Abstract
Henrich et al. (Behavioral and Brain Science 33:61–135, 2010), with their call to increase the number of samples from non-WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic) societies, represented a major roadblock in the steady progress of the science of evolutionary psychology and caused a significant detour. Whatever merit Henrich et al.’s (Behavioral and Brain Science 33:61–135, 2010) article might have had for social and behavioral sciences in general, it is the wrong call for evolutionary psychology. In this essay, I explain why evolutionary psychologists must continue to test their general theories about evolved human nature mainly in WEIRD societies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Apostolou, M. (2007). Sexual selection under parental choice: The role of parents in the evolution of human mating. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 403–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.05.007
Apostolou, M. (2010a). Sexual selection under parental choice: Evidence from sixteen historical societies. Evolutionary Psychology, 10, 504–518.
Apostolou, M. (2010b). Sexual selection under parental choice in agropastoral societies. Evolution and Hu Man Behavior, 31, 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.06.010
Atran, S. (2002). In gods we trust: The evolutionary landscape of religion. Oxford University Press.
Awad, E., Dsouza, S., Kim, R., Schulz, J., Henrich, J., Shariff, A., ... & Rahwan, I. (2018). The moral machine experiment. Nature, 563, 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0637-6
Awad, E., Dsouza, S., Shariff, A., Rahwan, I., & Bonnefon, J.-F. (2020). Universals and variations in moral decisions made in 42 countries by 70,000 participants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117, 2332–2337. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1911517117
Barabanova, S. V., Sanger, P. A., Ziyatdinova, J., Sokolova, A., & Ivanov, V. G. (2013). The decline of women in Russian engineering education: Historical and societal forces at play. Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference And Exposition, Atlanta, GA.
Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992). The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Oxford University Press.
Baron-Cohen, S. (2003). The essential difference. Penguin.
Breton, D., & Prioux, F. (2009). The one-child family: France in the European context. Demographic Research, 20, 657–692. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2009.20.27
Buss, D. M., Abbott, M., Angleitner, A., Asherian, A., Biaggio, A., Blanco-Vilasenor, A., ... & Yang, K.-S. (1990). International preferences in selecting mates: A study of 37 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21, 5–47.
Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.
Cai, H., Kwan, V. S. Y., & Sedikides, C. (2012). A sociocultural approach to Narcissism: The case of modern China. European Journal of Personality, 26, 529–535. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.852
Cai, Y., & Feng, W. (2021). The social and sociological consequences of China’s one-child policy. Annual Review of Sociology, 47, 587–606. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-090220-032839
Cameron, L., Erkal, N., Gangadharan, L., & Meng, X. (2013). Little emperors: Behavioral Impacts of China’s one-child policy. Science, 339, 953–957. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230221
Cashdan, E., Marlowe, F. W., Crittenden, A., Porter, C., & Wood, B. M. (2012). Sex differences in spatial cognition among Hadza foragers. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33, 274–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2011.10.005
Christakis, N. A. (2019). Blueprint: The evolutionary origins of a good society. Little, Brown Spark.
Dudová, R., Hašková, H., & Chaloupková, J. K. (2022). Disentangling the link between having one child and partnership trajectories: A mixed-methods life-course research. Journal of Family Studies, 28, 1466–1487. https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2020.1839534
Dutton, D. (2009). The art instinct: Beauty, pleasure, and human evolution. Bloomsbury.
Gaertner, L., Sedikides, C., Cai, H., & Brown, J. D. (2010). It’s not WEIRD, it’s WRONG: When researchers Overlook uNderlying Genotypes, they will not detect universal processes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 93–94. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000105
Geary, D. C. (2021). Now you see them, now you don’t: An evolutionarily informed model of environmental influences on human sex differences. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 125, 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.02.020
Gebauer, J. E., Sedikides, C., Schönbrodt, F. D., Bleidorn, W., Rentfrow, P. J., ... & Gosling, S. D. (2017). The religiosity as social value hypothesis: A multi-method replication and extension across 65 countries and three levels of spatial aggregation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, e18–e39. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000104
Goldstein, J., Lutz, W., & Testa, M. R. (2003). The emergence of sub-replacement family size ideas in Europe. Population Research and Policy Review, 22, 479–496.
Guthrie, S. E. (1993). Faces in the clouds: A new theory of religion. Oxford University Press.
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–135. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
Jiao, S., Ji, G., Jing, Q., & (Ching, C. C.),. (1986). Comparative study of behavioral qualities of only children and sibling children. Child Development, 57, 357–361.
Kanazawa, S. (2003). Why productivity fades with age: The crime–genius connection. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00538-X
Kanazawa, S. (2015). Where do gods come from? Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 7, 306–313.
Kowal, M., Sorokowski, P., Pisanski, K., Valentova, J. V., Varella, M. A. C., Frederick, D. A., ... & Zumárraga-Espinosa, M. (2022). Predictors of enhancing human physical attractiveness: Data from 93 countries. Evolution and Human Behavior, 43, 455–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2022.08.003
Lang, M., Purzycki, B. G., Apicella, C. L., Atkinson, Q. D., Bolyanatz, A., Cohen, E., ... & Henrich, J. (2019). Moralizing gods, impartiality and religious parochialism across 15 societies. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 286, 20190202. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.0202
Laudan, L. (1990). Science and relativism: Some key controversies in the philosophy of science. University of Chicago Press.
Leavens, D. A., Bard, K., & Hopkins, W. D. (2010). BIZARRE chimpanzees do not represent “the chimpanzee.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 100–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000166
Lippa, R. (1998). Gender-related individual differences and the structure of vocational interests: The importance of the people-things dimension. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 996–1009.
Lippa, R. A., Collaer, M. L., & Peters, M. (2010). Sex differences in mental rotation and line angle judgments are positively associated with gender equality and economic development across 53 nations. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 990–997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-008-9460-8
Maryanski, A. R. (1995). What is the good society for hominids? Critical Review, 9, 483–499.
Maryanski, A. (2010). WEIRD societies may be more compatible with human nature. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 103–104. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000191
Miller, G. F. (1999). Sexual selection for cultural display. In R. Dunbar, C. Knight, & C. Power (Eds.), The evolution of culture: An interdisciplinary view (pp. 71–91). Rutgers University Press.
Pick, C. M., Ko, A., Wormley, A. S., Wiezel, A., Kenrick, D. T., Al-Shawaf, L., ... & Varnum, M. E. W. (2022). Family still matters: Human social motivation across 42 countries during a global pandemic. Evolution and Human Behavior, 43, 527–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2022.09.003
Purzycki, B. G., Henrich, J., Apicella, C. L., Atkinson, Q. D., Baimel, A., Cohen, E., ... & Norenzayan, A. (2017). The evolution of religion and morality: A synthesis of ethnographic and experimental evidence from eight societies. Religion, Brain & Behavior, 8, 101–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2016.1267027
Rai, T. S., & Fiske, A. (2010). ODD (observation- and description-deprived) psychological research. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 106–107. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000221
Rosenthal, B. G. (1975). The role and status of women in the Soviet Union: 1917 to the present. In R. Rohrlich-Leavitt (Ed.), Women cross-culturally: Change and challenge (pp. 429–455). Aldine.
Schmitt, D. P., Realo, A., Voracek, M., & Allik, J. (2008). Why can’t a man be more like a woman? Sex differences in Big Five personality traits across 55 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 168–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.168
Schultz, J. F., Bahrami-Rad, D., Beauchamp, J. P., & Henrich, J. (2019). The Church, intensive kinship, and global psychological variation. Science, 366, eaau5141. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau5141
Sobotka, T., & Beaujouan, É. (2014). Two is best? The persistence of a two-child family ideal in Europe. Population and Development Review, 40, 319–419.
Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2018). The gender-equality paradox in science, technology, engineering, and mathematical education. Psychological Science, 29, 518–593. https://doi.org/10.1177/095679761989289
Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2020). Sex-specific academic ability and attitude patterns in students across developed nations. Intelligence, 81, 101453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2020.101453
Tay, P. K. C., Ting, Y. Y., & Tan, K. Y. (2019). Sex and care: The evolutionary psychological explanations for sex differences in formal care occupations. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 867. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00867
Vashro, L., & Cashdan, E. (2015). Spatial cognition, mobility, and reproductive success innorthwestern Namibia. Evolution and Human Behavior, 36, 123–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.09.009
Vashro, L., Padilla, L., & Cashdan, E. (2016). Sex differences in mobility and spatial cognition: A test of the fertility and parental care hypothesis in northwestern Namibia. Human Nature, 27, 16–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-015-9247-2
Weinberg, S. (1992). Dreams of a final theory: The search for the fundamental laws of nature. Vintage.
Yong, J. C., & Li, N. P. (2022). Elucidating evolutionary principles with the traditional Mosuo: Adaptive benefits and origins of matriliny and “walking marriages.” Culture and Evolution, 19, 22–40. https://doi.org/10.1556/2055.2022.00017
Acknowledgements
I thank Simon S. Groome, Norman P. Li, Jose C. Yong, and anonymous reviewers for their comments on earlier drafts.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
As the sole author, SK is responsible for all aspects of the work reported.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval
Not applicable. There are no human or animal subjects involved.
Consent to Participate
Not applicable.
Consent for Publication
Not applicable.
Conflict of Interest
The author declares no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Kanazawa, S. Why All Evolutionary Psychological Theories Must be Tested in WEIRD Societies. Evolutionary Psychological Science 10, 33–39 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-024-00383-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-024-00383-6