Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Sky is the Limit: Evaluating Business Models from an Integral and Non-Reductionist View of Reality

  • Published:
Philosophy of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents an ontological perspective that enables evaluating the effectiveness of business models from an integrative worldview. Different groups’ fragmented and reductionist views on this topic create a dichotomy that makes it difficult to compare and analyze them in practice. Such groups use different values for some components, which may result in neglecting others and their interrelationship. This study discusses a functional characteristic of business models that academia still needs to address. It explores new frontiers in the field, such as business models for networks, sustainability, and their practical evaluation. To achieve an integrative ontology and avoid focusing on specific constructs or systems at the expense of others, we draw upon the theory of worldviews from Wilhelm Dilthey, reformational philosophy, and Herman Dooyeweerd’s theory of modal aspects. Society should move beyond dualistic thinking and embrace practical and applicable solutions. To help companies develop effective models, we introduce a new business model framework based on an integrative worldview that enables comparisons and evaluations of companies in practice. Creating competitive advantages and value appropriations synergizes with essential aspects of reformational philosophy. Analyzing and interrelating such elements are fundamental to understanding the real applied value of business models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aay, H., and A.B. Van Langevelde. 2005. A Dooyeweerd-based approach to regional economic development. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie 96 (2): 184–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Applegate, L.M. 2001. E-Business models: Making sense of the Internet business landscape. Information technology and the future enterprise: New models for managers 49–94.

  • Attanasio, G., N. Preghenella, A.F. De Toni, and C. Battistella. 2022. Stakeholder engagement in business models for sustainability: The stakeholder value flow model for sustainable development. Business Strategy and the Environment 31 (3): 860–874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balogun, J. 2007. The Practice of Organizational Restructuring: From Design to Reality. European Management Journal 25 (2): 81–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barth, H., P.O. Ulvenblad, and P. Ulvenblad. 2017. Towards a conceptual framework of sustainable business model innovation in the agri-food sector: A systematic literature review. Sustainability 9 (9): 1620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basden, A. 2008. Engaging with and enriching humanist thought: The case of information systems. Philosophia Reformata 73 (2): 132–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basden, A. 2013. Understanding artefacts related to human aspects: The case of information technology and systems. Koers: Bulletin for Christian Scholarship=Koers: Bulletin vir Christelike Wetenskap 79 (3): 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basden, A. 2011. A presentation of Herman Dooyeweerd’s aspects of temporal reality’. International Journal of Multi-aspectual Practice 1 (1).

  • Basden, A. 2020. Foundation and practice of research. Editora Routledge: Abingdon, Oxon, UK.

  • Bauman, Z. 2013. Liquid modernity. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blank, S. 2013. Why the lean startup changes everything. Harvard Business Review 91 (5): 63–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brea-Solís, H., R. Casadesus-Masanell, and E. Grifell-Tatjé. 2015. Business Model Evaluation: Quantifying Walmart’s Sources of Advantage. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal 9 (1): 12–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budler, M., and P. Trkman. 2019. The nature of management models. Journal of Management & Organization 1–18.

  • Budler, M., I. Župič, and P. Trkman. 2021. The development of business model research: A bibliometric review. Journal of Business Research 135: 480–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M. 1979. A systems concept of society: Beyond individualism and holism. Theory and Decision 10 (1): 13–30.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Casadesus-Masanell, R., and J.E. Ricart. 2010. From Strategy to Business Models and onto Tactics. Long Range Planning 43 (2/3): 195–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer, E. 1965. The philosophy of symbolic forms: volume 3: The phenomenology of knowledge. Yale University Press.

  • Chesbrough, H., and R.S. Rosenbloom. 2002. The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation’s technology spin-off companies. Industrial and Corporate Change 11 (3): 529–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. 2013. Uma visão cristã dos homens e do mundo, 139–143. Brasília: Monergismo.

  • Cohen, W.M., and D.A. Levinthal. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new philosophical perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 128–152.

  • De Vries, R., M.S. Anderson, and B.C. Martinson. 2006. Normal misbehavior: Scientists talk about the ethics of research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 1 (1): 43–50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dilthey, W. 1911. Os tipos de concepção do mundo e o seu desenvolvimento nos sistemas metafísicos. Tradução: Artur Mourão 4.

  • Dilthey, W. 1991. Die typen der weltanschauung und ihre ausbildung in den metaphisischen system (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht), p. 75, GS VIII.

