Skip to main content

An Empirical Study on the Application of the Burden of Normality to Patients Undergoing Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson’s Disease

Abstract

Psychosocial maladjustment frequently occurs following deep brain stimulation (DBS) in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). This paper aimed at investigating, for the first time with first-hand data, whether the burden of normality model (BoN) could adequately describe the manifestations and underlying dynamics of psychosocial maladjustment after DBS for PD. In a mixed experimental design including quantitative and qualitative data, 19 patients treated with DBS for PD were interviewed on their post-DBS lived experience with the Austin CEP Interview, a semi-structured instrument addressing all elements of the BoN. In addition, health-related quality of life was measured before surgery and at the time of interview with the Medical Outcome Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey. All patients experienced clinical manifestations of psychosocial maladjustment as described in the BoN. Yet, there was a great interindividual heterogeneity in descriptions of the perceived course of the post-DBS life. Experiencing various types of symptoms was nevertheless associated with the perception of a less satisfying life after surgery. In addition, most patients had realistic expectations on the surgical outcome, and those with unrealistic or mixed expectations did not differ from other patients in terms of psychosocial maladjustment. The BoN accurately conceptualizes psychosocial maladjustment experienced by DBS patients with PD. However, no relationship was established between the nature of pre-operative expectations and BoN symptoms.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

Retrieved from Wilson et al. [20]

References

  1. de Ridder D, Geenen R, Kuijer R, van Middendorp H. Psychological adjustment to chronic disease. Lancet. 2008;372(9634):246–55.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bladin PF. Psychosocial difficulties and outcome after temporal lobectomy. Epilepsia. 1992;33(5):898–907.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wilson SJ, Saling MM, Kincade P, Bladin PF. Patient expectations of temporal lobe surgery. Epilepsia. 1998;39(2):167–74.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wilson SJ, Saling MM, Lawrence J, Bladin PF. Outcome of temporal lobectomy: expectations and the prediction of perceived success. Epilepsy Res. 1999;36(1):1–14.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wrench J, Wilson SJ, Bladin PF. Mood disturbance before and after seizure surgery: a comparison of temporal and extratemporal resections. Epilepsia. 2004;45(5):534–43.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wilson SJ, Frazer DW, Lawrence JA, Bladin PF. Psychosocial adjustment following relief of chronic narcolepsy. Sleep Med. 2007;8(3):252–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Genardini N, Wilson SJ, Lawrence JA, Hare DL. Patterns of psychosocial adjustment following cardiac surgery. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2008;28(6):397–401.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Agid Y, Schüpbach M, Gargiulo M, Mallet L, Houeto JL, Behar C, et al. Neurosurgery in Parkinson’s disease: The doctor is happy, the patient less so? J Neural Transm. 2006;70:409–14.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schüpbach WMM, Gargiulo M, Welter ML, Mallet L, Béhar C, Houeto JL, et al. Neurosurgery in Parkinson disease: A distressed mind in a repaired body? Neurology. 2006;66:1811–6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Perozzo P, Rizzone M, Bergamasco B, Castelli L, Lanotte M, Tavella A, et al. Deep brain stimulation of subthalamic nucleus: behavioural modifications and familiar relations. Neurol Sci. 2001;22(1):81–2.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pollak P (2013) Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease—patient selection. 1st ed, Vol. 116. Handbook of clinical neurology. Elsevier, pp 97–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53497-2.00009-7.

  12. Perestelo-Pérez L, Rivero-Santana A, Pérez-Ramos J, Serrano-Pérez P, Panetta J, Hilarion P (2014) Deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Neurol. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24487826.

  13. Houeto J-L, Mallet L, Mesnage V, du Montcel ST, Béhar C, Gargiulo M, et al. Subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson disease: behavior and social adaptation. Arch Neurol. 2006;63(8):1090–5.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Houeto J-L, Mesnage V, Mallet L, Pillon B, Gargiulo M, du Moncel ST, et al. Behavioural disorders, Parkinson’s disease and subthalamic stimulation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;72(6):701–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Meyer M, Montel SR, Colnat-Coulbois S, Lerond J, Potheegadoo J, Vidailhet P, et al. Neurosurgery in Parkinson’s disease: social adjustment, quality of life and coping strategies. Neural Regen Res. 2013;8(30):2856–67.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Funkiewiez A, Ardouin C, Caputo E, Krack P, Fraix V, Klinger H, et al. Long term effects of bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation on cognitive function, mood, and behaviour in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004;75(6):834–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Burkhard PR, Vingerhoets FJGG, Berney A, Bogousslavsky J, Villemure J-G, Ghika J. Suicide after successful deep brain stimulation for movement disorders. Neurology. 2004;63(11):2170–2.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Vesper J, Haak S, Ostertag C, Nikkhah G. Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation in elderly patients–analysis of outcome and complications. BMC Neurol. 2007;7:7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fluchere F, Witjas T, Eusebio A, Bruder N, Giorgi R, Leveque M, et al. Controlled general anaesthesia for subthalamic nucleus stimulation in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014;85(10):1167–73. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2013-305323.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wilson SJ, Bladin PF, Saling MM. The “burden of normality”: concepts of adjustment after surgery for seizures. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001;70(5):649–56. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.70.5.649.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gilbert F. The burden of normality: from “chronically ill” to “symptom free”. New ethical challenges for deep brain stimulation postoperative treatment. J Med Ethics. 2012;38(7):408–12.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bell E, Maxwell B, McAndrews MP, Sadikot AF, Racine E. A review of social and relational aspects of deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease informed by healthcare provider experiences. Parkinsons Dis. 2011;2011:871–4.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dos Santos JFA, du Montcel ST, Gargiulo M, Behar C, Montel S, Hergueta T, et al. Tackling psychosocial maladjustment in Parkinson’s disease patients following subthalamic deep-brain stimulation: a randomised clinical trial. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(4):e0174512. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Baertschi M, Dos Santos JFA, Burkhard P, Weber K, Canuto A, Favez N. The burden of normality as a model of psychosocial adjustment after deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease: a systematic investigation. Neuropsychology. 2019;33(2):178–94. https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000509.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wilson SJ, Bladin PF, Saling MM. Paradoxical results in the cure of chronic illness: the “burden of normality” as exemplified following seizure surgery. Epilepsy Behav. 2004;5(1):13–21.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wilson SJ, Bladin PF, Saling MM. The burden of normality: a framework for rehabilitation after epilepsy surgery. Epilepsia. 2007;48(Suppl 9):13–6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wilson SJ, Bladin PF, Saling MM, Pattison PE. Characterizing psychosocial outcome trajectories following seizure surgery. Epilepsy Behav. 2005;6(4):570–80.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kemp S, Garlovsky J, Reynders H, Caswell H, Baker G, Shah E. Predicting the psychosocial outcome of epilepsy surgery: a longitudinal perspective on the ‘burden of normality. Epilepsy Behav. 2016;60:149–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.04.029.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Haahr A, Kirkevold M, Hall EOC, Østergaard K. From miracle to reconciliation: a hermeneutic phenomenological study exploring the experience of living with Parkinson’s disease following deep brain stimulation. Int J Nurs Stud. 2010;47(10):1228–36.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mattis S. Dementia rating scale professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ware JEJ, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-ltem short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. McKim CA. The value of mixed methods research: a mixed methods study. J Mix Methods Res. 2017;11(2):202–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Schermer M. Ethical issues in deep brain stimulation. Front Integr Neurosci. 2011;5:17.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kraemer F. Authenticity or autonomy? When deep brain stimulation causes a dilemma. J Med Ethics. 2013;39(12):757–60.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Gilbert F, Viaña JNM, Ineichen C. Deflating the “DBS causes personality changes” bubble. Neuroethics. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-018-9373-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kim YE, Kim HJ, Kim H-J, Lee J-Y, Yun JY, Kim J-Y, et al. Impulse control and related behaviors after bilateral subthalamic stimulation in patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Clin Neurosci. 2013;20(7):964–9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lhommée E, Klinger H, Thobois S, Schmitt E, Ardouin C, Bichon A, et al. Subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson’s disease: restoring the balance of motivated behaviours. Brain. 2012;135(Pt 5):1463–77. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/aws078.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Eusebio A, Witjas T, Cohen J, Fluchère F, Jouve E, Régis J, et al. Subthalamic nucleus stimulation and compulsive use of dopaminergic medication in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013;84(8):868–74.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Amami P, Dekker I, Piacentini S, Ferré F, Romito LM, Franzini A, et al. Impulse control behaviours in patients with Parkinson’s disease after subthalamic deep brain stimulation: de novo cases and 3-year follow-up. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2014;86:562–4.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang Y, Li Y, Zhang X, Xie A. Apathy following bilateral deep brain stimulation of subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson’s disease: a meta-analysis. Parkinsons Dis. 2018;2018:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Lamberti VMJ, Pereira B, Lhommée E, Bichon A, Schmitt E, Pelissier P, et al. Profile of neuropsychiatric symptoms in Parkinson’s Disease: surgical candidates compared to controls. J Parkinsons Dis. 2016;6(1):133–42.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Gisquet E. Cerebral implants and Parkinson’s disease: a unique form of biographical disruption? Soc Sci Med. 2008;67(11):1847–51.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hariz G-M, Hamberg K. Perceptions of living with a device-based treatment: an account of patients treated with deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease. Neuromodulation. 2014;17(3):272–7 discussion 277–8.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Sherif C, Dorfer C, Kalteis K, Thun C, Kaiser I, Gibson D, et al. Deep brain pulse-generator and lead-extensions: subjective sensations related to measured parameters. Mov Disord. 2008;23(7):1036–41.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hasegawa H, Samuel M, Douiri A, Ashkan K. Patients’ expectations in subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation surgery for Parkinson disease. World Neurosurg. 2014;82(6):1295–1295.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2014.02.001.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Maier F, Lewis CJ, Horstkoetter N, Eggers C, Kalbe E, Maarouf M, et al. Patients’ expectations of deep brain stimulation, and subjective perceived outcome related to clinical measures in Parkinson’s disease: a mixed-method approach. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013;84(11):1273–81.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Gilbert F, Goddard E, Viaña JNM, Carter A, Horne M. I Miss being me: phenomenological effects of deep brain stimulation. AJOB Neurosci. 2017;8(2):96–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Llebaria G, Pagonabarraga J, Kulisevsky J, García-Sánchez C, Pascual-Sedano B, Gironell A, et al. Cut-off score of the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale for screening dementia in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2008;23(11):1546–50.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (Grant Number: CR31I3_149578/1). The authors are thankful to Prof. Sarah Wilson and her colleagues from the University of Melbourne for allowing us to use the Austin CEP Interview.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc Baertschi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest has been declared by the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baertschi, M., Favez, N., Radomska, M. et al. An Empirical Study on the Application of the Burden of Normality to Patients Undergoing Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson’s Disease. J. Psychosoc. Rehabil. Ment. Health 6, 175–186 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40737-019-00149-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40737-019-00149-5

Keywords

  • Burden of normality
  • Deep brain stimulation
  • Expectations
  • Parkinson’s disease
  • Rehabilitation
  • Consultation-liaison psychiatry