Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education

, Volume 3, Issue 2, pp 139–153 | Cite as

Digital Making in Elementary Mathematics Education

  • Janette Hughes
  • George Gadanidis
  • Chris Yiu


There is currently an increased focus on technology and on making, pointing to new opportunities for engaging learners in constructionist practices with digital technology. In this context, we share our investigations of elementary school mathematics applications of Arduino and Chibitronics, two popular environments for making digital circuits and controlling them with code. We are especially interested in affordances typically associated with coding and more generally with computational thinking--low floor, high ceiling, abstraction, automation and dynamic modelling (Papert 1980; Wing (Commun ACM 49(3);33-35, 2006), (Philos Trans R Soc A 366(1881):3717-3725, 2008))--and how these affordances manifest themselves in making experiences with digital tangibles.


Digital making Computational thinking Mathematics education Elementary 


  1. Buechley, L. (2010). Questioning invisibility. Computer, 43(4), 84–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Buechley, L., Elumeze, N. & Eisenberg, M. (2006). Electronic/Computational textiles and children’s crafts. In Proceedings of Interaction Design and Children, 2006, Tampere. Retrieved 10/05/2016 from
  3. Buechley, L., Peppler, K., Eisenberg, M. & Kafai, Y. (Eds) (2013). Textile Messages: Dispatches From the World of E-Textiles and Education. NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  4. Coelho, M., Hall, L., Berzowska, J. & Maes, P. (2009). Pulp-based computing: a framework for building computers out of paper. Extended Abstracts of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘09). Boston.Google Scholar
  5. Dissanakye, E. (1992). Homo aestheticus. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  6. Fleming, L. (2015). Worlds of making: best practices for establishing a makerspace for your school. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.Google Scholar
  7. Gadanidis, G. (2012). Why can’t I be a mathematician? For the Learning of Mathematics, 32(2), 20–26.Google Scholar
  8. Gadanidis, G., & Borba, M. (2008). Our lives as performance mathematicians. For the Learning of Mathematics, 28(1), 42–49.Google Scholar
  9. Gadanidis, G., & Hughes, J. (2011). Performing big math ideas across the grades. Teaching Children Mathematics, 17(8), 486–496.Google Scholar
  10. Gadanidis, G., Hughes, J., Minniti, L. & White, B. (2016). Computational thinking, Grade 1 students and the Binomial Theorem. Digital Experience in Mathematics Education. Google Scholar
  11. Halverson, E., & Sheridan, K. (2014). The maker movement in education. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 495–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hughes, J., & Gadanidis, G. (2010). Learning as community service: thinking with new media. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 19(3), 287–306.Google Scholar
  13. Kafai, Y., Fields, D., & Searle, K. (2013). Making connections across disciplines in high school ETextile workshops. In L. Buechley, K. Peppler, M. Eisenberg, & Y. Kafai (Eds.), Textile messages: dispatches from the world of E-textiles and education (pp. 85–94). NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  14. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: children, computers, and powerful ideas. NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  15. Papert, S. (1991). Situating constructionism. In S. Papert & I. Harel (Eds.), Constructionism (pp. 1–11). Norwood: Alex.Google Scholar
  16. Peppler, K., & Glosson, D. (2013). Learning about circuitry with E-textiles in after-school settings. In L. Buechley, K. Peppler, M. Eisenberg, & Y. Kafai (Eds.), Textile messages: dispatches from the world of e-textiles and education. NY: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  17. Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wing, J. M. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 366(1881), 3717–3725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Yadav, A., Mayfield, C., Zhou, N., Hambrusch, S., & Korb, J. T. (2014). Computational thinking in elementary and secondary teacher education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 14(1), 5:1–5:16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationUniversity of Ontario Institute of TechnologyOshawaCanada
  2. 2.Faculty of EducationWestern UniversityLondonCanada
  3. 3.Department of Computer ScienceWestern UniversityLondonCanada

Personalised recommendations