Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reactive transport modeling of arsenic mobilization in shallow groundwater: impacts of CO2 and brine leakage

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Carbon dioxide (CO2) and saline water leakage from deep sequestration reservoirs to overlying shallow drinking water aquifers is a major concern for geologic CO2 sequestration. In this study, a field-scale reactive transport model of a natural CO2 analog, the Chimayo site in New Mexico, was created to quantify water–rock–CO2 interactions and arsenic (As) mobilization responses to CO2 and saline water leakage. This study provides analyses and forecasts of the site following field observations of hydrogeological and geochemical data, and integrated calculations with combined batch experiments and reactive transport simulations of geochemical reaction kinetic parameters. The results of this study suggest that: (1) with the regional groundwater flow of 1% hydraulic gradient, the leakage of CO2 could reach to 3000 m downstream in 1000-year time scale; (2) clay minerals of the aquifer show a strong capacity to mitigate As mobilization with adsorption reactions, and within 1000-year simulation time, the aquifer sediments stabilize almost 100% leaked As; (3) the deeper brackish water is the source of As contamination of the Chimayo groundwater, and As concentration increase only appears along the fault.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Appelo CJA, Postma D (1993) Geochemistry groundwater and pollution. AA Balkema, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachu S (2000) Sequestration of CO2 in geological media: criteria and approach for site selection in response to climate change. Energy Convers Manag 41(9):953–970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachu S, Watson TL (2009) Review of failures for wells used for CO2 and acid gas injection in Alberta, Canada. Energy Procedia 1:3531–3537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacon DH, Dai Z, Zheng L (2014) Geochemical impacts of carbon dioxide, brine, trace metal and organic leakage into an unconfined, oxidizing limestone aquifer. Energy Procedia 63:4684–4707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacon DH, Qafoku NP, Dai Z, Keating EH, Brown CF (2016) Modeling the impact of carbon dioxide leakage into an unconfined, oxidizing carbonate aquifer. Int J Greenh Gas Control 44:290–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll SA, Keating E, Mansoor K, Dai Z, Sun Y, Trainor-Guitton W, Brown C, Bacon D (2014) Key factors for determining groundwater impacts due to leakage from geologic carbon sequestration reservoirs. Int J Greenh Gas Control 29:153–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celia MA, Nordbotten JM, Court B, Dobossy M, Bachu S (2011) Field-scale application of a semi-analytical model for estimation of CO2 and brine leakage along old wells. Int J Greenh Gas Control 5:257–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cumming KA (1997) Hydrogeochemistry of groundwater in Chimayo, New Mexico. M. S. Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, pp 19–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai Z, Samper J (2004) Inverse problem of multicomponent reactive chemical transport in porous media: formation and applications. Water Resour Res. doi:10.1029/2004WR003248

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai Z, Keating E, Bacon D, Viswanathan H, Stauffer P, Jordan A, Pawar R (2014) Probabilistic evaluation of shallow groundwater resources at a hypothetical carbon sequestration site. Sci Rep. doi:10.1038/srep04006

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai Z, Viswanathan H, Middleton R, Pan F, Ampomah W, Yang C, Jia W, Xiao T, Lee S, McPherson B, Balch R, Grigg R, White M (2016) CO2 accounting and risk analysis for CO2 sequestration at enhanced oil recovery sites. Environ Sci Technol 50(14):7546–7554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty J (2000) PEST, model-independent parameter estimation. Watermark Computing, Corinda

    Google Scholar 

  • Frye E, Bao C, Li L, Blumsack S (2014) Environmental controls of cadmium desorption during CO2 leakage. Environ Sci Technol 46:4388–4395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gershenzon NI, Soltanian M, Ritzi RW, Dominic DF (2014) Influence of small scale heterogeneity on CO2 trapping processes in deep saline aquifers. Energy Procedia 59:166–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gershenzon NI, Ritzi RW, Dominic DF, Soltanian M, Mehnert E, Okwen RT (2015) Influence of small-scale fluvial architecture on CO2 trapping processes in deep brine reservoirs. Water Resour Res 51(10):8240–8256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg S, Johnston CT (2001) Mechanisms of arsenic adsorption on amorphous oxides evaluated using macroscopic measurements, vibrational spectroscopy, and surface complexation modeling. J Colloid Interface Sci 234:204–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg S, Hyun S, Lee LS (2008) Chemical modeling of arsenic (III, V) and selenium (IV, VI) adsorption by soils surrounding ash disposal facilities. Vadose Zone J 7(4):1231–1238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey OR, Qafoku NP, Cantrell KJ, Lee G, Amonette GE, Brown CF (2013) Geochemical implications of gas leakage associated with geologic CO2 storage—a qualitative review. Environ Sci Technol 47(1):23–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karamalidis AK, Torres SG, Hakala JA, Shao H, Cantrell KJ, Carroll S (2013) Trace metal source terms in carbon sequestration environments. Environ Sci Technol 47:322–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keating E, Fessenden J, Kanjorski N, Koning D, Pawar R (2010) The impact of CO2 on shallow groundwater chemistry: observations at a natural analog site and implications for carbon sequestration. Environ Earth Sci 60:521–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keating EH, Hakala JA, Viswanathan H, Carey JW, Pawar R, Guthrie GD, Fessenden-Rahn J (2013a) CO2 leakage impacts on shallow groundwater: field-scale reactive-transport simulations informed by observations at a natural analog site. Appl Geochem 30:136–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keating EH, Newell DL, Viswanathan H, Carey JW, Zyvoloski G, Pawar R (2013b) CO2/brine transport into shallow aquifers along fault zones. Environ Sci Technol 47:290–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keating EH, Harp DH, Dai Z, Pawar RJ (2016) Reduced order models for assessing CO2 impacts in shallow unconfined aquifers. Int J Greenh Gas Control 46:187–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch K, Navarre-Sitchler AK, Wunsch A, McCray JE (2014) Metal release from sandstones under experimentally and numerically simulated CO2 leakage conditions. Environ Sci Technol 48:1436–1442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawter A, Qafoku NP, Wang G, Shao H, Brown CF (2016) Evaluating impacts of CO2 intrusion into an unconsolidated aquifer: I. Experimental data. Int J Greenh Gas Control 44:323–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki JL, Birkholzer J, Tsang C (2007) Natural and industrial analogues for leakage of CO2 from storage reservoirs: identification of features, events, and processes and lessons learned. Environ Geol 52:457–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little MG, Jackson RB (2010) Potential impacts of leakage from deep CO2 geosequestration on overlying freshwater aquifers. Environ Sci Technol 44(23):9225–9232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu J, Partin J, Hovorka S, Wong C (2010) Potential risks to freshwater resources as a result of leakage from CO2 geological storage: a batch-reaction experiment. Environ Earth Sci 60:335–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning BA, Goldberg S (1997) Adsorption and stability of arsenic (III) at the clay mineral-water interface. Environ Sci Technol 31:2005–2011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NETL (2015) Carbon storage atlas, 5th ed. National Energy Technology Laboratory, Morgantown, WV, USA. http://www.netl.doe.gov/research/coal/carbon-storage/atlasv. Accessed 2 Dec 2016

  • Pruess K (2005) ECO2 N: A TOUGH2 fluid property module for mixtures of water, NaCl, and CO2. Report LBNL-57952. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley

  • Shao H, Qafoku NP, Lawter AR, Bowden ME, Brown CF (2015) Coupled geochemical impacts of leaking CO2 and contaminants from subsurface storage reservoirs on groundwater quality. Environ Sci Technol 49:8202–8209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soltanian MR, Amooie MA, Cole DR, Graham DE, Hosseini SA, Hovorka S, Pfiffner SM, Phelps TJ, Moortgat J (2016a) Simulating the Cranfield geological carbon sequestration project with high-resolution static models and an accurate equation of state. Int J Greenh Gas Control 54:282–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soltanian MR, Amooie MA, Dai Z, Cole D (2016b) Critical dynamics of gravito-convective mixing in geological carbon sequestration. Sci Rep. doi:10.1038/srep35921

