The Psychological Record

, Volume 65, Issue 1, pp 23–30 | Cite as

A History of “Behavior” and “Mind”: Use of Behavioral and Cognitive Terms in the 20th Century

Original Article

Abstract

If we assume that the terms used in a book tend to reflect its orientation, this provides a way to compare the relative trajectories of the influences of cognitivism and behaviorism. In Study 1, we used the search engine Google Ngram to search for the terms behavior and mind in all books printed in English over the period 1900 to 2008. The results for all books tend to support the pattern of standard accounts of the so-called behavioral and cognitive revolutions. In Study 2, we replicated the analysis with a selection of terms specific to behavioral psychology and to cognitive psychology. Again, the results supported the pattern of the so-called behavioral and cognitive revolutions. Neither study showed any indication that cognitivism had replaced behaviorism, although it has in fact overtaken it. The present methodology may open the way for a new quantitative approach to study trends in scientific theories.

Keywords

Behavior Mind Cognition Causal analysis 

References

  1. Baars, B. J. (1986). The cognitive revolution in psychology. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  2. Cromwell, H. C., & Panksepp, J. (2011). Rethinking the cognitive revolution from a neural perspective: How overuse/misuse of the term ‘cognition’ and the neglect of affective controls in behavioral neuroscience could be delaying progress in understanding the BrainMind. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35, 2026–2035. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.02.008.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 427–431. doi:10.2307/2286348.Google Scholar
  4. Friman, P. C., Allen, K. D., Kerwin, M. L. E., & Larzelere, R. (1993). Changes in modern psychology: A citation analysis of the Kuhnian displacement thesis. American Psychologist, 48, 658-664. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.48.6.658
  5. Gardner, H. (1985). The minds new science: A history of the cognitive revolution. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  6. Gerrig, R. J., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2002). Psychology and life (16th ed.). Edinburgh Gate, Harlow, England: Pearson Education. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/research/action/glossary.aspx
  7. Google Ngram Viewer Team (2012). Google books Ngram Viewer. Language corpora retrieved from: http://storage.googleapis.com/books/ngrams/books/datasetsv2.html
  8. Greenwood, J. D. (1999). Understanding the “cognitive revolution” in psychology. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 35, 1–22. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6696(199924)35:1<1::AID-JHBS1>3.0.CO;2-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hobbs, S., & Burman, J. (2009). Looking back: Is the ‘cognitive revolution’ a myth? The Psychologist, 22(9), 812–815.Google Scholar
  10. Hunt, M. (1993). The story of psychology. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  11. Leahey, T. H. (1992). The mythical revolutions of American psychology. American Psychologist, 47, 308–318. doi:10.1037//0003-066X.47.2.308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Leahey, T. H. (2000). A history of modern psychology (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  13. Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382–386. doi:10.1097/00006199-617198611000-00017.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. MacKinnon, J. G. (1996). Numerical distribution functions for unit root and cointegration tests. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11, 601–618. doi:10.1002/jae.2295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mandler, G. (2002). Origins of the cognitive revolution. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 38, 339–353. doi:10.1002/jhbs.10066.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Michel, J. B., Shen, Y. K., Aiden, A. P., Veres, A., Gray, M. K., The Google Books Team, Pickett, J. P.,…Aiden, E. L.. (2010). Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science, 331, 176-182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1199644
  17. Miller, G. A. (2003). The cognitive revolution: A historical perspective. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7, 141–144. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00029-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  19. O'Donohue, W., Ferguson, K. E., & Naugle, A. E. (2003). The structure of the cognitive revolution: An examination from the philosophy of science. The Behavior Analyst, 26, 85–110.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Pear, J. J. (2007). A historical and contemporary look at psychological systems. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  21. Proctor, R. W., & Kim-Phuong, L. V. (2006). The cognitive revolution at age 50: Has the promise of the human information-processing approach been fulfilled? International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 21, 253–284. doi:10.1207/s15327590ijhc2103_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Robins, R. W., Gosling, S. D., & Craik, K. H. (1999). An empirical analysis of trends in psychology. American Psychologist, 54, 117–128. doi:10.1037//0003-066X.54.2.117.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Searle, J. (1990). Is the brain's mind a computer program? Scientific American, 262, 20–25. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0190-26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Searle, J. (1992). The rediscovery of the mind. Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
  25. Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  27. Sperry, R. W. (1988). Psychology's mentalist paradigm and the religion-science tension. American Psychologist, 43, 606–613. doi:10.1037//0003-066X.43.8.607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sperry, R. W. (1993). The impact and promise of the cognitive revolution. American Psychologist, 48, 878–885. doi:10.1037//0003-066X.48.8.878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. STATA® Data Analysis and Statistical Software (version 11). [Computer software] version 11. College Station, TX: STATA Corporation.Google Scholar
  30. ter Hark, M. (2010). The psychology of thinking before the cognitive revolution: Otto Selz on problems, schemas, and creativity. History of Psychology, 13, 2–24. doi:10.1037/a0017442.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tracy, J. L., Robins, R. W., & Gosling, S. D. (2004). Tracking trends in psychological science: An empirical analysis of the history of psychology. In T. C. Dalton & R. B. Evans (Eds.), The life cycle of psychological ideas: Understanding prominence and the dynamics of intellectual change (pp. 105–130). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
  32. Virues-Ortega, J., Carod-Artal, F. J., Serrano-Dueñas, M., Ruiz-Galeano, G., Meza-Rojas, G., Velazquez, C., … Martinez-Martin, P. (2009). Cross-cultural validation of the Scales for Outcomes in Parkinson’s disease-psychosocial questionnaire (SCOPA-PS) in four Latin American countries. Value in Health, 12, 385-391. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00436.x
  33. Watrin, J. P., & Darwich, R. (2012). On behaviorism in the cognitive revolution: Myth and reactions. Review of General Psychology, 16, 269–282. doi:10.1037/a0026766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20, 158–177. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.101.2.248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PsychologyThe University of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
  2. 2.University of ManitobaWinnipegCanada

Personalised recommendations