Abstract
Above ground biomass (AGB) and carbon stock are key parameters to understand the carbon sequestration in trees which plays a major role in reducing the CO2 emissions in the atmosphere and thereby reducing the global climate change. With the latest technology of Light detection and ranging (LiDAR), it is now possible to estimate the AGB and Carbon stock at tree level. Studies on the use of terrestrial LiDAR for AGB and carbon stock estimation have mostly used the individual trees as it is easy to extract such standalone trees from LiDAR point cloud data. However, trees which are adjacent and overlapping that are common in forests are difficult to extract and the present study considered such a plot within our university campus and showed how both point cloud data and photos can be utilized to calculate the AGB & Carbon stock without extracting the trees. Terrestrial LiDAR survey of 37 scans was performed at 7 locations covering 144 trees of 21 types which has a mix of both individual and overlapping trees with varying diameter, height, green cover, etc. The LiDAR derived diameter at breast height (DBH) and height of 144 trees were compared with the actuals and it was found that the LiDAR measurements were highly accurate as the resultant mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) was less than 5. The extracted DBH and height were used in a generic allometric model to calculate the AGB and carbon stock and was calculated as 67.893 Mg and 34 Mg respectively. A slanting S-shaped curve was found to fit well between AGB and the input parameters of DBH and height with R2 of 0.87 and 0.96 respectively. The model results revealed that instead of using both DBH and height to estimate biomass and carbon stock, any one parameter also can be used to estimate the AGB as the results are comparable.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
References
Aabeyir R, Adu-Bredu S, Agyare WA, Weir M (2020) Allometric models for estimating aboveground biomass in the tropical woodlands of Ghana, West Africa. For Ecosyst 7:41:1–33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-020-00250-3
Assefa D, Mekuriaw A, Tesfaye M, Sewnet H, Belay B (2023) Mapping of Prosopis juliflora rate of expansion and developing species-specific allometric equations to estimate its aboveground biomass in the dry land of Ethiopia. Model Earth Syst Environ 9:263–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-022-01495-3
Beyene SM, Hussin YA, Kloosterman HE, Ismail MH (2020) Forest Inventory and Aboveground Biomass Estimation with Terrestrial LiDAR in the Tropical Forest of Malaysia. Can J Remote Sens 46(2):130–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/07038992.2020.1759036
Bhatti S, Ahmad SR, Asif M, Farooqi I (2023) Estimation of aboveground carbon stock using Sentinel-2A data and Random Forest algorithm in scrub forests of the Salt Range, Pakistan. For Int J For Res 96(1):104–120
Brahma B, Nath AJ, Deb C, Sileshi GW, Sahoo UK, Kumar Das A (2021) A critical review of forest biomass estimation equations in India. Trees For People 5:100098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2021.100098
Chan EPY, Fung T, Wong FKK (2021) Estimating above-ground biomass of subtropical forest using airborne LiDAR in Hong Kong. Sci Rep 11(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81267-8
Chave J, Mechain M, Burquez A, Chidumayo E, Colgan M, Delitti W, Duque A, Eid T, Fearnside P, Goodman R, Henry M, Yrizar A, Mugasha W, Landau H, Mencuccini M, Nelson BW, Ngomanda A, Nogueira E, Malavassi E, Pelissier R, Ploton P, Ryan CM, Saldarriaga JG, Vieilledent G (2015) Improved allometric models to estimate the above ground biomass of tropical trees. Glob Change Biol 20:3177–3190. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12629
Demol M, Verbeeck H, Gielen B, Armston J, Burt A, Disney M, Duncanson L, Hackenberg J, Kükenbrink D, Lau A, Ploton P, Sewdien A, Stovall A, Takoudjou SM, Volkova L, Weston C, Wortel V, Calders K (2022) Estimating forest above-ground biomass with terrestrial laser scanning: current status and future directions. Methods Ecol Evol 13(8):1628–1639. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13906
Disney M, Burt A, Calders K, Schaaf C, Stovall A (2019) Innovations in Ground and Airborne Technologies as Reference and for training and validation: terrestrial laser scanning (TLS). Surv Geophys 40(4):937–958. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-019-09527-x
DOPA (2021) Factsheet J2 EN Above-Ground Carbon Stock. Digital Observatory for Protected Areas (DOPA), European Commission, Ispra, Italy. https://dopa.jrc.ec.europa.eu/dopa/documentation/en
Ewunetie GG, Miheretu BA, Mareke GT (2021) Carbon stock potential of Sekele Mariam forest in North Western Ethiopia: an implication for climate change mitigation. Model Earth Syst Environ 7:351–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-020-01044-w
Fararoda R, Reddy RS, Rajashekar G, Chand TRK, Jha CS, Dadhwal VK (2021) Improving forest above ground biomass estimates over indian forests using multi source data sets with machine learning algorithm. Ecol Inf 65:101392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101392
