Skip to main content
Log in

A Novel Rotating Flexure-Test Technique for Brittle Materials with Circular Geometries

  • Research paper
  • Published:
Experimental Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The four-point bend test is one of the simplest and often the preferred flexural strength evaluation method for brittle materials. In this loading mode, fracture often initiates from a critical surface (or subsurface) flaw when subjected to a tensile stress state. However, if the critical flaw exists on the compression side of the test specimen, it may not activate to grow a crack and hence the resulting flexural strength will be higher than the true value. The goal of this study is to measure the true flexural strength of a solid or hollow cylindrical brittle specimen by ensuring that failure occurs at its weakest point by rotating along its longitudinal axis, thereby exposing and activating its critical surface flaw during a four-point bend test. A novel test fixture has been designed and fabricated, and the true flexural strengths of cylindrical brittle and quasi-brittle tubular specimens have been measured and compared to existing experimental data obtained through traditional four-point bend tests. Experimental results showcase the orientation dependance on flexural strength for various materials. Additionally, similarities between experimental findings and those available in literature, including observations of fracture surfaces and relationships between surface roughness and material strength, are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Lower grit numbers refer to coarser and larger grits and hence, result in higher surface roughness on the specimens.

References

  1. Oses C, Toher C, Curtarolo S (2020) High-entropy ceramics. Nat Rev Mater 5:295–309. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-019-0170-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Subhash G, Ghosh D, Awasthi A (2021) Dynamic response of advanced ceramics. Wiley, Hoboken

  3. Bavdekar S, Subhash G (2021) Failure mechanisms of ceramics under quasi-static and dynamic loads: overview. Handbook of damage mechanics. Springer New York, New York, pp 1–29

    Google Scholar 

  4. Griffith AA (1921) The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 221:163–198. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1921.0006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Vargas-Gonzalez L, Speyer RF, Campbell J (2010) Flexural strength, fracture toughness, and hardness of silicon carbide and boron carbide armor ceramics. Int J Appl Ceram Technol 7:643–651. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7402.2010.02501.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. ASTM (2018) ASTM C1421-18, Standard test methods for determination of fracture toughness of advanced ceramics at ambient temperature. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nie X, Chen WW, Wereszczak AA, Templeton DW (2009) Effect of loading rate and surface conditions on the flexural strength of borosilicate glass. J Am Ceram Soc 92:1287–1295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03019.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cantrell JT, Rohde S, Damiani D et al (2017) Experimental characterization of the mechanical properties of 3D-printed ABS and polycarbonate parts. Rapid Prototyp J 23:811–824. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-03-2016-0042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Spierings GACM (1993) Wet chemical etching of silicate glasses in hydrofluoric acid based solutions. J Mater Sci 28:6261–6273. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01352182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bouras N, Madjoubi MA, Kolli M et al (2009) Thermal and mechanical characterization of borosilicate glass. Phys Procedia 2:1135–1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2009.11.074

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Quinn GD (2016) NIST Recommended practice guide fractography of ceramics and glasses. Gaithersburg, MD

  12. Tsirk A (2014) Fractures in knapping. Archaeopress Publishing Ltd, Gloucestershire

  13. Horii H, Nemat-Nasser S (1985) Compression-induced microcrack growth in brittle solids: Axial splitting and shear failure. J Geophys Res 90:3105. https://doi.org/10.1029/jb090ib04p03105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ashby MF, Hallam (Née Cooksley) SD (1986) The failure of brittle solids containing small cracks under compressive stress states. Acta Metall 34:497–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(86)90086-6

  15. Wallner H (1939) Linienstrukturen an Bruchflächen. Z Phys 114:368–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01337002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Buckley-lewis DH (1973) Friction behavior of glass and metals in contact with glass in various environments. Nasa Technical Note

  17. Zortrax SA (2020) Z-HIPS Technical Data. zortrax.com/filaments/z-hips/. Accessed 6 Oct 2021

  18. Zortrax SA (2020) Z-UltraT Technical Data. zortrax.com/filaments/z-ultrat/. Accessed 6 Oct 2021

  19. Ahn S, Montero M, Odell D et al (2002) Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS. Rapid Prototyp J 8:248–257. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540210441166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bellini A, Güçeri S (2003) Mechanical characterization of parts fabricated using fused deposition modeling. Rapid Prototyp J 9:252–264. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552540310489631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. ASTM (2014) Standard test method for tensile properties of plastics. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  22. Syrlybayev D, Zharylkassyn B, Seisekulova A et al (2021) Optimisation of strength properties of FDM printed parts—A critical review. Polym (Basel) 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13101587

  23. Engineering ToolBox (2008) Ceramic materials properties. https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/ceramics-properties-d_1227.html

  24. Alarcon OE, Medrano RE, Gillis PP (1994) Fracture of glass in tensile and bending tests. 25:961–968. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02652271

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research was performed under Department of Energy (DOE) Nuclear Energy University Programs (NEUP) grant number DE-NE0008773 to University of Florida.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Subhash.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

MacIsaac, M., Bavdekar, S., Nance, J. et al. A Novel Rotating Flexure-Test Technique for Brittle Materials with Circular Geometries. Exp Tech 47, 505–516 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-022-00565-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-022-00565-6

Keywords

Navigation