Abstract
Purpose of Review
The objective of this study is to review the literature on the role of urban environmental structures and to develop proper strategies to strengthen their resilience so that the management performance of the Corona disease can be enhanced.
Recent Findings
Cities have been severely affected by the Coronavirus pandemic. Changes in the lifestyle of citizens during the pandemic have led urban planners to the realization that the current structure and function of cities do not meet the needs of citizens. Hence, the structure of urban landscape must be transformed so that cities become livable ecosystems for citizens and the urban environment becomes resilient to all kinds of crises. As a result, considering the new standards of life during the pandemic, the question of what changes to the urban planning and design are required to make cities viable and resilient systems arises. Since the year 2020, much research has been published on the impact of Coronavirus on the lifestyle of citizens and the urban environment. These impacts have positively or negatively affected the structure and function of cities in a direct or indirect manner. Similar to all the related studies, the necessity of making changes to the planning and design of urban landscapes has been emphasized here.
Summary
The present study reviews the literature on the effect of the structure of the urban environment on the corona pandemic management. The objective is to develop proper strategies for planning and designing resilient urban landscapes. It is emphasized that in order to realize the dream of resilient cities during and after the pandemic, the need to develop an interconnected network of green and open urban patches, green transportation system, green neighborhoods, and green residential buildings should be met so that urban resilience and livability can be achieved at a higher level.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The rise of Coronavirus pandemic in 2019 gave rise to an unprecedented set of restrictions on country and city scales and affected human life. It also disrupted the economic and health conditions in different societies [1••, 2].
Generally, during the outbreak of respiratory epidemics such as Corona, one of the most important measures to control the crisis is to close public space and enforce quarantine [3]. Measures like quarantine enforcement affect the environment and people’s lives.
In this regard, several studies have pointed out the positive and negative impacts of the Corona pandemic. For instance, one positive environmental effect of the pandemic is the reduction of urban air pollution [4], while the negative one is the increased level of household and health waste. In general, it can be claimed that the Corona pandemic has changed the environmental conditions and lifestyle of humans, especially in urban areas [5].
As the world’s densest population centers, cities have been thirsting for infectious disease-control measures. Thus, at the peak of the pandemic, cities and public spaces have turned into empty environments in image, and this, in turn, affects the lives of citizens from social, economic, and psychological angles. These changes and new living standards will lead to a new lifestyle in cities [6, 7].
From a professional point of view, it can be argued that based on the close relationship between the structure and function [8, 9] of socio-ecological systems [10] such as cities, a crisis like Corona will change the urban planning systems sooner or later. Of course, these changes can be considered an opportunity to turn cities into resilient environments.
Over the past decades, ideas and concepts such as healthy city [11], livable city [12, 13], and biophilic city [14, 15] have always been proposed to facilitate the road to sustainability in the future. The intellectual basis of these scientific concepts and approaches is to transform cities into socio-ecological ecosystems in which the health of the environment and citizens is a priority.
Urban resilience is one of the most widely used approaches that has been adopted from the 1970s to the present [16], especially during the Corona pandemic [17,18,19]. The main objective of all fields of research on urban resilience is to enhance the quality of the urban environment and the lives of citizens [20]. In general, resilience is defined by such terms as resistance, absorption, adaptation, and recovery of a system against a wide range of different threats such as terrorism, climate change, economic crisis, and epidemics like Corona [16]. In general, “resilience” involves planning to prepare societies against disasters [21], and it is basically a specific program that targets more successful absorption, resuscitation, and acceptance of maladaptive events. Increased resilience provides the basis for risk prediction and better planning to reduce losses. This approach can replace the expectation of hazards and overcome possible unpleasant consequences [22].
For the past 2 years, Corona has been recognized as a catastrophe that challenges urban resilience. Many studies have investigated the impact of the Corona pandemic on urban landscape structures and functions in this period [23,24,25,26,27,28,29], and they have all focused on the inefficiency of urban structures and infrastructure in meeting the needs of citizens. These studies emphasize the necessity of transforming traditional urban management and planning methods. In addition, researchers have stressed the need to reorganize future cities based on the needs of citizens to resist disasters like epidemics.
Therefore, the present study attempts to respond to the following question: ‘Which component of urban structures has been challenged the most in terms of efficiency (during Corona)?’ Furthermore, based on the experience gained from the quarantine period and its impacts on the urban form and infrastructure, effective strategies are proposed here to make plans on the resilient urban landscape structure during and after the corona pandemic.
Methods
The research method adopted here is a qualitative systematic review approach to developing strategies for planning on a resilient urban landscape structure establishment during and after Corona. In line with the purpose of this research, a comprehensive literature review was carried out to analyze various dimensions of this issue with emphasis on the following these key words and terms: (“Cities OR “Urban Environment” OR “Urban”) AND (“Urban Landscape Structure” OR “Urban Environmental Quality”) AND (“Corona Pandemic” OR “Corona Era” OR “Post Corona”). The following highlights have been used in choosing the target terms:
-
Identifying the effects of Corona on cities and citizens;
-
Determining which urban landscape structure components are more important to meet the new lifestyle and needs of citizens during and after Corona; and
-
What strategies to consider in urban environmental planning to ensure the development of resilient cities.
This research was performed in 6 stages, first of which was conducted on 15th January 2021, and it involved searching the entire database of Web of Science. As a result, 2086 articles were collected and screened in 4 stages. In the first stage of screening, the main inclusion criterion was the selection of papers that had already addressed “urban environmental quality” as a key term. In this respect, 965 articles were separated. After reviewing the abstracts of these, 602 articles were selected. These papers developed proper strategies to improve the urban environmental quality during and after the pandemic. In the third screening stage, 497 papers that had focused on economic, social, and demographic factors, urban management, and urban governance aspects were excluded. In this stage, 105 papers on the “urban landscape structure” were selected. In the final stage of screening, following a comprehensive review of the selected papers, 48 articles were selected in line with the objectives of this research. Four dimensions affecting the “quality and resiliency of the urban landscape structure” were identified and extracted from these papers. For each dimension, a certain number of related articles were identified. Then, the strategies corresponding to each of these dimensions were extracted and summarized.
-
Urban green and open network (14 articles)
-
Urban green transportation system (13 articles)
-
Urban green neighborhoods (11 articles)
-
Urban green residential buildings (10 articles)
In the final step, the ideas derived from the extracted strategies were designed by employing CityEnginesoftware [30]. Figure 1 shows the research steps and the number of reviewed papers in this study.
Results
The obtained results take two parallel directions. First, the results of literature review were discussed in terms of four main urban landscape components: urban green and open network, urban green transportation system, urban green neighborhoods, and green residential buildings, all of which affect urban resiliency during and after the pandemic. Second, effective strategies for planning and designing resilient urban landscapes are presented in a table. Finally, this table is designed for each of the components based on the strategies developed in this research.
Results of Literature Review
Most of the related studies have already discussed the four main components of the urban landscape structure that affect urban resilience during the pandemic. Therefore, upon reviewing the findings in this field, the current study explores the planning and design requirements of urban resilience for each component during and after the pandemic. In the following, each of these components is explained in detail.
Urban Green and Open Network
With the growth of population and construction in urban spaces, lack of green and open spaces has emerged as an obvious problem. Thus, the role of urban green spaces in maintaining the morale of citizens during the quarantine has become quite important.
Numerous studies in the field of psychology have shown that contact with nature improves mental stability and functioning as well as reduces stress [29, 31], mental fatigue [31], and mental disorders [32]. Moreover, the experience of quarantine in most large cities has shown that citizens exhibit a stronger longing for nature while maintaining social distance [33]. Since citizens were officially forced to avoid many public recreations and entertainments during the outbreak, attending to such activities as gardening and agriculture, especially in cities, can positively contribute to the mental health and stability of citizens. As a result, planning to build a network of green and open urban patches (parks, urban gardens, etc.) will become an important measure in future cities. A platform for activities such as horticulture and urban agriculture should be established so that many socio-cultural services such as creating a space to grow and plant food products, increased access to healthy food [34,35,36,37], and cheap and fresh [37] products may be provided or facilitated for people. This measure promotes the life quality by (a) allocating proper spaces and opportunities needed to improve social relations and form social solidarity in open space [36, 38] and (b) addressing such concerns as social distance, proximity to nature [39,40,41], and the need for increased physical activities for the citizens [39]. Therefore, the design of a network of green and open urban patches [42] will play a significant role in making cities resilient during and after the pandemic.
