Gossip as an Intrasexual Competition Strategy: Sex Differences in Gossip Frequency, Content, and Attitudes

A Correction to this article was published on 30 October 2017

This article has been updated

Abstract

From an evolutionary perspective, gossip has been considered a putative intrasexual competition strategy that is used to vie for mates and resources linked to reproductive success. To date, no study has directly examined the relations between intrasexual competitiveness, reported tendency to gossip, and attitudes toward gossiping. Limited empirical work has also focused on whether gossip frequency, gossip content, and gossip attitudes correspond to women’s and men’s divergent intrasexual competition strategies and evolved mating preferences. In a sample of 290 heterosexual young adults, we found that intrasexual competition positively predicted reported gossip frequency and favorable attitudes toward gossiping. Additionally, women reported a greater tendency to gossip in comparison to men, particularly about physical appearance and social information, whereas men reported gossiping more about achievement. Women also reported greater enjoyment of, and perceived more value in, gossiping than men. Collectively, these findings provide empirical support for the hypothesis that gossip is an intrasexual competition tactic that, by and large, corresponds to women’s and men’s evolved mate preferences and differential mate competition strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Change history

  • 30 October 2017

    In Table 1 of the published article, the mean and standard deviation values for women and men on the Tendency to Gossip Questionnaire (TGQ) are in the incorrect columns. Women had a M = 67.09 (SD = 19.47), whereas men had a M = 60.20 (SD = 17.91) on the TGQ.

References

  1. Abed, R., Mehta, S., Figueredo, A. J., Aldridge, S., Balson, H., Meyer, C., & Palmer, R. (2012). Eating disorders and intrasexual competition: testing an evolutionary hypothesis among young women. Scientific World Journal, 2012, 290813. https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/290813.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. American Psychological Association. (2015). APA dictionary of psychology (2nd ed.). Washington, DC.

  3. Archer, J. (2004). Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: a meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 8(4), 291–322. https://doi.org/10.1037/10892680.8.4.291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Archer, J. (2009). Does sexual selection explain human sex differences in aggression? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32(3–4), 249–266. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X09990951.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Arnocky, S. (2016). Intrasexual rivalry among women. In T. K. Shackelford & V. A. Weekes-Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of evolutionary psychological science (pp. 1–8). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1424-1.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Arnocky, S., & Piché, T. (2014). Cosmetic surgery as intrasexual competition: the mediating role of social comparison. Psychology, 5(10), 1197–1205. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2014.510132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Arnocky, S., & Vaillancourt, T. (2012). A multi-informant longitudinal study on the relationship between aggression, peer victimization, and dating status in adolescence. Evolutionary Psychology, 10(2), 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491201000207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Arnocky, S., & Vaillancourt, T. (2017). Sexual competition among women: a review of the theory and supporting evidence. In M. L. Fisher (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of women and competition (pp. 1–31). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Arnocky, S., Sunderani, S., Miller, J. L., & Vaillancourt, T. (2012). Jealousy mediates the relationship between attractiveness comparison and females’ indirect aggression. Personal Relationships, 19(2), 290–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2011.01362.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Arnocky, S., Perilloux, C., Cloud, J. M., Bird, B. M., & Thomas, K. (2016). Envy mediates the link between social comparison and appearance enhancement in women. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 2(2), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-015-0037-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Aukett, R., Ritchie, J., & Mill, K. (1988). Gender differences in friendship patterns. Sex Roles, 19(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Azar, B. (2010). Are your findings ‘WEIRD’? Monitor on Psychology, 41(5), 11 Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/monitor/2010/05/weird.aspx.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Barkow, J. H. (1992). Beneath new culture is old psychology: gossip and social stratification. In L. Cosmides & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 627–637). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Beersma, B., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2011). How the grapevine keeps you in line: gossip increases contributions to the group. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(6), 642–649. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611405073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bendixen, M., & Kennair, L. E. O. (2015). Revisiting judgment of strategic self-promotion and competitor derogation tactics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32(8), 1056–1082. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407514558959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Benenson, J. F. (2013). The development of human female competition: allies and adversaries. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 368 (1631). doi:https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0079.

