Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Selection of Sustainable Mode of Transportation Based on Environmental, Economic, and Social Factors: Pakistan a Case in Point

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Transportation in Developing Economies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The transport sector has evolved globally with a revolution that has brought innovation and comfort to people's lives. The modern-day commute has become relatively easier and the standard of living has relatively improved. The revolution in the modern era has increased transportation that, on one hand, proves to be good for the general population, but on the other hand, it is resulting in heavy traffic, environmental pollution, and health problems. Furthermore, the utilization of fossil fuels is resulting in resource depletion. A developing country such as Pakistan is currently facing the same situation and thus requires a solution to this problem. To do so, a proper sustainable mode of transportation is deemed necessary, and for this purpose, this research evaluated five different alternatives based on nine distinct criteria. Such a complex decision-making scenario was addressed via a multi-criteria decision-making technique, i.e., Fuzzy-VIKOR. The analysis concluded cycling as the most sustainable mode of transportation for Pakistan. The analysis evaluated cycling to be the most cost-effective and environmentally sustainable alternative for Pakistan’s transport sector, especially for shorter distances. The findings of the study suggest that policymakers must work on implementing cycling dedicated lanes across the country and create awareness by setting examples. The contribution of the study focuses on recommending the government of Pakistan to solve its ever-growing environmental issues by implementing taxes on lavish and non-environment-friendly vehicles. Based on such steps, Pakistan can solve its current issue of smog in different parts of the country and also contribute to better health, and social and economic conditions for its citizens. Furthermore, the implementation of a novel technique proves to be another contribution of the study in the case of such an application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Source: author's construction)

Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abbas MH, Sumarsono H, Rahmawati F, Dwiputri IN (2021) Towards the green economy: calculating the degradation of transportation sector in Batu Cit. Safety 13:15–16

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adeel M, Yeh AG-O, Zhang F (2016) Transportation disadvantage and activity participation in the cities of Rawalpindi and Islamabad, Pakistan. Transp Policy 47:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Agency EE (2018) Recent trends and projections. https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/recent-trends-and-projections-in. Retrieved 27 Jan 2018

  4. Alazawi Z, Altowaijri S, Mehmood R, Abdljabar MB (2011) Intelligent disaster management system based on cloud-enabled vehicular networks. In: St. Petersburg, Russia: 11th international conference on ITS telecommunications

  5. Ali L, Mi J, Shah M, Shah SJ, Khan S, Ullah R, Bibi K (2018) Local residents’ attitude towards road and transport infrastructure (a case of China Pakistan economic corridor). J Chin Econ Foreign Trade Stud 104–120

  6. Ali Y, Razi M, Felice FD, Sabir M, Petrillo A (2019) A VIKOR based approach for assessing the social, environmental and economic effects of “smog” on human health. Sci Total Environ 650:2897–2905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ali Y, Shah ZA, Khan AU (2018) Post-terrorism image recovery of tourist destination: a qualitative approach using fuzzy-VIKOR. J Tour Anal Revista de Análisis Turístico 25(2):129–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Alsalem MA, Zaidan AA, Zaidan BB, Hashim M, Albahri OS, Albahri AS, Mohammed KI (2018) Systematic review of an automated multiclass detection and classification system for acute leukaemia in terms of evaluation and benchmarking, open challenges, issues and methodological aspects. J Med Syst 42:1–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ashmore DP, Pojani D, Thoreau R, Christie N, Tyler NA (2018) The symbolism of ‘eco cars’ across national cultures: potential implications for policy formulation and transfer. Transp Res Part D Transp Enviro 63:560–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Association EA (2018) Vehicles in use—Europe. Brussels: European Automobile Manufacturers Association (ACEA)

  11. Black JA, Paez A, Suthanaya PA (2002) Sustainable urban transportation: performance indicators and some analytical approaches. J Urb Plan Dev 128(4):184–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bridgelall R, Stubbing E (2021) Forecasting the effects of autonomous vehicles on land use. Technol Forecast Soc Change 163:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. California Department of Transportation (2021). Retrieved from transportation benefit-cost analysis. http://bca.transportationeconomics.org/benefits/economic-effects. Accessed 15 July 2019

  14. Chang GL, Mahmassani HS (1988) Travel time prediction and departure time adjustment behavior dynamics in a congested traffic system. Transp Res Part B Methodol 22(3):217–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen S-M (1994) Fuzzy system reliability analysis using fuzzy number arithmetic operations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 64(1):31–38