  • Dilthey, W. 2010. Wilhelm dilthey: Selected works, volume iv: Hermeneutics and the study of history (Vol. 4). Princeton University Press.

  • Dooyeweerd, H. 1979. Roots of Western Culture: Pagan, Secular and Christian Options. Toronto: Wedge Publishing Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooyeweerd, H. 2016. A new critique of theoretical thought, 2. Ontario: Paidea Press.

  • Dooyeweerd, H. 2020. Filosofia cristã e o sentido da história. Brasília: Monergismo.

  • Durkheim, E. 1999. Da divisão social do trabalho. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, Câmara Brasileira do Livro.

  • Foss, N.J., and T. Saebi. 2017. Fifteen years of research on business model innovation: How far have we come, and where should we go? Journal of Management 43 (1): 200–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.E. 2004. The Stakeholder Approach Revisited. Zeitschrift Fuer Wirtschafts- Und Unternehmensethik 5 (3): 228–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, G., and A.J. Bock. 2009. Inventing entrepreneurs: Technology innovators and their entrepreneurial journey. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

  • Gerdoci, B., G. Bortoluzzi, and S. Dibra. 2017. Business model design and firm desempenho: Evidence of interactive effects from a developing economy. European Journal of Innovation Management 21 (2): 315–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D.A., K. Corley, and A.L. Hamilton. 2012. Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods 16 (1): 15–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grassl, W., and A. Habisch. 2011. Ethics and economics: Towards a new humanistic synthesis for business. Journal of Business Ethics 99 (1): 37–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. 1986. The new obscurity: The crisis of the welfare state and the exhaustion of utopian energies: Translated by Phillip Jacobs. Philosophy & Social Criticism 11 (2): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, Nicolai. 1955. Der philosophische Gedanke und seine Geschichte, 6–8. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, P.D., and P.A. Zandbergen. 1995. Ecologically sustainable organizations: An institutional approach. Academy of Management Review 20 (4): 1015–1052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M.W., C.M. Christensen, and H. Kagermann. 2008. Reinventing your business model. Harvard Business Review 86 (12): 57–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. 2008. Critique of pure reason. New York: Penguin Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R.S. 2009. Conceptual foundations of the balanced scorecard. Handbooks of Management Accounting Research 3: 1253–1269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopes, H.E.G., B.H. Watté, and M. Gosling. 2020. Business model change of printed newspapers in the internet age: The New York Times Case [J]. Revista Economía & Gestão 20 (55): 102–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lüdeke-Freund, F., and K. Dembek. 2017. Sustainable business model research and practice: Emerging field or passing fancy? Journal of Cleaner Production 168: 1668–1678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G., and H.A. Simon. 1958. Organizations. University of Illinois at Urbana-champaign’s academy for entrepreneurial leadership historical research reference in entrepreneurship tripsas e gavetti (2000).

  • Markides, C., and D. Oyon. 2010. What to do against disruptive business models (when and how to play two games at once). MIT Sloan Management Review 51 (4): 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A.H. 1943. Preface to motivation theory. Psychosomatic Medicine 5: 85–92.

  • Massa, L., C.L. Tucci, and A. Afuah. 2017. A Critical Assessment of Business Model Research. Academy of Management Annals 11 (1): 73–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P., and J. Roberts. 1986. Price and advertising signals of product quality. Journal of political economy 94 (4): 796–821.

  • Minbaeva, D., T. Pedersen, I. Björkman, C.F. Fey, and H.J. Park. 2003. MNC knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity, and HRM. Journal of International Business Studies 34 (6): 586–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M., M. Schindehutte, and J. Allen. 2005. The entrepreneur’s business model: Toward a unified philosophical perspective. Journal of Business Research 58 (6): 726–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ocasio, W. 2011. Attention to Attention. Organization Science 22 (5): 1286–1296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osterwalder, A. 2004. The business model ontology a propostion in a design science approach. (Doctoral dissertation, Université de Lausanne, Faculté des hautes études commerciales).

  • Osterwalder, A., and Y. Pigneur. 2005. Clarifying Business Models: Origins, Present, and Future of the Concept. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 16: 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patala, S., A. Jalkala, J. Keränen, S. Väisänen, V. Tuominen, and R. Soukka. 2016. Sustainable value propositions: Framework and implications for technology suppliers. Industrial Marketing Management 59: 144–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peter, F. Drucker 1954. Practice of Management.