  17. Benenson, J. F., Markovits, H., Hultgren, B., Nguyen, T., Bullock, G., & Wrangham, R. (2013). Social exclusion: more important to human females than males. PloS One, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055851.

  18. Bischoping, K. (1993). Gender differences in conversation topics, 1922-1990. Sex Roles, 28, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00289744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Björkqvist, K. (1994). Sex differences in physical, verbal, and indirect aggression: a review of recent research. Sex Roles, 30(3), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01420988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bleske-Rechek, A., & Buss, D. M. (2006). Sexual strategies pursued and mate attraction tactics deployed. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(6), 1299–1311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.11.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Buss, D. M. (1988). The evolution of human intrasexual competition: tactics of mate attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(4), 616–628. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.4.616.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525 X00023992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Buss, D. M., & Dedden, L. A. (1990). Derogation of competitors. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7(3), 395–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407590073006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100(2), 204–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.204

  25. Buunk, A. P., & Fisher, M. (2009). Individual differences in intrasexual competition. Evolutionary Psychology, 7(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1556/JEP.7.2009.1.5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Campbell, A. (1999). Staying alive: evolution, culture, and women's intrasexual aggression. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(02), 203–214 Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11301523.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Campbell, A. (2004). Female competition: causes, constraints, content, and contexts. Journal of Sex Research, 41(1), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490409552210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1991). The evolution of parental care. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Confer, J. C., Easton, J. A., Fleischman, D. S., Goetz, C. D., Lewis, D. M., Perilloux, C., & Buss, D. M. (2010). Evolutionary psychology: controversies, questions, prospects, and limitations. American Psychologist, 65(2), 110–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018413.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66(3), 710–722. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00900.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Crick, N. R., & Nelson, D. A. (2002). Relational and physical victimization within friendships: Nobody told me there’d be friends like these. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30(6), 599–607.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: Murray.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. De Backer, C. J., Nelissen, M., & Fisher, M. L. (2007). Let’s talk about sex: a study on the recall of gossip about potential mates and sexual rivals. Sex Roles, 56(11–12), 781–791. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9237-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Dunbar, R. I. M. (1996). Groups, gossip, and the evolution of language. In A. Schmitt, K. Atzwanger, K. Grammer, & K. Schäfer (Eds.), New aspects of human ethology (pp. 77–89). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Dunbar, R. I. (2004). Gossip in evolutionary perspective. Review of General Psychology, 8(2), 100–110. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.8.2.100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2013). The nature–nurture debates: 25 years of challenges in understanding the psychology of gender. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 340–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613484767.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (2016). Social role theory of sex differences. In N. Naples, R. C. Hoogland, M. Wickramasinghe, & W. C. A. Wong (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell encyclopedia of gender and sexuality studies. New York: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118663219.wbegss183.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Eckert, P. (1990). Cooperative competition in adolescent “girl talk”. Discourse Processes, 13(1), 91–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539009544748

  39. Eder, D., & Enke, J. L. (1991). The structure of gossip: opportunities and constraints on collective expression among adolescents. American Sociological Review, 494–508 Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2096270.

  40. Engeln-Maddox, R., Miller, S. A., & Doyle, D. M. (2011). Tests of objectification theory in gay, lesbian, and heterosexual community samples: mixed evidence for proposed pathways. Sex Roles, 65(7), 518–532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9958-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Fisher, M., & Cox, A. (2009). The influence of female attractiveness on competitor derogation. Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 7(2), 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1556/ JEP.7.2009.2.3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Fisher, M., Cox, A., Bennett, S., & Gavric, D. (2008). Components of self-perceived mate value. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 2(4), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0099347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Fisher, M., Cox, A., & Gordon, F. (2009). Self-promotion versus competitor derogation: the influence of sex and romantic relationship status on intrasexual competition strategy selection. Evolutionary Psychology, 7(4), 287–308. https://doi.org/10.1556/EP.7.2009.4.6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Fisher, M., Shaw, S., Worth, K., Smith, L., & Reeve, C. (2010). How we view those who derogate: perceptions of female competitor derogators. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 4(4), 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0099284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Foster, E. K. (2004). Research on gossip: taxonomy, methods, and future directions. Review of General Psychology, 8(2), 78–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.8.2.78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. French, D. C., Jansen, E. A., & Pidada, S. (2002). United States and Indonesian children’s and adolescents’ reports of relational aggression by disliked peers. Child Development, 73(4), 1143–1150. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00463.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Galen, B. R., & Underwood, M. K. (1997). A developmental investigation of social aggression among children. Developmental Psychology, 33(4), 589–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.33.4.589.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Hess, N. H., & Hagen, E. H. (2006). Sex differences in indirect aggression: psychological evidence from young adults. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(3), 231–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.11.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Hill, S. E., & Durante, K. M. (2011). Courtship, competition, and the pursuit of attractiveness: mating goals facilitate health-related risk taking and strategic risk suppression in women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 383–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210395603.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Klomek, A. B., Marrocco, F., Kleinman, M., Schonfeld, I. S., & Gould, M. S. (2007). Bullying, depression, and suicidality in adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 46(1), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.chi.0000242237.84925.18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Klomek, A. B., Marrocco, F., Kleinman, M., Schonfeld, I. S., & Gould, M. S. (2008). Peer victimization, depression, and suicidality in adolescents. Suicide and Life-threatening Behavior, 38(2), 166–180. https://doi.org/10.1521/suli.2008.38.2.166.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Lagerspetz, K. M., Björkqvist, K., & Peltonen, T. (1988). Is indirect aggression typical of females? Gender differences in aggressiveness in 11‐to 12‐year‐old children. Aggressive Behavior, 14(6), 403–414. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2337(1988)14:6<403::AIDAB2480140602>3.0.CO;2-D.

  53. Leaper, C., & Holliday, H. (1995). Gossip in same-gender and cross-gender friends’ conversations. Personal Relationships, 2(3), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1995.tb00089.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Levin, J., & Arluke, A. (1985). An exploratory analysis of sex differences in gossip. Sex Roles, 12, 281–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Levin, J., & Arluke, A. (1987). Gossip: the inside scoop. New York: Plenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  56. Li, N. P., Valentine, K. A., & Patel, L. (2011). Mate preferences in the US and Singapore: a cross-cultural test of the mate preference priority model. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(2), 291–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.10.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Lippa, R. A. (2007). The preferred traits of mates in a cross-national study of heterosexual and homosexual men and women: an examination of biological and cultural influences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36(2), 193–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-006-9151-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Litman, J. A., & Pezzo, M. V. (2005). Individual differences in attitudes towards gossip. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(4), 963–980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.09.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Litman, J. A., Huang, C., & Chang, H. (2009). Development and validation of a Chinese version of the attitudes towards gossip scale. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies, 10(2), 131–150 Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263853280_Development_and_Validation_of_a_Chinese_Version_of_the_Attitudes_Towards_Gossip_Scale.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Massar, K., Buunk, A. P., & Rempt, S. (2012). Age differences in women’s tendency to gossip are mediated by their mate value. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(1), 106–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.09.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. McAndrew, F. T. (2014). The “sword of a woman”: Gossip and female aggression. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19(3), 196–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2014.04.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. McAndrew, F. T. (2016). Gossip is a social skill—not a character flaw. Psychology Today. Retrieved from https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/out-the-ooze/201601/gossip-is-social-skill-not-character-flaw

  63. McAndrew, F. T. (2017). How “the gossip” became a woman and how “gossip” became her weapon of choice. In M. L. Fishers (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of women and competition (pp. 191–205). New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199376377.013.13.

    Google Scholar 

  64. McAndrew, F. T., & Milenkovic, M. A. (2002). Of tabloids and family secrets: the evolutionary psychology of gossip. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(5), 1064–1082. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00256.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. McAndrew, F. T., Bell, E. K., & Garcia, C. M. (2007). Who do we tell and whom do we tell on? Gossip as a strategy for status enhancement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37(7), 1562–1577. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00227.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Montemurro, B., & Siefken, J. M. (2014). Cougars on the prowl? New perceptions of older women's sexuality. Journal of Aging Studies, 28, 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2013.11.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Nevo, O., Nevo, B., & Derech-Zehavi, A. (1993). The development of the tendency to gossip questionnaire: construct and concurrent validity for a sample of Israeli college students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 973–981. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053004010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Österman, K., Björkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K. M., Kaukiainen, A., Landau, S. F., Frączek, A., & Caprara, G. V. (1998). Cross-cultural evidence of female indirect aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 24(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1998)24:1<1::AID-AB1 >3.0. CO;2-R.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Owens, L., Shute, R., & Slee, P. (2000). “Guess what I just heard!”: indirect aggression among teenage girls in Australia. Aggressive Behavior, 26(1), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337 (2000)26:1<67::AID-AB6>3.0.CO;2-C.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Parker, S., & de Vries, B. (1993). Patterns of friendship for women and men in same and cross-sex relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10(4), 617–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407593104010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Paulhus, D. L. (1991). Measurement and control of response bias. In: J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of social psychological attitudes, Vol. 1. Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 17–59). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-590241-0.50006-X.

  72. Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (1996). Strategic self-promotion and competitor derogation: sex and context effects on the perceived effectiveness of mate attraction tactics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(6), 1185–1204 Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8667162.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Shackelford, T. K. (1997). Perceptions of betrayal and the design of the mind. In J. A. Simpson & D. T. Kenrick (Eds.), Evolutionary social psychology (pp. 73–107). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Shackelford, T. K., Schmitt, D. P., & Buss, D. M. (2005). Universal dimensions of human mate preferences. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(2), 447–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.01.023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Singh, D. (1993). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(2), 293–307. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.293.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Stockley, P., & Campbell, A. (2013). Female competition and aggression: interdisciplinary perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 368(1631). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0073.

  77. Symons, D. (1995). Beauty is in the adaptations of the beholder: the evolutionary psychology of human female sexual attractiveness. In P. R. Abramson & S. D. Pinkerton (Eds.), Sexual nature, sexual culture (pp. 80–118). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind (pp. 19–136). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  79. Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man (pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Vaillancourt, T. (2005). Indirect aggression among humans: social construct or evolutionary adaptation. In R. E. Tremblay, W. W. Hartup, & J. Archer (Eds.), Developmental origins of aggression (pp. 158–177). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Vaillancourt, T. (2013). Do human females use indirect aggression as an intrasexual competition strategy? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 368(1631). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0080.

  82. Vaillancourt, T., & Sharma, A. (2011). Intolerance of sexy peers: intrasexual competition among women. Aggressive Behavior, 37(6), 569–577. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20413.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Vaillancourt, T., Miller, J. L., & Sharma, A. (2010). “Tripping the prom queen”: female intrasexual competition and indirect aggression. In K. Österman (Ed.), Indirect and direct aggression (pp. 17–31). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Walsh, A., & Yun, I. (2016). Evoked culture and evoked nature: the promise of gene-culture co-evolution theory for sociology. Frontiers in Sociology, 1. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2016.00008.

  85. Walters, S., & Crawford, C. (1994). The importance of mate attraction for intrasexual competition in men and women. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15, 5–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095 (94)90025-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Watson, D. C. (2012). Gender differences in gossip and friendship. Sex Roles, 67(9–10), 494–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0160-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1985). Competitiveness, risk taking, and violence: the young male syndrome. Ethology and Sociobiology, 6(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095 (85)90041-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam C. Davis.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Davis, A.C., Dufort, C., Desrochers, J. et al. Gossip as an Intrasexual Competition Strategy: Sex Differences in Gossip Frequency, Content, and Attitudes. Evolutionary Psychological Science 4, 141–153 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-017-0121-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Gossip
  • Intrasexual competition
  • Mate preferences
  • Sex differences