Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Validation of allometric models for Sele-Nono forest in Ethiopia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In relation to the current climate change scenario, an increasing demand for research about forest biomass and/or carbon stock assessment through general allometric equation has been evident especially in tropical areas, which include the Ethiopian forests too. In Ethiopia, the majority of the natural forests that reflect large reservoirs of carbon are found in the moist southwest forests of the country as in for instance Sele-Nono forest, and estimating this biomass/carbon stock would influence the country to revise its forest policy. However, most of the allometric equations were developed based on data collected far from the southwest forests of the country; and hence may be a source of error in biomass and carbon stock estimation. Thus, this study was conducted aiming to validate the possible allometric equation for Sele-Nono forest so as to minimize the uncertainty that might be introduced due to the choice of the allometric models. For this purpose, a total of 30 plant individuals (10 trees, 5 palms, 5 fern trees, 5 lianas, and 5 bamboos) were used in this study for relevant data collection following the recommendation of Walker et al. (Standard operating procedures for terrestrial carbon measurement. Version 2012. Winrock International, USA). Regression graphs, paired t test, and cross-validation statistics were used for data analysis. The results showed that Chave et al. (Glob Change Biol 20:3177–3190, 2014) model was the more accurate model for estimating the biomass of trees in the Sele-Nono forest as compared to the local equations developed by the woody biomass project in Ethiopia and the general allometric equations developed for moist trees of tropical forest. Lianas were found to be better estimated using Schnitzer et al. (Biotropica 38:581–591, 2006), whereas Palms, highland bamboos (Arundinaria alpina), and fern trees (Cyathea manniana) were better estimated using Tiepolo et al. (Extension Serie Taiwan Forestry Research Institute 153:98–115, 2002), Mulatu and Fetene (Ethiop J Biol Sci 12:1–23, 2013), and Stanley et al. (The climate action project research initiative. Paper Presented at the Second Annual Conference on Carbon Sequestration, Arlington, 2003) models, respectively (Bias ≤ 10%). Based on the findings of our study we recommend that the biomass equations proposed by Chave et al. (Glob Change Biol 20:3177–3190, 2014), Tiepolo et al. (Extension Serie Taiwan Forestry Research Institute 153:98–115, 2002), Schnitzer et al. (Biotropica 38:581–591, 2006), Mulatu and Fetene (Ethiop J Biol Sci 12:1–23, 2013), and Stanley et al. (The climate action project research initiative. Paper Presented at the Second Annual Conference on Carbon Sequestration, Arlington, 2003) shall be employed for biomass and carbon stock estimation of trees, palms, lianas, bamboos, and fern trees, respectively, in Sele-Nono forest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

The data used and analyzed in this study can be provided from the respective author for scientific, non-profit purpose.

References

  • Aalde H, Abdelgadir A, Penman J, Gytarsky M and Hiraishi T (2003) Forest land. Good practice guidance for land use, land-use change and forestry. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES) for the IPCC, Kanagawa, Japan

  • Addo-Fordjour P, Rahmad ZB (2013) Mixed species allometric models for estimating above-ground liana biomass in tropical primary and secondary forests, Ghana. ISRN Forestry 153587. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/153587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • An Ha T, My-Anh LT (2014) Overview of Bamboo biomass for energy production. University of Sciences and technologies of Hanoi Department of Renewable Energy

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelsen A (ed.) (2008) Moving ahead with REDD: issues, options and implications. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia

  • Banik R (1997) Domestication and improvement of Bamboos. International Network for Bamboo and Rattan. INBAR Working Paper No. 10

  • Bastin JF, Barbier N, Rejou-Mechain M et al (2015) Seeing Central African forests through their largest trees. Sci Rep 5:13156

    Google Scholar 

  • Basuki TM, van Laake PE, Skidmore AK, Hussin YA (2009) Allometric equations for estimating the above-ground biomass in tropical lowland Dipterocarp forests. For Ecol Manag 257:1684–1694

    Google Scholar 

  • Beets PN, Kimberley MO, Oliver GR, Pearce SH, Graham D, Brandon A (2012) Allometric equations for estimating carbon stocks in Natural Forest in New Zealand. Forests 3:818–839

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekele M, Tesfaye Y, Mohammed Z, Zewdie S, Tebikew Y, Maria B, Kassa H (2015). The Context of REDD+ in Ethiopia: Drivers, agents and institutions. Occasional Paper 127. Bogor, Indonesia, CIFOR

  • Brown S (1997) Estimating biomass and biomass change of tropical forests. A primer. FAO Forestry Paper 134. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy

  • Brown S, Gillespie AJR, Lugo AE (1989) Biomass estimation methods for tropical forests with applications to forest inventory data. For Sci 35:881–902

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown S, Burnham M, Delaney M, Vacca R, Powell M, Moreno A (2000) Issues and challenges for forest-based carbon-offset projects: a case study of the Noel Kempff Climate Action Project in Bolivia. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 5:99–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Cailliez F (1992) Forest volume estimation and yield prediction. FAO Forestry Paper 22/1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy

  • Chave J, Riera B, Dubois M (2001) Estimation of biomass in a Neotropical forest of French Guiana: spatial and temporal variability. J Trop Ecol 17:79–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Chave J, Condit R, Aguilar S et al (2004) Error propagation and scaling for tropical forest biomass estimates. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 359:409–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Chave J, Andalo C, Brown S et al (2005) Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests. Oecologia 145(1):87–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Chave J, Mechain MR, Burquez A et al (2014) Improved allometric models to estimate the aboveground biomass of tropical trees. Glob Change Biol 20:3177–3190

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiyenda S, Kozak A (1982) Some comments on ‘choosing regression models for biomass prediction equations.’ For Chron 58:203–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Claesson S, Sahlen K, Lundmark T (2001) Functions for biomass estimation of young Pinus sylvestris, Picea abies and Betula spp. from stands in Northern Sweden with high stand densities. Scand J for Res 16:138–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark DA, Brown S, Kicklighter D, Chambers JQ, Thomlinson JR, Ni J (2001) Measuring net primary production in forests: concepts and field methods. Ecol Appl 11(2):356–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Colgan MS, Asner GP, Swemmer T (2013) Harvesting tree biomass at the stand level to assess the accuracy of field and airborne biomass estimation in Savannas. Ecol Appl 23(5):1170–1184

    Google Scholar 

  • Condit R (2008) Methods for estimating above ground biomass of forest and replacement vegetation in tropics. Centre for Tropical Forest Science and Forest, Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute

  • Cummings DL, Kauffman JB, Perry DA, Hughes RF (2002) Above ground biomass and structure of rain forests in the South-western Brazilian Amazon. For Ecol Manage 163:293–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis D (2005) National tree climbing guide. United States Department of Agriculture (USAD) Forest Service, Washington DC

  • De Aguiar DR, Lima AJN, Gama JRV, de Andrade DFC, dos Santos J, Higuchi N (2017) Adjustment of volumetric equations from fallen trees for analysis of the logging effect in the Tapajos National Forest, Para, Brazil. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 11(10):48–59

    Google Scholar 

  • De Beenhouwer M, Geeraert L, Mertens J, Van Geel M, Aerts R, Vanderhaegen K, Olivier Honnay O (2016) Biodiversity and carbon storage co-benefits of coffee agroforestry across a gradient of increasing management intensity in the SW Ethiopian highlands. Agr Ecosyst Environ 222:193–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean C (2003) Calculation of wood volume and stem taper using terrestrial single-image close range photogrammetry and contemporary software tools. Silva Fennica 37(3):359–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz J, Kuyah S (2011) Guidelines for establishing regional allometric equations for biomass estimation through destructive sampling. World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Nairobi, Kenya

  • Dixon RK, Solomon AM, Brown S, Houghton RA, Trexler MC, Wisniewski J (1994) Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems. Science 263:185–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Djomo NA, Picard N, Fayolle A, Henry M, Ngomanda A, McLellan J, Saborowski J, Adamou I, Ploton P, Lejeune P (2016) Tree allometry for estimation of carbon stocks in African Tropical forests. Forestry. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpw025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dudani SN, Mahesh MK, Chandran MDS, Ramachandra TV (2014) Cyathea nilgirensis Holttum (Cyatheaceae: Pteridophyta): a threatened tree fern from central Western Ghats India. J Threat Taxa 6(1):5413–5416

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncanson L, Rourke O, Dubayah R (2015) Small sample size yields biased Allometric equations in temperate forests. Sci Rep 5:17153

    Google Scholar 

  • Dykstra DP, Kowero GS, Ofosu-Asiedu A, Kio P (1996) Promoting Stewardship of Forests in the Humid Forest Zone of Anglophone West and Central Africa. Final Report of a Collaborative Research Project Undertaken by the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) and the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Nairobi, Kenya

  • Embaye K, Weih M, Ledin S, Christersson L (2005) Biomass and nutrient distribution in a highland bamboo forest in southwest Ethiopia: implications for management. For Ecol Manag 204:159–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Ensslin A, Rutten G, Pommer U, Zimmermann R, Hemp A, Fischer M (2015) Effects of elevation and land use on the biomass of trees, shrubs and herbs at Mount Kilimanjaro. Ecosphere 6(3):45

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldpausch TR, Banin L, Phillips OL et al (2011) Height-diameter allometry of tropical forest trees. Biogeosciences 8:1081–1106

    Google Scholar 

  • Friis I (1992) Forests and forest trees of North East Tropical Africa. Kew Bull Add Ser

  • Friis I, Demissew S, Breugel PV (2011) Atlas of the potential vegetation of Ethiopia. Addis Ababa University Press, Addis Ababa

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehring C, Parks S, Denich M (2004) Liana allometric biomass equations for Amazonian primary and secondary forest. Forest Ecol Manag 195:83–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerwing JJ, Farias DL (2000) Integrating liana abundance and forest stature into an estimate of total aboveground biomass for an eastern Amazonian forest. J Trop Ecol 16:327–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs HK, Brown S, Niles JO, Foley JA (2007) Monitoring and estimating tropical forest carbon stocks: making REDD a reality. Environ Res Lett 2:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Gimenez BO, Santos LT, Gebara J, Celes CH, Durgante FM, Lima AJ, dos Santos J, Higuchi N (2017) Tree climbing techniques and volume equations Eschweilera (Mata–Mata), a hyper dominant genus in the Amazon forest. Forests 8:154

    Google Scholar 

  • Guangyi M, Yujun S, Saeed S (2017) Models for predicting the biomass of Cunninghamia lanceolata trees and stands in southeaster China. PLoS ONE 12(1):e0169747. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta HV, Sorooshian S, Yapo PO (1999) Status of automatic calibration for hydrologic models: comparison with multilevel expert calibration. J Hydrol Eng 4:135–143. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1999)4:2(135)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanselman DH, Spencer PD, McKelvey DR, Martin MH (2012) Application of an acoustic-trawl survey design to improve estimates of rockfish biomass. Fish Bull 110:379–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry M, Besnard A, Asante WA, Eshun J, Adu-Bredu S, Valentini R, Bernoux M, Saint-Andre L (2010) Wood density, phytomass variations within and among trees, and allometric equations in a tropical rainforest of Africa. For Ecol Manag 260:1375–1388

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry M, Bombelli A, Trotta C et al (2013) GlobAllomeTree: international platform for tree allometric equations to support volume, biomass and carbon assessment. iForest 6:326–330

    Google Scholar 

  • https://www.netl.doe.gov. Paper presented by William G. Stanley on Climate Action Project Research Initiative, The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, Virginia, USA

  • Hughes RF (1997) Effects of deforestation and land use on biomass, carbon and nutrient polls in the Los Tuxtlas region, Mexico. PhD Dissertation. Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR

  • Imani G, Boyemba F, Lewis S, Nabahungu NL, Calders K, Zapfack L, Riera B, Balegamire C, Cuni-Sanchez A (2017) Height-diameter allometry and above ground biomass in tropical montane forests; insights from the Albertine Rift in Africa. PLoS ONE 12(6):e0179653

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2001) Climate Change 2001: the scientific basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

  • IPCC (2003) Good practice guidance for land use, land-use change and forestry. IPCC National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, Kanagawa, Japan

  • Jenkins JC, Chojnacky DC, Health LS, Birdsey RA (2003) National scale biomass estimators for united states tree species. For Sci 49(1):12–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaonga ML, Bayliss-Smith TP (2010) Allometric models for estimation of aboveground carbon stocks in improved fallows in eastern Zambia. Agrofor Syst 78:217–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaushal R, Subbulakshmi V, Tomar JMS, Alam NM, Jayaparkash J, Mehta H, Chaturvedi OM (2016) Predictive models for biomass and carbon stock estimation in male bamboo (Dendrocalamus strictus L.) in Doon valley India. Acta Ecol Sin. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chnaes.2016.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kefalew A, Soromessa T, Demissew S (2022) Plant diversity and community analysis of Sele-Nono forest, Southwest Ethiopia: implication for conservation planning. Bot Stud 63:23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40529-022-00353-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozak A, Kozak R (2003) Does cross validation provide additional information in the evaluation of regression models? Can J for Res 33:976–987

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuyah S, Sileshi GW, Rosenstock TS (2016) Allometric models based on Bayesian frameworks give better estimates of above ground biomass in the Miombo Woodlands. Forests 7:13

    Google Scholar 

  • Large MF, Braggins JE (2004) Tree ferns. Timber Press, Oregon

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovett JC (1993) Eastern arc moist forest flora. In: Lovett JC, Wasser SK (eds) Biogeography and ecology of the rain forests of Eastern Africa. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 33–55

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCoun RJ (1998) Biases in the interpretation and use of research results. Annu Rev Psychol 49:259–287

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDicken K (1997) A guide to monitoring carbon storage in forestry and agroforestry projects. In: Forest carbon monitoring program. Winrock International, Arlington, VA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Malhi Y, Adu-Bredu S, Asare RA, Lewi SL, Mayaux P (2013) African rainforests: past, present and future. Phil Trans R Soc B 368:20120312

    Google Scholar 

  • Mate R, Johansson T, Sitoe A (2014) Biomass equations for tropical forest tree species in Mozambique. Forests 5:535–556

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyamoto K, Sato T, Olivos EAA, Orellana GC, Stornaiuolo CMR (2013) Variation in tree community composition and carbon stock under natural and human disturbances in andean forests, Peru. Forests 9:390. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9070390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molto Q, Rossi V, Blanc L (2013) Error propagation in biomass estimation in tropical forests. Methods Ecol Evol 4:175–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Muchiri MN, Muga MO (2013) A preliminary yield model for Natural Yushania Alpina Bamboo in Kenya. J Nat Sci Res 3:10

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulatu Y, Fetene M (2013) Stand structure, growth and biomass of Arundinaria alpina (highland bamboo) along topographic gradient in the choke mountain, northwestern Ethiopia. Ethiop J Biol Sci 12(1):1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Nam VT, Van Kuijk M, Anten NPR (2016) Allometric equations for aboveground and below ground biomass estimation in an evergreen forest in Vietnam. PLoS ONE 11(6):e0156827. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nascimento HEM, Laurance WF (2001) Total aboveground biomass in central Amazonian rainforests: a landscape-scale study. For Ecol Manag 5793:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostertag R, Inman-Narahari F, Cordell S, Giardia CP, Sack L (2014) Forest structure in low-diversity tropical forests: a study of Hawaiian Wet and Dry forests. PLoS ONE 9(8):e103268

