Thanks to the major advances introduced in the past two decades, RA treatment outcomes have markedly improved over time. Despite this, it has been reported that the overall patient perception of well-being has decreased with regard to pain, fatigue, physical function and QOL [11, 12]. In real life, the implementation of treat to target may be hampered by lack of resources and time constraints [13]. This could lead the rheumatologists to emphasise objective, standardised disease activity parameters over patients’ perspectives, aspirations and personal goals. Results from this survey increase awareness on the impact of RA on patients’ lives among those without the disease.
Results from this survey showed that both the physical and emotional impacts of RA on relationships are often not well understood by those without the disease. The more the patients felt understood by others, the better they can cope with the disease burden. Patients in relationships or with children felt that their disease was better understood when compared to those who are single, divorced or widowed. Important relationships with spouses or partners, children, family, friends and colleagues were generally negatively affected. Patients reported the strongest negative impacts on sex life and intimacy. Inclusion in family and social events was also negatively affected.
Regarding work ability, patients who felt the least understood from others reported greater inability to work due to fatigue, pain and unpredictability of how they feel. This is in line with the findings from a study that reported how patients with RA had to accept major adjustments in their career to maintain their jobs [14].
Patients’ aspirations are primarily centred on the need for having understanding from others about the physical and emotional impact of the disease. Notably, patients underscored how RA negatively impacted the most important relationships, with 1 in 10 patients feeling that RA has ruined their life. The physical effects of RA, such as pain, stiffness and fatigue, have been reported as primary barriers to patients’ daily activities. The inability to conduct these activities led to feelings of frustration and possible guilt in patients.
In line with recently published literature [15], our findings emphasise the need for identification and evaluation of outcomes that matter to patients, and that may help to achieve their personal goals. This survey also showed that lack of understanding of RA by those not affected by the disease remains a major barrier to improving patients QOL. Pitsilka et al. reported that the quality of social support that patients with RA received correlated directly with their QOL, which remained statistically significantly improved irrespective of the disease severity [16].
Generally, similar observations were noted between patients and HCP responses. However, the battery of questions on disease effect on relationships and aspirations recorded the highest degree of variability between the two groups. Because of the nature of the survey, that did not include any formal statistical comparisons between the two groups and taking into account other limitations as well, we did not provide any interpretations for these findings.
The strength of this survey lies in the large sample of participants which, to our knowledge, place it among the largest surveys ever conducted on RA. However, there are major limitations too. RA Matters was designed and executed as a social media campaign. To ensure the largest possible number of participants, a mixed method sampling plan was utilized, with part of the sample coming from a panel with verified unique respondents recruited by KRC Research, and part of the sample coming from open online links that were shared by different patient advocacy groups through their social network web pages. However, including data from the online open links in the analysis would have significantly limited the reproducibility of the results. For this reason, we focused the statistical analysis on the responses coming from the verified unique respondents panel sample only. Because of such an approach, no patient response was available for the analysis in reference to three countries (Spain, Sweden, and the Netherlands). In addition, no response from the panel was available for HCPs from Spain. For all these reasons, the sample may not be a true representative of the overall patient population with RA. Multifactorial different participation percentage, e.g. due to higher participation from countries with more active patient advocacy groups, was not taken into account in the analyses. Cultural inter-country perspectives (ethnicity, race) related to some aspects such as relationships and work, as well as objective domains such as disease activity and duration, pain, fatigue and physical function, were not captured in the survey. In addition, socio-economic, geographical and healthcare- or work-related considerations may have influenced the answers. Finally, both the stage of disease and comorbidities were not assessed in the study and these may have an impact on the responses too.