Abstract
Measuring the social preferences of economic agents using experiments has become common place. This process, while incentive compatible, is costly and time consuming, making it infeasible in many settings. We combine standard altruism and warm glow choice experiments with a battery of candidate survey questions to construct behaviorally validated questionnaires. We use machine learning to create parsimonious 3-question modules that reliably replicate existing results on general altruism and provide an alternative method for collecting warm glow preferences.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
It is also reassuring to see that question WG21 which has been used in Carpenter (2021) also performs relatively well here.
References
Abrahams, B., & Schmitz, M. (1984). The crowding out effect of government transfers on private charitable contributions: Cross sectional evidence. National Tax Journal, 37, 536–38.
Andreoni, J. (2015). Warm glow and donor-advised funds: Insights from behavioral economics.
Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. The Economic Journal, 100(401), 464–477.
Bekkers, R. (2007). Measuring altruistic behavior in surveys: The all-or-nothing dictator game. In Survey research methods (Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 139–144).
Camerer, C. F., & Hogarth, R. M. (1999). The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor-production framework. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19, 7–42.
Carpenter, J. (2021). The shape of warm glow: Field experimental evidence from a fundraiser. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 191, 555–574.
Carpenter, J., Connolly, C., & Myers, C. K. (2008). Altruistic behavior in a representative dictator experiment. Experimental Economics, 11(3), 282–298.
Clotfelter, C. T. (1985). Federal tax policy and charitable giving. University of Chicago Press.
Crumpler, H., & Grossman, P. J. (2008). An experimental test of warm glow giving. Journal of Public Economics, 92(5–6), 1011–1021.
D’Ambrosio, A., & Tutore, V. A. (2011). Conditional classification trees by weighting the Gini impurity measure. In New perspectives in statistical modeling and data analysis (pp. 273–280). Springer.
Dzeroski, S., & Zenko, B. (2004). Is combining classifiers better than selecting the best one. Machine Learning, 2004, 255–273.
Eckel, C. C., & Grossman, P. J. (1996). Altruism in anonymous dictator games. Games and Economic Behavior, 16(2), 181–191.
Falk, A., Becker, A., Dohmen, T. J., Huffman, D., & Sunde, U. (2016). The preference survey module: A validated instrument for measuring risk, time, and social preferences.
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. H. (2001). The elements of statistical learning: Data mining, inference, and prediction. Springer.
Koschate-Fischer, N., Stefan, I. V., & Hoyer, W. D. (2012). Willingness to pay for cause-related marketing: The impact of donation amount and moderating effects. Journal of Marketing Research, 49(6), 910–927.
Lilley, A., & Slonim, R. (2014). The price of warm glow. Journal of Public Economics, 114, 58–74.
Luccasen, A., & Grossman, P. J. (2017). Warm-glow giving: Earned money and the option to take. Economic Inquiry, 55(2), 996–1006.
McHugh, M. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276–282. https://doi.org/10.11613/bm.2012.031
Nunes, P. A., & Schokkaert, E. (2003). Identifying the warm glow effect in contingent valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45(2), 231–245.
Payne, A. A. (1998). Does the government crowd-out private donations? New evidence from a sample of non-profit firms. Journal of Public Economics, 69(3), 323–345.
Ribar, D. C., & Wilhelm, M. O. (2002). Altruistic and joy-of-giving motivations in charitable behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 110(2), 425–457.
Rushton, J. P., Chrisjohn, R. D., & Fekken, G. C. (1981). The altruistic personality and the self-report altruism scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 2(4), 293–302.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Carpenter, J., Lyford, A. & Zhang, M. A behaviorally validated warm glow questionnaire. J Econ Sci Assoc (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40881-024-00161-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40881-024-00161-x