Advertisement

Psychopathy and the Induction of Desire: Formulating and Testing an Evolutionary Hypothesis

  • Kristopher J. BrazilEmail author
  • Adelle E. Forth
Research Article

Abstract

The problems psychopathic individuals impose on society and in their interpersonal relationships can be held in stark contrast to reports of their appeal and sexual success in some of those relationships. In the current paper, we seek to contextualize this enigma by focusing on the interpersonal dynamics of psychopathic individuals in romantic encounters. We first formulate a plausible evolutionary function, the sexual exploitation hypothesis, that proposes psychopathy exhibits “special design” features for subverting female mate choice, facilitating the induction of favorable impressions and desire in prospective intimate relationships. We then test the hypothesis in two studies with university samples. Study 1 had young men assessed on psychopathy, social intelligence, and sociosexuality engage in a filmed dating interaction. Study 2 had young women view a subsample of the videos, rate them on desirability, and leave voice messages. Results show psychopathy was related to sociosexuality, specific factors of social intelligence, and generating higher desirability ratings from women after controlling for men’s physical attractiveness. Analyses involving comparisons of two men showed women’s ratings increased in favor of the more psychopathic man. Women’s voice pitch also changed, but only in response to different facets of psychopathy. The results provide preliminary support for the sexual exploitation hypothesis and suggest that more dynamic assessment of putative desirability in psychopathy may be required to capture its plausible special design features in prospective dating encounters.

Keywords

Psychopathy Intimate relationships Evolutionary function Dating Female mate choice Voice pitch 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Chantelle Dias and Paz Fortier for their invaluable and supportive contributions in completing this manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

40806_2019_213_MOESM1_ESM.docx (19 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 19 kb)