    Google Scholar 

  • Trautz RC, Pugh JD, Varadharajan C, Zheng L, Bianchi M, Nico PS, Spycher NF, Newell DL, Esposito RA, Wu Y, Dafflon B, Hubbard SS, Birkholzer JT (2013) Effect of dissolved CO2 on a shallow groundwater system: a controlled release field experiment. Environ Sci Technol 47(1):298–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viswanathan H, Dai Z, Lopano C, Keating E, Hakala JA, Scheckel KG, Zheng L, Guthrie GD, Pawar R (2012) Developing a robust geochemical and reactive transport model to evaluate possible sources of arsenic at the CO2 sequestration natural analog site in Chimayo, New Mexico. Int J Greenh Gas Control 10:199–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao T, McPherson B, Pan F, Esser R, Jia W, Bordelon A, Bacon D (2016) Potential chemical impacts of CO2 leakage on underground source of drinking water assessed by quantitative risk analysis. Int J Greenh Gas Control 50:305–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao T, Dai Z, Viswanathan H, Hakala A, Cather M, Jia W, Zhang Y, McPherson B (2017) Arsenic mobilization in shallow aquifers due to CO2 and brine intrusion from storage reservoirs. Sci Rep (accepted)

  • Xu T, Spycher N, Sonnenthal E, Zhang G, Zheng L, Pruess K (2011) TOUGHREACT version 2.0: a simulator for subsurface reactive transport under non-isothermal multiphase flow conditions. Comput Geosci 37:763–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang C, Mickler P, Reedy R, Scanlon BR, Romanak KD, Nicot JP, Hovorka SD, Larson T (2013) Single-well push-pull test for assessing potential impacts of CO2 leakage on groundwater quality in a shallow gulf coast aquifer in Cranfield, Mississippi. Int J Greenh Gas Control 18:375–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang C, Dai Z, Romanak KD, Hovorka SD, Treviño RH (2014) Inverse modeling of water-rock-CO2 batch experiments: potential impacts on groundwater resources at carbon sequestration sites. Environ Sci Technol 48:2798–2806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng L, Apps JA, Zhang Y, Xu T, Birkholzer JT (2009) On mobilization of lead and arsenic in groundwater in response to CO2 leakage from deep geological storage. Chem Geol 268:281–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng L, Apps JA, Spycher N, Birkholzer JT, Kharaka YK, Thordsen J, Beers SR, Herkelrath WN, Kakouros E, Trautz RC (2012) Geochemical modeling of changes in shallow groundwater chemistry observed during the MSU-ZERT CO2 injection experiment. Int J Greenh Gas Control 7:202–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng L, Qafoku NP, Lawter A, Wang G, Shao H, Brown CF (2016a) Evaluating impacts of CO2 intrusion into an unconsolidated aquifer: II. Modeling results. Int J Greenh Gas Control 44:300–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng L, Spycher N, Bianchi M, Pugh JD, Varadharajan C, Tinnacher RM, Birkholzer JT, Nico P, Trautz RC (2016b) Impacts of elevated dissolved CO2 on a shallow groundwater system: reactive transport modeling of a controlled-release field test. Chem Geol 447:117–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

For sake of development of a modeling approach appropriate for subsurface CO2 storage sites, partial funding for this project was provided by the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) through the Southwest Regional Partnership on Carbon Sequestration (SWP) under Award No. DE-FC26-05NT42591.

Disclaimer

This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored in part by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian McPherson.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiao, T., Dai, Z., McPherson, B. et al. Reactive transport modeling of arsenic mobilization in shallow groundwater: impacts of CO2 and brine leakage. Geomech. Geophys. Geo-energ. Geo-resour. 3, 339–350 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40948-017-0058-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40948-017-0058-2

Keywords

Navigation