Urban Green Transportation System
The Corona pandemic has dramatically changed the urban transportation system [6, 43]. There has been an unprecedented decline in demand for public transport systems [5, 44]. As a result, many citizens tend to use private cars [45] as part of the social distancing mandate.
Of note, dependence on private vehicles exerts negative effects on the environment and the health of citizens. Among its negative effects, we can mention air pollution, traffic, and greenhouse gas emissions [7].
Therefore, in many cities around the world such as London, Milan, Barcelona, Paris, and Sardinia [46], urban development plans like the 15-min city [47] have been put on the agenda of municipalities. The main objective of these projects is to encourage citizens to reduce the use of private vehicles in order to provide opportunities for more physical activities while meeting the requirements of social distance.
In such projects, the design of footpaths [48], cycling, and scooters routes is a priority. Such plans will have positive impacts including calming traffic and reducing congestion on traffic routes [29, 49]. Therefore, based on the numerous benefits to be expected for the health of the entire city and its citizens [50], it is of necessity to develop future cities with proper design and planning to reduce consumer dependence on private vehicles [46, 51].
Urban Green Neighborhoods
Neighborhood, as a smaller community within a larger city, is an important element to consider in urban planning [52]. On a neighborhood scale, basic infrastructure for the lives of citizens is provided. Principled planning on this scale provides citizens with a sense of identity [53]. During the pandemic, the significance of this scale has become quite apparent due to traffic restrictions at the city level in many cities dealing with the compulsory quarantine. As a result, citizens should meet their daily needs including access to parks and green spaces, shopping malls, and clinics in their neighborhoods [54].
As a result, planning to create self-sufficient neighborhoods that meet the needs of citizens is an important principle to consider in future urban planning. Therefore, urban planning for the development of green and low-carbon neighborhoods [55, 56] should be on the agenda of municipalities because such neighborhoods protect the health of citizens and reduce unnecessary mobility [56], costs, and environmental impacts [57]. In the future, it is recommended that open public spaces [58, 59] be designed at the urban neighborhood level. These plans for urban neighborhood positively contribute to the health of citizens significantly [59] and enhance their life quality on a neighborhood scale [54].
Urban Green Residential Buildings
During the Corona pandemic, the living conditions of citizens have changed due to imperative enforcement of quarantines and development of a culture of teleworking [60]. It is predicted that human life will be affected by these changes in the future. Changing values, habits, social behaviors, and tendency for isolation will be among the new conditions in the post-Corona era [61]. Therefore, given the pervasive culture of telecommuting, the use of residential spaces for different purposes during and after the quarantine will increase.
Citizens’ inclination to telecommuting causes higher water consumption [7] and increased waste production [61]. Therefore, in the future, the design of green and safe residential buildings by creating versatile and flexible spaces [2, 62] that guarantee the physical and mental health of citizens is recommended. Also, given that citizens spend many hours of their lives indoors, the use of building materials derived from natural elements [63,64,65] as well as the maximum use of renewable energy [24] should be on the agenda for the construction of residential units.
In general, in order to make residential buildings livable, it is recommended that green buildings [63, 66] be designed with emphasis on energy management and environmentally friendly materials [66], maximum use of sunlight and optimal energy consumption [67], and roof gardens [65].
Strategies for the Urban Resilient Structures During and After the Pandemic
According to the reviewed literature, to maintain the physical and mental health of citizens and make cities resilient to all types of crises, especially pandemics like Corona, it is quite necessary to establish a platform that is compliant with not only multiple scales of urban landscape structures but also natural environment. Figure 2 presents a framework of resilient cities during and after the pandemic.
