FormalPara Key Points

Patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) are at an increased risk of pancreatitis; however, the role of IBD therapy in the development of pancreatitis is currently unclear.

Data captured in a global safety database were queried to identify risk factors for developing pancreatitis among patients treated with vedolizumab, a gut-selective anti–lymphocyte trafficking agent.

Risk factors associated with serious pancreatitis included age, indication of use, use of concomitant medications, pancreatitis history, and comorbid conditions. Such findings help to inform which patients treated for IBD might have an elevated risk of developing pancreatitis, regardless of treatment.

1 Introduction

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD), affects approximately 6.8 million people worldwide [1], with the highest prevalence of cases reported in Europe (505 and 322 cases per 100,000 for UC and CD, respectively) and North America (286 and 319 cases per 100,000 for UC and CD, respectively) [2]. The American College of Gastroenterology and the European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation recommend administration of corticosteroids, immunomodulators, and biologics (anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha [anti-TNFα] or anti-α4β7 integrin therapy) for inducing and/or maintaining remission in patients with UC or CD [3,4,5,6]. 5-aminosalicylates (5-ASAs) are also recommended for the treatment of patients with UC [3, 5].

Vedolizumab is a gut-selective anti–lymphocyte trafficking agent approved for the treatment of moderate to severe UC and CD [7, 8]. It is a humanized anti-α4β7 integrin monoclonal antibody that selectively antagonizes gastrointestinal integrin receptors, consequently reducing lymphocyte trafficking into the intestine [9]. The efficacy and safety profile of vedolizumab treatment in patients with UC and CD has been demonstrated in the clinical setting [10,11,12].

Although IBDs mainly affect the bowel, extraintestinal manifestations (EIMs) are frequently observed in patients with UC and CD [13,14,15]. These EIMs can present in a wide range of organ systems, including the dermatological, hepatopancreatobiliary, musculoskeletal, ocular, pulmonary, and renal systems [15]. EIMs of the hepatopancreatobiliary system are estimated to affect approximately 50% of patients with IBD during the course of their disease, and include, among others, pancreatic disorders [13, 14].

These pancreatic disorders represent a heterogeneous group of pancreatic manifestations including acute, chronic, and autoimmune pancreatitis, asymptomatic imaging abnormalities, and asymptomatic elevation of pancreatic enzymes [14]. Acute pancreatitis is one of the most common pancreatic pathologies observed in patients with IBD, among whom the odds of developing acute pancreatitis has been estimated at 3.11 times higher (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.93–3.30) than that of the general population [16]. Additionally, a recent meta-analysis reported an elevated risk of developing acute pancreatitis in patients with IBD compared with patients without IBD (odds ratio 2.78 [95% CI 2.40–3.22]) [17]. When data are stratified by IBD type, the patient groups with UC and CD were both more likely to develop acute pancreatitis than patients without IBD (pooled risk estimates [95% CI] of 3.62 [2.99–3.48] for UC and 2.24 [1.85–2.71] for CD) [17].

Risk factors associated with developing pancreatitis are well documented. Smoking, alcohol abuse, and disease-related risk factors such as hypertriglyceridemia, autoimmune diseases, genetic mutations, infections, gall bladder disorder, IBD, and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) are extensively reported in the literature [18,19,20]. Cases of pancreatitis are also associated with the medical treatments used to treat patients with IBD such as endoscopic procedures and drug-induced pancreatitis [16, 18]. Drug-induced pancreatitis has been reported for patients taking first-line IBD treatments including 5-ASAs (mesalazine) and thiopurines (azathioprine, mercaptopurine, and sulfasalazine) [16]. Only a few cases of drug-induced pancreatitis have been reported for patients with IBD treated with biologics such as vedolizumab [21,22,23]. Reported incidences of drug-induced pancreatitis are generally collected via spontaneous case reports; as such, true incidences are likely to be underestimated.

Distinguishing IBD from pancreatitis in patients is often difficult owing to similarities in the clinical symptoms presented; for example, abdominal pain and diarrhea are typically experienced by both patient populations [15]. In addition, determining if the development of pancreatitis is related to the pathogenesis of IBD (an EIM) or from an extraintestinal complication, such as side effects of the IBD therapy, further complicates determination of etiology [16].

This study aimed to identify factors associated with pancreatitis in patients undergoing treatment for IBD among data captured in a large global safety database, to inform who might benefit from close monitoring, regardless of specific treatment.

2 Materials and Methods

Takeda’s Global Safety Database was queried for case reports of adverse events (AEs) following vedolizumab treatment, from licensure (May 20, 2014) through March 31, 2021, representing > 700,000 patient-years of exposure to vedolizumab at the time of the analysis. The Global Safety Database consists of all (serious and non-serious) post-marketing reports of AEs forwarded to Takeda by healthcare providers, patients, regulatory authorities, literature, investigators conducting post-marketing studies, and patient support programs. Serious AEs (SAEs) reported in clinical trials are also entered into the database. The estimated number of patient-years of exposure is calculated by the total number of vials sold (considering package size) divided by 6.5 (dosing interval considering 52 weeks per year) plus the total number of pens sold (considering package size) divided by 26 (dosing interval considering 52 weeks per year).

Unsolicited and solicited case reports of pancreatitis were coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) (version 24.0) High-Level Term “Acute and chronic pancreatitis,” which included the following Preferred Terms: “pancreatitis,” “pancreatitis acute,” “autoimmune pancreatitis,” “obstructive pancreatitis,” “pancreatitis necrotizing,” “pancreatitis relapsing,” and “chronic pancreatitis.” Unsolicited spontaneous reported cases of AEs were received directly from patients, healthcare professionals, regulatory authorities, and scientific literature; solicited reported cases of AEs were obtained from interventional clinical studies, observational studies, registries, patient support programs, and market research programs.

A comparator group was then extracted from Takeda’s Global Safety Database using data from 600 case reports of random non-pancreatitis AEs among patients with IBD treated with vedolizumab. In order to examine factors associated with serious pancreatitis, case reports in the comparator group meeting the regulatory definition of serious criteria were compared with serious case reports (SAEs) of pancreatitis. An AE was defined as serious if it (1) resulted in death; (2) was considered life-threatening; (3) required inpatient hospitalization or prolonged existing hospitalization; (4) resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; (5) was a congenital anomaly/birth defect; and/or (6) was considered a medically important event or reaction. Case reports were returned in chronological order following query of the database and randomized using the randomization function in Microsoft Excel to eliminate a possible time effect.

Case reports were medically reviewed, and details of patient demographics (age and sex), vedolizumab treatment indication, medical history, use of concomitant medications, comorbid conditions, and time to AE onset were extracted.

Unadjusted comparisons were performed using t tests for continuous data, and χ2 tests and Fisher’s exact tests for categorical data. A logistic regression analysis was performed to adjust for covariates that allowed backward selection. Baseline characteristics included in the model were age, sex, vedolizumab indication for use, medical history, use of concomitant medications, and comorbid conditions. To account for differences in patient baseline characteristics between pancreatitis and random case reports, an adjusted analysis was performed using inverse probability treatment weighting to reduce biases on estimates of average group effects. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3 Results

3.1 Extraction of Pancreatitis Group from the Global Safety Database

Over the approximate 7 years since the first regulatory approval of vedolizumab (> 700,000 patient-years of exposure to vedolizumab at the time of the analysis), a total of 196 patients in Takeda’s Global Safety Database were reported to have pancreatitis. The onset of symptoms of pancreatitis in two of these patients was positively re-challenged and reported previously [21, 22]. Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 Baseline patient demographics and clinical characteristics

3.2 Comparison of Pancreatitis Group (SAEs) with Random Comparator Group

The majority of patients in the pancreatitis group reported SAEs (99.5%, n = 195/196). SAEs were reported by approximately one-third of patients in the random comparator group (32.5%, n = 195/600). The description and analyses used for the comparison of the pancreatitis group with the random comparator group were limited to patients with SAEs (195 in each group).

Table 2 summarizes patient demographics and clinical characteristics in patients reporting SAEs in the pancreatitis and random comparator groups. Patients in the pancreatitis group were younger (mean age 39.5 years) compared with patients in the random comparator group (48.8 years). Approximately equal numbers of patients were male (n = 92) and female (n = 90) in the pancreatitis group, whereas there were more females than males in the random comparator group (n = 115 and n = 75, respectively). For case reports with vedolizumab indication specified, the highest proportion of patients in the pancreatitis group had UC (40.5%), whereas CD was most often reported in the random comparator group (45.1%). An unadjusted comparison between patients with SAEs showed that females (p = 0.015) and CD (p = 0.001) were more common in the random comparator group versus the pancreatitis group.

Table 2 Baseline patient demographics and clinical characteristics in the pancreatitis and random comparator groups classified as serious adverse events

A higher proportion of patients in the pancreatitis group had a relevant medical history compared with patients in the random comparator group (13.3% [n = 26/195] vs 2.1% [n = 4/195], respectively). Among the patients in the pancreatitis group, 8.7% (n = 17/195) had a history of pancreatitis, whereas none in the random comparator group had a history of pancreatitis.

In the pancreatitis group, 2.6% (n = 5/195) of patients had pancreatitis as a comorbid condition prior to exacerbation of the condition, usually leading to hospitalization and reporting it as an SAE, versus none in the random comparator group. Cholelithiasis was the most frequently reported comorbid condition in the pancreatitis group (7.2% [n = 14/195 patients]), whereas hyperlipidemia and diabetes were the most frequently reported in the random comparator group (5.6% [n = 11/195] and 5.1% [n = 10/195], respectively) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Patients with comorbid conditions in the pancreatitis and random comparator groups. aIncludes hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia

Alcohol abuse was reported for 0.5% of patients, and gall bladder disorder, hyperlipidemia, pancolitis, and PSC were all reported as comorbid conditions for 1.0% of patients in the pancreatitis group. Gall bladder disorder (0.5%), pancolitis (0.5%), and pancreatic cyst (1.0%) were reported for patients in the random comparator group.

The percentage of patients taking the five most common drugs in the pancreatitis group that have risk of developing pancreatitis listed in the prescribing information or summary of product characteristics is shown in Fig. 2. Although patient numbers are small, it is noted that infliximab was more often taken by patients in the pancreatitis group (n = 10) than the random comparator group (n = 1). Statins were more frequently taken by patients in the random comparator group (n = 10 vs n = 3 in the pancreatitis group), who were older.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Patients taking concomitant medications associated with a risk of developing pancreatitis. Patients could be taking one or more of these medications at any one time. Includes medications with pancreatitis risk listed in the prescribing information or summary of product characteristics

Time to SAE onset was reported for 13.8% (n = 27/195) of case reports in the pancreatitis group and 29.2% (n = 57/195) of case reports in the random comparator group. About half of the AEs were reported in year 1 for both the pancreatitis group and random comparator group (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Time to onset of serious adverse events in the pancreatitis and random comparator groups

Results of the logistic regression analysis are shown in Table 3. Various factors including younger age, vedolizumab treatment indication for UC, use of concomitant drugs, history of pancreatitis, and presence of comorbid conditions were strongly associated with the development of pancreatitis.

Table 3 Analysis of effect significance

4 Discussion

This retrospective cohort analysis using Takeda’s Global Safety Database of > 700,000 patient-years of exposure to vedolizumab at the time of analysis showed that a very small number of vedolizumab-treated patients with IBD reported pancreatitis (n = 196). Pancreatitis was serious in the majority of cases (n = 195).

