Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Empirics of service taxation in India: a macroeconomic perspective

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Social and Economic Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper attempts to study service taxation in India from a macroeconomic perspective, focusing on broad questions such as the level and composition of service tax revenue during the time span of the “positive list approach” from 1994–1995 to 2011–2012. The income elasticity of service tax revenue collection is estimated for the Indian economy with the help of pooled ordinary least squares, utilising data from Directorate of Service Tax and National Account Statistics. The importance of service tax as a consumption-based tax is also analysed descriptively. The study found that “business services” and “real estate and ownership of dwellings” have emerged as the major service tax revenue earners in recent years. The income elasticity of service tax revenue collection is estimated to be 2.74. The study found that in spite of India’s low tax–GDP ratio and humble contribution of service tax to total tax revenue collection, a high and statistically significant income elasticity of service tax revenue collection implies that service tax collection has in fact grown at a pace much faster than services GDP, underlining the importance of service sector in the Government’s revenue mobilisation efforts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Source: Author’s calculation and compilation based on data from DST, Government of India

Fig. 2

Source: Author’s compilation based on data from DST and NAS, various years

Fig. 3

Source: Author’s calculation and compilation based on data from DST, Government of India

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. When service tax was first introduced in India on 1 July 1994, it was imposed at the rate of 5%. It was later on increased to 8% in May 2003 and to 10% in September 2004. The Union Budget of 2006–2007 increased it further to 12%. The Union Budget of 2009–2010 reduced it to 10%. “Negative List” approach to service taxation was introduced in the Union Budget of 2012–2013. This budget also reverted the service tax rate to 12%. The Union Budget of 2015–2016 hiked the service tax rate to 14%.

References

  • Bagchi A (2004) Taxing services: the way forward. Econ Political Wkly 39(19):1876–1879

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahl RW (1971) A regression approach to tax effort and tax ratio analysis. Staff Pap Int Monet Fund 18(3):570–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chelliah RJ (1971) Trends in taxation in developing countries. Staff Pap Int Monet Fund 18(2):254–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das A, Banga R, Kumar D (2011) Global economic crisis: impact and restructuring of the services sector in India. ADBI working paper 311, Asian Development Bank Institute, Tokyo

  • Government of India (2011) Faster, sustainable and more inclusive growth: an approach to the Twelfth Five Year Plan. Planning Commission, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India (2013a) Economic survey 2012–2013. Ministry of Finance, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India (2013b) Union budget 2013–2014. Ministry of Finance, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India (2013c) Twelfth Five Year Plan (2012–2017): faster, more inclusive and sustainable growth, vol I. Planning Commission, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta AS (2007) Determinants of tax revenue efforts in developing countries. IMF working paper 07/184, International Monetary Fund, Washington DC

  • Hansda SK (2001) Sustainability of services-led growth: an input–output analysis of Indian economy. Reserve Bank India Occas Pap 22(1–3):73–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotwal A, Ramaswami B, Wadhwa W (2011) Economic liberalization and Indian economic growth: What’s the evidence? J Econ Lit 49(4):1152–1199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A (2015) Macroeconomic aspects of goods and services tax. Econ Political Wkly 50(29):26–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Leuthold JH (1991) Tax shares in developing economies: a panel study. J Dev Econ 35(1):173–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2012) OECDStat—revenue statistics. http://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?DataSetCode=REV. Accessed 28 Nov 2013

  • Patel BS (2012) CBEC admits crores held up in frivolous litigation. The Indian Express, June 15

  • Rao MG (2001) Taxing services: issues and strategy. Econ Political Wkly 42:3999–4006

    Google Scholar 

  • Rath DP, Rajesh R (2006) Analytics and implications of service sector growth in Indian economy. J Income Wealth 28(1):1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarma JVM, Bhaskar V (2012) A road map for implementing the goods and services tax. Econ Political Wkly 47(31):68–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh N (2006) Services-led industrialisation in India: assessment and lessons. Santa Cruz Center for International Economics working paper 06-9, University of California, Santa Cruz

  • Tanzi V (1992) Structural factors and tax revenue in developing countries: a decade of evidence. In: Goldin I, Winters LA (eds) Open economies: structural adjustment and agriculture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 267–284

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tanzi V, Zee HH (2000) Tax policy for emerging markets: developing countries. Natl Tax J 53(2):299–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This paper is based on the author’s doctoral dissertation, under UGC-Junior Research Fellowship Scheme, at the Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bangalore. The author is very grateful to her PhD supervisor, Prof. M R Narayana, and anonymous referees of this journal for their valuable comments and suggestions on an earlier version of this paper. However, the usual disclaimers apply.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mini P. Thomas.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 5, 6 and Figs. 4, 5.

Table 5 Service GDP–tax classification.
Table 6 Service PFCE–tax classification.
Fig. 4
figure 4

Source: Author’s compilation based on data from National Account Statistics, CSO

Components of India’s private services GDP (1994–1995 to 2011–2012).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Source: Author’s compilation based on data from National Account Statistics, CSO

Share of sub-sectors in private services GDP (1994–1995 to 2011–2012).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thomas, M.P. Empirics of service taxation in India: a macroeconomic perspective. J. Soc. Econ. Dev. 19, 143–160 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40847-017-0036-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40847-017-0036-0

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation