ALLEA. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for research integrity. Berlin. Retrieved from: https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/ Accessed 1 October 2021.
Alghamdi, A. H., & Li, L. (2013). Adapting design-based research as a research methodology in educational settings. International Journal of Education and Research, 1(10), 1–12.
Anderson, M. S., Shaw, M. A., Steneck, N. H., Konkle, E., & Kamata, T. (2013). Research integrity and misconduct in the academic profession. In Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 217–261).
Avci, E. (2017). Learning from experiences to determine quality in ethics education. International Journal of Ethics Education, 2, 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40889-016-0027-6
Bakker, A. (2018). Design research in education: A practical guide for early career researchers. London: Routledge.
Beever, J., Kuebler, S. M., & Collins, J. (2021). Where ethics is taught: An institutional epidemiology. International Journal of Ethics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40889-021-00121-7
Gallant, B., & Tricia. (Eds.). (2011). Creating the ethical academy: A systems approach to understanding misconduct and empowering change. London: Routledge.
Biggs, J. (1999). What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 18(1), 57–75.
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university ((3rd edn) ed.). SRHE and Open University Press.
Bjelobaba, S. (2020). Academic integrity teacher training: preventive pedagogical practices on the course level. In Plagiarism across Europe and beyond (Vol. 2020, pp. 9–18).
Cavanagh, M. (2011). Students’ experiences of active engagement through cooperative learning activities in lectures. Active Learning in Higher Education, 12(1), 23–33.
Chi, M. T. H., Siler, S. A., Jeong, H., Yamauchi, T., & Hausmann, R. G. (2001). Learning from human tutoring. Cognitive Science, 25(4), 471–533.
Clarkeburn, H. (2002). The aims and practice of ethics education in an undergraduate curriculum: Reasons for choosing a skills approach. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 26(4), 307–315.
Clarkeburn, H. M., Roger Downie, J., Gray, C., & Matthew, R. G. S. (2003). Measuring ethical development in life sciences students: A study using Perry's developmental model. Studies in Higher Education, 28(4), 443–456.
Dahm, M. J. (2015). Dilemma-based approach to teaching ethics: Life lessons for family and consumer sciences college seniors. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences Education, 32(1).
Finnish Advisory Board on Research Ethics. (2019). The ethical principles of research with human participants and ethical review in the human sciences in Finland. Helsinki. Retrieved from: https://www.tenk.fi/sites/tenk.fi/files/Ihmistieteiden_eettisen_ennakkoarvioinnin_ohje_2019.pdf. Accessed 1 October 2021.
Fisher, C. B., & Kuther, T. L. (1997). Integrating research ethics into the introductory psychology course curriculum. Teaching of Psychology, 24(3), 172–175.
Furberg, A. (2016). Teacher support in computer-supported lab work: Bridging the gap between lab experiments and students’ conceptual understanding. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11(1), 89–113.
Goldin, I. M., Ashley, K. D., & Pinkus, R. L. (2001). Introducing PETE: Computer support for teaching ethics. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Artificial intelligence and law (pp. 94–98).
Greenwood, M., Kendrick, T., Davies, H., & Gill, F. J. (2017). Hearing voices: Comparing two methods for analysis of focus group data. Applied Nursing Research, 35, 90–93.
Hakkarainen, K. (2009). A knowledge-practice perspective on technology-mediated learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(2), 213–231.
Hattie, J. A. C., & Brown, G. T. L. (2004). Cognitive processes in asTTle: The SOLO taxonomy. asTTle Technical Report #43. University of Auckland/Ministry of Education.
Hea Teadustava. (2017). Estonian code of conduct for research integrity. Tartu. Retrieved from: https://www.eetika.ee/sites/default/files/www_ut/hea_teadustava_eng_trukis.pdf. Accessed 1 October 2021.
Hook, P. (2012). Teaching and learning: Tales from the ampersand. Dordrecht: Springer.
Hyytinen, H., & Löfström, E. (2017). Reactively, proactively, implicitly, explicitly? Academics’ teaching conceptions of research ethics and integrity. Journal of Academic Ethics, 15(1), 23–41.
Jordan, S. R. (2013). Conceptual clarification and the task of improving research on academic ethics. Journal of Academic Ethics, 11(3), 243–256.
Jordan, J., Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Finkelstein, S. (2013). Someone to look up to: Executive–follower ethical reasoning and perceptions of ethical leadership. Journal of Management, 39(3), 660–683.
Juuti, K., & Lavonen, J. (2006). Design-based research in science education: One step towards methodology. Nordic Studies in Science Education, 2(2), 54–68.
Kim, S., Phillips, W. R., Pinsky, L., Brock, D., Phillips, K., & Keary, J. (2006). A conceptual framework for developing teaching cases: A review and synthesis of the literature across disciplines. Medical education, 40(9), 867–876.
Lu, J., Lajoie, S. P., & Wiseman, J. (2010). Scaffolding problem-based learning with CSCL tools. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(3), 283–298.
Löfström, E. (2012). Students' ethical awareness and conceptions of research ethics. Ethics & Behavior, 22(5), 349–361.
Löfström, E., Kyllönen S., Hannele, P., Cekanauskaite, A., Lukaseviciene, V., & Gefenas, E. (2019). Expert strategies on research integrity problem-solving 6th World Conference for Research Integrity (WCRI), Hong Kong, June 2-5, 2019. (Poster presentation).
Löfström, E., & Pyhältö, K. (2017). Ethics in the supervisory relationship: supervisors' and doctoral students' dilemmas in the natural and behavioural sciences. Studies in Higher Education, 42(2), 232–247.
Löfström, E., Trotman, T., Furnari, M., & Shephard, K. (2015). Who teaches academic integrity and how do they teach it? Higher Education, 69(3), 435–448.
Macfarlane, B., Zhang, J., & Pun, A. (2014). Academic integrity: a review of the literature. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 339–358.
Mustajoki, H., & Mustajoki, A. (2017). A new approach to research ethics: Using guided dialogue to strengthen research communities. London: Routledge.
Puntambekar, S., & Hubscher, R. (2005). Tools for scaffolding students in a complex learning environment: What have we gained and what have we missed? Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 1–12.
Quintana, C., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Krajcik, J., Fretz, E., Duncan, R. G., Kyza, E., Edelson, D., & Soloway, E. (2004). Scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 337–386.
Reiser, B. J. (2004). Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13.
Reinmann, G. (2020). Ein holistischer design-based research-Modellentwurf für die Hochschuldidaktik. EDeR. Educational Design Research, 4(2).
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1987). Knowledge telling and knowledge transforming in written composition. Advances in Applied Psycholinguistics, 2, 142–175.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97–118). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shephard, K., Trotman, T., Furnari, M., & Löfström, E. (2015). Teaching research integrity in higher education: Policy and strategy. Journal of Higher Education Policy Management, 37(6), 615–632.
Smith, K. A., Sheppard, S. D., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2005). Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom‐based practices. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 87–101.
Stahl, G. (2002). Contributions to a theoretical framework for CSCL. Proceedings of CSCL 2002. Retrieved from: https://repository.isls.org/bitstream/1/3878/1/62-71.pdf. Accessed 1 October 2021.
Tambaum, T. (2016). Teenage internet tutors’ use of scaffolding with older learners. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 23(1), 97–118.
Tammeleht, A., Rodríguez-Triana, M. J., Koort, K., & Löfström, E. (2019). Collaborative case-based learning process in research ethics. International Journal of Educational Integrity, 15(1), 6.
Tammeleht, A., Rodríguez-Triana, M. J., Koort, K., & Löfström, E. (2020). Scaffolding collaborative case-based learning in research ethics. Journal of Academic Ethics, 19, 229–252.
ten Have, H. (2021). Ethics teaching as an infectious activity. International Journal of Ethics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40889-021-00131-5
Vehviläinen, S., & Löfström, E. (2016). ‘I wish I had a crystal ball’: Discourses and potentials for developing academic supervising. Studies in Higher Education, 41(3), 508–524.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1980). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wang, F., & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5–23.
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100.
Zucchero, R. A. (2008). Can psychology ethics effectively be integrated into introductory psychology? Journal of Academic Ethics, 6(3), 245–257.