Table 1 shows the strategies for forming a resilient urban structure during and after the pandemic based on the main components of the urban landscape structure.
Discussion
In this stage, according to the strategies developed in Table 1, each of the components affecting urban resilience is illustrated.
Designing an Urban Green and Open Network
The purpose of designing an urban green and open network is to connect the isolated and fragmented patches of urban green spaces to each other so as to strengthen the connectivity of green and open urban spaces. Figure 3 presents an example of the designed network of green and open urban patches.
Urban Green Neighborhoods
In the process of designing green neighborhoods, the following items were considered. Figure 4 shows a design example of urban green neighborhoods.
-
Designing multi-functional spaces to meet the needs of residents in the neighborhood;
-
Designing green and open spaces fit for telecommuting in urban areas; and
-
Multi-purpose green spaces (public gatherings).
Urban Green Transportation System
The following items have been considered in the design of urban green transportation. Figure 5 presents an example of the urban green transportation network design.
-
Design of bicycle and scooter routes;
-
Design of green sidewalks; and
-
Design of narrow lanes for car traffic.
Urban Green Residential Buildings
In the process of designing green residential buildings, the following items have been considered. Figure 6 shows an example of one green building design.
-
Planning on the use of green energy including solar energy in buildings;
-
Green roof design for building occupants to spend leisure time;
-
Creating a multi-purpose green area around buildings; and
-
Maximum use of energy and sunlight in the design of buildings.
Conclusions
Since the Industrial Revolution, cities have always been growing ecosystems dominated by human structures. However, the impact of the pandemic crisis indicates that the same urban characteristics that have transformed cities into human-centered ecosystems with “car centeric urbanism” are jeopardizing the entire physical and mental health of citizens. This unfortunate phenomenon has made cities and citizens vulnerable to all kinds of crises.
In fact, the corona pandemic represents a wake-up call for all experts to realize that the structures and functions of cities are not efficient enough to maintain and support the health of the citizens. Therefore, in order to strengthen the resilience of urban landscape, short-term and long-term urban planning and investment should be seriously taken into account.
In fact, to date, the planning process for most cities, especially in developing countries, continues to rely merely on physical growth and construction development with almost no regard for human health and urban livability. During the Corona pandemic, many changes in the lives of citizens occurred. Besides the changes made to the employment process and working conditions, the pandemic impact on the functioning of urban services, transportation, etc. indicates that cities are on the verge of a great transformation. As a result, in response to such changes, such concepts as greater citizen access to green and open spaces, diverse land use cases, low-traffic designs, small projects, and bicycle-friendly, humanistic, and biophilic cities need to be considered by urban planners and designers.
In general, the main structures in cities should be planned and designed in a way that citizens and nature can live in harmony. Therefore, to ensure a modern and efficient urban planning and design, the following areas should receive undivided attention:
-
Expansion of green infrastructure;
-
Development of urban green neighborhoods;
-
Development of green transportation; and
-
Design of green buildings.
References
Papers of particular interests that have been published recently were highlighted as: •• Of major importance
••Zambrano-Monserrate MA, Ruano MA, Sanchez-Alcalde L. Indirect effects of COVID-19 on the environment. Sci Total Environ. 2020 Aug 1;728:138813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138813. Epub 2020 Apr 20. PMID: 32334159; PMCID: PMC7169883.
Kang M, Choi Y, Kim J, Lee KO, Lee S, Park IK, et al. COVID-19 impact on city and region: what’s next after lockdown? Int J Urban Sci. 2020;24(3):297–315.
Chen S, Yang J, Yang W, Wang C, Bärnighausen T. COVID-19 control in China during mass population movements at New Year. Lancet. 2020 Mar 7;395(10226):764–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30421-9. Epub 2020 Feb 24. PMID: 32105609; PMCID: PMC7159085.
Kerimray A, Baimatova N, Ibragimova OP, Bukenov B, Kenessov B, Plotitsyn P, Karaca F. Assessing air quality changes in large cities during COVID-19 lockdowns: The impacts of traffic-free urban conditions in Almaty, Kazakhstan. Sci Total Environ. 2020 Aug 15;730:139179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139179. Epub 2020 May 4. PMID: 32387822; PMCID: PMC7198157.