ICRAF (2022) Tree functional attributes and ecological database. International Council for Research in Agroforestry (ICRAF), Nairobi, Kenya. http://db.worldagroforestry.org//wd
IPCC (2022) Climate Change 2022 Mitigation of Climate Change Working Group III Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change - Summary for Policymakers. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Geneva, Switzerland. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/downloads/report/IPCC_AR6_WGIII_SPM.pdf
Kefalew A, Soromessa T, Demissew S, Belina M (2022) Validation of allometric models for sele-nono forest in Ethiopia. Model Earth Syst Environ 9:2239–2258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-022-01611-3
Krause P, Forbes B, Barajas-Ritchie A, Clark M, Disney M, Wilkes P, Bentley LP (2023) Using terrestrial laser scanning to evaluate non-destructive aboveground biomass allometries in diverse northern California forests. Front Remote Sens 4:1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsen.2023.1132208
Liu X, Zhang L, Yang X, Liao M, Li W (2022) Retrieval of Tropical Forest Height and above-ground Biomass using Airborne P- and L-Band SAR Tomography. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 19:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2021.3069371
Liu W, Xu C, Zhang Z, Boeck D, Wang Y, Zhang L, Xu X, Zhang C, Chen G, Xu C (2023) Machine learning-based grassland aboveground biomass estimation and its response to climate variation in Southwest China. Front Ecol Evol 11:1–15
Ministry of Civil Aviation (2021) The Drone Rules, 2021. Ministry of Civil Aviation, New Delhi, India. https://egazette.nic.in/WriteReadData/2021/229221.pdf
Nwilag BD, Eyoh AE, Ndehedehe CE (2023) Digital topographic mapping and modelling using low altitude unmanned aerial vehicle. Model Earth Syst Environ 9:1463–1476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-022-01677-z
Overman JP, Johannes H, Witte L, Saldarriaga JG (1994) Evaluation of regression models for above-ground biomass determination in Amazon rainforest. J Trop Ecol 10(2):207–218. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467400007859
Pargal S, Fararoda R, Rajashekar G, Balachandran N, Réjou-Méchain M, Barbier N, Jha CS, Pélissier R, Dadhwal VK, Couteron P (2017) Inverting aboveground biomass-canopy texture relationships in a landscape of forest mosaic in the western ghats of India using very high resolution Cartosat imagery. Remote Sens 9(3):1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9030228
Rodda SR (2023) Non-destructive allometric modeling for tree volume estimation in tropical dry deciduous forests of India using terrestrial laser scanner. J Indian Soc Remote Sens. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-022-01664-y
Salunkhe OR, Valvi R, Singh S, Rane M, Khan L, Saxena V, Khare K (2023) Forest carbon stock and biomass estimation in West Central India using two allometric models. Carbon Res 2(9):1–10
Schreiber LV, Atkinson Amorim JG, Guimarães L, Motta Matos D, Maciel da Costa C, Parraga A (2022) Above-ground biomass wheat estimation: deep learning with UAV-based RGB images. Appl Artif Intell. https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2022.2055392
Singh A, Kushwaha SKP, Nandy S, Padalia H, Ghosh S, Srivastava A, Kumari N (2023) Aboveground forest biomass estimation by the integration of TLS and ALOS PALSAR data using machine learning. Remote Sens 15(4):1143. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15041143
Singhal J, Srivastava G, Reddy CS, Rajashekar G, Jha CS, Rao P, Reddy R, Roy PS (2021) Assessment of Carbon Stock at Tree Level using terrestrial laser scanning Vs. Traditional Methods in Tropical Forest, India. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Observations Remote Sens 14:5064–5071. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2021.3076195
Xu D, Wang H, Xu W, Luan Z, Xu X (2021) LiDAR applications to estimate forest biomass at individual tree scale: opportunities, challenges and future perspectives. Forests 12(5):1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12050550
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank the management of VIT University for the purchase and permission to use the Leica BLK 360 Laser Scanner for terrestrial laser scanning of trees within the university campus. The authors wish to thank Mr. Riyaz Khan and Mr. Shishodiya Ghanshyam Singh for their help during LiDAR data collection. Thanks to Mr. Prabhakaran, Horticulturist for providing all the tree details within the campus.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests to declare.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Gaikadi, S., Selvaraj, V.K. Allometric model based estimation of biomass and carbon stock for individual and overlapping trees using terrestrial LiDAR. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 10, 1771–1782 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-023-01864-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-023-01864-6