Abstract
Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) is an extremely rare condition characterized by separation of dermoepidermal junctions, necrosis, and subsequent detachment of the epidermis over large cutaneous areas. TEN can emerge after exposure to certain medications such as allopurinol, aromatic anticonvulsants, NSAIDs, nevirapine, and antibacterial sulfonamides. There is no standard protocol for TEN, and the therapy of choice varies from one patient to another. Some of these therapies include silver-releasing wraps/dressings, glucocorticoids, antibodies to inhibit Fas-mediated keratinocyte apoptosis, and cyclosporine A. A 35-year-old male with an allergy to antibacterial sulfonamides who was being treated for arterial hypertension and hyperuricemia with captopril and allopurinol, respectively, was admitted to hospital. The patient showed skin detachment affecting approximately 95% of his surface area, including his face, upper and lower extremities, trunk, back, oropharyngeal mucosa, anal mucosa, ocular mucosa, and genital mucosa. Intravenous methylprednisolone at a dosage of 40 mg/day for 7 days along with abrasive cures was found to be an appropriate treatment in this case.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), also known as Lyell syndrome in honor of Alan Lyell [1], is an extremely rare condition characterized by the separation of dermoepidermal junctions (DEJ), necrosis, and subsequent detachment of the epidermis over large cutaneous areas. At the beginning of the last century, Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS) and TEN were described as two totally different entities. TEN, SJS/TEN, and SJS are differentiated based on the degree of skin detachment. TEN is classified as the detachment of > 30% of the skin, SJS/TEN involves the detachment of 10–30% of the skin, and SJS is associated with the detachment of < 10% of the skin [2]. TEN can occur after exposure to some drugs, including allopurinol, aromatic anticonvulsants, NSAIDs, nevirapine, and antibacterial sulfonamides [3]. The HLA-B∗58:01 allele has been identified as a risk factor for allopurinol hypersensitivity; indeed, in some populations, screening for this allele is recommended before prescribing allopurinol [4].
A 35-year-old male who was 183 cm high and weighed 104 kg presented to the clinic. He was allergic to antibacterial sulfonamides and was being treated for arterial hypertension and hyperuricemia with captopril (150 mg daily for nearly 5 months) and allopurinol (100 mg daily for about 3 weeks), respectively. His allergic background to sulfonamides was reported to manifest as a mild urticaria that disappeared after drug removal and without receiving any treatment. He also reported ibuprofen use without specifying intake time or dose. At a medical consultation, the patient presented with mild urticaria, so a 25-mg chloropyramine hydrochloride tablet was administered, and he returned home. The next day, he returned for another medical consultation, where he reported pruritus and little blisters on his trunk, upper extremities, and back. A 20-mg injection of chloropyramine hydrochloride was then administered. At this point, hospitalization was recommended to allow closer monitoring. There was no recovery during the following 2–3 days; indeed, the blisters worsened until they resembled second-degree burns. At day 8, he showed skin detachment across roughly 95% of his total surface area, including his face, upper and lower extremities, trunk, back, oropharyngeal mucosa, anal mucosa, ocular mucosa, and genital mucosa (Fig. 1). A dermatological consultation confirmed TEN, after which both captopril and allopurinol were both immediately suspended. Despite the unfavorable conditions, there was no skin infection nor renal failure. Due to oropharyngeal mucosal involvement, the patient showed hypoxemia, so oxygen support was required to kept the oxygen saturation above 94% (Fig. 1b). Both his fluid balance and his creatinine remained stable. The patient’s severity-of-illness score for toxic epidermal necrolysis (SCORTEN), which can be used to assess the severity of this condition based on seven independent risk factors (age ≥ 40 years, malignancy, tachycardia > 120 pbm, body surface area involved > 10%, serum urea > 28 mg/dL, serum bicarbonate < 20 mEq/L, and serum glucose > 252 mg/dL) [5], is shown in Table 1. The patient recovered favorably after treatment with surgical cleanliness, debridement, specialized wraps/dressings, intravenous methylprednisolone 40 mg/day, ophthalmic lubricant, humectant, cutaneous amoxicillin, and dexamethasone 0.5 mg/day. The skin reepithelialization process is shown in Fig. 2.
TEN usually presents as a symmetrical, confluent erythematous exanthem that initiates on the face and trunk but rapidly migrates across the trunk and extremities. During the evolution of TEN, the lesions present detachment of the laminar epidermis, much like a second-degree burn. This was our first TEN case at the medical center since August 2010. The patient was not aware of any family background of TEN. It is complicated to estimate the incidence and mortality rates of TEN within Guadalajara. In this case, allopurinol was the culprit drug. It has been reported that allopurinol frequently induces SJS/TEN in Europe and Israel [6].
Scientific evidence pointing to the optimal TEN treatment is lacking. Many authors recommend cyclosporine A as the sole immunosuppressant, although further trials of this treatment are planned [7]. We initiated TEN treatment with corticosteroids, specifically intravenous methylprednisolone at a dose of 40 mg/day for 7 days. Abrasive cures were also performed, followed by silver-releasing wraps/dressings. Strict contact isolation and timely hemodynamic support were implemented. It should be noted that the patient did not need vasoactive infusion and there were no infectious complications during his stay at the hospital. During the 7 days of the acute phase, the patient received parenteral nutrition and ophthalmic lubrication with sodium cromoglycate 4%. Based on our experience, treatment with corticosteroids was appropriate and yielded positive results. More clinical research in this field is needed in Guadalajara.
References
Lyell A. Toxic epidermal necrolysis: an eruption resembling scalding of the skin. Br J Dermatol. 1956;68:355–61.
Bastuji-Garin S, Rzany B, Stern RS, Shear NH, Naldi L, Roujeau JC. Clinical classification of cases of toxic epidermal necrolysis, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and erythema multiforme. Arch Dermatol. 1993;129:92–6.
Mockenhaupt M, Viboud C, Dunant A, Naldi L, Halevy S, Bouwes Bavinck JN, et al. Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: assessment of medication risks with emphasis on recently marketed drugs. The EuroSCAR-study. J Investig Dermatol. 2008;128:35–44.
Saksit N, Nakkam N, Konyoung P, Khunarkornsiri U, Tassaneeyakul W, Chumworathayi P, et al. Comparison between the HLA-B*58: 01 allele and single-nucleotide polymorphisms in chromosome 6 for prediction of allopurinol-induced severe cutaneous adverse reactions. J Immunol Res. 2017;2017:2738784.
Bastuji-Garin S, Fouchard N, Bertocchi M, Roujeau JC, Revuz J, Wolkenstein P. SCORTEN: a severity-of-illness score for toxic epidermal necrolysis. J Investig Dermatol. 2000;115(2):149–53.
Halevy S, Ghislain PD, Mockenhaupt M, Fagot JP, Bouwes Bavinck JN, Sidoroff A, et al. Allopurinol is the most common cause of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis in Europe and Israel. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;58:25–32.
Lee HY, Fook-Chong S, Koh HY, Thirumoorthy T, Pang SM. Cyclosporine treatment for Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis: retrospective analysis of a cohort treated in a specialized referral center. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76:106–13.
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the critical reading of the manuscript by Oswaldo Martín Beraún-López, M.D.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this study.
Conflict of interest
Ignacio Buenrostro-Rubio, José Antonio Silva-Villaseñor, Avi William Hatami-Blechner, Juan J Salazar-del Valle, Norma Alejandra Vázquez-Cárdenas, Lilia Patricia Bustamante-Montes and Rafael González-Alvarez have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this study.
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Patient consent
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent may be requested for review from the corresponding author.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Buenrostro-Rubio, I., Silva-Villaseñor, J.A., Hatami-Blechner, A.W. et al. Allopurinol-Induced Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis. Drug Saf - Case Rep 6, 8 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40800-019-0101-z
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40800-019-0101-z