Skip to main content
Log in

Aerial spread of smut spores during peanut harvest

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Tropical Plant Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Peanut smut (Thecaphora frezzii) is one of the most important peanut diseases in Argentinian peanut production. This monocyclic soil-borne pathogen transforms kernels into spore masses. Spore liberation from broken infected pods during the harvest process is supposed to be the main mechanism of inoculum spread, with the subsequent spread among fields increasing the soil inoculum for future peanut cropping seasons. However, we are unaware of any published study on the role of wind (in terms of speed and direction) in how far smut spores spread. Therefore, we conducted an observational study where passive spore traps were distributed at harvest around six fields placed at 100, 200, 300, and 400 m away from each field’s centroid in four cardinal directions. Three time slices were sampled: from the beginning of harvest to 90-, 180-, and 270-minutes continuously during harvest. Wind speed and direction were recorded at each trap. A generalized additive model was fitted to describe the spore spread. Modeling the dispersal shows that the spread is influenced by wind speed and the smut severely damaged pods incidence present at the harvested field. Additionally, spore size and proportion of different smut spore types were assessed (from a single unit spore to a 5-multinuclear propagule). No statistical differences were observed in the proportion of the spore types trapped. However, fewer spores were trapped at distances farther from the harvested area. This work led us to understand a fundamental component of the peanut smut cycle and epidemiology, which is to design management strategies. For example, avoiding harvest on windy days (typically >10 km h-1) to prevent the distant spread of inoculum for subsequent seasons or predicting the risk surrounding an infected field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

A research compendium containing the raw data and R scripts used in the analysis of this paper is available at https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/TK978.

References

  • Agüero D (2017) Mercado internacional y nacional del maní. In: Fernandez E, Giayetto O (Eds.) El cultivo de maní en Córdoba Departamen. pp. 411–433.

  • Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 19(6):716–723

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Arias SL, Mary VS, Velez PA, Rodriguez MG, Otaiza-González SN, Theumer MG (2021) Where does the peanut smut pathogen, Thecaphora frezzii, fit in the spectrum of smut diseases? Plant Disease 105(9):2268–2280

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Asinari F, Paredes JA, Monguillot JH, Rago AM (2019) Últimos años de registros del carbón del maní, ¿hacia donde vamos? In XXXIV Jornada Nacional del Maní. General Cabrera, Córdoba, Argentina

  • Astiz Gasso M, Leis R, Marinelli A (2008) Evaluación de incidencia y severidad del carbón de maní (Thecaphora frezzii) en infecciones artificiales, sobre cultivares comerciales de maní. In 1 Congreso Argentino de Fitopatología. p (Vol. 161).

  • Aylor D (2017) CHAPTER 2: Patterns of Disease Spread. In: Aerial Dispersal of Pollen and Spores pp. 15–27

  • Aylor DE (1990) The role of intermittent wind in the dispersal of fungal pathogens. Annu Rev Phytopathol 28(1):73–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergamin Filho A (1996) Doenças de plantas tropicais: epidemiologia e controle econômico. Agronômica Ceres

  • CAM (2023) Cámara Argentina del maní. Clúster manisero. https://camaradelmani.org.ar/cluster-manisero. Accessed 16 Jan 2023

  • Cazón LI, Paredes JA, Rago AM (2018) The biology of Thecaphora frezzii smut and its effects on argentine Peanut production. Advances in Plant Pathology. London: IntechOpen Ltd 31-46

  • Dunn PK (2004) Occurrence and quantity of precipitation can be modelled simultaneously. Int J Climatol: A J Royal Meteorol Soc 24(10):1231–1239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El Jarroudi M, Karjoun H, Kouadio L, El Jarroudi M (2020) Mathematical modelling of non-local spore dispersion of wind-borne pathogens causing fungal diseases. Appl Math Computation 376:125107

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fiers M, Edel-Hermann V, Chatot C, Le Hingrat Y, Alabouvette C, Steinberg C (2012) Potato soil-borne diseases. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 32(1):93–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gideon S (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat 6(2):461–464

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Grewling Ł, Bogawski P, Szymańska A, Nowak M, Kostecki Ł, Smith M (2020) Particle size distribution of the major Alternaria alternata allergen, Alt a 1, derived from airborne spores and subspore fragments. Fungal Biology 124(3–4):219–227

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Habel K, Grasman R, Gramacy RB, Mozharovskyi P, Sterratt DC (2023) Geometry: mesh generation and surface tessellation. R package version 0.4.7. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=geometry. Accessed 6 Mar 2024

  • Hartig F (2022) DHARMa: residual diagnostics for hierarchical (Multi-Level / Mixed) regression models. R package version 0.4.6. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=DHARMa. Accessed 6 Mar 2024

  • Hasan MM, Dunn PK (2010) A simple Poisson–gamma model for modelling rainfall occurrence and amount simultaneously. Agric For Meteorol 150(10):1319–1330

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Hastie TJ, Tibshirani RJ (1990) Generalized additive models. Chapman & Hall/CRC, New York/Boca Raton

  • Hau B, de Vallavieille-Pope C (2006) Wind-dispersed diseases. In The Epidemiology of Plant Diseases pp.387–416

  • Jordan DL, Buol GS, Brandenburg RL, Reisig D, Nboyine J, Abudulai M, ... Rhoads J (2022) Examples of Risk Tools for Pests in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) Developed for Five Countries Using Microsoft Excel. J Integr Pest Manag 13(1), 20.

  • Katan J (2017) Diseases caused by soilborne pathogens: biology, management and challenges. Plant Pathol J 305–315.

  • Khaliq I, Fanning J, Melloy P, Galloway J, Moore K, Burrell D, Sparks AH (2020) The role of conidia in the dispersal of Ascochyta rabiei. Eur J Plant Pathol 158(4):911–924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtemberg PSF, Moreira LM, Zeviani WM, Amorim L, De Mio LL (2022) Dispersal gradient of M. fructicola conidia from peach orchard to an open field. Eur J Plant Pathol 162(1):231–236.

  • Mahaffee WF, Stoll R (2016) The ebb and flow of airborne pathogens: Monitoring and use in disease management decisions. Phytopathology 106:420–431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marinelli A, March GJ, Oddino C (2008) Aspectos biológicos y epidemiológicos del carbón del maní (Arachis hypogaea L.) causado por Thecaphora frezii Carranza & Lindquist. Agriscientia 25(1):1–6

  • McCartney A, West J (2007) Dispersal of fungal spores through the air. Mycology Series 25:65

    Google Scholar 

  • Munir M, Wang H, Dufault NS, Anco DJ (2020) Early detection of airborne inoculum of Nothopassalora personata in spore trap samples from peanut fields using quantitative PCR. Plants 9:1–15

  • Norros V, Rannik Ü, Hussein T, Petäjä T, Vesala T, Ovaskainen O (2014) Do small spores disperse further than large spores? Ecology 95(6):1612–1621

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paredes JA (2017) Importancia regional del carbón del maní (Thecaphora frezzii) y efecto de ingredientes activos de fungicidas sobre la intensidad de la enfermedad. MSc thesis, Río Cuarto, Universidad Nacional de Rio Cuarto

  • Paredes JA, Cazón LI, Bima M, Kearney MI, Nicolino JM, Rago AM (2017) Protocolo de toma de muestras y evaluación para un correcto relevamiento del carbón del maní. In XXXII Jornada Nacional de Maní. General Cabrera, Argentina

  • Paredes JA, Asinari F, Monguillot JH, Edwards Molina JP, Oddino C, Rago AM (2019) Incidencia del carbón del maní en función del inóculo de Thecaphora frezii en el suelo. In XXXIV Jornada Nacional de Maní. General Cabrera, Argentina

  • Paredes JA, Cazon LI, Oddino C, Monguillot JH, Rago AM, Molina JE (2021) Efficacy of fungicides against peanut smut in Argentina. Crop Protection 140:105403

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paredes JA, Edwards Molina JP, Cazón LI, Asinari F, Monguillot JH, Morichetti SA, Rago AM, Torres AM (2022a) Relationship between incidence and severity of peanut smut and its regional distribution in the main growing region of Argentina. Trop Plant Pathol 47:233–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paredes JA, Pérez IA, Monguillot JH, Asinari F, Rago AM, Torres A (2022b) Incremento de esporas de carbón durante un ciclo de cultivo de maní. In XXXVII Jornada Nacional de Maní. General Cabrera, Argentina

  • R Core Team (2023) R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available in https://www.R-project.org. Accessed 6 Mar 2024

  • Rago AM, Cazón LI, Paredes JA, Molina JPE, Conforto EC, Bisonard EM, Oddino C (2017) Peanut smut: from an emerging disease to an actual threat to Argentine peanut production. Plant Disease 101(3):400–408

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rekah Y, Shtienberg D, Katan J (1999) Spatial distribution and temporal development of Fusarium crown and root rot of tomato and pathogen dissemination in field soil. Phytopathology 89(9):831–839