    Google Scholar 

  • Ough K, Murphy A (2004) Decline in tree fern abundance after clear fell harvesting. For Ecol Manag 199:153–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson TRH, Walker S, Brown SL (2005) Source Book for LULUCF Projects. Winrock International, Arlington, VA, USA

  • Pearson TRH, Brown SL, Birdsey RA (2007) Measurement guidelines for the sequestration of forest carbon. General Technical Report- NRS-18, USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station Newtown Square, USA

  • Picard N, Saint-Andre L, Henry M (2012) Manual for building tree volume and biomass allometric equations: from field measurement to prediction. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome

  • Picard N, Boyemba BF, Rossi V (2014) Reducing the error in biomass estimates strongly depends on model selection. Ann for Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-014-0434-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putz FE (1983) Liana biomass and leaf area of a ‘tierra firme’ forest in the Rio Negro basin, Venezuela. Biotropica 15:185–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Putz FE (1984) The natural history of lianas on Barro Colorado Island Panama. Ecology 65(6):1713–1724

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravindranath NH, Ostwald M (2007) Carbon inventory methods: hand book for greenhouse gas inventory. Carbon mitigation and roundwood production projects. Springer Science & Business Media, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Reusing M (1998) Monitoring of natural high forests in Ethiopia. Government of the Federal Democratic republic of Ethiopia, Ministry of Agriculture, Natural Resources Management and Regulatory Department; in cooperation with GTZ, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

  • Risley LS (1984) A modified rope-climbing techniques for reaching canopies of forest trees in remote areas. J GA Entomol Soc 9(4):533–538

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzer SA, Saara J, DeWalt SJ, Chave J (2006) Censusing and measuring lianas: a quantitative comparison of the common methods. Biotropica 38(5):581–591

    Google Scholar 

  • Seaman MA, Levin JR, Serlin RC (1991) New developments in pairwise multiple comparisons some powerful and practicable procedures. Psychol Bull 110:577–586 https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.110.3.577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segura M, Kanninen M (2005) Allometric models for tree volume and total aboveground biomass in a tropical humid forest in Costa Rica. Biotropica 37(1):2–8

    Google Scholar 

  • SNDAO (2015) Sele-Nono District Agricultural Organization: Unpublished annual report on socio-economy of Sele-Nono District

  • Stanley W, Brown S, Kant Z, Calmon M, Tiepolo G, Boucher T (2003) The climate action project research initiative. Paper Presented at the Second Annual Conference on Carbon Sequestration, Arlington

  • Taylor CS (2013) Understanding statistics: validity and validation, 1st edn. Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiepolo G, Calmon M, Feretti AR (2002) Measuring and Monitoring Carbon Stocks at the Guaraqueçaba Climate Action Project, Paraná, Brazil. In: International Symposium on Forest Carbon Sequestration and Monitoring. Extension Serie Taiwan Forestry Research Institute 153:98–115

  • UNFCC (1997) Kyoto protocol to the convention on climate change. Climate Change Secretariat, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • UNFCC (2007) Report on the Conference of Parties on its Thirteenth Session, Bali, Indonesia. United Nation Framework Convention on Climate Change, Geneva

  • Vadeboncoeur MA, Hamburg SP, Yanai RD (2007) Validation and refinement of allometric equations for roots of northern hardwoods. Can J for Res 37:1777–1783

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Heijden GMF, Powers JS, Schnitzer SA (2015) Liana reduce carbon accumulation and storage in tropical forests. PNAS 112(43):13267–13271

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderhaegen K, Verbist B, Hundera K, Muys B (2015) REALU vs REDD+: carbon and biodiversity in the Afromontane landscapes of SW Ethiopia. For Ecol Manag 343:22–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieilledent G, Courbaud B, Kunstler G, Dhote JF, Clark JS (2010) Individual variability in tree allometry determines light resource allocation in forest ecosystems: a hierarchical Bayesian approach. Oecologia 163:759–773

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieilledent G, Vaudry R, Andriamanohisoa SFD, Rakotonarivo OS, Randrianasolo HZ, Razafindrabe HN, Rakotoarivony C, Ebeling J, Rasamoelina M (2012) A universal approach to estimate biomass and carbon stock in tropical forests using generic allometric models. Ecol Appl 22(2):572–583

    Google Scholar 

  • Vieira SA, Alves LF, Aidar M, Araujo LS, Baker T, Batista JLF, Campos MC, Camargo PB, Chave J, Delitti WBC (2008) Estimation of biomass and carbon stocks: the case of the Atlantic Forest. Biota Neotrop 8:21–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent JB, Henning B, Saulei S, Sosanika G, Weiblen GD (2015) Forest carbon in lowland Papua New Guinea: local variation and the importance of small trees. Austral Ecol 40(2):151–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Vreugdenhil D, Payton IJ, Vreugdenhil A, Tilahun T, Nune S, Weeks E (2011) Establishing a “Carbon Baseline” and mechanisms for payments for carbon environmental services discharged by protected areas in Ethiopia, World Institute for Conservation and Environment (WICE), USA

  • Walker SM, Pearson TRH, Casarim FM, Harris N, Petrova S, Grais A, Swails E, Netzer M, Goslee KM, Brown S (2012) Standard operating procedures for terrestrial carbon measurement. Version 2012. Winrock International, USA

  • Walter H (1983) Vegetation of the earth and ecological systems of the geobiosphere, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • WBISPP (2000) Manual for woody biomass inventory: woody biomass inventory and strategic planning project, Ministry of Agriculture, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

  • White F (1983) The vegetation of Africa. UNESCO

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams LJ, Abdi H (2010) Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) test. In: Encyclopedia of research design, vol 218, pp 840–853

  • Wimbush SH (1945) The African alpine bamboo. Emp for J 24:33–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Winrock International: Winrock International Ecosytem Services website (http://www.winrock.org/Ecosytems/publications.aspm

  • Yuen JQ, Fung T, Ziegler AD (2017) Carbon stocks in bamboo ecosystems worldwide: estimates and uncertainties. For Ecol Manag 393:113–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1996) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao F, Guo Q, Kelly M (2012) Allometric equation choice impacts lidar-based forest biomass estimates: a case study from the Sierra National Forest, CA. Agric for Meteorol 165:64–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Zianis D, Mencuccini M (2004) On simplifying allometric analyses of forest biomass. For Ecol Manag 187:311–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Zianis D, Muukkonen P, Makipaa R, Mencuccini M (2005) Biomass and stem volume equations for tree species in Europe. Silva Fennica Monographs 4:63

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the research crew of the local people for the tree climbing data (Biomass data of trees and palm) from the Sele-Nono forest. This work has been funded by the Second Thematic Research Fund (DEB 0235650 and DEB 9810221) of Addis Ababa University (AAU), and Debre Markos University (DMU). We highly acknowledge them

Funding

This research has been funded by Addis Ababa University and Debre Markos University (Both in Ethiopia).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Research design, data collection, data analysis, writing drats manuscripts AK. Review and editing, Supervision MB, TS and SD. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alemayehu Kefalew.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Not applicable since the study involves no human participants.

Consent to participate

Not applicable as the study involves no human participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kefalew, A., Soromessa, T., Demissew, S. et al. Validation of allometric models for Sele-Nono forest in Ethiopia. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 9, 2239–2258 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-022-01611-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-022-01611-3

Keywords

Navigation