Nano-Micro Letters

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 381–387 | Cite as

Electrochemical Synthesis of Novel Zn-Doped TiO2 Nanotube/ZnO Nanoflake Heterostructure with Enhanced DSSC Efficiency

  • Aijo John K
  • Johns Naduvath
  • Sudhanshu Mallick
  • Jacob W. Pledger
  • S. K. Remillard
  • P. A. DeYoung
  • Manju Thankamoniamma
  • T. Shripathi
  • Rachel Reena Philip
Open Access


The paper reports the fabrication of Zn-doped TiO2 nanotubes (Zn-TONT)/ZnO nanoflakes heterostructure for the first time, which shows improved performance as a photoanode in dye-sensitized solar cell (DSSC). The layered structure of this novel nanoporous structure has been analyzed unambiguously by Rutherford backscattering spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and X-ray diffractometer. The cell using the heterostructure as photoanode manifests an enhancement of about an order in the magnitude of the short circuit current and a seven-fold increase in efficiency, over pure TiO2 photoanodes. Characterizations further reveal that the Zn-TONT is preferentially oriented in [001] direction and there is a Ti metal-depleted interface layer which leads to better band alignment in DSSC.

Graphical Abstract


Zn-doped TiO2 nanotubes ZnO nanoflakes Heterostructures DSSC 

1 Introduction

The ability to fine tune the optoelectronic and transport properties of the metal oxide semiconductors nominates them as promising candidates for chemical gas sensing, photocatalysis, energy conversion, and storage applications [1]. Among the metal oxide semiconductors, TiO2 and ZnO have been studied extensively in the recent years owing to their exceptional characteristics such as high stability, low-cost fabrication, nontoxicity, and excellent photoelectrochemical properties [2, 3, 4, 5]. Nevertheless, these pure metal oxides individually exhibit relatively low energy conversion efficiencies because of the limited photoresponse range and the fast recombination rate of the generated charge carriers [6, 7, 8, 9].

These drawbacks of the pure metal oxide semiconductors have led researchers to explore the heterostructures using TiO2 and ZnO. These heterostructures exhibit good stability because of the good compatibility between TiO2 and ZnO and similar band alignments [2]. Also, TiO2/ZnO heterostructures are expected to act as better photoanodes on account of the combination of the very high reactivity of TiO2 and large binding energy of ZnO [10, 11].

Several attempts are being made to fabricate heterostructures based on nanostructures of TiO2 and ZnO such as TiO2 nanotube/ZnO nanorod composite, ZnO-coated TiO2 nanotubes, and branched ZnO nanorod/TiO2 nanotube arrays due to the high surface-to-volume ratio attainable [12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17]. It has been found that the presence of ZnO prevents the fast recombination of the photogenerated charge carriers with the dye molecules in dye-sensitized solar cells because of the slightly higher band gap of the ZnO compared to the TiO2 [18, 19]. The extension of the photoresponse range and enhanced mobility of the charge carrier can also be expected from these heterostructures.

In the present work, heterostructure of ZnO nanoflakes partially covering the Zn-doped TiO2 nanotube (Zn-TONT) was fabricated for the first time. The layer of ZnO nanoflakes is expected to increase the dye absorption and the Zn doping of TiO2 nanotubes tends to increase their electrical transport properties. The improved performance of a dye-sensitized solar cell (DSSC) with Zn-TONT/ZnO nanoflake heterostructure instead of pure TONT as photoanode is also demonstrated.

2 Experimental Methods

The Zn-TONT/ZnO nanoflake heterostructure was fabricated by a two-step method (Fig. 1). In the first step, well-aligned and uniform TONT were fabricated on titanium foil by electrochemical anodization [20]. In the second step, Zn doping and tailoring of ZnO nanoflakes on the Zn-TONT were done using a three-electrode system, where TONT was used as the working electrode, platinum rod as counter electrode, and Ag/AgCl as reference electrode (3 M KCl electrolyte), with 0.1 M ZnSO4 in ionized water as the solution for doping. A negative voltage pulse of 1–2.5 V was applied to the working electrode for duration of 2–10 s to trigger the doping process.
Fig. 1

Schematic of the fabrication of Zn-TONT/ZnO nanoflake heterostructure

The detailed analysis of the Zn-TONT/ZnO nanoflake heterostructure was performed using X-ray diffractometer (XRD), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), Rutherford backscattering spectroscopy (RBS), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The current density–voltage (JV) data of the DSSC were carried on a Solar Simulator (NEWPORT) under the standard solar conditions.