In our analysis of serious case reports of pancreatitis that were reported to Takeda’s Global Safety Database, an approximately equal proportion of males (47.2%) and females (46.2%), with a mean age of 39.5 years, were included in the pancreatitis group. These findings are consistent with the accepted fact that UC and CD are known to affect men and women equally [24]. An unadjusted comparison between patients with SAEs showed that vedolizumab therapy for CD was more common in the random comparator group compared with the pancreatitis group (p = 0.001). This finding is consistent with a published analysis showing that patients with UC are more likely to develop acute pancreatitis than patients with CD, when compared with the general population [17]. Although a higher proportion of patients in the pancreatitis group were prescribed vedolizumab for UC therapy than the random comparator group (40.5 vs 38.5%, respectively), the difference was numerically minimal and not significant.

Of the concomitant medications evaluated (i.e., those with a risk of pancreatitis listed in the package insert), steroids and azathioprine were the most frequently taken by patients in both the pancreatitis and random comparator groups. This is consistent with corticosteroids and immunosuppressant therapies being recommended as first-line treatments for UC and CD [3, 25]. For patients in the pancreatitis group with relevant medical history available, 8.7% had a history of pancreatitis, whereas none in the random comparator group had a history of pancreatitis. PSC, diabetes, and cholelithiasis were the most frequently reported comorbid conditions for patients in the pancreatitis group, whereas hyperlipidemia and diabetes were the most common for patients in the random comparator group. The development of diabetes mellitus following an episode of acute pancreatitis is becoming more recognized, although the subtype of diabetes presenting in this context remains unclear [26].

Although time to SAE onset was reported infrequently for patients in both the pancreatitis and random comparator groups, available data extracted from Takeda’s Global Safety Database showed that the majority of SAEs occurred within the first year of starting vedolizumab. This is consistent with the literature, which reports onset of drug-induced pancreatitis within 2 days to 1 month post therapy, and up to 1 year in some cases [27]. Furthermore, these analyses were unable to control for other risk factors associated with pancreatitis; therefore, these findings should be interpreted with caution.

In addition to the post-marketing case reports presented above, an integrated summary of safety data from six clinical trials evaluating vedolizumab in patients with IBD showed that only 0.7% of patients (n = 12/1723) taking vedolizumab developed acute or chronic pancreatitis; however, no association between taking vedolizumab and onset of pancreatitis was confirmed [28]. Furthermore, a literature search identified only three reported cases of pancreatitis in patients taking vedolizumab [21,22,23] (Online Resource 1, see the electronic supplementary material). Taken together, these findings do not support a risk of developing pancreatitis specific to vedolizumab treatment.

There were a few limitations of this analysis. This was a retrospective cohort analysis of AEs reported to a global safety database; therefore, the data presented herein are largely based on spontaneous case reports of AEs. Use of such data introduces the potential for reporting bias, which might in part explain the high rates of pancreatitis that were reported as SAEs. Furthermore, these case reports were frequently missing data. As such, the data should be interpreted with caution. Furthermore, the medical history of patients in the pancreatitis group included alcohol abuse [29], gall bladder disorder [30, 31], hyperlipidemia [32], pancolitis [33], and PSC [34], all of which are known risk factors for pancreatitis. The type of data included in the case reports was also limited; for example, duration of illness was seldom included. The higher the number of data types available for inclusion in an analysis set, the higher the number of potential risk factors analyzed.

5 Conclusions

This retrospective analysis identified several factors associated with 196 spontaneous case reports of pancreatitis captured in our large global safety database of > 700,000 patient-years of exposure to vedolizumab at the time of the analysis. Quantitative analysis of data extracted from the case reports indicates that younger age, vedolizumab indication for UC, concomitant medications, a history of pancreatitis, and comorbid conditions (especially ongoing pancreatitis) may be associated with the development of pancreatitis to the degree that it is reported as an SAE. Given that only 196 cases of pancreatitis were identified from the Global Safety Database of over 700,000 patient-years of exposure, our findings suggest that there is no evidence of a causal relationship between patients taking vedolizumab and the risk of pancreatitis. Findings can inform which patients undergoing treatment for IBD might have an elevated risk of developing pancreatitis, regardless of what treatment they are receiving. These findings are hypothesis generating, and further research to prospectively identify risk factors for developing pancreatitis in patients with IBD undergoing treatment may be of interest.