Jabareen Y, Eizenberg E. The failure of urban forms under the COVID-19 epidemic: towards a more just urbanism. Town Plan Rev. 2021;92:57–63.
Mouratidis K. How COVID-19 reshaped quality of life in cities: a synthesis and implications for urban planning. Land Use Policy. 2021;111: 105772.
Schmidt M. Impacts of covid on urban transport. 2020.
Byrne JA, Houston D. Urban Ecology. In Kobayashi A, editor. International encyclopedia of human geography. 2nd ed. Oxford: Elsevier. 2020;47–58.
Botequilha Leitão A, Ahern J. Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning. Landsc Urban Plan. 2002;59(2):65–93.
Botequilha-Leitão A, Díaz-Varela ER. Performance based planning of complex urban social-ecological systems: the quest for sustainability through the promotion of resilience. Sustain Cities Soc. 2020;56: 102089.
Barton H, Grant M. Urban planning for healthy cities a review of the progress of the European healthy cities programme. J Urban Health Bull New York Acad Med. 2012;90.
Badland H, Whitzman C, Lowe M, Davern M, Aye L, Butterworth I, et al. Urban liveability: emerging lessons from Australia for exploring the potential for indicators to measure the social determinants of health. Soc Sci Med. 2014;111:64–73.
Pacione M. Urban liveability: a review. Urban Geogr. 1990;11(1):1–30.
Radha CH. Biophilic design as a new approach in urban sustainability-by-NC 4.0). Pollack Period. 2021.
Amat RC, Ismail S, Wahab MH, Ahmad NH, Rani WNMWM. A dimension of biophilia in urban design. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 2020;409(1):012016.
Bueno S, Bañuls VA, Gallego MD. Is urban resilience a phenomenon on the rise? A systematic literature review for the years 2019 and 2020 using textometry. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2021;66:102588.
Akter S, Hakim SS, Rahman MS. Planning for pandemic resilience: COVID-19 experience from urban slums in Khulna, Bangladesh. J Urban Manag. 2021;10(4):325–44.
Kesselring S, Freudendal-Pedersen M. Searching for urban mobilities futures. Methodological innovation in the light of COVID-19. Sustain Cities Soc. 2021;75:103138.
Jain J, Muñoz Arriola F, Khare D. Chapter19 - short-term resilience and transformation of urban socioenvironmental systems to COVID-19 lockdowns in India using air quality as proxy. In Ramanathan AL, Sabarathinam C, Arriola F, Prasanna MV, Kumar P, Jonathan MP, editors. Environmental resilience and transformation in times of COVID-19: Elsevier. 2021;191–206.
MacKinnon D. Resilient City. In: Wright JD, editor. International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Oxford: Elsevier; 2015. p. 561–7.
Büyüközkan G, Ilıcak Ö, Feyzioğlu O. A review of urban resilience literature. Sustain Cities Soc. 2022;77: 103579.
Shafiei Dastjerdi M, Lak A, Ghaffari A, Sharifi A. A conceptual framework for resilient place assessment based on spatial resilience approach: an integrative review. Urban Climate. 2021;36: 100794.
Sharifi A, Khavarian-Garmsir AR. The COVID-19 pandemic: Impacts on cities and major lessons for urban planning, design, and management. Sci Total Environ. 2020;749: 142391.
Amerio A, Brambilla A, Morganti A, Aguglia A, Bianchi D, Santi F, et al. COVID-19 lockdown: housing built environment’s effects on mental health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020;17(16).
Capolongo S, Rebecchi A, Buffoli M, Appolloni L, Signorelli C, Fara GM, et al. COVID-19 and cities: from urban health strategies to the pandemic challenge. A Decalogue of Public Health opportunities. Acta Biomedica Atenei Parmensis. 2020;91(2):13–22.
Connolly C, Ali SH, Keil R. On the relationships between COVID-19 and extended urbanization. Dialogues in Human Geography. 2020;10(2):213–6.
Daneshpour Z. Out of the coronavirus crisis, a new kind of urban planning must be born - post pandemic urban and regional planning and the lessons that can be learned from Coronavirus pandemic 20202020.
Allam Z, Jones DS. On the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak and the smart city network: universal data sharing standards coupled with artificial intelligence (AI) to benefit urban health monitoring and management. Healthcare. 2020;8(1):46.
Elgheznawy D, Eltarabily S. Post-pandemic cities - the impact of COVID-19 on cities and urban design. Architecture Research. 2020;10:75–84.
.Environmental System Research Institute(ESRI). ArcGIS CityEngine - 3D City Design for Urban Environments. 2022. https://www.esri.com/en-us/arcgis/products/arcgis-cityengine/overview. Accessed 15 Feb 2022.
Frumkin H, Bratman GN, Breslow SJ, Cochran B, Kahn Jr PH, Lawler JJ, et al. Nature contact and human health: a research agenda. Environ Health Perspect. 2017;125(7).
Cabral MI, Costa S, Weiland U, Bonn A. Urban gardens as multifunctional nature-based solutions for societal goals in a changing climate. Nature-Based Solutions to Climate Change Adaptation in Urban Areas. 2017:237–53.
Young C, Hofmann M, Frey D, Moretti M. Psychological restoration in urban gardens related to garden type, biodiversity and garden-related stress. Landsc Urban Plan. 2020;198:103777.
Venter ZS, Barton DN, Gundersen V, Figari H, Nowell MS. Back to nature: Norwegians sustain increased recreational use of urban green space months after the COVID-19 outbreak. Landsc Urban Plan. 2021;214: 104175.
Zezza A, Tasciotti L. Urban agriculture, poverty, and food security: empirical evidence from a sample of developing countries. Food Policy. 2010;35:265–73.
Meenar MR, Hoover BM. Community food security via urban agriculture: understanding people, place, economy, and accessibility from a food justice perspective. J Agric Food Syst Community Dev. 2012;3(1):143–60.
Lee JH, Matarrita-Cascante D. The influence of emotional and conditional motivations on gardeners. Urban For Urban Green. 2019:21–30.
Okvat HA, Zautra A. Community gardening: a parsimonious path to individual, community, and environmental resilience. Am J Community Psychol. 2011;47(3–4):374–87.
Lin B, Philpott S, Jha S, Liere H. Urban agriculture as a productive green infrastructure for environmental and social well-being. 2017;155–79.
Egerer M, Lin BB, Philpott SM. Water use behavior, learning, and adaptation to future change in urban gardens. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2018;2:71.
Ma ATH, Lam TWL, Cheung LTO, Fok L. Protected areas as a space for pandemic disease adaptation: a case of COVID-19 in Hong Kong. Landsc Urban Plan. 2021;207:103994-.
Dallimer M, Irvine KN, Skinner AM, Davies ZG, Rouquette J, Maltby L, et al. Biodiversity and the feel-good factor: understanding associations between self-reported human well-being and species richness. Bioscience. 2012;62(1):47–55.
Wang G, Huawei L, Yang Y, Jombach S, Tian G. “City in the park,” greenway network concept of high-density cities: adaptation of Singapore park connector network in Chinese Cities2019.
Nan Z, Zhao X, He X. Understanding the relationships between information architectures and business models: an empirical study on the success configurations of smart communities. Gov Inf Q. 2019;37: 101439.
de Weert Y, Gkiotsalitis K. A COVID-19 public transport frequency setting model that includes short-turning options. Future Transp. 2021;1(1).
Rojas-Rueda D, de Nazelle A, Teixidó O, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ. Replacing car trips by increasing bike and public transport in the greater Barcelona metropolitan area: a health impact assessment study. Environ Int. 2012;49:100–9.
Zografos C, Klause KA, Connolly JJT, Anguelovski I. The everyday politics of urban transformational adaptation: struggles for authority and the Barcelona superblock project. Cities. 2020;99: 102613.
Balletto G, Ladu M, Milesi A, Borruso G. A methodological approach on disused public properties in the 15-minute city perspective. Sustainability. 2021;13(2).
Appolloni L, Corazza MV, D’Alessandro D. The pleasure of walking: an innovative methodology to assess appropriate walkable performance in urban areas to support transport planning. Sustainability. 2019;11(12).
Hanzl M. Urban forms and green infrastructure – the implications for public health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cities Health. 2020:1–5.
Nieuwenhuijsen MJ. Urban and transport planning pathways to carbon neutral, liveable and healthy cities; a review of the current evidence. Environ Int. 2020;140: 105661.
Rode P, Floater G, Thomopoulos N, Docherty J, Schwinger P, Mahendra A, et al. Accessibility in cities: transport and urban form. 2017. p. 239–73.
Hashem D. Towards decentralization: Spatial changes of employment and population in Tehran Metropolitan Region, Iran. Appl Geogr. 2017;85:51–61–2017 v.85.
Ruijsbroek A, Droomers M, Kruize H, Van Kempen E, Gidlow CJ, Hurst G, et al. Does the health impact of exposure to neighbourhood green space differ between population groups? An explorative study in Four European Cities. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(6).
Beyer KM, Kaltenbach A, Szabo A, Bogar S, Nieto FJ, Malecki KM. Exposure to neighborhood green space and mental health: evidence from the survey of the health of Wisconsin. (1660–4601 (Electronic)).
Weimann H, Björk J, Håkansson C. Experiences of the Urban Green Local Environment as a Factor for Well-Being among Adults: An Exploratory Qualitative Study in Southern Sweden. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 11;16(14):2464. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142464. PMID: 31373298; PMCID: PMC6678511.
Crawford J, French W. A low-carbon future: spatial planning’s role in enhancing technological innovation in the built environment. Energy Policy. 2008;36:4575–9.
Wang X, Zhao G, He C, Wang X, Peng W. Low-carbon neighborhood planning technology and indicator system. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2016;57:1066–76.
Freeman S, Eykelbosh A. COVID-19 and outdoor safety: considerations for use of outdoor recreational spaces. Prepared by 2020.
Wei T. Building low-carbon cities through local land use planning: towards an appropriate urban development model for sustainability. 2011.
Irwin NB, McCoy SJ, McDonough IK. Water in the time of corona(virus): the effect of stay-at-home orders on water demand in the desert. J Environ Econ Manag. 2021;109: 102491.
Filho WL, Voronova V, Kloga M, Paço A, Minhas A, Salvia AL, et al. COVID-19 and waste production in households: a trend analysis. Sci Total Environ. 2021;777: 145997.
Tokazhanov G, Tleuken A, Guney M, Turkyilmaz A, Karaca F. How is COVID-19 Experience transforming sustainability requirements of residential buildings? A review. Sustainability. 2020;12(20).
Cuerdo-Vilches T, Navas-Martín MÁ, Oteiza I. A mixed approach on resilience of Spanish dwellings and households during COVID-19 lockdown. Sustainability. 2020;12(23).
D'Alessandro D, Gola M, Appolloni L, Dettori M, Fara GM, Rebecchi A, Settimo G, Capolongo S. COVID-19 and Living space challenge. Well-being and Public Health recommendations for a healthy, safe, and sustainable housing. Acta Biomed. 2020 Jul 20;91(9-S):61–75. https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i9-S.10115. PMID: 32701918; PMCID: PMC8023091.
Eroğlu H. Effects of Covid-19 outbreak on environment and renewable energy sector. Environ Dev Sustain. 2021;23(4):4782–4790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00837-4. Epub 2020 Jun 28. PMID: 32837274; PMCID: PMC7321016.
Gillis K, Gatersleben B. A review of psychological literature on the health and wellbeing benefits of biophilic design. Buildings. 2015;5(3).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights
This article does not contain any studies involving humans or animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Landscape Ecological Science from Iran
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Parivar, P., Sotoudeh, A. & Mazloomshah, Z. Developing Strategies to Improve the Urban Environmental Structure Resiliency During and After Corona Pandemic: A Literature Review. Curr Landscape Ecol Rep 7, 128–136 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40823-022-00078-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40823-022-00078-3