3 Results and Discussion

The FESEM surface images of the pure TONT and Zn-TONT/ZnO nanoflakes are shown in Fig. 2. Figure 2a indicates that the pure TONT formed by electrochemical anodization possesses an approximate inner diameter of 100 nm, wall thickness of 16 nm, and thickness of 6.9 µm. The side view of the as-formed aligned nanotubes is shown in the inset of Fig. 2a. Sponge-like ZnO nanoflakes (Fig. 2b) appear on the surface of TONT when doping was done for a short time of ~2 s, and partially cover the top of the tubes upon annealing, as seen in the inset of Fig. 2b.
Fig. 2

FESEM images of a top view of undoped TONT, and side view of undoped TONT (inset). bTop view of Zn-TONT/ZnO nanoflake heterostructure, and top view of the heterostructure after annealing at 500 °C (inset)

More detailed layered structures of both pure TONT and the heterostructure were studied using RBS of 2.97 MeV α particles, a technique that can effectively bring out the at.% composition and thickness of different layers through SIMNRA fitting [21]. The RBS spectrum of pure TONT fitted with SIMNRA shows a structure of ~7 µm TiO2 as the top layer and a Ti metal substrate as the bottom layer (Fig. 3a). The spectrum from the Zn-TONT/ZnO structure suggests four layers (Fig. 3b), with a partial coverage by ZnO flakes at the top surface and a slightly Ti-depleted layer at the interface of the heterostructure. Partial coverage of ZnO flakes is simulated by superposing weighted models of ZnO-covered Zn-TONT and ZnO-uncovered Zn-TONT. The thickness of the ZnO flakes assuming ~14 % coverage of the top, is around 22 nm and the Zn-TONT beneath the ZnO layer consists of >3 µm with a Zn doping at.% of 2.7 ± 0.4. Between the TONT layer and the ZnO layer, the Ti-depleted layer (Ti: 25.3 ± 1.3 %) has a thickness of 320 ± 30 nm. The fourth and last layer is the Ti metal substrate with infinite thickness.
Fig. 3

RBS of a pure TONT (areal thickness of 1.1 × 1019 atoms cm−2), and b Zn-TONT/ZnO nanoflake heterostructure (Layer 1 areal thickness of 1.5 × 1017 atoms cm−2, Layer 2 areal thickness of 2.9 × 1018 atoms cm−2, and Layer 3 areal thickness of >3 × 1019 atoms cm−2)

RBS confirms that during the doping step, in addition to the formation of ZnO nanoflakes on top, a small percentage of Zn was doped into the TONT, the adsorption has led to a preferential orientation of the nanocrystallites in the tube on annealing. This phenomenon has been discussed in detail elsewhere [22]. The 3 % Zn doping of the TiO2 nanotubes was confirmed by taking the XPS of the heterostructure after removing the top ZnO nanoflake layer by dipping in 1 M HCl for one hour. The inset of Fig. 4 shows the detailed spectrum of the titanium, oxygen, and zinc, respectively.
Fig. 4

XPS of the Zn-TONT with 3 % zinc doping

The crystallinity of the annealed pure TONT and Zn-TONT/ZnO nanoflake heterostructure characterized by XRD (Fig. 5) reveals that the pure TONT (Fig. 5a) consist of (101), (004), (200), and (105) planes with preferential orientation along (101) plane (JCPDS 89-4203). Contrary to this observation, the TONT in the heterostructure (Fig. 5b) shows preferential orientation along (004) plane. This strong preferential orientation has been interpreted on the basis of the Zn-assisted minimization of the surface energy of (004) plane [22].
Fig. 5

