Skip to main content
Log in

Sensitivity Analysis of the Fuzzy Mean-Entropy Portfolio Model with Transaction Costs Based on Credibility Theory

  • Published:
International Journal of Fuzzy Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes the fuzzy mean-entropy portfolio models with transaction costs based on credibility theory. In the paper, entropy is used as the measurement of risk. Furthermore, sensitivity analysis is discussed for objective function coefficients and constraint coefficients on the right sides in our proposed models. In addition, two numerical examples are given to illustrate the effectiveness of our proposed models and the practicability of sensitivity analysis. More importantly, the obtained results also show that when certain coefficient changes in some value range, we still can obtain the unchanged optimal solutions or unchanged objective function values. Compared with Huang (IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 16:1096–1101, 18; Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 10:71–89, 19), our paper not only proposes the mean-entropy models, but also does research work on sensitivity analysis about objective function coefficients and constraint coefficients in depth in maximizing return model and minimizing risk model. Our results can provide more choices for investors in the practical financial market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Markowitz, H.: Portfolio selection. J. Financ. 7, 77–91 (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Markowitz, H.: Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investment. Wiley, New York (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Markowitz, H.: Mean-Variance Analysis in Portfolio Choice and Capital Markets. Basil Blackwell, Oxford (1987)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Best, M.J., Hlouskova, J.: The efficient frontier for bounded assets. Math. Methods Oper. Res. 52, 195–212 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Merton, R.C.: An analytic derivation of the efficient frontier. J. Financ. Quantit. Anal. 9, 1851–1872 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pang, J.S.: A new efficient algorithm for a class of portfolio selection problems. Oper. Res. Int. J. 28, 754–767 (1980)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Perold, A.F.: Large-scale portfolio optimization. Manag. Sci. 30, 1143–1160 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Sharpe, W.F.: Portfolio Theory and Capital Markets. McGraw-Hill, New York (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stein, M., Branke, J., Schmeck, H.: Efficient implementation of an active set algorithm for large-scale portfolio selection. Comput. Oper. Res. 35, 3945–3961 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Anagnostopoulos, K.P., Mamanis, G.: The mean-variance cardinality constrained portfolio optimization problem: an experimental evaluation of five multiobjective evolutionary algorithms. Expert Syst. Appl. 38, 14208–14217 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Liu, B.D.: Uncertainty Theory, 3rd edn. Spring-Verlag, Berlin (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu, B.D.: A survey of credibility theory. Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak. 5, 387–408 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu, B.D., Iwamura, K.: Chance constrained programming with fuzzy parameters. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 94, 227–237 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Amiri, M., Ekhtiari, M., Yazdani, M.: Nadir compromise programming: a model for optimization of multi-objective portfolio problem. Experts Syst. Appl. 38, 7222–7226 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bhattacharyya, R., Kar, S., Majumder, D.D.: Fuzzy mean-variance-skewness portfolio selection models by interval analysis. Comput. Math. Appl. 61, 126–137 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Dastkhan, H., Gharneh, N.S., Golmakani, H.R.: A linguistic-based portfolio selection model using weighted max-min operator and hybrid genetic algorithm. Expert Syst. Appl. 38, 11735–11743 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Philippatos, G.C., Wilson, C.J.: Entropy, market risk, and the selection of efficient portfolios. Appl. Econ. 4, 209–220 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Huang, X.X.: Mean-Entropy models for fuzzy portfolio selection. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 16, 1096–1101 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Huang, X.X.: Mean-risk model for uncertain portfolio selection. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 10, 71–89 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Mukesh, K.M.: Credibilistic mean-entropy models for multi-period portfolio selection with multi-choice aspiration levels. Inf. Sci. 345, 9–26 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhou, R.X., Zhan, Y., Cai, R., Tong, G.Q.: A mean-variance hybrid-entropy model for portfolio selection with fuzzy returns. Entropy 17, 3319–3331 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang, W.G., Zhang, X.L., Chen, Y.X.: Portfolio adjusting optimization with added assets and transaction costs based on credibility measures. Insur. Math. Econ 49, 353–360 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Sadjadi, S.J., Seyedhosseini, S.M., Hassanlou, K.H.: Fuzzy multi period portfolio selection with different rates for borrowing and lending. Appl. Soft Comput. 11, 3821–3826 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Li, P., Liu, B.D.: Entropy of credibility distributions for fuzzy variables. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 16, 123–129 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Liu, S.T.: The mean-absolute deviation portfolio selection problem with interval-valued returns. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 235, 4149–4157 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu, S.T.: A fuzzy modeling for fuzzy portfolio optimization. Experts Syst. Appl. 38, 13803–13809 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Qin, Z.F., Li, X., Li, X.Y.: Portfolio selection based on fuzzy cross-entropy. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 228, 139–149 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhou, R.Z., Yang, Z.B., Yu, M.: A portfolio optimization model based on information entropy and fuzzy time series. Fuzzy Optim Decis. Mak. 14, 381–397 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Yue, W., Wang, Y.P.: A new fuzzy multi-objective higher order moment portfolio selection model for diversified portfolios. Phys. A 465, 124–140 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Chen, W., Wang, Y., Mehlawat, M.K.: A hybrid FA-SA algorithm for fuzzy portfolios selection with transaction costs. Ann. Oper. Res. (1047). doi:10.1007/s9-016-2365-3

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8, 338–353 (1965)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1, 3–28 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by “the National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 11271140,” “the Ministry of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences Youth Fund Project of China, No. 13YJCZH030,” “the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, No. 2016A030313545” and “the Graduate Education Innovation Projects of Guangdong Province, Nos. 2015JGXM-ZD03, 2016QTLXXM-19.” The authors are highly grateful to the referees and editor-in-chief for their very helpful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xue Deng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deng, X., Zhao, J. & Li, Z. Sensitivity Analysis of the Fuzzy Mean-Entropy Portfolio Model with Transaction Costs Based on Credibility Theory. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 20, 209–218 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-017-0330-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-017-0330-1

Keywords

Navigation