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Crainic TG, Ricciardi N, Storchi G (2009) Models for evaluating and planning city logistics systems. Transp Sci 43(4):432–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ezghari S, Zahi A, Zenkouar K (2017) A new nearest neighbor classification method based on fuzzy set theory and aggregation operators. Expert Syst Appl 80:58–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fu M, Rothfeld R, Antoniou C (2019) Exploring preferences for transportation modes in an urban air mobility environment: Munich case study. Transp Res Rec. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198119843858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gärling T, Schuitema G (2007) Travel demand management targeting reduced private car use: effectiveness, public acceptability and political feasibility. J Soc Issues 63(1):139–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Giuliano G, Dargay J (2006) Car ownership, travel and land use: a comparison. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 40(2):106–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Goldman T, Gorham R (2006) Sustainable urban transport: four innovative directions. Technol Soc 28(1):261–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Greene DL, Wegener M (1997) Sustainable transport. J Transp Geogr 5(3):177–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gupta H (2018) Evaluating service quality of airline industry using hybrid best worst method and VIKOR. J Air Transp Manag 68:35–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Haghshenas H, Vaziri M (2012) Urban sustainable transportation indicators for global comparison. Ecol Ind 15(1):115–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hietanen S (2014) Mobility as a service. Helsinki: Forum Virium

  26. Hyder A, Ghaffar A, Sugerman D, Masood T, Ali L (2016) Health and road transport in Pakistan. Public Health 120(2):132–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ignacy K (2006) Soft computing for complex multiple criteria decision making, 85th edn. Springer, Warszawa

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Ilyas SZ (2007) A review of transport and urban air pollution in Pakistan. J Appl Sci Environ Manag 11(2):113–121

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Imran M (2009) Public transport in Pakistan: a critical overview. J Public Transp 12(2):52–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ingram M, Leih R, Adkins A, Sonmez E, Yetman E (2020) Health disparities, transportation equity and complete streets: a case study of a policy development process through the lens of critical race theory. J Urb Health 97(6):876–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Javed U (2017) Dawn, Pakistan’s ‘middle-class’ future. https://www.dawn.com/news/1371675. Retrieved 8 Nov 2018

  32. Jensen M (1999) Passion and heart in transport—a sociological analysis on transport behaviour. Transp Policy 6(1):19–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kabir G (2015) Selection of hazardous industrial waste transportation firm using extended VIKOR method under fuzzy environment. Int J Data Anal Tech Strateg 7(1):40–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kang H-Y, Lee AH, Yeh Y-F (2020) An optimization approach for traveling purchaser problem with environmental impact of transportation cost. Kybernetes 2289–2317

  35. Karballaeezadeh N, Zaremotekhases F, Shamshirband S, Mosavi A, Nabipour N (2020) Intelligent road inspection with advanced machine learning; hybrid prediction models for smart mobility and transportation maintenance systems. Energies 13(7):1718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Khan AU, Ali Y (2020) Analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and analytic network process methods and their applications: a twenty year review from 2000–2019. Int J Anal Hierar Process 369–459

  37. Khan FM, Jawaid M, Chotani H, Luby S (1999) Pedestrian environment and behavior in Karachi, Pakistan. Accid Anal Prev 31(1):335–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Laden F, Neas LM, Dockery DW, Schwartz J (2000) Association of fine particulate matter from different sources with daily mortality in six U.S. cities. Environ Health Perspect 108(10):941–947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Laer TV, Ruyter KD, Visconti LM, Wetzels M (2013) The extended transportation-imagery model: a meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequences of consumers’ narrative transportation. J Consum Res 40(5):797–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Loyola M, Shiftan Y, Aviram H, Monterde-i-Bort H (2019) Impact of public transport context situation and culture on mode choice. Soc Sci 1–12

  41. Mardani A, Kazimieras EZ, Govindan K, Senin AA, Jusoh A (2016) VIKOR technique: a systematic review of the state of the art literature on methodologies and applications. Sustainability 8(1):37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Marks LA, Dunn EG, Keller JM, Godsey LD (1995) Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) using fuzzy logic: an innovative approach to sustainable agriculture. In: Proceedings of 3rd international symposium on uncertainty modeling and analysis and annual conference of the North American fuzzy information processing society. Maryland: IEEE, pp 503–508

  43. Marshall WE, Norman GW (2011) Evidence on why bike-friendly cities are safer for all road users. Environ Pract 13(1):16–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Mohmand YT, Wang A, Saeed A (2017) The impact of transportation infrastructure on economic growth: empirical evidence from Pakistan. Transp Lett 9(2):63–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Nadeem O, Hameed R (2008) Evaluation of environmental impact assessment system in Pakistan. Environ Impact Assess Rev 28(8):562–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Opricovic S (1998) Multicriteria optimization of civil engineering systems. Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade, pp 5–21

  47. Opricovic S (2011) Fuzzy VIKOR with an application to water resources planning. Expert Syst Appl 38(10):12983–12990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (2015) Compendium on environment statistics of Pakistan. Islamabad: Government of Pakistan

  49. Panjwani N (2018) Mainstreaming gender in Karāchī’s public transport policy. Eur J Sustain Dev 7(1):355–364

    Google Scholar 

  50. Qureshi IA, Huapu L (2007) Urban transport and sustainable transport strategies: a case study of Karachi, Pakistan. Tsinghua Sci Technol 12(3):309–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Raza W, Saeed S, Saulat H, Gul H, Sarfaraz M, Sonne C, Kim K-H (2021) A review on the deteriorating situation of smog and its preventive measures in Pakistan. J Clean Prod (in press)