References

  1. Andersson, S. (1989). Sexual selection and cues for female choice in leks of Jackson’s widowbird Euplectes jacksoni. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 25, 403–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews, P. W., Gangestad, S. W., & Matthews, D. (2002). Adaptationism—how to carry out an exaptationist program. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 489–504.Google Scholar
  3. Apicella, C. L., & Feinberg, D. R. (2009). Voice pitch alters mate-choice-relevant perception in hunter–gatherers. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 276, 1077–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Babiak, P., & Hare, R. D. (2006). Snakes in suits. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  5. Bateman, A. J. (1948). Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity, 2, 349–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benenson, J. F. (2014). Warriors and worriers. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Blanchard, A., Lyons, M., & Centifanti, L. (2016). An effective way to deal with predators is to taste terrible: primary and secondary psychopathy and mate preference. Personality and Individual Differences, 92, 128–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Book, A., Methot-Jones, T., Blais, J., Hosker-Field, A., Volk, A., Visser, B. A., Gauthier, N., Holden, R. R., & D’Agata, M. T. (2019). Psychopathic traits and the cheater–hawk hypothesis. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34, 3229–3251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Book, A., Methot, T., Gauthier, N., Hosker-Field, A., Forth, A., Quinsey, V., & Molnar, D. (2015). The mask of sanity revisited: psychopathic traits and affective mimicry. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 1, 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Book, A. S., & Quinsey, V. L. (2004). Psychopaths: cheaters or warrior-hawks? Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown, S. L. (2009). Women who love psychopaths (2nd ed.). Penrose: Mask Publishing.Google Scholar
  12. Buss, D. M. (1995). Evolutionary psychology: a new paradigm for psychological science. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buss, D. M. (2016). The evolution of desire. New York: Basic Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Buss, D. M., Abbott, M., Angleitner, A., Asherian, A., Biaggio, A., Blanco-Villasenor, A., Bruchon-Schweitzer, M., Ch'U, H. Y., Czapinski, J., Deraad, B., Ekehammar, B., el Lohamy, N., Fioravanti, M., Georgas, J., Gjerde, P., Guttman, R., Hazan, F., Iwawaki, S., Janakiramaiah, N., Khosroshani, F., Kreitler, S., Lachenicht, L., Lee, M., Liik, K., Little, B., Mika, S., Moadel-Shahid, M., Moane, G., Montero, M., Mundy-Castle, A. C., Niit, T., Nsenduluka, E., Pienkowski, R., Pirttilä-Backman, A. M., de Leon, J. P., Rousseau, J., Runco, M. A., Safir, M. P., Samuels, C., Sanitioso, R., Serpell, R., Smid, N., Spencer, C., Tadinac, M., Todorova, E. N., Troland, K., van den Brande, L., van Heck, G., van Langenhove, L., & Yang, K.-S. (1990). International preferences in selecting mates: a study of 37 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology., 21, 5–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Buss, D. M., & Barnes, M. (1986). Preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 559–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Buss, D. M., & Duntley, J. D. (2008). Adaptations for exploitation. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 12, 53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cale, E. M., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2002). Sex differences in psychopathy and antisocial personality disorder: a review and integration. Clinical Psychology Review, 22, 1179–1207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Carter, G. L., Campbell, A. C., & Muncer, S. (2014). The dark triad personality: attractiveness to women. Personality and Individual Differences, 56, 57–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cleckley, H. (1976). The mask of sanity (5th ed.). St. Louis: Mosby.Google Scholar
  21. Coid, J., & Yang, M. (2008). The distribution of psychopathy among a household population: categorical or dimensional? Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 43, 773–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cunha, O., Braga, T., & Gonçalves, R. A. (2018). Psychopathy and intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1–19.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518754870.
  23. Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. de Bruyn, E. H., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Wissink, I. B. (2009). Associations of peer acceptance and perceived popularity with bullying and victimization in early adolescence. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 30, 543–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Deck, E. (2017). Manipulation tactics: the role of love bombing and gas-lighting in psychopathic intimate relationships. (Unpublished honours thesis). Carleton University: Ottawa, Ontario.Google Scholar
  26. Efferson, L. M., & Glenn, A. L. (2018). Examining gender differences in the correlates of psychopathy: a systematic review of emotional, cognitive, and morality-related constructs. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 41, 48–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ellis, L. (2005). A theory explaining biological correlates of criminality. European Journal of Criminology, 2, 287–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fairless, D. (2018). Mad blood stirring: the inner lives of violent men. Toronto: Random House Canada.Google Scholar
  29. Feinberg, D. R., DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., & Perrett, D. I. (2008). The role of femininity and averageness of voice pitch in aesthetic judgments of women’s voices. Perception, 37, 615–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fisher, R. A. (1935). The evolution of sexual preference. Eugenics Review, 7, 184–192.Google Scholar
  31. Forth, A. E., Kosson, D. S., & Hare, R. D. (2003). Hare psychopathy checklist: youth version. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
  32. Fraccaro, P. J., Jones, B. C., Vukovic, J., Smith, F. G., Watkins, C. D., Feinberg, D. R., Little, A. C., & Debruine, L. M. (2011). Experimental evidence that women speak in a higher voice pitch to men they find attractive. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 9, 57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gacono, C. B., Meloy, J. R., Sheppard, K., Speth, E., & Roske, A. (1995). A clinical investigation of malingering and psychopathy in hospitalized insanity acquittees. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 23, 387–397.Google Scholar
  34. Glenn, A. L., Efferson, L. M., Iyer, R., & Graham, J. (2017). Values, goals, and motivations associated with psychopathy. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 36, 108–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Glenn, A. L., Kurzban, R., & Raine, A. (2011). Evolutionary theory and psychopathy. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16, 371–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Grieve, R., & Mahar, D. (2013). Can social intelligence be measured? Psychometric properties of the Tromsø Social Intelligence Scale – English version. The Irish Journal of Psychology, 34, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Harasymchuk, C., & Fehr, B. (2012). A prototype analysis of relational boredom. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 627–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hare, R. D. (1993). Without conscience. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  39. Hare, R. D. (2003). The Hare psychopathy checklist–revised (2nd ed.). Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
  40. Hare, R. D., Neumann, C. S., & Mokros, A. (2018). The PCL–R assessment of psychopathy: development, properties, debates, and new directions. In C. J. Patrick (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy, 2nd edition (pp. 39–80). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  41. Harpending, H. C., & Sobus, J. (1987). Sociopathy as an adaptation. Ethology and Sociobiology, 8, 63S–72S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., Hilton, N. Z., Lalumiere, M. L., & Quinsey, V. L. (2007). Coercive and precocious sexuality as a fundamental aspect of psychopathy. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Holtzman, N. S., & Strube, M. J. (2012). People with dark personalities tend to create a physically attractive veneer. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 461–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jauk, E., Neubauer, A. C., Mairunteregger, T., Pemp, S., Sieber, K. P., & Rauthmann, J. F. (2016). How alluring are dark personalities? The dark triad and attractiveness in speed dating. European Journal of Personality, 30, 125–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jonason, P. K., Girgis, M., & Milne-Home, J. (2017). The exploitive mating strategy of the dark triad traits: tests of rape-enabling attitudes. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46, 697–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jonason, P. K., Koenig, B. L., & Tost, J. (2010a). Living a fast life: the dark triad and life history theory. Human Nature, 21, 428–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jonason, P. K., & Lavertu, A. N. (2017). The reproductive costs and benefits of associated with the dark triad traits in women. Personality and Individual Differences, 110, 38–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., & Buss, D. M. (2010b). The costs and benefits of the dark triad: implications for mate poaching and mate retention tactics. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 373–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., Webster, G. D., & Schmitt, D. P. (2009). The dark triad: facilitating a short-term mating strategy in men. European Journal of Personality, 23, 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Jones, D. N. (2014). Predatory personalities as behavioral mimics and parasites: mimicry-deception theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 445–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kastner, R. M., & Sellbom, M. (2012). Hypersexuality in college students: the role of psychopathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 644–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ketelaar, T., & Ellis, B. J. (2000). Are evolutionary explanations unfalsifiable? Evolutionary psychology and the Lakatosian philosophy of science. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kiehl, K. A. (2014). The psychopath whisperer. New York: Crown Publishers.Google Scholar
  54. Kirkman, C. A. (2005). From soap opera to science: towards gaining access to the psychopaths who live amongst us. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 78, 379–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kirkpatrick, M. (1982). Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution, 36, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Koladich, S. J., & Atkinson, B. E. (2016). The dark triad and relationship preferences: a replication and extension. Personality and Individual Differences, 94, 253–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Krupp, D. B., Sewall, L. A., Lalumière, M. L., Sheriff, C., & Harris, G. T. (2012). Nepotistic patterns of violent psychopathy: evidence for adaptation? Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lande, R. (1981). Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 78, 3721–3725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Leedom, L. J., Geslien, E., & Hartoonian Almas, L. (2012). “Did he ever love me?” A qualitative study of life with a psychopathic husband. Family and Intimate Partner Violence Quarterly, 5, 103–135.Google Scholar
  60. Logan, M. H. (2015). Seduced: recruited by a violent inmate. Violence and Gender, 2, 141–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. MacMillan, J., & Kofoed, L. (1984). Sociobiology and antisocial personality: an alternative perspective. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 172, 701–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Mealey, L. (1995). The sociobiology of sociopathy: an integrated evolutionary model. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 18, 523–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Mokros, A., Hare, R. D., Neumann, C. S., Santtila, P., Habermeyer, E., & Nitschke, J. (2015). Variants of psychopathy in adult male offenders: a latent profile analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 124, 372–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Mokros, A., Osterheider, M., Hucker, S. J., & Nitschke, J. (2011). Psychopathy and sexual sadism. Law and Human Behavior, 35, 188–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Monteiro, R. P., Lopes, G. S., Nascimento, B. S., Gouveia, V. V., Shackelford, T. K., & Zeigler-Hill, V. (2017). Dark triad predicts self-promoting mate attraction behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 119, 83–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Moore, M. M. (2010). Human nonverbal courtship behaviour: a brief historical review. Journal of Sex Research, 47, 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Mouilso, E. R., & Calhoun, K. S. (2012). A mediation model of the role of sociosexuality in the associations between narcissism, psychopathy, and sexual aggression. Psychology of Violence, 2, 16–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Murray, A. A., Wood, J. M., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2012). Psychopathic personality traits and cognitive dissonance: individual differences in attitude change. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 525–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Neal, T. M. S., & Sellbom, M. (2012). Examining the factor structure of the Hare self-report psychopathy scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 94, 244–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Neumann, C. S., Schmitt, D. S., Carter, R., Embley, I., & Hare, R. D. (2012). Psychopathic traits in females and males across the globe. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 30, 557–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Patrick, C. J. (2018). Psychopathy as masked pathology. In C. J. Patrick (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy, 2nd edition (pp. 3–21). New York: Guildford.Google Scholar
  72. Patrick, C. J., Fowles, D. C., & Krueger, R. F. (2009). Triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy: developmental origins of disinhibition, boldness, and meanness. Development and Psychopathology, 21, 913–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Paulhus, D. L., Neumann, C. S., Hare, R. D., Williams, K. M., & Hemphill, J. F. (2016). Manual for the self-report psychopathy scale 4. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.Google Scholar
  74. Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2008). Beyond global sociosexual orientations: a more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1113–1135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Porter, S., ten Brinke, L., Baker, A., & Wallace, B. (2011). Would I lie to you? “Leakage” in deceptive facial expressions relates to psychopathy and emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 133–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Provenzano, D. A., Dane, A. V., Farrell, A. H., Marini, Z. A., & Volk, A. A. (2018). Do bullies have more sex? The role of personality. Evolutionary Psychological Science4, 221–232.Google Scholar
  77. Prum, R. O. (2012). Aesthetic evolution by mate choice: Darwin’s really dangerous idea. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 367, 2253–2265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Prum, R. O. (2017). The evolution of beauty. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  79. Qureshi, C., Harris, E., & Atkinson, B. E. (2016). Relationships between age of females and attraction to the dark triad personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 95, 200–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Regan, P. C., & Berscheid, E. (1997). Gender differences in characteristics desired in a potential sexual and marriage partner. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 9, 25–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Renninger, L. A., Wade, T. J., & Grammer, K. (2004). Getting that female glance: patterns and consequences of male nonverbal behavior in courtship contexts. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 416–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Ribeiro da Silva, D., Vagos, P., & Rijo, D. (2019). An evolutionary model to conceptualize psychopathic traits across community and forensic male youth. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 63, 574–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Sacco, D. F., Merold, S. J., Lui, J. H. L., Lustgraaf, C. J. N., & Barry, C. T. (2016). Social and emotional intelligence moderate the relationship between psychopathy traits and social perception. Personality and Individual Differences, 95, 95–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Seto, M. C., Khattar, N. A., Lalumière, M. L., & Quinsey, V. L. (1997). Deception and sexual strategy in psychopathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 301–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Silvera, D. H., Martinussen, M., & Dahl, T. I. (2001). The Tromsø social intelligence scale, a self-report measure of social intelligence. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 42, 313–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Simmons, R. E. (1988). Food and the deceptive acquisition of mates by polygynous male harriers. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 23, 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Simpson, J. A., & Campbell, L. (2016). Methods of evolutionary sciences. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology, 2nd edition (pp. 115–135). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  88. Smith, S. S., & Newman, J. P. (1990). Alcohol and drug abuse-dependence disorders in psychopathic and nonpsychopathic criminal offenders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 99, 430–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Smith, C. V., Øverup, C. S., & Webster, G. D. (2019). Sexy deeds done dark? Examining the relationship between dark personality traits and sexual motivation. Personality and Individual Differences, 146, 105–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Smuts, B. B., & Smuts, R. W. (1993). Male aggression and sexual coercion of females in nonhuman primates and other mammals: evidence and theoretical implications. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 22, 1–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Sprague, J., Javdani, S., Sadeh, N., Newman, J. P., & Verona, E. (2012). Borderline personality disorder as a female phenotypic expression of psychopathy? Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 3, 127–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  93. Tinbergen, N. (1963). On aims and methods of ethology. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 20, 410–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Tooke, W., & Camire, L. (1991). Patterns of deception in intersexual and intrasexual mating strategies. Ethology and Sociobiology, 12, 345–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Verona, E., & Vitale, J. (2018). Psychopathy in women: assessment, manifestations, and etiology. In C. J. Patrick (Ed.), Handbook of psychopathy, 2nd edition (pp. 509–528). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  96. Visser, B. A., DeBow, V., Pozzebon, J. A., Bogaert, A. F., & Book, A. (2015). Psychopathic sexuality: the thin line between fantasy and reality. Journal of Personality, 83, 376–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Visser, B. A., Pozzebon, J. A., Bogaert, A. F., & Ashton, M. C. (2010). Psychopathy, sexual behavior, and esteem: it’s different for girls. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 833–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Watts, A. L., Rohr, J. C., McCauley, K. L., Smith, S. F., Howe, K. L., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2019). Do psychopathic birds of a feather flock together? Psychopathic personality traits and romantic preferences. Journal of Personality, 87, 341–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Wiebe, R. P. (2004). Psychopathy and sexual coercion: a Darwinian analysis. Counseling and Clinical Psychology Journal, 1, 23–41.Google Scholar
  100. Williams, G. C. (1966). Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  101. Zuckerman, M. (1971). Physiological measures of sexual arousal in the human. Psychological Bulletin, 75, 297–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Child and Youth StudiesBrock UniversitySt. CatharinesCanada
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyCarleton UniversityOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations