Skip to main content
Log in

Capacity Analysis of Uncontrolled Intersections with and Without Pedestrian Cross Flow in Mixed Traffic Conditions

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Transportation in Developing Economies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Indian traffic differs significantly from that of developed countries in many aspects, mainly due to its highly mixed nature and weak lane discipline. Capacity of an uncontrolled intersection plays an important role in the overall performance of urban road networks. The non-compliance of the road users to the traffic rules at uncontrolled intersections makes the situation complex. Moreover, roadside frictions like pedestrians interfere with the traffic flow in most of the intersections in India. Gap acceptance method for capacity estimation has few drawbacks in the practical application under the condition of non-compliance behaviour of drivers including influence of pedestrian cross flow. Capacity estimation of intersection with significant pedestrian cross flow can be possible using the conflict method. This paper aims to study the capacity reduction in uncontrolled intersection having significant pedestrian cross flow. For this purpose, traffic video data were collected from two uncontrolled intersections in Kochi City, onewais an ideal site without significant pedestrian cross flow and the other a pedestrian site with significant pedestrian cross flow. The capacity of ideal and pedestrian intersections was estimated using the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) method as well as conflict method and a comparison was made between them. HCM method gave lesser values of capacity compared to conflict method and also gave unreasonably higher reduction in capacity due to pedestrian cross flow. This proves that HCM methodology is not suitable when the pedestrian traffic is also considered in addition to vehicular traffic in mixed traffic conditions. It was found that the capacity of the pedestrian intersection is 24.8% lesser than the ideal intersection. This study will be helpful for the traffic engineers to suggest a suitable pedestrian facility to reduce the conflicts between vehicles and pedestrians at intersections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amin HJ, Desai RN, Patel PS (2014) Modelling the crossing behavior of pedestrian at uncontrolled intersection in case of mixed traffic using adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system. J Traffic Logisti Eng 2(4):263–270

    Google Scholar 

  2. Li H, Deng W, Tian Z, Hu P (2009) Capacities of unsignalized intersections under mixed vehicular and non-motorized traffic conditions, transportation research record. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies Washington, D.C. 2130:129–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brilon W, Wu W (2001) Capacity at unsignalized intersections derived by conflict technique, transportation research record. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C 1776:82–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gleue, A. W., VereinfachtesverfahrenzurBerechnungsignalgeregelterKnotenpunkte. ForschungStrassenbau und Strassenverkehrstechnik 136, Bonn, 1972.

  5. Brilon W, Miltner T (2005) Capacity and delays at intersections without traffic signals, transportation research record. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies Washington, D.C 192:32–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Prasetijo J, Pour MH, Ghadiri SMR (2011) Capacity of unsignalized intersections under mixed traffic conditions. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 16:676–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Parameswaran A, Asaithambi G. Capacity estimation of uncontrolled intersections in mixed traffic: comparison of gap acceptance procedure and additive conflict flow technique, in proceedings of the 12th transportation planning and implementation methodologies for developing countries, December 2016. pp 19–21.

  8. Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board (2000). National Research Council, Washington D.C.

  9. Prasetijo J, Wu N, Ambak K, Sanik MS, Daniel BD, Hadipramana J (2016) Performance of non-priority intersections under mixed traffic conditions based on conflict streams analysis. Transportation in Developing Economies 2(2):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yang Z, Zhang Y, Zhu R, Yei X, Jiang X (2014) Impacts of pedestrians on capacity and delay of major street through traffic at two-way-stop-controlled intersections, Mathematical Problems in Engineering

  11. Mohan M, Chandra S (2016) Three methods of PCU estimation at unsignalized intersections. Transportation Lettes 10(2):68–74

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the opportunity provided by the 4th Conference of the Transportation Research Group of India (4th CTRG) held at IIT Bombay, Mumbai, India between 17th December,2017 and 20th December, 2017 to present the work that forms the basis of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gowri Asaithambi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

T, A., Asaithambi, G. Capacity Analysis of Uncontrolled Intersections with and Without Pedestrian Cross Flow in Mixed Traffic Conditions. Transp. in Dev. Econ. 8, 20 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40890-022-00159-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40890-022-00159-2

Keywords

Navigation