XRD patterns of a pure TONT, and b Zn-TONT/ZnO nanoflake heterostructure

When Zn is doped into the tubes and then annealed, the amorphous TONT break up into crystallites and Zn gets preferentially adsorbed on the higher surface energy (0.90 J m−2) facets {001} which possess more adsorption ability. The Zn adsorption reduces the surface energy of the facet, resulting in the enhancement of the surface area, until the differential adsorption ability of that facet gets weaker and further adsorption and growth are impeded. There will be no further reduction in the surface energy of the {001} facets, and hence it does not go below the surface energy (0.44 J m−2) of {101} facets. During the stacking of the crystallites, the comparatively higher energy {001} facets connect each other and hence the {001} surfaces faces the tube up. The XRD peaks observed at 34.4° and 36.6° confirm the formation of the ZnO layer on the top of TONT (JCPDS-79-0205).

The performance comparison of the TONT and the heterostructure Zn-TONT/ZnO nanoflake in DSSC application was done by fabricating both type of cells, one with TONT and the other with Zn-TONT/ZnO nanoflake heterostructure as the photoanode, and platinum-coated FTO as the front electrode. After dye sensitization of the photoanode with N719, a redox electrolyte was sandwiched between the photoanode and the front electrode for the regeneration of the dye molecules (Fig. 6a).
Fig. 6

a Schematic of the DSSC with Zn-TONT/ZnO nanoflake heterostructure, b band structure of the DSSC fabricated using Zn-TONT/ZnO nanoflake heterostructure, and cJV curves of DSSCs

The JV data of the DSSC are depicted in Fig. 6c. The JV characteristics of the DSSC (Fig. 6c) using Zn-TONT/ZnO nanoflake heterostructure and the Zn-doped TONT after removing the top ZnO nanoflake layer are compared with that of DSSC using the as-prepared TONT. While the improvement in the open circuit voltage (Voc) with the heterostructure DSSC is only about 70 mV than that with pure TONT, the short circuit current for the heterostructure (ISc ~4 mA) is about an order of magnitude higher on comparison with the pure TONT (Isc ~0.6 mA). The Voc and Isc of DSSC with Zn-doped TONT show a slight increase ~30 mV and 0.6 mA, respectively. This has produced a considerable increase (>7 times) in the efficiency of the heterostructure cell over the pure TONT-based cell, fabricated and operated under the same conditions, while the efficiency of DSSC with Zn-doped TONT over that of pure TONT is ~2 times. The result shows that although efficiency is slightly increased in the DSSC using Zn-TONT in comparison with that using pure TONT, the DSSC fabricated with Zn-TONT/ZnO nanoflake heterostructure shows still a significant enhancement when compared to either of them. Hence, it can be concluded that the improved performance is due to the combined effect of ZnO nanoflake and preferential [001] orientation of the anatase TONT, where the effect of ZnO nanoflakes is more prominent than the orientation effect. The results emphasize the significance of TONT/ZnO photoanodes over pure TONT photoanodes, for improved DSSC performance.

The improvement in the efficiency of DSSC could be explained based on the more effective processes of carrier production and transport in the heterostructure-based DSSC whose band alignment is illustrated in Fig. 6b. In TONT-based DSSC, when the solar radiation falls on the dye molecules through the transparent platinum FTO window and the electrons from the HOMO (highest occupied molecular orbital) of the N719 dye are excited to the LUMO (lowest unoccupied molecular orbital), the photogenerated electrons are injected into the conduction band of the TONT and are collected by the Ti metal back contact. In this process, there is a large possibility for the charge recombination of the electrons in the conduction band of the TONT and holes present in the HOMO of the dye, which may reduce the efficiency of the device. In the Zn-TONT/ZnO nanoflake heterostructure-based DSSC, the presence of ZnO nanoflakes (band gap ~3.37 eV with conduction band and valence band positioned slightly above that of the corresponding bands in TONT) on the top of the TiO2 nanotubes (band gap ~3.2 eV) decreases the recombination rate of the electrons owing to the small energy barrier created by them [19, 23]. In addition, ZnO lattice was reported to provide electron mobility almost 3 times larger compared to the TONT which facilitates faster transport of the generated electrons to the back metal contact [18]. This increased mobility thus acts as an additional factor that further reduces the recombination rate of the photogenerated charge carriers. This synergetic property of Zn-TONT/ZnO nanoflakes in promoting efficient separation of carriers may be the reason for improved solar cell efficiency.

4 Conclusion

In conclusion, a clear picture of the layered structure, morphology, and crystallinity of the Zn-TONT/ZnO heterostructure was gained using RBS, SEM, and XRD. The advantage of using heterostructures of the Zn-TONT/ZnO nanoflake heterostructure in a DSSC constructed by a cost-effective and highly reproducible method was analyzed. This layered heterostructure shows enhanced DSSC efficiency over the pure TiO2 nanotubes.



AJK, MT, and RRP acknowledge UGC-DAE CSR, Indore, for funding through a collaborative project and SAIF IIT Bombay for the help with SEM. The work at Hope College was supported by the Michigan Space Grant Consortium and by Hope College. AJK and MT acknowledge DAE-BRNS for funding the preliminary works.


  1. 1.
    I. Concina, A. Vomiero, Metal oxide semiconductor for dye and quantum-dot sensitized solar cells. Small 11(15), 1744–1774 (2015). doi:10.1002/smll.201402334 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. Cai, Q. Yang, Z. Hu, Z. Duan, Q. You, J. Sun, N. Xu, J. Wu, Enhanced photo electrochemical activity of vertically aligned ZnO coated TiO2 nanotubes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 053114 (2014). doi:10.1063/1.4863852 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Hagfeldt, G. Boschloo, L. Sun, L. Kloo, H. Pettersson, Dye sensitized solar cells. Chem. Rev. 110(11), 6595–6663 (2010). doi:10.1021/cr900356p CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    T.P. Gujarati, A.G. Ashish, M. Rai, M.M. Shajumon, Highly ordered vertical arrays of TiO2/ZnO hybrid nanowires: synthesis and electrochemical characterization. J. Nanosci. Nanotech. 15(8), 5833–5839 (2015). doi:10.1166/jnn.2015.10040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    B. Zhang, F. Wang, C. Zhu, Q. Li, J. Song, M. Zheng, L. Ma, W. Shen, A facile self-assembly synthesis of hexagonal ZnO nanosheet films and their photoelectrochemical properties. Nano-Micro Lett. 8(2), 137–142 (2016). doi:10.1007/s40820-015-0068-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    P.E. De Jongh, E.A. Meulenkamp, D. Vanmackelbergh, J.J. Kelly, Charge carrier dynamics in illuminated particulate ZnO electrode. J. Phys. Chem. B 104(32), 7686–7693 (2000). doi:10.1021/jp000616a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    G.H. Schoenmakers, D. Vanmackelbergh, J.J. Kelly, Study of charge carrier dynamics at illuminated ZnO photoanodes. J. Phys. Chem. 100(8), 3215–3220 (1996). doi:10.1021/jp952392f CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    A.J. Frank, N. Kopidakis, J.V. De Langemaat, Electrons in nanostructured TiO2 solar cells; transport, recombination and photovoltaic properties. Coord. Chem. Rev. 248(13–14), 1165–1179 (2004). doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2004.03.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Y. Liu, H. Zhou, J. Li, H. Chen, D. Li, B. Zhou, W. Cai, Enhanced photoelectrochemical properties of Cu2O-loaded short TiO2 nanotube array electrode prepared by sonoelectrochemical deposition. Nano-Micro Lett. 2(4), 277–284 (2010). doi:10.3786/nml.v2i4.p277-284 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    U. Diebold, The surface science of titanium dioxide. Surf. Sci. Rep. 48(5–8), 53–229 (2003). doi:10.1016/S0167-5729(02)00100-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A.B. Djurišić, X. Chen, V.H. Leung, A.M. Ching, Ng, ZnO nanostructures: growth, properties and applications. J. Mater. Chem. 22(14), 6526–6535 (2012). doi:10.1088/0953-8984/16/25/R01 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Y. Yang, X. Wang, C. Sun, L. Li, Photoluminescence of ZnO nanorod-TiO2 nanotube hybrid arrays produced by electrodeposition. J. Appl. Phys. 105, 094304 (2009). doi:10.1063/1.3121202 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    H. Cai, Q. You, Z. Hu, Z. Duan, Y. Cui, J. Sun, N. Xu, J. Wu, Fabrication and correlation between photoluminescence and photo electrochemical properties of vertically aligned ZnO coated TiO2 nanotube arrays. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 123, 233–238 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.solmat.2014.01.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Y.C. Huang, S.Y. Chang, C.F. Lin, W.J. Tseng, Synthesis of ZnO nanorod grafted TiO2 nanotube 3-D array heterostructure as supporting platform for nanoparticle deposition. J. Mater. Chem. 21(36), 14056–14061 (2011). doi:10.1039/c1jm11659b CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    W. Liu, P. Su, S. Chen, N. Wang, Y. Ma, Y. Liu, J. Wang, Z. Zhang, H. Li, T.J. Webster, Synthesis of TiO2 nanotubes with ZnO nanoparticles to achieve antibacterial properties and stem cell compatibility. Nanoscale 6(15), 9050–9062 (2014). doi:10.1039/C4NR01531B CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Y. Let, G. Zhao, M. Liu, Z. Zhang, X. Tong, T. Cao, Fabrication characterization and photoelectrocatalytic application of ZnO nanorods grafted on vertically aligned TiO2 nanotubes. J. Phys. Chem. C 113(44), 19067–19076 (2009). doi:10.1021/jp9071179 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    F.X. Xiao, S.F. Hung, H.B. Tao, J. Miao, H.B. Yang, B. Liu, Spatially branched hierarchical ZnO nanorod-TiO2 nanotube array heterostructures for versatile photocatalytic and photoelectrocatalytic applications: towards intimate integration of 1D–1D nanostructures. Nanoscale 6(24), 14950–14961 (2014). doi:10.1039/c4nr04886e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    J. Ren, W. Que, X. Yin, Y. He, H.M.A. Javed, Novel fabrication of TiO2/ZnO nanotube array heterojunction for dye sensitized solar cells. RSC Adv. 4(15), 7454–7460 (2014). doi:10.1039/c3ra45741a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    S.S. Kim, S.I. Na, Y.C. Nah, TiO2 nanotubes decorated with ZnO rod like nanostructures for efficient dye sensitized solar cells. Electrochim. Acta 58(1), 503–509 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2011.09.076 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    P. Roy, S. Berger, P. Schmuki, TiO2 Nanotubes: synthesis and applications. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50(13), 2904–2939 (2011). doi:10.1002/anie.201001374 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    M. Mayer, SIMNRA User’s Guide, Report IPP 9/113 (Max-Planck-InstitutfürPlasmaphysik, Garching, 1997)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    J.K. Aijo, N. Johns, S. Mallick, T. Shripathi, T. Manju, R.P. Reena, Novel cost effective fabrication technique for highly preferential oriented TiO2 nanotubes. Nanoscale 7(48), 20386–20390 (2015). doi:10.1039/C5NR06328K CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    C.S. Chou, F.C. Chou, Y.G. Ding, P. Wu, The effect of ZnO coating on the performance of a dye sensitized solar cell. Sol. Energy 86(5), 1435–1442 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.solener.2012.02.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aijo John K
    • 1
  • Johns Naduvath
    • 2
    • 6
  • Sudhanshu Mallick
    • 2
  • Jacob W. Pledger
    • 3
  • S. K. Remillard
    • 3
  • P. A. DeYoung
    • 3
  • Manju Thankamoniamma
    • 4
  • T. Shripathi
    • 5
  • Rachel Reena Philip
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physics Union Christian CollegeAluvaIndia
  2. 2.Department of Metallurgical Engineering and Material ScienceIndian Institute of TechnologyMumbaiIndia
  3. 3.Department of PhysicsHope CollegeHollandUSA
  4. 4.Department of PhysicsSree Sankara CollegeKaladyIndia
  5. 5.UGC-DAE Consortium for Scientific ResearchIndoreIndia
  6. 6.Department of PhysicsSt. Thomas CollegeThrissurIndia

Personalised recommendations