1 Introduction

Discard coal is the low-energy-value residue after excavation of bituminous hard coal and may comprise a mix of waste coal with some soil and rock (i.e. spoil) which in South Africa, is typically stockpiled in dumps. When left for extended periods, these discard dumps tend to be a source of air pollutants and, following precipitation leach metal ions from the carbonaceous material into waterways that may lead to acid rock drainage and contamination of recipient water courses and streams (Claassens et al. 2006). Land devastation in regions where coal mining has taken place is well documented and serves to emphasise the need for continued effort to develop sound rehabilitation technologies to support re-vegetation and transformation of this disturbed land to a new beneficial condition (Sheoran et al. 2010; Limpitlaw and Briel 2015; Weyer et al. 2017). Biological rehabilitation has become the strategy of choice and is considered to be economic, safe, more energy efficient and environmentally compatible, and potentially capable of providing a means to convert coal discard to ash and sulphur-free products of value (Reich-Walber et al. 1997; Klein et al. 2001; Hofrichter and Fakoussa 2001; Machnikowska et al. 2002; Sekhohola et al. 2013; Cowan et al. 2016).

It has long been recognised that coal is susceptible to microbial transformation and several articles on this subject were published during the period 1908–1927 (reviewed by Klein et al. 2001). However, there was little further interest until bacteria were shown to solubilise part of the organic phase of hard coal (Fakoussa 1981). At about the same time it was reported that wood-rot fungi quantitatively solubilised the low-rank coal, Leonardite (Cohen and Gabriele 1982). This was followed by confirmation of the microbial degradation of coal by a wide variety of biocatalysts including: Streptomyces viridosporous (Strandberg and Lewis 1987), Streptomyces flavovirens (Moolick et al. 1989), Penicillium sp. (Moolick et al. 1989), Bacillus cereus (Maka et al. 1989), Arthrobacter sp. (Torzilli and Isbister 1994), Nematoloma frowardii (Hofrichter and Fritsche 1997), Aspergillus sp. (Laborda et al. 1999), Penicillium sp. (Laborda et al. 1999), Trichoderma sp. (Laborda et al. 1999), Phanerochaete chrysporium (Ralph and Catcheside 1994), Trametes versicola (Gotz and Fakoussa 1999), Pseudomonas putida (Machnikowska et al. 2002), Coriolus versicolor (Basaran et al. 2003), Trichoderma sp. (Kai-yi et al. 2009), Pseudomonas stutzeri (Singh and Tripathi 2011) and Neosartorya fischeri (Igbinigie et al. 2008; Sekhohola et al. 2014; Sekhohola and Cowan 2017). While the detail of mechanisms involved in biodegradation of coal are still to be elucidated, oxidation of sub-bituminous coal by Pseudomonas fluorescens (Hazrin-Chong et al. 2014), solubilisation of brown coal by Gordonia alkanivorans and Bacillus mycoides (Romanowska et al. 2015), the production of humic substances from low-rank coal by strains of Bacillus mycoides, Microbacterium sp., Acinetobacter baumannii, and Enterobacter aerogenes (Valero et al. 2014) together with release from liquefied coal of humic and fulvic acids by a novel recombinant Fusarium oxysporum laccase (Kwiatos et al. 2018) and other coal biosolubilization mediators (David et al. 2017), illustrate the potential to use microbes in developing sustainable rehabilitation strategies.

Biological degradation of complex hydrocarbons such as coal, crude oil, and petroleum usually requires cooperation between species or assemblages of mixed populations (Ghazali et al. 2004; Jacques et al. 2008). Thus, consortia of microorganisms appear to be more efficient as biocatalysts than individual strains (Hofrichter et al. 1999; Grinhut et al. 2007). The latter has been particularly evident in studies on the bacterial conversion of coal to methane (Lavania et al. 2014; Zhang et al. 2015; He et al. 2016). In the present work, bacteria were sourced by bio-prospecting and isolated from slurries of coal tailings, from the root zone of grasses on coal discard dumps, and from diesel-contaminated soil and screened for coal biodegradation potential in liquid medium. In this study, the molecular identification of ten coal degrading bacteria is reported. Additionally, experiments are described that were carried out to demonstrate the ability of the most active of these strains, both individually and in consort, to colonise and degrade coal. Results provide further evidence in support of formation of humic acid (HS)- and fulvic acid (FS)-like substances as products of the microbial degradation of bituminous coal discard and geologically weathered coal.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Preparation and characterization of substrates

Coal discard was obtained from waste dumps in the eMalahleni coal fields, Mpumalanga Province, South Africa. Geologically weathered coal was sourced from the No.2 Seam, Kromdraai Section, Landau Colliery (Cowan et al. 2016). Substrates were air-dried and ground using a HP-M 100 Pulverizer (HERZOG Maschinenfabrik GmbH Co., Osnabrück, Germany) to yield particles of approximately 0.2–0.5 mm in diameter and sterilized by freeze thawing using liquid nitrogen (three cycles) to eliminate any in situ bacterial activity. Confirmation of sterilization was achieved by monitoring microbial growth after plating on nutrient agar (containing; 1 g meat extract, 5 g peptone, 2 g yeast extract, 8 g NaCl, and 15 g agar, obtained from Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) incubated at 37 °C for 48 h.

Proximate and ultimate analysis of the bituminous coal discard and geologically weathered coal substrates is presented in Table 1. Analyses included determination of the amount of fixed carbon, moisture, volatile matter, and ash content and these are expressed as mass percentage. Moisture content was determined after exposure of substrate samples (1 g) to 105 °C for 1 h and the relative loss of mass reported as percentage moisture. Ash content was determined after combustion of substrate in a muffle furnace (Model JK-222 M, Jingke Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai) at 815 °C. This was achieved by increasing the temperature to 400 °C for over 30 min, then to 815 °C for a further 30 min, followed isothermally for 2 h and the residue, reported as percentage ash. Volatile matter was quantified after heating to 910 °C for 7 min and loss of mass reported as percentage volatile matter. The mass percentage of fixed carbon of the two substrates was determined from the expression: [100 − (% moisture + % volatile matter + % ash)]. Elemental analysis of both substrates was carried out using an elemental analyser (PE 2400 CHNS/O, PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA).

Table 1 Proximate and ultimate analysis of the coal discard and geologically weathered coal substrates
Full size table

2.2 Bacterial strains and culture conditions

Bacterial strains were sourced through bio-prospecting and isolated from slurries prepared from coal tailings and material taken from the root zones (at a depth of ~ 15 cm) of grasses growing on coal discard dumps at coal mines in eMalahleni, Mpumalanga Province, South Africa and from diesel-contaminated soil (at a depth of ~ 15 cm) collected from mechanical workshops in the Makana Local Municipality, Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. After 48 h, slurries of nutrient broth (containing 10 g/L NaCl, 10 g/L tryptone powder, and 5 g/L yeast extract, prepared by suspending solids in distilled water prior to autoclaving at 120 °C for 20 min) containing 5 g of excavated material, were serially diluted and aliquots plated on nutrient agar and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. Pure colonies were picked and after re-streaking and plating (3 passages), screened for coal degradation potential by monitoring the change in pH of a coal-containing minimal salt medium and precipitate formation on minimal salt agar medium. From a total of 72 isolates, ten bacterial strains tested positive for coal degradation potential (Table S1) and each was enriched prior to molecular characterisation. For enrichment, each isolate was successively cultivated in the presence of pulverised coal discard (1 g), as the sole carbon source, in sterile minimal salt medium (pH 6.8) composed of K2HPO4 (1.71 g/L), KH2PO4 (1.32 g/L), NHCl4 (1.26 g/L), MgCl2·6H2O (0.01 g/L), CaCl2 (0.02 g/L), and FeCl3 (0.05 g/L), to which was added 4 mL of trace element solution that contained MnSO4·H20 (5 mg/L), NaCl (10 mg/L), FeSO4·H20 (5 mg/L), CoCl2 (1 mg/L), CaCl2 (1 mg/L), ZnSO4.7H20 (1 mg/L), CuSO4·5H20 (0.1 mg/L), AlK(SO4)·12H20 (0.8 mg/L), H3BO3 (0.1 mg/L), and NaMoO4·2H20 (0.9 mg/L). Where necessary, stock cultures of each isolate were maintained in 30% glycerol and stored at − 20 °C.

2.3 Molecular identification of isolated bacterial strains

Total genomic DNA was extracted from bacteria grown on nutrient agar plates in pure culture using the methods outlined by Head et al. (1998) and Bond et al. (2002). Briefly, lysozyme stock solution (6 µL; 50 mg/mL) was added to a bacteria suspension in 500 µL of Tris–EDTA buffer and incubated for 3 h at 37 °C with occasional mixing. Extracts were then subjected to five heating (100 °C for 1 min) and freeze–thaw (liquid nitrogen followed by 80 °C water bath) cycles, cooled to room temperature, 50 µL sodium dodecyl sulphate (10%) and 2.5 µL proteinase K stock solutions (50 µg/mL) added, thoroughly mixed, and incubated overnight at 37 °C. After addition of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (10%; 100 µL) and NaCl (5 M; 200 µL), the extracts were incubated at 55 °C for 1 h. An equal amount of buffer-saturated phenol, pH 8 (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO), was then added to 500 µL aliquots of each extract which were mixed for 30 s and centrifuged (10,000×g for 2 min). The upper aqueous layer was partitioned against an equal volume of phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (24:24:1, v/v/v), mixed, and the layers separated by centrifugation as above. Upper aqueous layers were then partitioned against equal volumes of chloroform:isoamyl alcohol (24:1, v/v) until clear. To the final clear upper aqueous layer 2.5 volumes of ice-cold redistilled ethanol (96%) was added and DNA precipitated at − 20 °C for 12 h and recovered by centrifugation (10,000×g for 20 min). Pellets were air dried and re-suspended in triple distilled water.

For molecular typing of strains, PCR was carried out by amplifying 16S ribosomal DNA using the universal primer 907R (5′-CCCCGTCAATTCCTTTGAGTTT-3′) and the bacterial primer GMF5 (5′-CCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG-3′) manufactured by Integrated DNA Technologies, IO (Muyzer et al. 1995). The PCR conditions were as follows: 95 °C for 2 min, 4 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 68 °C for 45 s, 72 °C for 1 min, and a final extension step of 5 min at 72 °C. PCR products were purified and subsequently sequenced using an ABI 3130XL sequencer (Inqaba Biotec, Pretoria, South Africa). Chromatograms were converted to text format using Chromas, entered into the NCBI BLAST database, the resultant sequences submitted to GenBank using BankIT, the wild-type strains deposited with the Microbial Culture Collection (MCC), Maharashtra, India, and the accession numbers and nearest taxonomic designation assigned to each bacterial isolate are shown in Table 2.

Table 2 Identification of bacteria with coal-degrading potential. Isolates were from slurries of coal tailings, from rhizosphere of grasses on coal discard dumps, and from diesel-contaminated soil
Full size table

2.4 Bacterial growth and colonisation and biodegradation of coal in liquid media

Sterile powdered bituminous coal discard and geologically weathered coal (1 g), a highly oxidised naturally weathered lignite-like material, were added to flasks containing 150 mL aliquots of minimal salt medium containing 4 mL trace element solution at pH 6.8. Bacterial inoculum was prepared from Citrobacter strain ECCN 19b, Exiguobacterium strain ECCN 21b and Serratia strain ECCN 24b, by gentle centrifugation (2000×g for 10 min) of log phase cultures and washing three times with sterile 0.01 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7) to remove any residual carbon (Igbinigie et al. 2008), and 2 mL equivalent to 2.8 × 1011, 6.5 × 108, and 2.3 × 1011 CFU/mL respectively of each culture used. Also, a consortium of Citrobacter strain ECCN 19b, Exiguobacterium strain ECCN 21b and Serratia strain ECCN 24b was formulated from these log phase cultures. Following centrifugation at 2000×g for 10 min, pellets were washed in sterile PBS (pH 7), re-centrifuged (3 ×) and the mass of each determined and the consortium established by carefully and aseptically mixing the strains (g/g) to a culture concentration of 3.20 × 106–3.86 × 106 CFU/mL Flasks without coal discard or geologically weathered coal in minimal salt medium were used as controls. Bacterial growth and substrate colonisation and biodegradation were achieved by incubation at 37 °C for periods up to 21 d.

Where specified, a consortium of strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas putida and Bacillus subtilis, known to catalyze poly aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) degradation (Yu et al. 2001; Mukherjee and Bordoloi 2012), was prepared from seed cultures as described above and used as a positive control (+0).

Bacterial growth was determined by direct quantification of DNA in bacterial samples without prior isolation or purification using diphenylamine (Zhao et al. 2013). Briefly, and at specified intervals, aliquots (1.5 mL) of bacterial culture were harvested, centrifuged (2000×g for 10 min), the supernatant discarded, cell pellets washed in PBS (pH 7) and resuspended in 3 mL diphenylamine (DPA) reagent (prepared by dissolving 1.5 g of reagent grade DPA in 100 mL of glacial acetic acid and adding 1.5 mL conc. H2SO4). At time of growth measurement, a fresh solution of 1 mL acetaldehyde in 50 mL distilled water was prepared and 0.5 mL added to 100 mL of the DPA solution. Following incubation for 1 h at 60 °C the clarified supernatant was transferred to a cuvette and absorbance at 600 nm determined using a UV-1201 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan).

Change in media pH was monitored at regular intervals using a pH meter (HI 8314 pH/mV/ °C Meter, Hanna Instruments (Pty) Ltd) after calibration using standard buffer solutions.

Bacterial colonisation of substrate particles was established using scanning electron microscopy. In brief, colonised particles were collected by gentle centrifugation and fixed in 2.5% buffered glutaraldehyde at 4 °C overnight. The buffered glutaraldehyde was decanted and the samples washed twice with phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 7.3) and then dehydrated using a graded alcohol series. The alcohol concentrations used were 30% through absolute ethanol in increments of 10% and incubated for 10 min at each step. Thereafter, samples were placed into a Critical Point Dryer apparatus basket and immersed in absolute ethanol and dried at 15 °C for 2 h. After critical point drying, the desired part of the sample was mounted onto clean specimen stubs with double-sided conductive tape and gold-coated in order to improve the secondary electron emission and to reduce charge build up. Samples were examined using a Vega 3 LMU (TESCAN, Brno, Czech Republic) analytical scanning electron microscope at 30 kV.

To determine the quantity of substrate remaining following bacterial action, residual coal was recovered by centrifugation, washed in distilled water, the pellets freeze dried, and placed in a desiccator with activated silica gel to remove excess moisture prior to gravimetric analysis (Cimadevilla et al. 2003; Elbeyli et al. 2006). FTIR spectra were recorded using a PerkinElmer Spectrum 100 instrument (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA) with attenuated total reflectance (ATR) accessory eliminating the need for mixing of samples with KBr. The ATR accessory, fitted with a diamond top-plate, has spectral range of 25,000–100 cm−1, refractive index of 2.4, and 2.01 µ depth penetration. FTIR spectra were recorded in the range of 4000–700 cm−1.

2.5 Analysis of humic/fulvic acid-like substances

Humic acid-like (HS) and fulvic acid-like substances (FS) were extracted from the supernatant using essentially the method described by Janoš (2003).

Humic acid-like substances were precipitated at pH 1, after removal of residual substrate coal discard, for 24 h and concentrated by centrifugation (Eppendorf Bench-top Centrifuge 5810 R, Drücken, Germany) at 4000×g for 90 min at 10 °C. The supernatant was retained for analysis of FS and the pellet, washed three times in distilled water and then re-suspended in an equal volume of 0.5 M NaOH (1:10 ratio of material to extraction solution). After removal of particulates by centrifugation, HS and FS (in the original supernatant) were quantified by interpolation from standard curves either for Leonardite-derived humic acid or for peat-derived fulvic acid (purchased from the International Humic Substance Society, St. Paul, MN) after determining the absorbance (Thermo Aquamate, ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) at 250 nm.

2.6 Statistical analysis

All data were computed using the statistical function in Sigma Plot version 11 (Systat Software Inc., San Jose, CA). Where necessary, results were analysed by one-way analysis of variance and significant differences between measurements for each treatment determined (Holm–Sidak method; P < 0.05). Data are presented as the mean of at least three determinations ± standard error (SE).

3 Results

3.1 Bacterial growth and colonization of coal substrates

In this study use was made of the simplified DPA colorimetric method developed by Zhao et al. (2013) to estimate the growth of coal degrading bacteria. Method selection was based on wide acceptance of DNA concentration as an accurate indicator of cell number and to avoid interference from suspended coal particles. Results show that Citrobacter strain ECCN 19b, isolated from coal slurry and, Exiguobacterium strain ECCN 21b and Serratia strain ECCN 24b both isolated from diesel contaminated soil, were able to grow and proliferate when either coal discard or geologically weathered coal was used as substrate (Fig. 1a, b). However, growth of these isolates was faster and stationary phase achieved earlier in minimal salt medium containing geologically weathered coal as carbon source.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Growth response of Citrobacter strain ECCN 19b, Exiguobacterium strain ECCN 21b, and Serratia strain ECCN 24b in minimal salt medium containing either coal discard (a) or geologically weathered coal (b) as the sole carbon sources. Bacterial isolates were incubated in minimal salt medium with and without coal substrate on a rotary shaker at 37 °C and growth determined by direct quantification of DNA without prior isolation or purification using DPA. Results are expressed as the mean ± SE (n = 5)