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rieux A, Soubeyrand S, Bonnot F, Klein EK, Ngando JE, Mehl A et al (2014) Long-distance wind-dispersal of spores in a fungal plant pathogen: estimation of anisotropic dispersal kernels from an extensive field experiment. PLoS One 9(8):e103225

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers SL, Atkins SD, West JS (2009) Detection and quantification of airborne inoculum of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum using quantitative PCR. Plant Pathology 58(2):324–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nature methods 9(7):671–675

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Shukla A, Panchal H, Mishra M, Patel PR, Srivastava HS, Patel P, Shukla AK (2014) Soil moisture estimation using gravimetric technique and FDR probe technique: a comparative analysis. Am Int J Res Formal Appl Nat Sci 8:89–92

  • Sparks AH, Forbes GA, Hijmans R, Garrett KA (2011) A metamodeling framework for extending the application domain of process-based ecological models. Ecosphere 2(8):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villari C, Mahaffee WF, Mitchell TK, Pedley KF, Pieck ML, Hand FP (2017) Early detection of airborne inoculum of Magnaporthe oryzae in turfgrass fields using a quantitative LAMP assay. Plant Disease 101(1):170–177

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wickham H, Averick M, Bryan J, Chang W, McGowan LDA, François R, … , Yutani H (2019) Welcome to the Tidyverse. J Open Source Softw 4(43):1686.

  • Willocquet L, Berud F, Raoux L, Clerjeau M (1998) Effects of wind, relative humidity, leaf movement and colony age on dispersal of conidia of Uncinula necator, causal agent of grape powdery mildew. Plant Pathology 47(3):234–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood SN (2011) Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 73(1):3–36

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • WeatherSpark. Average Weather in Córdoba, Argentina. https://weatherspark.com/m/28147/5/Average-Weather-in-May-in-C%C3%B3rdoba-Argentina#Figures-WindDirection. Accessed on 16 Jan 2023

  • WPM (2021) World Peanut Magazine. ISSUE 01. https://camaradelmani.org.ar/wpmagazine-2/.  Accessed 16 Jan 2023

  • Yee TW, Mitchell ND (1991) Generalized additive models in plant ecology. J Veg Sci 2(5):587–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Fundación Maní Argentino and the National Institution of Agricultural Technology (INTA) (project [I090]) for the financial support in the experiments. J.A. Paredes holds a Ph.D. fellowship launched by the Argentinean National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET) and INTA, and the USQ Centre for Crop Health Advisory Group’s comments that helped improve the clarity of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Juan Andres Paredes: Conceptualization, data collection, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, and writing

Adam Sparks: Validation, formal analysis, visualization, and writing

Joaquin Humberto Monguillot: Data collection

Alejandro Mario Rago: Project administration and supervision of the project

Juan Pablo Edwards Molina: Validation, formal analysis, visualization, and writing

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan A. Paredes.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

All authors gave approval for submission of this manuscript. The manuscript has been prepared following principles of ethical and professional conduct. The research did not involve human participants or animals. Therefore, neither statements concerning informed consent nor welfare of animals is applicable. All authors have been personally and actively involved in substantive work leading to the manuscript and will be responsible for its content.

Consent for publication

Consent for publication was obtained from all co-authors.

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest. Author Adam Sparks is an associate editor for this journal and this manuscript was independently handled by another member of the editorial board. All authors gave approval for submission of this manuscript and declare that no conflicts of interest exist.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

40858_2024_645_MOESM1_ESM.png

Supplementary file1 Wind roses illustration for all the experimental locations (fields), showing wind speed and direction recorded at times slices 90 (0–90 min.), 180 (0–180 min.) and 270 (0–270 min.) from the time of harvest commencing at 0 minutes. The notation [] represents a ‘closed interval’ indicating an interval and is inclusive of both lower and upper values, whereas the notation (] represents ‘half open interval’ indicating an interval is exclusive of the lower value but inclusive of the upper value(PNG 497 KB)

40858_2024_645_MOESM2_ESM.png

Supplementary file2 Diagnostic plots of the generalized additive model’s fit to the data. The plots show no major issues with the fit of the model to the data in the residuals or fitted values and response(PNG 288 KB)

Supplementary file3 (XLSX 75 KB)

Supplementary file4 (XLSX 12 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Paredes, J.A., Sparks, A.H., Monguillot, J.H. et al. Aerial spread of smut spores during peanut harvest. Trop. plant pathol. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40858-024-00645-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40858-024-00645-5

Keywords

Navigation