Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Minimally Invasive Fetal Therapy for Myelomeningocele

  • Prenatal Therapies (W Peranteau, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Stem Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

This review details the discoveries that have propelled forward treatment for MMC, from medical management to postnatal surgical repair to open fetal surgery, paving the way for novel scientific research on non-invasive therapeutic approaches.

Recent Findings

Current investigations to treat MMC in less invasive ways and earlier in gestation include intra-amniotic particle injections, scaffold-based tissue engineering, and cell-based therapy. The common goal of each experimental approach is protecting the exposed spinal cord prior to its damage—to avoid the devastating clinical manifestations associated with the disease.

Summary

Significant discoveries in translational science are underway. Promising research utilizing fetal stem cells, tissue engineering, and non-invasive particle delivery could form the basis for a new approach to MMC or could augment current therapy to better patient outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Fidas A, MacDonald H, Elton RA, Wild SR, Chisholm GD, Scott R. Prevalence and patterns of spina bifida occulta in 2707 normal adults. Clin Radiol. 1987;38(5):537–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sharrard, W.J.W., Zachary, B., Lorber, J., Survival and paralysis in open Myelomeningocele with special reference to the time of repair of the spinal lesion - SHARRARD - 1967 - Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology - Wiley Online Library. Dev Med Child Neurol, 1967. 9(s13): p. 35–50.

  3. Boone D, Parsons D, Lachmann SM, Sherwood T. Spina bifida occulta: lesion or anomaly? Clin Radiol. 1985;36(2):159–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Heffez DS, et al. The paralysis associated with myelomeningocele: clinical and experimental data implicating a preventable spinal cord injury. Neurosurgery. 1990;26(6):987–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Adzick NS. Fetal myelomeningocele: natural history, pathophysiology, and in-utero intervention. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;15(1):9–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pruitt LJ. Living with spina bifida: a historical perspective. Pediatrics. 2012;130(2):181–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zachary RB. Spina bifida: to treat or not to treat? Give every baby a chance. Nurs Mirror. 1978;147(11):17–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lorber J. Results of treatment of myelomeningocele. An analysis of 524 unselected cases, with special reference to possible selection for treatment. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1971;13(3):279–303.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Danzer, E. and A.W. Flake, In utero repair of myelomeningocele: rationale, initial clinical experience and a randomized controlled prospective clinical trial, in Neuroembryology Aging. 2008. p. 165–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. •• Adzick NS, et al. A randomized trial of prenatal versus postnatal repair of myelomeningocele. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(11):993–1004 Randomized controlled trial which established outcomes from fetal surgery as superior to those from postnatal repair of MMC.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. • Danzer E, et al. Fetal myelomeningocele surgery: preschool functional status using the Functional Independence Measure for children (WeeFIM). Childs Nerv Syst. 2011;27(7):1083–8 Demonstrated the functional and self-care limitations still present after fetal repair of MMC.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. UCSF Fetal Treatment Center | Spina Bifida (Myelomeningocele). 2019(February 13, 2019).

  13. Peranteau WH, Adzick NS. Prenatal surgery for myelomeningocele. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2016;28(2):111–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. • Kohl T. Percutaneous minimally invasive fetoscopic surgery for spina bifida aperta. Part I: surgical technique and perioperative outcome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;44(5):515–24 Demonstrates technical feasibility and clinical safety of fetoscopic surgery after extensive training.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. •• Pedreira DA, et al. Endoscopic surgery for the antenatal treatment of myelomeningocele: the CECAM trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(1):111.e1–111.e11 Evidence of a watertight fetoscopic surgery using a patch and skin-closure technique that results in reversal of hindbrain herniation.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bruner JP, et al. Endoscopic coverage of fetal myelomeningocele in utero. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180(1 Pt 1):153–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Joyeux L, Engels AC, Russo FM, Jimenez J, van Mieghem T, de Coppi P, et al. Fetoscopic versus open repair for spina bifida aperta: a systematic review of outcomes. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2016;39(3):161–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pedreira, D.A.L., et al., Fetoscopic repair of spina bifida: safer and better?, in Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016. p. 141–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Moldenhauer JS, Soni S, Rintoul NE, Spinner SS, Khalek N, Martinez-Poyer J, et al. Fetal myelomeningocele repair: the post-MOMS experience at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2015;37(3):235–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Graf K, Kohl T, Neubauer BA, Dey F, Faas D, Wanis FA, et al. Percutaneous minimally invasive fetoscopic surgery for spina bifida aperta. Part III: neurosurgical intervention in the first postnatal year. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47(2):158–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Luks FI, Deprest J, Marcus M, Vandenberghe K, Vertommen JD, Lerut T, et al. Carbon dioxide pneumoamnios causes acidosis in fetal lamb. Fetal Diagn Ther. 1994;9(2):105–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gratacos E, et al. Effects of amniodistention with carbon dioxide on fetal acid-base status during fetoscopic surgery in a sheep model. Surg Endosc. 2001;15(4):368–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. •• Watanabe M, et al. A tissue engineering approach for prenatal closure of myelomeningocele with gelatin sponges incorporating basic fibroblast growth factor. Tissue Eng Part A. 2010;16(5):1645–55 Demonstrated the utility of tissue engineering with growth factors for early and effective coverage of the MMC defect.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. •• Watanabe M, et al. Complete tissue coverage achieved by scaffold-based tissue engineering in the fetal sheep model of Myelomeningocele. Biomaterials. 2016;76:133–43 Gelatin-based sponges placed over the fetal MMC defect resulted in granulation tissue and complete coverge of the MMC defect--further enhanced with addition of bFGF.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang, A., et al., Placental mesenchymal stromal cells rescue ambulation in ovine myelomeningocele, in Stem Cells Transl Med. 2015. p. 659–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Klein, J.D., et al., Amniotic mesenchymal stem cells enhance normal fetal wound healing. https://home.liebertpub.com/scd, 2010.

  27. •• Dionigi B, et al. Partial or complete coverage of experimental spina bifida by simple intra-amniotic injection of concentrated amniotic mesenchymal stem cells. J Pediatr Surg. 2015;50(1):69–73 Intra-amniotic injections of concentrated amniotic stem cells can induce coverage of MMC.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. •• Dionigi B, et al. Trans-amniotic stem cell therapy (TRASCET) minimizes Chiari-II malformation in experimental spina bifida. J Pediatr Surg. 2015;50(6):1037–41 A novel stem cell–based minimally invasive approach to MMC repair reduces Chiari II malformation.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. •• Farrelly JS, et al. Alginate microparticles loaded with basic fibroblast growth factor induce tissue coverage in a rat model of myelomeningocele. J Pediatr Surg. 2019;54(1):80–5 Intrauterine injections of alginate, a microparticle, with FGF induces tissue coverage in 30% of MMC in a rat model.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. I. Marwan, et al., Reverse thermal gel for in utero coverage of spina bifida defects: an innovative bioengineering alternative to open fetal repair. Vol. 17. 2017. 1600473.

  31. Bardill J, Williams SM, Shabeka U, Niswander L, Park D, Marwan AI. An injectable reverse thermal gel for minimally invasive coverage of mouse myelomeningocele. J Surg Res. 2019;235:227–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David H. Stitelman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors have grant funding through The Hartwell Foundation and have a licensed patent (YU6717/7223/7404 PCT) for particle based fetal therapy for myelomeningocele.

Human and Animal Rights

All reported studies/experiments with human or animal subjects performed by the authors have been previously published and complied with all applicable ethical standards (including the Helsinki declaration and its amendments, institutional/national research committee standards, and international/national/institutional guidelines).

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Prenatal Therapies

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Freedman-Weiss, M.R., Stitelman, D.H. Minimally Invasive Fetal Therapy for Myelomeningocele. Curr Stem Cell Rep 6, 1–5 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40778-020-00167-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40778-020-00167-1

Keywords

Navigation