Full size image

As expected a change in pH of the medium was observed for all isolates irrespective of substrate (Fig. 2a, b). Following inoculation of coal-containing minimal salt medium a decline in pH was observed. This decline was pronounced and sustained in uninoculated control samples reflecting the acid generating potential of both coal discard and geologically weathered coal. However, in the presence of the selected coal degrading bacteria medium acidification was attenuated, transient, and returned to ~ 6.8 (the starting pH) and then remained constant. No apparent difference in medium alkalinisation by either Citrobacter strain ECCN 19b, Exiguobacterium strain ECCN 21b or Serratia strain ECCN 24b was evident where coal discard was used as substrate (Fig. 2a). For geologically weathered coal however, alkalinisation by Exiguobacterium strain ECCN 21b occurred more rapidly and was substantially greater than with Citrobacter strain ECCN 19b but similar to Serratia strain ECCN 24b (Fig. 2b).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Time course of the change in pH of minimal salt medium containing either coal discard (a) or geologically weathered coal (b) after inoculation with either Citrobacter strain ECCN 19b, Exiguobacterium strain ECCN 21b, and Serratia strain ECCN 24b. All data are the mean ± SE (n = 6) of three determinations and are representatives of duplicate experiments

Full size image

Bacterial growth with coal as the sole carbon source (Fig. 1) and, media alkalinisation (Fig. 2) and decolourisation (Table S2) suggested that these bacterial isolates were capable of colonising both coal discard and geologically weathered coal. Scanning electron microscope examination of coal particles abstracted from minimal salt medium after inoculation revealed bacterial colonization of these substrates (Fig. 3). The isolates, Citrobacter strain ECCN 19b (Fig. 3a, b), Exiguobacterium strain ECCN 21b (Fig. 3b, c), and Serratia strain ECCN 24b (Fig. 3e, f) were equally effective at colonising coal discard and the more oxidised geologically weathered coal. Results for a consortium of the three isolates appear to show association of individual cells of Citrobacter strain ECCN 19b a Gram-negative flagellated bacillus, and Serratia strain ECCN 24b, a Gram-negative, rod-shaped soil bacterium with a single lateral flagellum, whereas colonies of Exiguobacterium strain ECCN 21b predominate on the surface of the coal substrate (Fig. 3g, h). This is perhaps not surprising as Exiguobacterium sp. are pigmented, alkaliphilic, halotolerant, non-spore-forming Gram-positive bacilli that form flat colonies on solid surfaces (Collins et al. 1983).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Scanning electron micrographs showing colonization by cells of Citrobacter strain ECCN 19b (a, b), Exiguobacterium strain ECCN 21b (c, d), Serratia strain ECCN 24b (e, f), and a consortium (ECCN 14b) of all three isolates (g, h) of either coal discard (a, c, and e) or geologically weathered coal (b, d, and f). Substrate colonization was facilitated in minimal salt medium and particles of either coal discard or geologically weathered coal were recovered after 7 d at 37 °C. Arrows indicate bacterial colonization of and attachment to the coal substrate

Full size image

3.2 Gravimetric determination of coal biodegradation

Biodegradation of coal discard in liquid culture by the various bacterial consortia was determined gravimetrically throughout the course of incubation and after careful recovery of residual substrate. As illustrated in Fig. 4, a substantial reduction in mass of coal discard was observed in the presence of either Citrobacter strain ECCN 19b, Exiguobacterium strain ECCN 21b, Serratia strain ECCN 24b, or a consortium of these isolates which, based on the earlier observed decolourisation (Table S2), was not unexpected. However, although average losses of up to 10% in mass of bituminous coal discard within 21 d were determined for each isolate and the consortium (Fig. 4a). By comparison, when the more oxidised geologically weathered coal was used, cultures of Citrobacter strain ECCN 19b, Exiguobacterium strain ECCN 21b, Serratia strain ECCN 24b, and the consortium reduced mass of this substrate by up to 30% (Fig. 4b). An attenuated reduction in mass of coal discard after inoculation either with these coal-degrading bacteria or a consortium of the isolates, suggests that substrate oxidation state plays a major role in facilitating biodegradation. No significant change in mass of either coal discard or geologically weathered coal was detected in the uninoculated controls. This latter observation, coupled with the absence of media decolouration, indicates little or no spontaneous release of organic compounds (e.g. PAH) during incubation which, might serve as an alternative substrate for bacterial growth or be utilised in the formation of co-metabolic products.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Time course of the change in mass of coal discard (a) and geologically weathered coal (b) after treatment with cells of Citrobacter strain ECCN 19b, Exiguobacterium strain ECCN 21b, Serratia strain ECCN 24b, and a consortium (ECCN 14b) of all three isolates. Residual substrate was recovered, dried to a constant weight, and the mass determined gravimetrically. All data are the mean ± SE of three determinations and are representatives of duplicate experiments

Full size image

Confirmation of bacterial degradation of coal discard was obtained by detailed FT-IR analysis of the substrate prior to and following inoculation and incubation either with the consortium Citrobacter strain ECCN 19b, Exiguobacterium strain ECCN 21b, Serratia strain ECCN 24b or with ECCN13b (Table S2; a consortium of Serratia strain ECCN 24b, Citrobacter strain ECCN 19b, Escherichia strain ECCN 25b) and the positive control (a consortium comprising PAH degrading strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas putida and Bacillus subtilis), and by comparing FT-IR spectra from inoculated and uninoculated coal discard. The results are shown in Fig. 5. FT-IR spectra of residual substrate from uninoculated media after 21 d incubation (Fig. 5a) and the spectrum from the raw coal discard substrate (Fig. 5b) reveal no substantial change in functional groups. In the presence of bacterial consortia however, significant shifts in functional groups were observed for coal discard exposed to either the positive control (Fig. 5c) or the consortium, ECCN 13 (Fig. 5d). Thus, while strong absorbance in the 1600 cm−1 region, consistent with alkene (C=C) stretching frequencies (Coates 1996), was observed for all treatments including the un-inoculated control, bands at 1660-1820 cm−1 denoting C=O and –COO groups (Yuan et al. 2006), were most prominent in substrate remaining after treatment with ECCN 13. The formation of C=O functional groups as suggested by Coates (1996), informs that –O–H groups will be evident in the 3400–2400 cm−1 region which were indeed observed for coal discard exposed to the consortium (Fig. 5d). Similar chemical shifts were also observed in spectra from coal discard after inoculation with a consortium of Citrobacter strain ECCN 19b, Exiguobacterium strain ECCN 21b, Serratia strain ECCN 24b (Fig. S1). Furthermore, embedded under the –O–H stretch is the C–H group (Coates 1996), which consists of alkane stretches (3000–2850 cm−1), alkene stretches (3100–3000 cm−1), aromatic stretches (3150–3050 cm−1) and alkyne stretches (3300 cm−1), and denotes the addition of methyl moieties to the substrate or the substitution of an atom or group by a methyl moiety. Together, these results indicate, in addition to presence of new functional groups within the coal discard, degradation of substrate.

Fig. 5
figure 5

FT-IR spectra of coal discard before and after treatment with bacterial isolates. Minimal salt medium containing coal substrate was inoculated and incubated at 37 °C for 21 d. Residual substrate was recovered, dried to a constant mass, and analysed by FT-IR. Coal substrate (a); recovered residual coal from uninoculated control (b); recovered residual coal following exposure to the positive control of a consortium of P. aeruginosa, P. putida and B. subtilis (c); and, recovered residual after treatment with either Citrobacter strain ECCN 19b, Exiguobacterium strain ECCN 21b, and Serratia strain ECCN 24b (ECCN 14b) or ECCN 13b (d)

Full size image

3.3 Formation of humic acid-like and fulvic acid-like substances

Colouration of the minimal salt medium coupled with changes in substrate functional groups indicated bioconversion of both coal discard and geologically weathered coal into water soluble products. Spectrophotometric analysis of the aqueous fraction after inoculation and incubation with either of the substrates and the bacterial isolates revealed sustained accumulation of a product tentatively identified as a HS. Confirmation of formation of HS from coal discard in liquid medium together with formation of FS was by FT-IR spectroscopy.

Spectra of a HS extracted from the aqueous fraction after inoculation and incubation of coal substrate with bacterial consortia (i.e. ECCN 14b and ECCN 13b) revealed no substantial differences in composition based on functional group assignments when compared to that of commercial HA (Fig. 6a, b). Additionally, evidence for formation of a FS from the coal-derived soluble HS fraction was obtained. Indeed, FT-IR analysis showed that the FS extracted from commercially available HA (Fig. 6c) was similar to the FS produced during incubation of bacteria with coal discard (Fig. 6d).

Fig. 6
figure 6

FT-IR spectra of HS and FS produced by bacterial degradation of coal discard. Minimal salt medium containing coal discard was inoculated with either ECCN 13b or a consortium of Citrobacter strain ECCN 19b, Exiguobacterium strain ECCN 21b, and Serratia strain ECCN 24b (ECCN 14b) and incubated at 37 °C for 21 d. Humic and fulvic acid-like substances were extracted, dried, and analysed by FT-IR. Commercial HA (a); HS produced from coal discard treated with bacteria (b); fulvic acids extracted from commercial humic acid (c); and, FS extracted from the HS produced from coal discard treated with bacteria (d)

Full size image

4 Discussion

Following the successful demonstration of fungal biodegradation of hard coal in our laboratories (Igbinigie et al. 2008; Sekhohola et al. 2014), it seemed pertinent to bio-prospect for bacteria with similar coal degrading attributes. To this end, bacteria were sourced and isolated from coal slurry and diesel-contaminated soil and, following screening, several isolates were obtained with potential to catalyse the biodegradation of coal.

It has been argued that the recalcitrance of coal to biodegradation stems in part from an inability to bring metabolically active biocatalysts into direct contact with the substrate (Sekhohola et al. 2013). Results from the present study demonstrate the close association of bacterial catalysts with the two coal substrates used. Scanning electron microscope analysis confirmed surface colonisation and partial disintegration of the coal particles which has been observed in other studies (Fakoussa 1988; Laborda et al. 1997; Igbinigie et al. 2008; Hazrin-Chong et al. 2014). Earlier work showed that bacterial and fungal strains grow extensively in media containing either hard coal, sub-bituminous coal or lignite and, that extracellular polymers produced by these microorganisms appear to facilitate not only adhesion to coal particles but microbial attack (Laborda et al. 1997). The latter study made use of nitric acid-treated coal which has been typical of methodologies used to demonstrate biosolubilisation of this material (Catcheside and Mallett 1991; Hofrichter et al. 1997; Machnikowska et al. 2002; Shi et al. 2009; Jiang et al. 2013; Romanowska et al. 2015; Kwiatos et al. 2018). Shi et al. (2012) showed that HNO3 pre-treatment of coal decreases ash content and aromaticity but increases substrate porosity, oxygenation of aliphatic carbon, and the quantity of humic acid carbon. Also, solid state 15N NMR spectroscopy has revealed that, in addition to nitro groups from nitration of aromatic carbon, products attributable to nitrosation reactions are evident in coal pre-treated with HNO3 and, that secondary reaction products of the initially formed oximes are also produced (Thorn and Cox 2016). Although the mechanism underlying coal nitration remains poorly understood, the last step in the oxidation of phenol with nitrous acid regenerates nitrous acid which will continue to react as a nitrosating agent. In contrast, the present study used substrates not treated with HNO3. Rather, coal discard and a geologically weathered coal were used, the latter with substantially higher oxygen concentration (Table 1), decreased aromaticity and abundant C-16 and C-18 fatty acids (van Breugel et al. 2019) and, without any confounding influence of nitrous acid and its associated nitrosation reactions.

In addition to colonisation, colouration of the coal-containing minimal medium, and changes in medium pH suggested that these bacterial isolates were able to degrade both of the coal substrates. While the initial decrease in medium pH to ~ 6.3 was attributed to the acid generating potential of the coal substrates (Hayatsu et al. 1978; Shi et al. 2009), subsequent bacterial-induced recovery to ~ 6.8 and higher was taken to indicate increased medium alkalinity due to release from coal discard and geologically weathered coal of alkalinising substances such as metal oxides, carbonates, borates, borosilicate, and aluminosilicate. Furthermore, the bacterial isolates described here were shown to proliferate in minimal medium with coal as the sole carbon source. Interestingly, growth rate of these isolates was faster and stationery phase achieved sooner in minimal medium containing geologically weathered coal. This observation suggests that the oxygen-rich weathered coal is a more friable substrate and thus readily colonised and biodegraded. Confirmation of bacterial degradation of these coal substrates was by FT-IR which showed that oxidation, hydroxylation and methylation are part of the process.

Production of extracellular laccases (LAC) would appear to be a common feature of coal degrading microorganisms (Haider et al. 2013; Sekhohola et al. 2014) and recently, a Fusarium oxysporum LAC expressed in Pichia pastoris was shown to solubilise brown coal and contribute HA and fulvic acid (FA) release from the liquefied substrate (Kwiatos et al. 2018). Laccase-like activity has been detected in bacterial strains (Ihssen et al. 2015; David et al. 2017) and, a highly stable LAC was recently cloned and characterised from Bacillus subtilis (Basheer et al. 2019). While LACs oxidize non-phenolic compounds indirectly, the principal oxidative detoxification agent responsible for elimination of many hydrophobic xenobiotics is cytochrome P-450 (CYP). Several variants of this monooxygenase have been isolated and characterized (Isin and Guengerich 2007) and roles in hydrocarbon biodegradation by fungi (Harayama 1997) and bacteria (Hyman 2013) have been considered. In fact, CYP are well known to be involved in many steps in biotransformation and degradation of environmental pollutants (Kellner et al. 1997; Kelly and Kelly 2013; Khmelevtsova et al. 2017). Also, a role for selected bacterial CYPs has been emphasized: for example, in the biotechnological applications of Pseudomonas putida P450cam (CYP101) and P450BM-3 (CYP102) from Bacillus megaterium (Lewis and Wiseman 2005). In particular, attention was placed on a role for these enzymes in biodegradation due in part, to catalytic self-sufficiency and an ability to metabolize long chain fatty acids such as lauric and pentadecanoic acid. Thus, CYP102 which is covalently linked to its NADPH dependent oxido reductase redox partner has amongst the highest catalytic activity of all known P450’s, with a turnover number of 4600 (Fulco 1991). It remains to be determined whether the bacteria isolated from coal slurry and diesel-contaminated soil in this study are capable of carrying out LAC- and CYP-catalysed reactions to facilitate coal biodegradation.

In addition to oxidative enzymes, hydrolytic enzymes also appear to contribute to the depolymerization of lignite and for several fungi, lignite solubilization is reported to correlate with enzymatic hydrolytic activity (Hölker et al. 1999). Later, content of HAs and water-soluble HS was shown to increase markedly while molecular mass of HA decreased in lignite depolymerized by Penicillium decumbens strain P6 (Dong et al. 2006). Depolymerization is believed to be a consequence of an esterase (Yang et al. 2018).

Taken together, the aforementioned enzymological studies indicate that the major products of microbial catalysed coal biodegradation appear to be HS and spectroscopic data obtained in the present study would seem to support this conclusion. Thus, a major product of coal discard as a result of inoculation with bacterial consortia was tentatively identified as HS. A second product, extracted from the HS-containing fraction, was identified by FT-IR as FS. Several studies have confirmed the ability of bacteria, fungi and algae to degrade HA and produce FS and, the utilisation of HA and HS by these microorganisms has also been documented (Steffen et al. 2002; Grinhut et al. 2007; Park and Kim 2015). Results from the present study therefore appear to support formation of HS and FS as products of the action of bacteria on coal discard and geologically weathered coal.

5 Conclusion

In conclusion, the present study investigated the bacterial degradation of coal in liquid medium. Consortia of bacterial isolates from coal and diesel-contaminated soil slurries were able to grow and either directly or indirectly facilitate HS- and FS formation with either coal discard or geologically weathered coal as the sole carbon source. These results contrast with previous findings which reported an inability or recalcitrance of bacteria to degrade coal (Fakoussa and Hofrichter 1999; Machnikowska et al. 2002) but support more recent observations (Hazrin-Chong et al. 2014; Romanowska et al. 2015). The most effective coal degrading consortia in the present study contained either Exiguobacterium strain ECCN 21b or Serratia strain ECCN 24b or both, and these reduced mass of the coal substrates by ~ 10% and ~ 30% respectively. Indeed, species of the alkalophilic bacterium Exiguobacterium aurantiacum are able to utilise n-alkanes (C9-C26) from diesel as a source of carbon and energy (Collins et al. 1983; Mohanty and Mukherji 2008). Similarly, strains of Serratia species have been identified as hydrocarbon degraders (Benedek et al. 2011). Aerobic degradation of alkanes can be catalysed by alkane monooxygenase and certain CYPs (van Beilen et al. 2006), and similar systems may supply both the carbon and energy for bacterial transformation of coal to HS and FS.