  52. Rodrigue J-P (2020) The geography of transport systems. Routledge, New York. Retrieved from the geography of transport systems. https://transportgeography.org/contents/chapter3/transportation-and-society/. Accessed 21 Aug 2019

  53. Sanayei A, Mousavi SF, Yazdankah A (2010) Group decision making process for supplier selection with VIKOR under fuzzy environment. Expert Syst Appl 37(1):24–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Shemshadi A, Shirazi H, Toreihi M, Tarokh MJ (2011) A fuzzy VIKOR method for supplier selection based on entropy measure for objective weighting. Expert Syst Appl 38(10):12160–12167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Shemshadi A, Shirazi H, Toreihi M, Tarokh MJ (2011) A fuzzy VIKOR method for supplier selection based on entropy measure for objective weighting. Expert Syst Appl 38(10):12160–12167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Simoes A (2016) Observatory of economic complexity. https://atlas.media.mit.edu/en/visualize/tree_map/hs92/import/pak/all/show/2016/. Retrieved 10 Jan 2019

  57. Soner O, Celik E, Akyuz E (2017) Application of AHP and VIKOR methods under interval type 2 fuzzy environment in maritime transportation. Ocean Eng 129:107–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Srivastava GN (2019) Understanding perception of commuters for safety and risk mitigation mechanism: the case of public transportation. Int J Appl Manag Sci 11(4):370–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Stevenson M, Thompson J, Hérick de Sá T, Ewing R, Mohan D, McClure R, Woodcock J (2016) Land use, transport, and population health: estimating the health benefi ts of compact cities. Lancet 388(10062):2925–2935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Sun L, Zhang Y, Hu X (2021) Economical-traveling-distance-based fleet composition with fuel costs: an application in petrol distribution. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev 1–28

  61. Tadic S, Zecevic S, Kristic M (2014) A novel hybrid MCDM model based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy-VIKOR for city logistics concept selection. Expert Syst Appl 41(18):8112–8128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Tareen WU, Anjum Z, Yasin N, Siddiqui L, Farhat I, Malik SA, Mekhilef S (2018) The prospective non-conventional alternate and renewable energy sources in Pakistan—a focus on biomass energy for power generation, transportation, and industrial fuel. Energies 11(9):2431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. U.S Energy Information Administration (2016) International Energy Outlook 2016. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Energy

  64. United States Environmental Protection Agency (2011) Greenhouse gas emissions from a typical passenger vehicle. https://www.epa.gov/greenvehicles/greenhouse-gas-emissions-typical-passenger-vehicle. Retrieved 8 Nov 2018

  65. Varlier NN, Özçevik Ö (2015) Social impacts and public participation in transportation projects: a review of the Third Bridge Project in Istanbul. WIT Trans Ecol Environ 193:699–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Wang H, Fang Y-P, Zio E (2021) Risk assessment of an electrical power system considering the influence of traffic congestion on a hypothetical scenario of electrified transportation system in New York state. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 22(1):142–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Xie X, Jiang Y (2017) Absorption heat exchangers for long-distance heat transportation. Energy 141:2242–2250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  69. Zadeh LA (1988) Fuzzy logic. Computer 21(4):83–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Zavadskas EK, Zenonas T, Simona K (2014) State of art surveys of overviews on MCDM/MADM methods. Technol Econ Dev Econ 20(1):165–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Zietsman J, Rilett LR (2001) Sustainable transportation: fad or fabulous. Southern African transport conference. University of Pretoria, Pretoria, pp 1–12

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Management Sciences, Ghulam Ishaq Khan Institute of Engineering Sciences and Technology, Topi, Swabi, KPK, Pakistan

    Yousaf Ali & Hameem Bin Hameed

  2. Department of Economics and Law, University of Macerata, Macerata, Italy

    Amin Ullah Khan

Authors
  1. Yousaf Ali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amin Ullah Khan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hameem Bin Hameed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yousaf Ali.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 14.

Table 9 BNPk values/crisp values for criteria
Full size table
Table 10 BNPk values/crisp values for private car alternative
Full size table
Table 11 BNPk values/crisp values for Uber/Careem alternative
Full size table
Table 12 BNPk values/crisp values for motorcycle alternative
Full size table
Table 13 BNPk values/crisp values for walking alternative
Full size table
Table 14 BNPk values/crisp values for criteria
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ali, Y., Khan, A.U. & Hameed, H.B. Selection of Sustainable Mode of Transportation Based on Environmental, Economic, and Social Factors: Pakistan a Case in Point. Transp. in Dev. Econ. 8, 18 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40890-022-00152-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40890-022-00152-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation