Skip to main content
Log in

Delay Discounting by College Undergraduates of Hypothetical Intervention Effects for Challenging Behavior

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is well-established that humans have a bias towards immediate, compared to delayed, rewards. Although this bias has been primarily studied using monetary or other consumable commodities, it has also been demonstrated with outcomes of caregiver-mediated behavioral interventions targeting challenging behavior, which is a prevalent concern among children with autism spectrum disorder. In particular, caregivers may discount improvements in their child’s challenging behavior following behavioral interventions when the onset of improvement is delayed (Call et al. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 45, 1013–1025, 2015). The present study includes a sample of college students reading hypothetical vignettes about children with challenging behavior to evaluate the impact of child characteristics and caregiver role (parent vs. teacher) on discounting and the relationship between discounting of treatment and monetary commodities. Results suggest a discounting pattern across all groups, with no significant differences in discounting based on characteristics of the child/caregiver and steeper discounting for monetary compared to treatment outcomes. The results have implications for future research on caregiver-mediated interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Availability of Data and Materials

The datasets generated are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Funding

This study was not funded.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mindy C. Scheithauer.

Ethics declarations

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional review board of the authors’ affiliated institution and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This also adheres to the APA ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Scheithauer, M.C., Call, N.A., Simmons, C.A. et al. Delay Discounting by College Undergraduates of Hypothetical Intervention Effects for Challenging Behavior. Psychol Rec 70, 65–73 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-019-00367-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-019-00367-0

Keywords

Navigation