  • Plugge, A., Nikou, S., and H. Bouwman. 2021. The revitalization of service orientation: A business services model. Business Process Management Journal  27 (8): 1–24.

  • Porac, J., and F.T. Tschang. 2013. Unbounding the managerial mind: It’s time to abandon the image of managers as “Small brains.” Journal of Management Inquiry 22 (2): 250–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porta, M.A.G. 2003. Filosofia a partir de seus problemas. Edições Loyola.

  • Provance, M., R.G. Donnelly, and E.G. Carayannis. 2011. Institutional influences on business model choice by new ventures in the microgenerated energy industry. Energy Policy 39 (9): 5630–5637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichow, J.K. 2019. Reformai a vossa mente : a filosofia cristã de Herman Dooyeweerd. Brasília, DF: Editora Monergismo.

  • Ries, E. 2011. The lean startup: How today’s entrepreneurs use continuous innovation to create radically successful businesses. Currency.

  • Rouleau, L., and J. Balogun. 2007. Exploring middle managers' strategic sensemaking role in practice. Advanced Institute of Management Research Paper, (055).

  • Rushdoony, R.J. 1999. The institutes of Biblical law. The intent of the law. The institutes of Biblical law.

  • Serafim, M.C., and C. Andion. 2010. Capital espiritual e as relações econômicas: Empreendedorismo em organizações religiosas. Cadernos EBAPE. BR 8: 564–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafer, S.M., Smith, H.J., and J.C. Linder. 2005. The power of business models. Business Horizons 48 (3): 199–207.

  • Silva, J.I.D. 2012. Filosofia e educação: Textos selecionados. Educação e Filosofia 26 (51): 327–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, L. 1995. Existentialism. Interpretation. 22 (3): 303–320.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, D.F.M. 2006. The best-known but least understood part of Dooyeweerd’s philosophy. Journal for Christian Scholarship=Tydskrif vir Christelike Wetenskap 42 (1_2): 61–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strijbos, S., and A. Basden. (Eds.). 2006. In search of an integrative vision for technology: Interdisciplinary studies in information systems. Springer Science & Business Media.

  • Täuscher, K., and N. Abdelkafi. 2018. Scalability and robustness of business models for sustainability: A simulation experiment. Journal of Cleaner Production 170: 654–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tripsas, M., and G. Gavetti. 2000. Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management Journal 21: 1147–1161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troost, A. 2012. What is reformational philosophy? An introduction to the cosmonomic philosophy of Herman Dooyeweerd. Ontario: Paidea Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urmetzer, S. 2021. Dedicated Business Models: Connecting Firms’ Values with the Systemic Requirements of Sustainability. Journal of Business Models 9 (2): 87–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verkerk, M.J. 2014. A philosophy-based toolbox for designing technology: The conceptual power of Dooyeweerdian philosophy. Koers: Bulletin for Christian Scholarship=Koers: Bulletin vir Christelike Wetenskap 79 (3): 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verkerk, M.J., and A. Zijlstra. 2003. Philosophical analysis of industrial organizations. Philosophia Reformata 68 (2): 101–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weill, P., and M. Vitale. 2001. Place to space: Migrating to E-business models. Harvard Business Press.

  • Weill, P., T.W. Malone, and T.G. Apel. 2011. The business models investors prefer. MIT Sloan Management Review 52 (4): 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteman, G., B. Walker, and P. Perego. 2013. Planetary boundaries: Ecological foundations for corporate sustainability. Journal of Management Studies 50 (2): 307–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wirtz, B.W., A. Pistoia, S. Ullrich, and V. Göttel. 2016. Business models: Origin, development, and future research philosophical perspectives. Long Range Planning 49 (1): 36–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zott, C., R. Amit, and L. Massa. 2011. The business model: Recent developments and future research. Journal of Management 37 (4): 1019–1042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais, Av. Itaú, 525-Bairro Dom Cabral-Belo Horizonte/MG-CEP, Belo Horizonte, MG, 30535012, Brazil

    Guilherme Coelho da Rocha de Castro & Humberto Elias Garcia Lopes

Authors
  1. Guilherme Coelho da Rocha de Castro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Humberto Elias Garcia Lopes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Humberto Elias Garcia Lopes.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author(s) declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Castro, G.C.d.R.d., Lopes, H.E.G. The Sky is the Limit: Evaluating Business Models from an Integral and Non-Reductionist View of Reality. Philosophy of Management 23, 125–151 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-023-00246-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-023-00246-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation