the countries, mean reversion only occurring in the cases of Korea, Iceland, Norway and Sweden. However, stronger evidence of mean reversion is found for the differences between the three original tax series and inflation compared to the tax series themselves, which points to the existence of a linkage between taxation and inflation, especially in the case of VAT and tax on income.
These findings add to the existing body of knowledge by providing more extensive evidence on the stochastic properties of tax revenues and inflation as well as on their linkages. They also suggest future avenues for research and have crucial policy implications. Particularly important is the evidence concerning the existence of a significant relationship between taxes and inflation, as the tax system is typically not neutral with respect to inflation (Beer et al. 2023). Specifically, its effects on incentives and tax burdens change with inflation and can create distortions such as the failure to adjust some parameters of the tax system (for instance, tax thresholds) in line with inflation, timing effects concerning tax collection and refunds, as well as the taxation of (both household and corporate) nominal rather than real gains and profits. Therefore it is essential that fiscal policy in the OECD countries should address these issues. This might require adjusting tax thresholds and other tax parameters in line with inflation; further, withholding taxes and advance corporate income taxes might be required to solve timing issues, and corporate cash-flow taxes might also be useful to reduce distortions (Beer et al. 2023). Thus OECD tax authorities should consider introducing such changes, and academic research should investigate further the issue of tax distortions and their effects.
It should be noted that the analysis conducted in this paper has some limitations which could be overcome in future work extending it in several directions. In particular, the reasons for the rejection of the unit root null hypothesis for both tax revenues and inflation in a number of cases could be investigated. In addition, tests for structural breaks could be carried out using the method of Bai and Perron (2003) and/or its adaptation to the specific case of fractional integration developed by Gil-Alana (2008)—this is an important issue because overlooking structural breaks can produce spurious long-memory (see, e.g., Diebold and Inoue 2001; Granger and Hyung 2004; etc.). Finally, possible nonlinearities could be modelled using an appropriate framework such as Chebyshev polynomials in time (Cuestas and Gil-Alana 2016), Fourier functions (Caporale et al. 2024) or neural networks (Gil-Alana and Yaya 2021) in the context of fractional integration.
Data availability
Data are available from the authors upon request.
Notes
Note that the US has a Sales Tax rather which is similar but not directly comparable to VAT.
We do not consider the case with β0 = 0 a priori, and thus, including a time trend in the model, because it does not usually occur.
A negative value of d indicates anti-persistence. In such a case a process reverses itself more often than a random series would.
References
Abbritti, M., L.A. Gil-Alana, Y. Lovcha, and A. Moreno. 2016. Term structure persistence. Journal of Financial Econometrics 14 (2): 331–352. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjfinec/nbv003.
Abbritti, M., H. Carcel, L.A. Gil-Alana, and A. Moreno. 2023. Term premium in a fractionally cointegrated yield curve. Journal of Banking and Finance 149: 106777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2023.106777.
Bai, J., and P. Perron. 2003. Computation and analysis of multiple structural change models. Journal of Applied Econometrics 18 (1): 1–22.
Beer, S., Griffiths, M. and A. Klemm (2023), “Tax Distortions from Inflation: What are They? How to Deal with Them?”, IMF WP/23/18, Washington D.C.
Caporale, G.M., Gil-Alana, L. and O.S. Yaya (2024), “Modelling persistence and non-linearities in the US Treasury 10-year bond yields”, forthcoming, Economics Bulletin.
Chambers, M. 1998. Long memory and aggregation in macroeconomic time series. International Economic Review 39: 1053–1072.
Cheung, Y.-W., and K. Lai. 1993. A fractional cointegration analysis of purchasing power parity. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.1993.10509936.
Cuestas, J.C., and L.A. Gil-Alana. 2016. A non-linear approach with long range dependence based on chebyshev polynomials. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics 23: 445–468.
Diebold, F.X., and A. Inoue. 2001. Long memory and regime switching. Journal of Econometrics 105 (1): 131–159.
Engle, R., and C.W.J. Granger. 1987. Cointegration and error correction. Representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica 55: 251–276.
Gil-Alana, L.A. 2003. Testing of fractional cointegration in macroeconomic time series, 518–529. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics.
Gil-Alana, L.A. 2008. Fractional integration and structural breaks at unknown periods of time. Journal of Time Series Analysis 29 (1): 163–185.
Gil-Alana, L.A., and A. Moreno. 2012. Uncovering the US term premium: An alternative route. Journal of Banking and Finance 36 (4): 1181–1193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.11.013.
Gil-Alana, L.A., and P.M. Robinson. 1997. Testing of unit roots and other nonstationary hypotheses in macroeconomic time series. Journal of Econometrics 80: 241–268.
Gil-Alana, L.A., and O. Yaya. 2021. Testing fractional unit roots with non-linear smooth break approximations using Fourier functions. Journal of Applied Statistics 48 (13–15): 2542–2559.
Granger, C.W.J. 1980. Long memory relationships and the aggregation of dynamic models. Journal of Econometrics 14: 227–238.
Granger, C.W.J., and N. Hyung. 2004. Occasional structural breaks and long memory with an application to the S&P 500 absolute stock returns. Journal of Empirical Finance 11 (3): 399–421.
Hassler, U. 2011. Estimation of fractional integration under temporal aggregation. Journal of Econometrics 162 (2): 240–247.
Koopman, S.J., and M. Ooms. 2003. Time series modelling of daily tax revenues. Statistica Neerlandica 57: 439–469.
Parke, W.R. 1999. What is fractional integration? The Review of Economics and Statistics 81: 632–638.
Patoli, A.Q., T. Zarif, and N.A. Syed. 2012. Impact of inflation on taxes in Pakistan: An empirical study of 2000–2010 period, IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS). Ilma University, Faculty of Management Science 8 (2): 31–41.
Robinson, P.M. 1978. Statistical inference for a random coefficient autoregressive model. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 5: 163–168.
Robinson, P.M. 1994. Efficient tests of nonstationary hypotheses. Journal of the American Statistical Association 89: 1420–1437.
Shi, W., and J. Sun. 2016. Aggregation and long-memory: An analysis based on the discrete Fourier transform. Economic Modelling 53: 470–476.
Souza, L.R. 2008. Why aggregate long memory time series? Econometric Reviews 27 (1–3): 298–316.
Sunday, C.N. 2015. The implications of tax revenue on the economic development of Nigeria. Issues in Business Management and Economics 3: 74–80.
Taqqu, M.S., W. Willinger, and R. Sherman. 1997. Proof of a fundamental result in self-similar traffic modelling. Computer Communication Review 27: 5–23.
Wang, S., and J. Han. 2018. Research on the interference trend of national taxation with price and inflation. Open Journal of Social Sciences 6: 156–167.
Acknowledgements
Comments from the Editor and an anonymous reviewer are gratefully acknowledged.
Funding
Open Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature. Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, MINEIC-AEI-FEDER PID2020-113691RB-I00, Luis Alberiko GIL-ALANA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Caporale, G.M., Tapia, S.G. & Gil-Alana, L.A. Persistence in Tax Revenues: Evidence from Some OECD Countries. J. Quant. Econ. 22, 475–491 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40953-024-00386-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40953-024-00386-x