Abstract
In Ecuador, tree tomato (Solanum betaceum) production is continuous throughout the year. Blight caused by Phythophthora andina is usually controlled with frequent fungicide applications containing the active ingredients metalaxyl, mefenoxam, or cymoxanil. The constant presence of inoculum year-round, the high number of sprays per season, and a pathogen population constituted by a single clonal lineage, exert a high selection pressure for development of resistance to these fungicides. The objective of this study was to measure the sensitivity of P. andina from tree tomato to the active ingredients metalaxyl, mefenoxam, and cymoxanil. For that, 69 isolates were collected from tree tomato in five provinces of Ecuador and evaluated in vitro with standard techniques to classify them as resistant, intermediate, or sensitive to metalaxyl and mefenoxam. Thirty-one of these isolates were evaluated in vitro for their sensitivity to cymoxanil by estimating EC50 by probit analysis. Most isolates were sensitive to metalaxyl (44.9%) and mefenoxam (56.5%), and 29% of the isolates had intermediate sensitivity to both fungicides. The percentage of resistant isolates was higher with metalaxyl (26.1%) than with mefenoxam (14.5%). Isolates showed a wide range of sensitivity to cymoxanil with EC50 values between 0.016 and 208.288 μg/mL. Restriction of mycelial growth occurred even with the lowest concentration dosage (0.1 μg/mL). Most isolates (55.6%) had intermediate sensitivity to cymoxanil, 40.7% were sensitive, and only one (3.7%) was resistant. The resistant isolate was collected in Napo and is the first report of resistance to cymoxanil in Ecuador. The Ecuadorian population of P. andina attacking tree tomato shows some level of resistance to three of the fungicides used to control the disease, and therefore the alternating use of active ingredients is advisable to reduce the increase of resistance in the pathogen population.
Data availability
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Isolate information is available on-line at BioWeb, https://bioweb.bio/portal.
References
Adler NE, Erselius LJ, Chacón MG, Flier WG, Ordoñez ME, Kroon LP, Forbes GA (2004) Genetic diversity of Phytophthora infestans sensu lato in Ecuador provides new insight into the origin of this important plant pathogen. Phytopathology 94(2):154–162
Aiello D, Hansen ZR, Smart CD, Polizzi G, Guarnaccia V (2018) Characterisation and mefenoxam sensitivity of Phytophthora spp. from ornamental plants in Italian nurseries. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 57:245–256
Burbano-David DM (2014) Determinación del tipo de apareamiento y evaluación del efecto de los ingredientes activos metalaxil y cimoxanil en poblaciones de Phytophthora infestans sensu lato aisladas de tomate de árbol (Solanum betaceum Cav.). Universidad de Nariño, San Juan de Pasto, Colombia. http://sired.udenar.edu.co/890/
Caten CE, Jinks JL (1968) Spontaneous variability of single isolates of Phytophthora infestans. I Cultural Variation. Canadian Journal of Botany 46:329–348
Céspedes MC, Cárdenas ME, Vargas AM, Rojas A, Morales JG, Jiménez P, Bernal AJ, Restrepo S (2013) Physiological and molecular characterization of Phytophthora infestans isolates from the Central Colombian Andean Region. Revista Iberoamericana de Micología 30:81–87
Danies G, Small IM, Myers K, Childers R, Fry WE (2013) Phenotypic characterization of recent clonal lineages of Phytophthora infestans in the United States. Plant Disease 97:873–881
Davidse LC, Looijen D, Turkensteen LJ, Van der Wal D (1981) Occurrence of metalaxyl-resistant strains of Phytophthora infestans in Dutch potato fields. Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology 87:65–68
de Miranda BEC, Dias Suassuna N, Reis A (2010) Mating type, mefenoxam sensitivity, and pathotype diversity in Phytophthora infestans isolates from tomato in Brazil. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 45:671–679
Dunn AR, Milgroom MG, Meitz JC, McLeod A, Fry WE, McGrath MT, Dillard HR, Smart CD (2010) Population structure and resistance to mefenoxam of Phytophthora capsici in New York State. Plant Disease 94:1461–1468
Escudero Ramírez M, Marín Montoya M, Jaramillo Villegas S, Cotes Torres JM (2009) Metodología de evaluación de la sensibilidad a fungicidas QoI – fenamidone: caso de estudio Phytophthora infestans (Mont.) de Bary. Revista Facultá Nacional de Agronomia Medellín 62:4773–4782
Finney DJ (1971) Probit analysis, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, London
Forbes GA, Escobar XC, Ayala CC, Revelo J, Ordoñez ME, Fry BA, Doucett K, Fry WE (1997) Population genetic structure of Phytophthora infestans in Ecuador. Phytopathology 87:375–380
Forbes GA, Gamboa S, Lindqvist-Kreuze H, Oliva RF, Pérez W (2016) Identification of an A2 population of Phythophthora andina attacking tree tomato in Peru indicates a risk of sexual reproduction in this pathosystem. Plant Pathology 65:1109–1117
Fry WE, Grünwald NJ, Cooke DEL, McLeod A, Forbes GA, Cao K (2009) Population genetics and population diversity of Phytophthora infestans. In: Lamour K, Kamoun S, (Eds.) Oomycete genetics and genomics: biology, interactions with plants and animals, and toolbox. Wiley, New York
Gómez-Alpizar L, Hu C, Oliva R, Forbes G, Ristaino JB (2008) Phylogenetic relationships of Phytophthora andina, a new species from the highlands of Ecuador that is closely related to the Irish potato famine pathogen Phytophthora infestans. Mycologia 100(4):590–602
González-Tobón J, Childers R, Olave C, Regnier M, Rodríguez-Jaramillo A, Fry W, Restrepo S, Danies G (2020) Is the phenomenon of mefenoxam-acquired resistance in Phytophthora infestans universal? Plant Disease 104:211–221
Grünwald NJ, Sturbaum AK, Romero Montes G, Garay Serrano E, Lozoya-Saldaña H, Fry WE (2006) Selection for fungicide resistance within a growing season in field populations of Phytophthora infestans at the center of origin. Phytopathology 96(12):1397–1403
Hwang J, Benson DM (2005) Identification, mefenoxam sensitivity, and compatibility type of Phytophthora spp. attacking floriculture crops in North Carolina. Plant Disease 89:185–190
Kroon L, Bakker F, Van den Bosch G, Bonants P, Flier W (2004) Phylogenetic analysis of Phytophthora species based on mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences. Fungal Genetics and Biology 41:766–782
Mideros MF, Turissini DA, Guayazán N, Ibarra-Avila H, Danies G, Cárdenas M, Myers K, Tabima J, Goss EM, Bernal A, Lagos LE, Grajales A, Gonzalez LN, Cooke DEL, Fry WE, Grünwald N, Matute DR, Restrepo S (2018) Phytophthora betacei, a new species within Phytophthora clade 1c causing late blight on Solanum betaceum in Colombia. Persoonia 41:39–55
Oliva RF, Kroon LP, Chacón G, Flier WG, Ristaino JB, Forbes GA (2010) Phytophthora andina sp. nov., a newly identified heterothallic pathogen of solanaceous hosts in the Andean highlands. Plant Pathology 59(4):613–625
Parra G, Ristaino JB (2001) Resistance to mefenoxam and metalaxyl among field isolates of Phytophthora capsici causing Phytophthora blight of bell pepper. Plant Disease 85:1069–1075
Pérez W, Lara J, Forbes GA (2009) Resistance to metalaxyl-M and cymoxanil in a dominant clonal lineage of Phytophthora infestans in Huánuco, Peru, an area of continuous potato production. European Journal of Plant Pathology 125:87–95
Reis A, Ribeiro FHS, Maffia LA, Mizubuti ESG (2005) Sensitivity of Brazilian isolates of Phytophthora infestans to commonly used fungicides in tomato and potato crops. Plant Disease 89:1279–1284
Rekanović E, Potočnik I, Milijašević-Marčić S, Stepanović M, Todorović B, Mihajlović M (2012) Toxicity of metalaxyl, azoxystrobin, dimethomorph, cymoxanil, zoxamide and mancozeb to Phytophthora infestans isolates from Serbia. Journal of Environmental Science and Health B 47:403–409
Revelo E, Dorado G, Lagos LE, Burbano-Figueroa O (2011) Foliar virulence of isolates of Phytophthora infestans sensu lato on detached leaves of two Solanum betaceum cultivars. Tropical Plant Pathology 36(6):367–373
Revelo J, Pérez E, Maila MV (2004) Cultivo ecológico del tomate de árbol en Ecuador: Texto de consulta del estudiante. INIAP, Estación Experimental Santa Catalina/PROMSA/FONTAGRO, Quito, Ecuador
Sujkowski LS, Fry BA, Power RJ, Goodwin SB, Peever TL, Hamlen RA, Fry WE (1995) Sensitivities of Mexican isolates of Phytophthora infestans to chlorothalonil, cymoxanil, and metalaxyl. Plant Disease 79:1117–1120
Therrien CD, Tooley PW, Spielman LJ, Fry WE, Ritch DL, Shelly SE (1993) Nuclear DNA content, allozyme phenotypes and metalaxyl sensitivity of Phytophthora infestans from Japan. Mycological Research 97:945–950
Zhu G, Huang F, Feng L, Qin B, Yang Y, Chen Y, Lu X (2008) Sensitivities of Phytophthora infestans to metalaxyl, cymoxanil, and dimethomorph. Agricultural Sciences in China 7:831–840
Acknowledgements
We thank the International Potato Center (Quito) and Marcelo Vinueza for their assistance with Phytophthora andina isolates and Fabián Muñoz for assistance in the statistical analysis.
Funding
This study was supported by the Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador (Projects QINV0183 and QINV040).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Project conceptualization and supervision: MG Chacón and ME. Ordóñez. Pathogen collection and isolation: E Caicedo, MG Chacón. Designed the experiments: MG Chacón, E Caicedo. Performed the experiments: E Caicedo. Analyzed the data: MG Chacón, E Caicedo. Project administration: ME Ordóñez. Writing original draft: MG Chacón. All the authors commented on drafts of the manuscript and read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chacón, M.G., Caicedo, E. & Ordóñez, M.E. Sensitivity to metalaxyl, mefenoxam, and cymoxanil in Phytophthora andina isolates collected from tree tomato (Solanum betaceum) in Ecuador. Trop. plant pathol. 47, 786–794 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40858-022-00512-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40858-022-00512-1