Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Do service sectors need core sectors to improve their productivity?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Eurasian Economic Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Examining Japanese micro-data, this study demonstrates that large core sectors (specialized or manufacturing sectors) in a local economy improve the productivity in the local non-tradable service sectors, and thereby increase employment. The size of service sector demand is determined by the size of the local economy, which, in turn, is determined by these large core sectors. The core sectors are generally sectors with tradable goods and services and their demand is not limited by the local market size as their goods and services supply multiple regions. A large demand for the service sectors induces heightened competition and improves their productivity through Darwinian selection or efficiency improvements within firms. Moreover, the spillover effect from core sectors might affect local service sectors. As a result, a 1% increase in added value in the specialized sectors in the previous estimation period, as well as a 1% increase in the change in added value in the specialized sectors, and a 1% increase in added value in the manufacturing sectors in the previous estimation period affect an increase in the productivity of the service sectors by approximately 4–5, 4 and 2.5%, respectively. Moreover, an increase of 100 thousand dollars of added value in the specialized sectors increases employment by 26 employees in the local service sectors. Furthermore, this study confirms efficiency improvements within firms as a productivity mechanism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Source The Basic Survey of Japanese Business Structure and Activities for the added value and the population census for the density of population

Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Some service sectors, such as computer software, information, and technology can trade their products and services outside the region where these are produced. This study investigates service sectors that include non-tradable local services such as retail, hospitals, and places to drink and eat.

  2. Excluding two municipalities, Chiyoda-ku where the imperial palace and cabinet-level ministry and agency are located and Chuo-ku where large commercial facilities and headquarter buildings agglomerate.

  3. Results are available upon request.

  4. This model is common in previous studies (Loecker and Warzynski 2012; Iwasaki 2013) and useful because the model captures the production shock by using intermediate goods, and these data are available in most cases.

  5. The results are available upon request.

  6. However, Morikawa (2016) argues the flexibility of labor demand increases the productivity of the service sectors.

References

  • Baumol, W. J. (1967). Macroeconomics of unbalanced growth: The anatomy of urban crisis. American Economic Review, 57(3), 415–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, B. P., Triplett, J. E. (2007). The Early 21st century U.S. productivity expansion is still in service. International Productivity Monitor, 14, 3–19.

  • Brezis, E. S., & Krugman, P. R. (1997). Technology and the life cycle of cities. Journal of Economic Growth, 2, 369–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekle, R. (2002). Industrial concentration and regional growth: Evidence from the prefectures. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(2), 310–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, L., Haltiwanger, J., Krizan, C.J. (2006). Market selection, reallocation, and restructuring in the U.S. Retail Trade Sector in the 1990s. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4), 748–758.

  • Iwasaki, Y. (2013). Inter-industries Spillover Effect from Direct Inward Investments [Tainai chyokusetsu toshi no sangyokan supiru oba kouka]. Bank of Japan Working Paper Series, No. 13-J-9.

  • Japan Revitalization Strategy. (2016). Prime Minister of Japan and his Cabinet, approved in a Cabinet meeting on June 2nd, 2016.

  • Kazekami, S. (2017). Local multipliers, mobility and agglomeration economies. Industrial Relations, 56(3), 489–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinsohn, J., & Petrin, A. (2003). Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. Review of Economic Studies, 70, 317–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ligthelm, A. (2011). Survival analysis of small informal businesses in South Africa, 2007–2010. Eurasian Business Review, 1(2), 160–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loecker, J. D., & Warzynski, F. (2012). Markups and firm-level export status. American Economic Review, 102(6), 2437–2471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 3–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maroto-Sánchez, A., & Cuadrado-Roura, J. R. (2009). Is growth of services an obstacle to productivity growth? A comparative analysis. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 20, 254–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moretti, E. (2004). Workers’ education, spillovers, and productivity: Evidence from plant-level production functions. The American Economic Review, 94(3), 656–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moretti, E. (2010). Local multipliers. American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings, 100, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morikawa, M. (2014). Analysis of productivity in service sectors [Sabisu Sangyo No Seisansei Bunseki]. Japan: Nihon Hyoron Sya.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morikawa, M. (2016). Service-oriented nation [Sabisu Rikkoku Ron]. Japan: Nihon Keizai shinbun syuppansya.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngo, V. T., Mullineux, A. W., & Ly, A. H. (2014). The impact of scale of operation on financial performance in microfinance. Eurasian Economic Review, 4(2), 177–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishimura, K. G., Nakajima, T., & Kiyota, K. (2005). Does the natural selection mechanism still work in server recessions? Examination of the Japanese Economy in the 1990s. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 58, 53–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olley, G. S., & Pakes, A. (1996). The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry. Econometrica, 64(6), 1263–1297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauch, J. E. (1991). Productivity gains from geographic concentration of human capital: Evidence from the Cities. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Working Paper No. 3905.

  • Syverson, C. (2004). Market structure and productivity: a concrete example. Journal of Political Economy, 112(6), 1181–1222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syverson, C. (2011). What determines productivity? Journal of Economic Literature, 49(2), 326–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author thanks the participants of the 20th Eurasia Business and Economic Society Conference, 14th Global Conference on Business and Economics, and the 15th international convention of the East Asian Economic Association for their very helpful comments. The author is also thankful for the financial support provided by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (Grant Number: 25380377).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sachiko Kazekami.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kazekami, S. Do service sectors need core sectors to improve their productivity?. Eurasian Econ Rev 7, 389–410 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40822-017-0073-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40822-017-0073-1

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation