Skip to main content
Log in

God and Modernity in Management Studies. A Case of Theological Social Theory

  • Published:
Philosophy of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examines how theology and social science can contribute to the specific task of talking about God in management without compromising the integrity of the Triune God. To talk about God in management studies initially requires a discussion on the character of modernity and about whether modernity is absence or transformation of religious forms; to follow is an examination of the governing assumptions operating in social theory from a religious perspective. The conclusion is that without the correct hermeneutics, what management scholars mean by God cannot be more than an idea.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Blaise Pascal, “The Memorial” on the overwhelming mystical experience of the night of 23 November 1654.

  2. Augustine, De Trinitate, V, 15. Cf., Letter 140, Ad Honoratum, ch. 4, n. 10, “we were indeed something before being sons of God, and we received the divine favor to become what we were not.”

  3. I found the same idea exposed by Joseph Ratzinger in an essay of political theology originally published in Germany in 1970: “In Greco-Roman culture the unity of the world had its source in pantheism: the divine was itself a part of the world, and the world had divine status. Hence the unity of humanity could be converted directly into political reality” (Ratzinger 2015: 11).

References

  • Augustine. 2015. De Trinitate [Latin Edition] (Opera Omnia S. Augustini). Post Falls: Mediatrix Press.

  • Bible with Apocrypha. 2010.The new Oxford annotated revised standard version. Edited by Michael D. Croogan, et al. Fourth Edition. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Cafferky, M.E. 2013. On becoming a prophet. Faith in Business Quarterly 15 (4): 23–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cafferky, M.E. 2015. Business ethics in biblical perspective: A comprehensive introduction. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Lubac, H. 1998. The mystery of the supernatural. Translated by Rosémary Sheel, Introduction by David L. Schindler. New York: Crossroad.

  • Dyck, B. 2013. Management and the gospel. Luke’s radical message for the first and twenty-first centuries. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetcher, C.M. 2015. 24/7 Christian: The secular vocation of the Laity. Collegeville: Liturgical Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D.F. 1997. Introduction. In The modern theologians. An introduction to Christian theology in the twentieth century, ed. David F. Ford. Oxford and Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ha, K.-M. 2015. The role of religious beliefs and institutions in disaster management: A case study. Religions 6: 1314–1329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, F. 1996. Milbank's Thesis in R. Gill (editor) Theology and sociology: A Reader, London: Cassell.

  • Long, S.D. 2000. Divine economy: Theology and the market. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Milbank, J. 2000. Theology and Social Theory and its significance for community building: A conversation with John Milbank, Charlottesville, VA-December 16.

  • Milbank, J. 2006. Theology and social theory: beyond secular reason. Oxford; Malden: Blackwell Pub 2nd and revised edition.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Milbank, J. 2013. Beyond secular order: The representation of being and the representation of the people. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Milbank, J. 2014. The suspended middle: Henri de Lubac and the renewed split in modern Catholic theology, Second edition. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.

  • Niebuhr, H.R. 1951. Christ and culture. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratzinger, J. 2015. The unity of nations: A vision of the church fathers, translate by Boniface Ramsey. Washington, D.C.: The CUA Press.

  • Schmitz, K.L. 1969. Postmodernism and the Catholic tradition. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 73: 223–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sison, A.J.G., and J. Fontrodona. 2012. The common good of the firm in the Aristotelian-Thomistic tradition. Business Ethics Quarterly 22 (2): 211–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. 1995. Two theories of modernity. Hastings Center Report Mar.-Apr.: 24–7.

  • Taylor, C. 2007. A secular age. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Ven, J.A. 1998. Practical theology: An empirical approach. Belgium: Peeters Press First published in 1990 by Kok Pharos, Kanpen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veith, G.E., Jr. 2002. God at work: Your Christian vocation in all of life. Wheaton: Crossway.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enrico Beltramini.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The single author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

I am indebted to the anonymous reviewers of an earlier version of this paper for providing insightful comments and directions for additional work which has resulted in this improved version.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beltramini, E. God and Modernity in Management Studies. A Case of Theological Social Theory. Philosophy of Management 18, 331–345 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-018-0090-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40926-018-0090-5

Keywords

Navigation