Abstract
Purpose of Review
The synergistic effects of microplastics (MPs) and heavy metals are becoming major threats to aquatic life and human well-being. Therefore, understanding synergistic interactions between MPs and heavy metals is crucial to comprehend their environmental impacts.
Recent Findings
The mechanisms such as electrostatic attraction, surface interactions, ion exchange, hydrogen bonding, hydrophobic forces, and π–π interactions behind the synergistic effects of MPs and heavy metals were critically reviewed and justified. In addition, the roles of surface chemistry in these interactions were also emphasized. Finally, efficient remediation techniques aligning with a circular economy-based initiative to promote sustainable solutions were recommended to mitigate plastic-heavy metal pollution to achieve a cleaner environment.
Summary
This review examines the combined impact of MPs and heavy metals in aquatic ecosystems, detailing their mechanistic interactions, and consequences with proposed sustainable solutions. Additionally, this review highlights the MP-heavy metal contamination risks and emphasizes the need for further research to safeguard aquatic life and human health.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Find the latest articles, discoveries, and news in related topics.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Plastic has been used globally for decades, and in 2019, 400 million tonnes of plastic were produced worldwide, a quantity that continues to rise [1•, 2••, 3, 4]. The volume of plastic-derived products has grown rapidly due to their widespread usage. However, their interactions with other emerging contaminants are poorly understood. Since plastic garbage takes a long time to disintegrate, improper management and disposal can affect the ecological sphere [5, 6]. A 2021 study projected that 307 to 925 million pieces of garbage, 82% of which were plastic-derived, are dumped into the ocean [7]. The breakdown of plastic wastes in the environment results in pollution and produces smaller plastic particles via disintegration [5, 8]. Therefore, their various sizes determine the category of these resulting small plastic particles [9, 10].
Nanoplastics (NPs) (< 100 nm), microplastics (MPs) (< 5 mm), mesoplastics (5–25 mm), and macroplastics (> 25 mm) make up environmental plastic refuse [11, 12]. These plastics degrade chemically, biologically, or physically into MPs and NPs [5, 13, 14]. Depending on their source, MPs can be categorized into primary (manufactured products) and secondary (degradation of products) types [10, 15]. Thus, waterbodies can get contaminated, and MPs can accumulate in marine habitats, endangering aquatic ecosystems and species [15, 16]. The implications of MPs as vectors for transporting harmful substances across environmental matrices have been explored in recent years [17]. The adverse effects of MPs on the environment and living organisms, ultimately affecting human health, have been well-documented (see Fig. 1).
There are two major types of chemicals associated with MPs, such as polymeric components and additives. Additives in plastic materials serve various purposes, such as flame retardancy, plasticization, antioxidant effects, UV stabilization, and reinforcement [13, 18, 19]. However, studies have indicated that these additives have adverse health risks on both organisms and the ecological sphere [13, 18]. The resulting environmental risks and potential health effects of MPs are summarized in Table 1.
The interplay between MPs and other chemical contaminants, including heavy metal ions and organic contaminants, has raised significant health concerns for both humans and aquatic life [13, 15, 20]. The rough surfaces and numerous functional groups of MPs enable the attachment of heavy metals and organic contaminants, influencing their environmental behaviour [8, 17]. Heavy metals are hazardous contaminants and can persist with threatening impacts on ecosystems, food quality, and human health safety [21].
Recent studies have revealed the adsorption capacity of both new and aged MPs with heavy metals like Pb, Cr, Fe, Zn, Sn, Ti, Mn, Al, Cu, and Ni, in aqueous environments [15, 20, 22••, 23••, 24•, 25, 26]. However, there exists a remarkable scarcity of research concerning the adsorption of metals. In particular, minimal effort has been made to comprehend the mechanisms governing the sorption interactions between MPs and heavy metals. Addressing this research gap is crucial in this emerging field of study. Hence, this review presents an overview of the escalating environmental challenges from the synergistic effects of microplastics (MPs) and heavy metals, stressing their substantial threats to aquatic ecosystems and human well-being. By examining recent findings, this review elucidates the complex mechanisms that orchestrate these synergies, including electrostatic attraction, surface interactions, ion exchange, hydrogen bonding, hydrophobic forces, and π–π interactions. Furthermore, the role of surface chemistry in these interactions is briefly clarified. To address these concerns, the review also introduces efficient and low-cost remediation techniques with a circular economy approach, indicating sustainable pathways to address issues related to plastic-heavy metal pollution. In conclusion, the study identifies contamination risks, stressing the priority for further research to safeguard the environment, aquatic life, and human health in the face of these complex environmental issues.
Interface Behaviour of MPs with Heavy Metals
MPs Interaction with Heavy Metals
Due to the advancement of metal-derived industries and inappropriate waste disposal, heavy metal pollution in the environment is becoming a major issue [27]. Several research works have highlighted the capacity of MPs to bind to chemical substances typically present in seawater or wastewater treatment plants [18, 28, 29]. Additionally, MPs have the ability to carry heavy metals to different parts of the environment, contributing to the spread of heavy metal pollution due to their strong binding capacity [17, 30]. However, the full extent of these effects is not yet fully understood, underscoring the need for more in-depth studies to thoroughly evaluate the influence of MPs and heavy metals on both the environment and living organisms [17, 31].
Cadmium (Cd) is recognized as one of the most common and hazardous metal contaminants in our environment. While Cd is naturally present, its release into the environment is often amplified by human activities, including mining, smelting, and various industrial operations. Once introduced into the environment, Cd tends to linger, accumulating in both soil and water bodies [32]. The interaction between MPs and Cd may lead to changes in the toxicity, bioavailability, and build-up of Cd within organisms [17]. A recent research revealed that when zebrafish were exposed to both MPs (specifically polystyrene) and Cd, they experienced oxidative harm and inflammation. Moreover, there was a heightened accumulation of Cd in their liver, intestines, and gills. This combined exposure amplified the detrimental effects of Cd on the fish’s tissues [30]. Another investigation analyzed plastic pellets from four distinct coastal locations, assessing the accumulation of primary metals like Al, Fe, and Mn and trace metals including Cu, Zn, Pb, Ag, Co, Cr, Mo, Sb, and Sn. However, the exact mechanism by which these pellets enriched metals remained unclear [33]. A study recently demonstrated that certain MPs, notably PE, PP, PS, and PVC, possess a pronounced capacity to bind quickly and store metals like Cr, Cu, Co, and Pb in water environments, reaching an equilibrium in merely 5 days [34]. Another study with pellet samples from 19 different beaches found that the absorbed metal quantities in these pellets exceeded those of the original particles. Additionally, the concentrations of Fe and Al in the pellets were measured at 0.23 mg g−1 and 0.04 mg g−1, respectively [20]. Furthermore, a study explored the adsorption of trace metals like Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Ni, and Pb on both ‘virgin’ and ‘beached’ polyethylene pellets with the ‘virgin’ pellets obtained from a local moulding facility, while the ‘beached’ pellets were collected from a nearby sandy beach. The study found that metals mainly adhered to the surface of the plastic pellets as metal cations or oxyanions. Thus, it was affirmed that the adsorption of metals on beached (aged) PE pellets was more pronounced than that observed for virgin pellets in seawater [35].
Effects of Surface Chemistry on Interface Behaviour of MPs and Heavy Metals
The fate and behaviour of MPs in the environment are significantly governed by their surface chemistry, and understanding these properties is important for developing effective strategies to mitigate the environmental impact of MPs [2••, 8, 24•, 35, 36••, 37••, 38]. These inherent attributes of MPs are central to the adsorption and interaction processes with pollutants, offering active sites where these reactions occur [35, 39•, 40]. The microplastic surfaces may become contaminated with contaminants, harming marine life. MPs have the ability to accumulate toxic metals in the marine environment due to their hydrophobic characteristics and large specific surface area [41••]. Adsorption of heavy metals onto MPs involves a complex mechanism. Therefore, the surface characteristics of plastic particles are modified, and a variety of active binding sites for metal ions are generated due to the precipitation of inorganic minerals [35, 42]. Various functional groups like aliphatic, aromatic, hydroxyl, carboxyl, and carbonyl mark the surface chemistry of MPs [8, 43, 44]. For instance, oxygen-containing functional groups on the surface, such as -COO and -OH, significantly impact the adsorption process [22••]. These functional groups tend to influence the synergistic interactions between metal ions and MPs, subsequently forming hydrogen bonds [38]. A study of the interaction of heavy metals with both pristine and aged MPs revealed that in contrast to the pristine MPs, the surfaces of aged MPs became more hydrophilic and exhibited a greater surface area. In addition, there was an increase in the presence of oxygen-containing functional groups, accompanied by a reduction in the point of zero charge (pHPZC) of the MPs [45]. Concurrently, the decrease in the pHPZC observed on the surface of MPs promotes electrostatic attraction between the MPs and heavy metal cations by facilitating the generation of a negative charge on the surface [22••]. Furthermore, when Cu2+ and Cd2+ were investigated using pristine and aged MPs, the adsorption capacity of aged MPs for the investigated heavy metals was significantly greater than that of pristine MPs. This phenomenon was attributed to the surface structure of aged MPs becoming rougher during the aging process, accompanied by a proportional increase in both specific surface area and the quantity of oxygen-containing surface functional groups. Therefore, these alterations collectively enhance the MPs’ affinity for pollutants [46]. Analytical techniques such as Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy can identify and quantify these groups, as evidenced in recent studies [22••, 24•, 36••, 40, 47, 48]. Certain studies have examined the presence of surface functional groups present in MPs, including ester, carboxyl, hydroxyl (-OH), and carbonyl groups [8, 22••, 38, 39•, 44, 49]. A recent study has also shown that MPs demonstrated higher Pb and Cu concentrations than surface water. This phenomenon was attributed to their potential affinity for heavy metals from the aquatic surroundings. Therefore, Pb and Cu tend to form weak bonds with MPs, resulting in the subsequent formation of a thin layer on the surface of the MPs [50]. This accumulation is due to biofilm on the surface of MPs and synergistic interactions with heavy metal-complex organic materials [51, 52]. Thus, the capacity of MPs binding to both organic and inorganic contaminants is attributed to the presence of potential hydrophobic surface [41••, 53]. Key aspects of surface chemistry influencing the behaviour of MPs and heavy metals at their interface are summarized in Table 2.
Factors Governing the Interface Behaviour of MPs with Heavy Metals
pH
The pH level of a solution, indicating its acidity or alkalinity, is understood to be a key determinant in shaping the surface charge of MPs and the form of metal ions [2••, 17, 36••, 54••, 55]. Changes in pH can modify the zeta potential of MPs, subsequently affecting the precipitation of heavy metals and the degree to which metals are taken up by MPs [2••, 17, 55]. Typically, an increase in pH results in a reduction in the zeta potentials of MPs. However, when the pH level of the water surpasses the point of zero charges of MPs, they acquire a negative charge [2••, 17]. This enhances the electrostatic pull between MPs and metals, especially cations [17, 56]. A study recently investigated the effect of pH on the adsorption of Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn to virgin plastic pellets (PE and PP) within the usual pH range of natural water (6 to 8) over a span of 4 h. The results revealed that a higher pH generally increased the adsorption rates for most metals, except for lead, which remained unchanged across the pH spectrum according to recent findings by Ahechti et al. [54••].
Another study also examined the adsorption behaviour of various metals with MPs; it was found that the adsorption rates of Pb, Ni, Cd, Pb, and Co rose as the pH of river water increased. However, the adsorption capacity for Cr decreased, while that of Cu remained relatively constant [35]. A separate study examining the effect of metal (Fe and Cu) nanoparticles on three different types of MPs (PS, PP, and PVC) showed a similar pattern. The study found that with a rise in pH, the MP’s capacity to adsorb Cu and Fe also increased, with the lowest adsorption observed at pH 3 [36••]. These observations were attributed to changes in the surface charge of MPs and the state of metal ions, both of which are affected by the pH of the solution [57]. The adsorption rate and amount on MPs are significantly impacted by H+ and OH− ions, which can modify the MPs’ surface charge. Thus, in an acidic environment, the concentration of H+ ions induces a positive charge on the MP surface, resulting in electrostatic repulsion between the positively charged microplastic surface and metal cations [36••]. A recent study investigated the effects of solution pH on the adsorption of Cr(VI) by three different types of MPs. The adsorption of Cr(VI) on PE and PS showed a slight decrease with increasing pH. However, the adsorption of Cr(VI) on the original PA demonstrated a positive-negative pattern, culminating in its peak at pH 4 (958.54 ± 102.33 µg/g). While aged PE and PS showed a further decrease in adsorption as pH increased from 2 to 7, aged PA reached its maximum at pH 3. This phenomenon was attributed to OH− competition impeding Cr(VI) adsorption, as indicated by the authors [58]. Thus, the adsorption of Cr(VI) on MPs was found to be influenced by pH-dependent electrostatic interactions, consistent with previous reports [59••, 60]. In a related study, Holmes and colleagues [61] reported that an increase in pH led to a decrease in Cr adsorption onto HDPE, emphasizing the importance of electrostatic interactions. In contrast, another study conducted by different researchers noted that an increase in pH resulted in higher efficiency of Cu and Zn adsorption but not Pb adsorption on beach MPs [35].
Salinity
The impact of salinity on the adsorption of metal ions to MPs depends on both the nature of the polymer and the particular form of the metal [34, 35]. At elevated salinity levels, there is a high tendency for an increase in the competition for adsorption sites between salt ions and heavy metal ions. As a result, there will be fewer available adsorption sites for heavy metals. For instance, in trace metal solutions containing Pb, Cd, Cu, and Zn, elevated salinity levels led to a longer adsorption time on polystyrene microplastics (PSMPs) and a decreased adsorption of trace metals [62]. This can be attributed to the ability of cations to compete for adsorption onto the surface of MPs [35, 53]. In addition, high salinities increase the negative charge on MPs, leading to more significant repulsive forces between MPs and heavy metal ions [35]. This, in turn, tends to induce a reduction in adsorption potential. Conversely, low salinity levels decrease the competition for adsorption sites and weaken the repulsive forces, resulting in an increase in the adsorption of heavy metals onto MPs [62]. For instance, a specific study that explored the adsorption of metals such as Cu, Pb, Cd, Ni, Co, and Cr onto MPs demonstrated that the adsorption ability of Co, Ni, and Cd waned with rising salinity, while that of Cr increased. The adsorption patterns of Cu and Pb in saline water were found to be analogous to those in freshwater. The researchers concluded that the main interaction with the pellet surface was the free ion, and the growing competition for binding sites on the pellet surface was a major key determinant [35].
Ionic Strength
The ionic strength of a solution plays a pivotal role in the adsorption process, determining its specificity [41••]. The type of adsorption, whether specific or non-specific, is determined by the interaction between the adsorbent and the adsorbate [41••]. Specific adsorption is characterized by the attraction of the adsorbate molecule to the adsorbent through stronger chemical interactions. These can include hydrogen bonding or covalent bonding [63]. In contrast, non-specific adsorption arises from weaker forces, such as electrostatic interactions or van der Waals forces [64, 65]. Specific adsorption is usually more selective and stronger, while non-specific adsorption is less selective and weaker [41••]. The presence of ions in the solution impacts how heavy metals adsorb onto MPs. For example, a study was conducted to explore the effects of ionic strength and the presence of competitive ions on the adsorption of As(III) by polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)-based MPs. The findings indicated that the presence of ions such as NO3− and PO43− in the solution hindered the adsorption of As(III) by PTFE, which caused a reduction in the adsorption amount of As(III) onto PTFE as the concentrations of NO3− and PO43− increased. However, the introduction of NO3− from an external source equally reduced the adsorption of As(III) by PTFE, but the effect was less significant with increasing NO3− concentration. Therefore, the authors proposed that the adsorption of As(III) by PTFE is likely the result of a combination of specific adsorption and electrosorption [65]. For instance, the decline in Pb(II) adsorption under varying environmental conditions emphasized the critical significance of ionic strength in regulating the adsorption capacity of MPs [66].
In the study conducted by Lin et al. [66], elevated ionic strength levels diminish the adsorption of Pb(II) onto MPs. The authors hypothesized that this reduction might be attributed to the presence of salt ions. These ions could create an electrostatic barrier between the negatively charged surface of MPs and the positively charged Pb(II) ions, thereby affecting the adsorption process. Similarly, Zou et al. [55] also observed a decline in Pb(II) adsorption onto MPs under high ionic strength conditions. Another study that explored the adsorption of lead on virgin MPs and other solid substrates found that as the ionic strength increased from 0.01 to 0.10, there was a uniform decrease in lead adsorption by the MPs. On the other hand, for the other solid substrates, there was an initial reduction in Pb (II) adsorption, which was then followed by a stabilization phase. Therefore, the authors confirmed that the decrease in adsorption identified might be triggered by the presence of electrostatic interactions, while the remaining portion might have been connected to irreversible chemical adsorption [51]. The efficiency of Pb(II) ion adsorption onto aged nylon MPs is heavily influenced by the ionic strength. In a study that used NaCl to mimic oceanic conditions, it was found that the presence of electrolyte cations (Na+) notably heightened the competition for the adsorption sites on nylon MPs. This increased competition, in turn, had an impact on the adsorption of Pb2+ ions [56]. The findings underscore the intricate interplay between ionic strength and adsorption behaviour, particularly in conditions that simulate natural marine environments.
According to the Derjaguin-Landau-Verwey-Overbeek (DLVO) theory, an increase in the ionic strength of a solution leads to the compression of the electrical double layer and a decrease in repulsive forces, ultimately causing an increase in aggregation [12]. For example, a study by Wegner et al. [67] observed that carboxylated polystyrene MPs sized 30 nm in seawater quickly aggregated and formed aggregates exceeding 1000 nm within 30 min. As a result, this would decrease their surface area and adsorption capacity. Furthermore, the aggregation caused by electrolytes can explain why the introduction of NaCl resulted in a reduction in Cd adsorption onto MP in the study recently reported by Wang et al. [17].
Dissolved Organic Matter (DOM)
DOM has the ability to bind to both MPs and heavy metals, creating complexes that modify their physicochemical properties [56, 68]. The presence of DOM can lead to competition with metals for binding sites on MPs, reducing the available sites for heavy metal sorption and causing the desorption of these metals [68]. Fulvic acid (FA), a significant component of DOM prevalent in water, soil, and sediment environments, plays a key role in this process [69]. A recent study explored the impact of FA on the adsorption of Pb(II) and nylon MPs. The research revealed that the adsorption process was strongly affected by the FA concentration, especially at high levels. Specifically, an increase in FA concentration led to the inhibition of Pb(II) adsorption, suggesting potential complexation interactions between FA and Pb2+ ions. As a result, a considerable number of Pb(II) ions are first attached to FA and then bound to the aged nylon MPs [56].
DOM can increase the hydrophilicity of MPs by coating their surfaces with polar functional groups. This hydrophilic coating increases the surface area of MPs, enabling them to adsorb heavy metals and form metal-DOM-MP complexes, which enhances their likelihood of adsorbing heavy metals [1•, 2••, 56], possibly due to the hydrophilic properties of FA, as reported in another study [70]. Moreover, the competitive dynamics between DOM and MPs for binding sites can also influence the adsorption of heavy metals onto MPs [1•, 71].
The coexistence of MPs and DOM has been reported to trigger high levels of bioaccumulation and toxicity of Cu in fish. The underlying reasons for this phenomenon were linked to the inhibition of Cu-ion transport in liver cells (hepatocytes) and a surge in oxidative stress [71]. Humic acid (HA), another component of DOM, is rich in oxygenated functional groups, including carboxylic and hydroxyl groups. HA can impact the colloidal stability of microplastics in aquatic settings [1•, 2••] Another study showed that humus, mainly composed of HA and FA, enhanced the adsorption of As(III) by PSMPs. The phenolic hydroxyl groups present in HA facilitated the transport of As(III), and the interaction HA and PSMPs formed a π complex, generating additional adsorption sites on the MPs and decreasing the time required to reach adsorption equilibrium. When both HA and FA were present, the adsorption of As(III) on MPs significantly increased, reaching as high as 81.83% and 80.83%, respectively [72]. Other factors influencing the sorption interaction of MPs with heavy metals can be found in the “Other Factors Influencing the Sorption Interaction of MPs with Heavy Metals” section.
Other Factors Influencing the Sorption Interaction of MPs with Heavy Metals
The sorption of metals by MPs is particularly influenced by the aging process, leading to changes in crystallinity and the formation of oxygen-containing groups [2••, 56, 73••, 74, 75]. This concept was further elaborated by Maity et al. [76] and [5], Lambert et al. [8], who emphasized that the state of crystallinity of MPs is an essential factor to consider. Low crystallinity or high amorphous characteristics of MPs result in rough surfaces, which tend to facilitate the sorption of other emerging contaminants and potentially increase their toxicity in the environment [55].
MPs persist in the environment for extended periods and undergo aging due to various factors [48]. As plastics enter the environment, they undergo degradation and come into contact with pollutants. During their migration, MPs tend to absorb pollutants to a greater extent. Therefore, aging is another factor that can influence the adsorption capacity of MPs [31, 48, 73••] found that Cu and Zn were more likely to bind with aged PVC. This increased binding affinity could be attributed to the enhanced polarity and surface area of the aged PVC, offering more sites for metal ion adsorption. Another research effort revealed that the adsorption capacity of various metal ions by PS grew with the degree of aging. This increase was likely due to the augmented surface roughness and the presence of oxygen-containing functional groups. The aging and biofouling of MPs also led to the accumulation of more substantial amounts of trace metals [35].
Functional groups on the surface of MPs, including –NH2, phenyl-OH, and –COOH, can facilitate metal binding via a complexation mechanism [77]. Biodegradable MPs such as polycaprolactone (PCL), polybutylene adipate terephthalate (PBAT), and polylactic acid (PLA), which contain a high density of oxygen-containing groups, exhibit enhanced adsorption of heavy metals [78]. Oxygen-containing functional groups on the surface, like -COO and -OH groups, can modify the surface interactions between MPs and metal ions, often leading to hydrogen bonding [2••, 73••, 79].
Particle size is another crucial factor influencing the interaction between MPs and heavy metals. It is a primary factor affecting adsorption and shaping the adsorption capacity of MPs [62]. In the natural environment, MPs are subject to fragmentation due to environmental factors, resulting in smaller particles. This fragmentation notably affects the adsorption potential of heavy metals onto MPs [8]. Generally, MP particles with smaller dimensions exhibit greater efficacy in adsorbing and retaining trace amounts of metals than larger particles, predominantly due to their increased surface-to-volume ratio [15, 17]. This observation was supported by a study where the metal adsorption capabilities of PE, PET, and PP towards Cu(II), Cr(III), and Pb(II) were found to increase with decreasing particle size [80]. However, a recent study contradicted this trend and found that larger particles of PSMPs showed higher adsorption levels for Pb, Cd, Cu, and Zn. This discrepancy was attributed to the larger particle size of PS [81]. The type of polymer also plays a role in determining the adsorption capacity of MPs with heavy metals [82]. The adsorption capacity varies based on the specific type of MP and metal, given their unique physicochemical properties. For instance, PS and film MPs have a higher adsorption capacity for Cu(II) compared to PVC, PE, bottle cap particles, and fishing line fibres, primarily due to the favourable physicochemical properties of film MPs [46, 82].
The initial concentration of heavy metals can also influence the adsorption capacity. While higher initial concentrations lead to increased adsorption capacity, they can also decelerate the adsorption rate [62]. For example, Hodson and colleagues [83••] demonstrated in their study that the adsorption capacity of Zn increased substantially at higher initial concentrations (0.1–100 mg L−1), reaching values between 236 and 7171 mg g−1, which were significantly greater than those at lower initial concentrations [35, 61]. Overall, aging, crystallinity, functional groups, and particle size are other factors that determine the adsorption capacity of MPs with heavy metals and chemical contaminants [17, 48, 55, 76, 78].
Insights into Adsorption Mechanisms Between MPs and Heavy Metals
The adsorption mechanisms between MPs and heavy metals involve various processes, including ion exchange [84], hydrogen bonding [63, 85], electrostatic interactions [2••, 86], hydrophobic surface [41••, 87], pore-filling [88], precipitation, surface sorption, and complexation [55, 84].
Electrostatic Interaction
Electrostatic interaction refers to the attractive or repulsive force between electrically charged particles [64]. When MP particles have a net negative charge and heavy metal ions have a net positive charge, they can interact electrostatically [59••]. Electrostatic sorption occurs when a plastic polymer and heavy metal come into contact, resulting in the attraction of molecules that have an opposite electric charge to that of the plastic polymer [86]. Conversely, electrostatic repulsion arises when both the plastic polymer and the heavy metal share the same charge. Factors such as the pH of the medium and the pH at the point of zero charge (pHpzc) influence electrostatic interactions. Typically, when the pH of the medium exceeds the pHpzc, the adsorbent generally acquires a negative charge [22••].
According to the studies by Guo et al. [60] and Liu et al. [84], the zeta potential is related to the propensities of chemicals to bind to MPs through electrostatic interactions. It has been hypothesized that the zeta potential represents the surface electrical potential of MP particles. The latest study examined how Pb(II) adsorbs onto virgin and natural-aged MPs in various electrolyte solutions. According to the authors, the adsorption process was significantly influenced by the presence of salt ions, despite the crucial role played by the electrostatic interaction [84]. The pH of 6.0 yielded the maximum adsorption capacity for Pb(II). The researchers demonstrated that the surfaces of aged-PE and virgin-PE had a negative charge between pH 3 and 7, which decreased as the pH increased. This electronegativity enhanced the binding process of Pb(II) to the MPs via electrostatic interaction. Nevertheless, when the pH increased to 7, Pb(II) was present in the forms of Pb2+, Pb(OH)+, and Pb(OH)2, resulting in a reduction in Pb(II) adsorption [84].
Electrostatic interaction has also been identified as a crucial mechanism in the adsorption of divalent metal ions (such as Cu, Zn, and Ni) onto MPs. The extent of this interaction was found to be notably dependent on the salinity of the solution, and its efficacy subsequently diminished as the concentration of NaCl increased [59••]. In the case of Cd adsorption onto MPs, electrostatic interaction was found to be the major governing mechanism. When the pH of the solution is above 7, the negatively charged surface of MPs favours the adsorption of positively charged Cd2+ ions. However, under acidic conditions, the decrease in adsorption primarily resulted from the electrostatic repulsion between the positively charged MP surfaces and the cationic Cd2+ ions. Furthermore, a higher concentration of H3O+ ions in the solution can reduce Cd adsorption as they compete with Cd2+ ions for available binding sites. Electrostatic attraction and ionic exchange were concluded to be the key mechanisms for Cd sorption by MPs [17].
Surface Complexation
Surface complexation has also been reported as one of the major mechanisms influencing the interface behaviour of MPs and heavy metals [55, 84, 89]. Surface complexation is a significant mechanism that influences the fate and transport of pollutants in the environment [90]. The mechanism operates by attracting ions or molecules onto the surface of solid materials, such as minerals or soil particles, by forming a bond between the surface of the solid and the charged species in the solution [91]. This bonding process is referred to as surface complexation, and the end product is called a surface complex [90, 91].
In a study conducted by Liu et al. [84] on the interaction of Pb with naturally aged MPs, it was observed that introducing NaCl and CaCl2 led to a decline in Pb2+ ions and an uptick in the formation of ion pairs such as PbCl+ and PbCl2. This shift resulted in a reduced activity coefficient for Pb(II) ions. Notably, CaCl2 formed more robust ion pairs with metal ions compared to NaCl, which hindered the movement of Pb(II) ions towards the MPs’ surface. The addition of these salts influenced both the adsorption kinetics and the isotherms. These effects were interconnected with other solution factors, such as pH and DOM, which could further alter the adsorption dynamics. When higher concentrations of FA were introduced, varying inhibition levels were observed in the presence of Na+ and Ca2+, suggesting a significant impact of surface complexation and aggregation on the interaction between MPs and metal ions. The study also emphasized that variations in environmental conditions, particularly pH and ionic strength, played a crucial role in shaping the adsorption capacity of MPs for Pb(II) ions.
In a separate investigation by Zou et al. [55], surface complexation was identified as a crucial mechanism for the adsorption of three separate different divalent metals onto four distinct virgin MPs. The behaviour of this adsorption was found to vary widely, influenced by the surface physicochemical characteristics of the MPs and further modulated by various environmental factors. At a pH of 6, all the MPs investigated in their study had negative zeta potentials, which implied that the three types of metals investigated were drawn to the MPs through electrostatic forces. The study determined that chlorinated polyethylene (CPE) had a negative and polar nature due to its chlorine content, which led to a significant difference in the sorption affinity observed among the three metals. Despite having similar hydrated ionic radii, Cu2+ exhibited stronger sorption than Cd2+, indicating that stronger complexation was responsible for the sorption behaviour of Cu2+ onto the MPs. Thus, the adsorption of Cu2+ onto the plastic surface was found to be largely influenced by the surface complexation [55]. In a related study by Tang et al. [59••], the focus was on the adsorption of Cu(II), Ni(II), and Zn(II) onto nylon MPs found on beaches. The study emphasized the importance of oxygen-containing groups on the MPs’ surface for the adsorption process. Surface complexation was again behind the adsorption process, highlighting its central role in the interaction between MPs and heavy metals.
Hydrogen Bond Interaction
The process of sorption on polymers can be influenced by the formation of hydrogen bonds which are relatively weak interactions involving the hydrogen ion, H+. The presence of proton donor and acceptor groups on the polymer surface can further modulate these interactions, emphasizing their role in the overall sorption mechanism [92]. Hydrogen bonds are comparatively weaker than covalent and ionic bonds as they result from the partial charge attraction, not the exchange or sharing of electrons. However, they are stronger than van der Waals forces, which are the least strong kind of intermolecular forces occurring between non-polar molecules [64]. A recent study in which the maximum adsorption of As(III) obtained was attributed to the involvement of hydrogen bonding [63]. The investigated PSMPs were prepared using a ball milling technique, endowing the plastic particles with a distinct porous surface structure and specialized surface attributes. A significant portion of the PSMP surface exhibited a positive electrostatic potential. Notably, the hydrogen atom within the carboxyl group showcased an exceptionally high positive potential, measured at + 56.6 kcal/mol. This resulted in the attraction of arsenic oxyanions towards the carboxyl group, demonstrating that As(III) was adsorbed onto the PSMP surface via hydrogen bonding with this specific group. When exposed to higher temperatures, the hydrogen bonds between As(III) and PSMPs weakened, causing a decrease in the attachment of As(III) to the PSMP. This behaviour indicated that the adsorption process was exothermic in nature [63].
In the case of PTFE interacting with As(III), hydrogen bonding has been predicted to be responsible for the interaction of As(III) with the existing hydroxyl functional group on the surface of PTFE. The rise in binding energy was linked to the interaction, suggesting that the electron density of the hydroxyl group’s oxygen atom decreased and resulted in a higher proton dissociation. It was observed that As(III) undergoes chemisorption on the PTFE surface, and the structure surrounding the hydroxyl group was subsequently affected significantly. In the case of the hydroxyl group present on the surface of PTFE, the hydrogen atom forms a covalent bond with the electronegative oxygen atom. This interaction results in the establishment of hydrogen bonds, facilitating the adsorption of the oxy-arsenic anion onto the PTFE surface [65]. Furthermore, in a more recent investigation, the primary mechanism for Pb ions adsorbing onto polyethylene microplastics (PE MPs) was identified as chemical adsorption. This process is driven by hydrogen bonding and surface complexation. Notably, the introduction of humic acid (HA) amplified the adsorption of Pb onto PE MPs. This enhancement is likely attributed to HA’s ability to act as a bridge, connecting the Pb species to the PEMPs. HA facilitated the formation of complexes between Pb ions and itself via cation exchange and hydrogen bonding, which then attached to the surface of PE MPs. In contrast, FA, which had a strong negative charge across a broad range of pH range, hindered the binding of Pb ions to the PE MPs when in association with FA [85]. Other possible mechanistic interactions, such as van der Waals forces and π-π interactions, and interaction of the hydrophobic surfaces of MPs with chemical contaminants together with their implications on health and environment, are detailed in the “Other Possible Mechanistic Interactions Between MPs and Heavy Metals” section.
Other Possible Mechanistic Interactions Between MPs and Heavy Metals
Given the aliphatic (e.g. PE) and aromatic (e.g. PS) properties of many plastic polymers, the sorption of heavy metals can be driven by the van der Waals forces and π-π interactions. Guo et al. [1•] identified these forces as key components in the sorption of Cd with four different MPs, emphasizing the dominant role of van der Waals forces due to the nonspecific functional groups of PE and PP. Conversely, given the presence of benzene rings, π-π interactions may be significant in PS polymers. The adsorption capacity of the MPs was strongly correlated with their specific surface area and total pore volume. Key mechanisms driving Cd (II) adsorption on MPs encompass π-π interactions, electrostatic interactions, and the presence of oxygen-containing functional groups [1•, 35]. Previous research has depicted major mechanistic pathways for interactions between various types of MPs and heavy metals, emphasizing the vector role of MPs in environmental contamination and associated ecotoxicological risks [77].
Holmes et al. [35, 61] stressed the importance of oxygen-containing functional groups and π-π interactions in metal adsorption onto MPs. Subsequent analyses of the C 1 s XPS spectra of various polymers, before and after Cd(II) sorption, aimed to unveil the underlying mechanism. Notably, increased proportions of the C = O band on most MPs post-Cd(II) adsorption (Fig. 2) suggest reactions leading to the formation of more C = O bonds. Conversely, the rise in the C = C/C–C band proportions for PA and ABS post-Cd(II) sorption affirms the significant role of π-π interactions in the metal ion adsorption process for certain MPs. Zhou et al. [2••] concluded that the main mechanisms of Cd(II) adsorption onto MPs are electrostatic and π-π interactions, with oxygen-containing functional groups also playing pivotal roles. Desorption hysteresis was observed in both simulated gut and sediment environments, with a notably higher degree of Cd(II) desorption from MPs in the gut environment. This emphasizes potential ecological risks associated with the adsorption–desorption behaviour of MPs in plastic-enriched environments [1•, 2••].
XPS C 1 s spectra for PA (a), PVC (b), PS (c), ABS (d), and PET (e), both before and following cadmium adsorption at a concentration of 80 mg/L [2••] with permission. Copyright 2020 Elsevier
Overall, the adsorption of heavy metals by MPs, particularly those with simple structures and polymer types, has always relied heavily on physical adsorption, which includes electrostatic interaction. In physical adsorption, water molecules move onto the absorbent surface or interior through simple diffusion without creating new substances or altering chemical bonds. The mechanisms governing the adsorption of each heavy metal differ depending on the characteristic features of the MPs (See Fig. 3) [93].
Various mechanisms that govern the adsorption of heavy metals by the MPs [93] with permission. Copyright 2022 Elsevier
Synergistic Hazards of the Hydrophobic Surfaces of MPs with Heavy Metals
The presence of MPs in aquatic environments can have implications for the transport and fate of environmental pollutants, leading to their diffusion and accumulation within organisms and subsequent bio-enrichment [2••]. Research has shown that heavy metals, discharged into aquatic ecosystems through various industrial effluents, can accumulate in different parts of aquatic life, including fish, through processes such as dissolution in water and subsequent accumulation in the organisms [35, 62]. This bioaccumulation of heavy metals in fish can have toxic effects and pose potential health risks to humans, especially through consuming contaminated fish [31, 62]. Similarly, studies have demonstrated the bioaccumulation of heavy metals in water, sediment, and organisms in various aquatic environments, highlighting the potential threat posed by the accumulation of these toxic substances [94]. Moreover, over 8 million tons of plastic debris are discharged annually in both global freshwater and marine ecosystems [95]. The interactions between MPs and heavy metals in the ecological sphere are inevitable and can lead to adverse effects. These interactions can alter the environmental behaviours, bioavailability, and potential toxicity of both MPs and heavy metals, leading to ecological risks [63]. The exposure routes to MPs include ingestion, inhalation, and dermal contact [96]. These routes can lead to potential ecosystem toxicity and human health risks [35]. The ingestion of MPs has been a significant concern, with studies reporting an increase in MPs ingested by humans [97]. Understanding these exposure routes is important for assessing the potential risks associated with microplastic contamination [19]. Therefore, these routes can lead to health issues. For instance, ingested MPs can accumulate in the digestive tract, potentially causing inflammation and other health problems (see Fig. 4) [98]. Inhaled MPs can also accumulate in the lungs, potentially causing respiratory issues. MPs that come into contact with the skin can also cause skin irritation [38].
Interaction of MPs and heavy metals in aquatic environments [98] with permission. Copyright 2020 Elsevier
One of the factors influencing the concentration of heavy metals in MPs is their availability in the environment [56, 94]. For instance, a study recently examined environmental effects on the adsorption of Pb and Cu in water and MPs. With low pH and salinity, the Musi River was freshwater-dominated (pH 6.2–6.6). PP > PE > PES > PVC and nylon polymers were randomly selected as MPs samples. Their findings showed increased concentrations of Pb and Cu in the river towards the estuary, ranging from 0.0245 to 0.0711 mg L−1 and 0.0099 to 0.0173 mg L−1, while higher Pb and Cu concentrations (0.152–2.218 mg kg−1 for Pb, 0.017–0.371 mg kg−1 for Cu) were noticed in MPs exceeded river values, with Pb outweighing Cu. The authors affirmed the dominance of the Freundlich model with weak bonds facilitating the easy release of MPs-laden heavy metals into the aquatic ecosystem due to environmental influences [50].
The hydrophobic nature of MPs can be attributed to their non-polar polymer chains, which result in a hydrophobic surface that can attract contaminants such as heavy metals, pharmaceuticals, or dyes [41••, 64, 99]. This interaction may cause the build-up of heavy metals on MPs, posing a potential risk to the environment and human health [29, 41••, 100•]. MPs have been detected in different tissues of marine fish, such as their brains, muscles, gills, and gastrointestinal tracts [101••]. Furthermore, the presence of MPs in the human gastrointestinal tract has also been confirmed [97]. The interaction between MPs’ hydrophobic surfaces and various chemicals is a significant concern, as it could potentially increase the risk. A recent study demonstrated that when mussels are exposed to MPs loaded with fluoranthene, the substance is transferred from the MPs to the mussels’ bodies [100•].
Moreover, Hildebrandt et al. [102] have reported that in a physiologically based extraction test (PBET) solution, metals can be significantly desorbed from MPs, and the ‘Trojan horse’ effect is stronger in smaller particles. The results imply that the adsorption of pollutants onto MPs may result in their leaching out of the plastic particles and penetrating the tissues of organisms, leading to harmful effects. Thus, the ‘Trojan horse’ effect is a significant concern in the context of microplastic pollution [102]. Various studies have documented the adsorption of different pollutants onto MPs [2••, 72, 103], highlighting the need to evaluate the desorption kinetics of these pollutants from MPs [2••].
Studies have also shown that the complexes of cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb) can adsorb onto MPs, altering their environmental behaviours, bioavailability, and potential toxicity. For instance, a recent study examined the adsorption of Pb(II) and Cd(II) ions onto PP and PS in water and their desorption in a simulated gastrointestinal environment. It revealed that within this simulated environment, the desorption rates of these metal ions from MPs were high and correlated with the MP particle size [2••]. Both MPs and heavy metals can accumulate at high levels in the environment and consequently contaminate the food chains, leading to significant ecological risks. Thus, ingesting MP-laden heavy metals can cause direct harm to the digestive system, potentially leading to fatal blockages in the gastrointestinal tract [104, 105••, 106]. These reports indicate a potential toxicological hazard for organisms that ingest metal-contaminated microplastics [2••]. Overall, the adsorption of heavy metals by MPs may induce toxic effects on aquatic biota, affecting processes such as photosynthesis, growth, and reproduction of organisms [107]. The synergistic hazards of MPs with chemical contaminants can result in various environmental concerns (see Fig. 5). Therefore, the synergistic interaction between MPs and heavy metals in aquatic environments presents a significant concern for the health of marine ecosystems and human populations.
Systematic and Effective Strategies for the Mitigation of MPs Triggered Pollution
Sustainable Remediation Strategies for the Clean-up of MPs from an Aqueous Environment
Strategies aimed at removing MPs are critical for mitigating plastic pollution. Therefore, this necessitates their clean-up to avoid further environmental degradation towards achieving a sustainable and habitable environment [19]. Thus, different removal strategies such as coagulation [108], photocatalysis [19], advanced oxidation processes [19, 109], filtration [110], and adsorption [10, 111] have been employed to mitigate their prevalence in various media.
Coagulation has also been reported for the mitigation of MP. According to the previous study, iron or aluminium-derived salts were employed through a coagulation technique involving a mechanistic approach of electrostatic interactions between MP (PE or PS) and the existing metal ion. However, the reported removal efficiency was < 40%. When the authors improved the coagulant using plant-produced tannic acid, > 95% of the MP-PS beads were reportedly removed through filtration compared to when ordinary coagulants were applied [108].
Advanced oxidation techniques are efficient and eco-friendly strategies for removing environmental pollutants. The application of homogeneous advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) has been extensively utilized in treating industrial wastewater. However, this technique is associated with noteworthy limitations such as a restricted pH range, production of sludge, and catalyst inactivation. To mitigate these challenges, scientists have directed their attention towards developing heterogeneous AOPs, featuring heterogeneous catalysts for efficient clean-up [19].
Kang et al. [112] recently demonstrated the degradation of cosmetic MPs by applying a combined approach encompassing carbon catalytic oxidation and hydrothermal hydrolysis [112]. A wide variety of air and water contaminants have been reportedly degraded through photocatalysis with the aid of semiconductor-derived materials as photocatalysts [19]. Photocatalysis allows light to be used as a source of energy supply, and frequently, non-toxic byproducts are produced [113, 114]. Photodegradation is a promising technique, but it produces toxic by-products that enter aquatic systems, and the removal rate is lower. For example, zinc oxide nanorods took 456 h to achieve 65% removal of a 150 µm polypropylene particle, rendering it impractical for industrial usage [115]. While smaller plastic particles can reduce the photodegradation time, they also emit hazardous carbon emissions like CO, which restricts their application [19].
Recent studies have explored using N-TiO2 powders as catalysts in the photocatalytic degradation of PE. These studies demonstrated efficient degradation of the MP through active involvement of photogenerated e− in the process leading to the production of free OH● [116]. Additionally, the synergistic effect of ozonation and H2O2 on the degradation of PE MPs was observed. Changes in the structure of MP, including increased intensity of O–H and C = O bands and a decrease in the intensity of the C–H groups, were observed. These findings suggest that the presence of hydrophilic features could enhance the performance of microorganisms to facilitate the degradation of polymers later, and the approach was recommended as a pre-treatment before the biodegradation [109].
Filtration has also been applied using biochar to enhance the efficient performance of sand filters for removing MP spheres (microbeads) in wastewater. In the process, MP spheres stuck, trapped, and entangled in the biochar were employed to improve the sand filter, which accounted for over 90% of removal using biochar [110].
Another removal technology that has also been employed for the remediation of contaminants is adsorption [10, 117, 118]. The recent work reported biochar synthesized using agro-wastes as precursors (rice husks) and magnetically modified was employed as efficient and low-cost adsorbent for removing MPs from aqueous solution. The magnetic biochar showed 99.96% removal efficiency. The adsorbent’s performance was attributed to electrostatic attraction and surface complexation in the adsorption process [111]. The performance of various removal techniques for removing MPs is presented in Table 3. Replacing plastic polymers with sustainable alternatives derived from natural sources and implementing environmental policy, regulation, and circular economy practice are other sustainable solutions to MP pollution (see “Replacing Plastic Polymers with Sustainable Alternatives Derived from Natural Sources” and “Implementation of Environmental Policy, Regulation, and Circular Economy Practice: A Key Solution to MP Pollution” sections).
Replacing Plastic Polymers with Sustainable Alternatives Derived from Natural Sources
The environmental impact of synthetic plastics has highlighted the need for sustainable alternatives. Synthetic plastics, derived from petroleum, have desirable physical and chemical properties but are non-biodegradable, leading to environmental pollution and the release of hazardous substances [3]. Plastic pollution is an imminent environmental challenge, largely due to the widespread use and non-biodegradable nature of plastic products that eventually accumulate in natural habitats, including landfills and oceans. Consequently, the quest for sustainable alternatives to plastic polymers that can mitigate their harmful effects on the environment has become increasingly popular [119]. A promising solution is the substitution of plastic polymers with natural materials derived from renewable sources such as corn starch, cellulose, chitosan, or natural fibres like cotton, hemp, and bamboo [3, 120]. These materials possess numerous benefits as alternatives to plastic since they are biodegradable, thus facilitating their degradation by microorganisms in the environment, which helps minimize the accumulation in oceans and landfills [119].
Additionally, natural materials are renewable and can be obtained through sustainable harvesting methods that limit the environmental impact of their production. Biopolymers, derived from plant, animal, or microbial sources, offer a sustainable alternative, with some being naturally biodegradable, such as polylactic acid [3]. Biopolymers have been successfully used in various fields, including packaging, disposable goods, and medicine. Using biopolymers can help preserve natural ecosystems and prevent further environmental damage [120]. Nevertheless, some challenges exist in substituting polymers with natural materials, such as the limited mechanical properties of natural materials compared to plastic, which could restrict their applicability in certain products [3, 119, 120]. Furthermore, producing natural materials may require additional resources, including land, water, and energy, that may also contribute to environmental degradation. Despite these challenges, continued research and innovation in this area hold the promise of achieving a sustainable and eco-friendly future by substituting plastic polymers with natural materials [3, 120].
Implementation of Environmental Policy, Regulation, and Circular Economy Practice: A Key Solution to MP Pollution
The issue of MP pollution poses a growing threat to both aquatic ecosystems and human well-being. Therefore, implementing policies and regulations to encourage the adoption of sustainable practices that minimize plastic production and use is critical [43]. In addition, a circular economy approach that prioritizes reducing, reusing, and recycling plastic waste can effectively address microplastic pollution [10, 18, 121]. Policies promoting biodegradable materials and sustainable waste management practices can help reduce the amount of plastic waste in water bodies [32, 119, 120]. Regulations requiring manufacturers to adopt sustainable production processes can prevent the creation of MPs [43]. Rather than imposing taxes and levies on plastic bag users, some countries have incentivized plastic household consumers to return used plastic materials to regulate and reduce plastic litter in the environment [43, 121].
Several countries have advocated for legislation to exclude MPs and microbeads from cosmetic products and other consumables. By implementing policy, regulation, and meticulous utilization of circular economy strategy, we can mitigate the further accumulation of MPs in the environment and its harmful impacts on protecting the planet [121, 122]. In response, there has been growing interest in transitioning towards a circular economy to mitigate plastic pollution and promote sustainable production and consumption practices, according to SDG-12 [119, 123, 124]. Therefore, engaging a circular economy in managing plastic pollution is inevitable, considering the recent high plastic and plastic-related material consumption [10, 119, 123]. A circular economy is a systemic approach that seeks to minimize waste, conserve resources, and enhance environmental sustainability by promoting a closed-loop system of production, consumption, and disposal [123, 124]. Within this framework, the value of materials and products can be productively maintained for as long as possible, and waste is minimized through innovative recycling and recovery processes [121, 124, 125].
Conclusion, Perspective, and Future Outlook
Over the decades, plastic and plastic-related products have offered beneficial applications in various aspects, with humans enjoying a greater share of their benefits. This overview provides crucial perspectives on the intricate relationships between MPs and heavy metals in aquatic environments. The increasing combined effect of MPs and heavy metals presents substantial risks to both aquatic organisms and human health. Therefore, to manage the environment effectively, it is essential to have a thorough understanding of synergistic interactions between MPs and heavy metals. Thus, this review has identified and emphasized mechanistic processes such as electrostatic attraction, surface interactions, ion exchange, hydrogen bonding, hydrophobic forces, and π–π interactions as possible key players involved in such interactions. Furthermore, the review has also critically justified the influence of surface chemistry on these interactions. In addition, the review supports effective remediation techniques that align with the principles of a circular economy, promoting sustainable solutions to address this menace.
Nevertheless, several research gaps persist and are identified below:
-
Gap 1. Limited studies on metal desorption from MPs: Despite extensive research on heavy metal adsorption onto MPs, a significant gap exists in comprehending the desorption of metals from MPs.
-
Gap 2. Limited studies on desorption phenomenon: This research gap left a vacuum in the understanding of the broader consequences, including heavy metal-MPs pollution, bioaccumulation, and human exposure.
-
Gap 3. Lack of studies on heavy metal-biodegradable MPs interaction: The recommendation of biodegradable plastics as an alternative to conventional plastics sounds interesting. However, there is a need to explore the potential ecological consequences and underlying mechanisms of biodegradable MPs, representing a significant research gap.
-
Gap 4. Lack of effective remediation strategies: Research gaps persist in developing effective remediation strategies for the removal of both MPs and heavy metals from aqueous media.
In addition, to be able to critically address MPs-heavy metal pollution successfully, we identify research priorities for future focus as below:
-
Future studies should investigate the persistence of these pollutants in the environment and their long-term impacts in the field.
-
As plastic products persist over time, they degrade, leading to the discharge of their inherent chemicals into the surroundings. Therefore, dedicated studies are required to investigate the combined effects of plastic leachates/additives and heavy metals released into the environment.
-
Future research should evaluate the long-term effects of exposure to combined plastic leachates/additives and heavy metals on various ecosystems, including aquatic and terrestrial environments.
-
Despite the growing body of research on the adsorption of heavy metals onto MPs, there remains a substantial need for a better understanding concerning the desorption of metals from MPs. Among various articles reported in this study, only five studies reported the desorption of heavy metals from MPs [2••, 15, 17, 68, 72]. Therefore, studying this phenomenon would facilitate our understanding of the consequences of heavy metals-MP pollution, bioaccumulation, and human exposure to them.
-
Furthermore, extensive investigations are needed to explore the potential ecological consequences and mechanisms of biodegradable MPs-heavy metal pollution.
-
In addition, there is a need to develop effective remediation strategies to remove MPs and heavy metals from aqueous media.
-
Therefore, collective efforts are required. Given this, we envisage that environmental laws should prioritize the reduction of single-use plastics and promote sustainable alternatives. Workable procedures/blueprints and action plans to achieve the enforcement of environmental laws require efficient study.
Abbreviations
- ABS:
-
Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene
- MPs/NPs:
-
Micro/nanoplastics
- AOPs:
-
Advanced oxidation processes
- WWTPs:
-
Wastewater treatment plants
- SDGs:
-
Sustainable development goals
- PE:
-
Polyethylene
- PS:
-
Polystyrene
- PET:
-
Polyethylene terephthalate
- PSMP:
-
Polystyrene-microplastics
- PMMA:
-
Polymethylmethacrylate
- PEI:
-
Polyethyleneimine
- PVC:
-
Polyvinylchloride
- PA:
-
Polyamide
- PHAs:
-
Polyhydroxyalkanoates
- HDPE:
-
High-density polyethylene
- LDPE:
-
Low-density polyethylene
- PU:
-
Polyurethane
- PP:
-
Polypropylene
- PCBs:
-
Polychlorinated biphenyls
- DDT:
-
Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane
- POPs:
-
Persistent organic pollutants
- DOM:
-
Dissolved organic matter
- HA:
-
Humic acid
- FA:
-
Fulvic acid
- PTFE:
-
Polytetrafluoroethylene
- CA:
-
Cellulose acetate
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
• Guo X, et al. Sorption properties of cadmium on microplastics: the common practice experiment and a two-dimensional correlation spectroscopic study. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2020;190:110118. The study affords new insights in the fate and transport of heavy metals and presents a new analysis method for evaluating the environmental behavior of MPs and their role in transporting other contaminants.
•• Zhou Y, et al. Adsorption mechanism of cadmium on microplastics and their desorption behaviour in sediment and gut environments: the roles of water pH, lead ions, natural organic matter and phenanthrene. Water Research. 2020;184:116209 This paper highlights the role of Uptake and Accumulation of Polystyrene Microplastics in Zebrafish with consequences on liver and effects on food chains.
Ncube LK, et al. Environmental impact of food packaging materials: a review of contemporary development from conventional plastics to polylactic acid based materials. Materials. 2020;13(21):4994.
Ren C, et al. Polyurethane elastomer layered nanocomposite material for sports grounds and the preparation method thereof. Biomed Res Int. 2022;2022:5152911.
Lambert S, Sinclair C, Boxall A. Occurrence, degradation, and effect of polymer-based materials in the environment. In: Whitacre DM, editor. Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology, vol. 227. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2014. p. 1–53.
Geyer R, Jambeck JR, Law KL. Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Sci Adv. 2017;3(7):e1700782.
González-Fernández D, et al. Floating macrolitter leaked from Europe into the ocean. Nature Sustainability. 2021;4(6):474–83.
Lambert S, Scherer C, Wagner M. Ecotoxicity testing of microplastics: considering the heterogeneity of physicochemical properties. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2017;13(3):470–5.
Van Cauwenberghe L, et al. Microplastics in sediments: a review of techniques, occurrence and effects. Mar Environ Res. 2015;111:5–17.
Adeleye AT, et al. Recent developments and mechanistic insights on adsorption technology for micro- and nanoplastics removal in aquatic environments. J Water Process Eng. 2023;53:103777.
Paul MB, et al. Micro- and nanoplastics – current state of knowledge with the focus on oral uptake and toxicity. Nanoscale Advances. 2020;2(10):4350–67.
Alimi OS, et al. Microplastics and nanoplastics in aquatic environments: aggregation, deposition, and enhanced contaminant transport. Environ Sci Technol. 2018;52(4):1704–24.
Okoye CO, et al. Toxic chemicals and persistent organic pollutants associated with micro-and nanoplastics pollution. Chemical Engineering Journal Advances. 2022;11:100310.
Tursi A, et al. Microplastics in aquatic systems, a comprehensive review: origination, accumulation, impact, and removal technologies. RSC Adv. 2022;12(44):28318–40.
Khalid N, et al. Interactions and effects of microplastics with heavy metals in aquatic and terrestrial environments. Environ Pollut. 2021;290:118104.
Koelmans AA, Besseling E, Shim WJ. Nanoplastics in the aquatic environment. Critical Review. In: Bergmann M, Gutow L, Klages M, editors. Marine Anthropogenic Litter. Springer International Publishing: Cham; 2015. p. 325–40.
Wang F, et al. Adsorption characteristics of cadmium onto microplastics from aqueous solutions. Chemosphere. 2019;235:1073–80.
Hahladakis JN, et al. An overview of chemical additives present in plastics: migration, release, fate and environmental impact during their use, disposal and recycling. J Hazard Mater. 2018;344:179–99.
John KI, et al. Environmental microplastics and their additives—a critical review on advanced oxidative techniques for their removal. Chem Pap. 2023;77(2):657–76.
Vedolin MC, et al. Spatial variability in the concentrations of metals in beached microplastics. Mar Pollut Bull. 2018;129(2):487–93.
Vardhan KH, Kumar PS, Panda RC. A review on heavy metal pollution, toxicity and remedial measures: current trends and future perspectives. J Mol Liq. 2019;290:111197.
•• Fu Q, et al. Mechanism analysis of heavy metal lead captured by natural-aged microplastics. Chemosphere. 2021;270:128624. This paper demostrated that the natural-aged microplastics had a stronger adsorption efficiency than pristine microplastics for Pb (II) because of the organic film.
•• Godoy V, et al. Microplastics as vectors of chromium and lead during dynamic simulation of the human gastrointestinal tract. Sustainability (Basel, Switzerland). 2020;12(11):4792. This paper highlights the adverse role of microplastics and heavy metals in the human gastrointestinal tract.
• Zhang Y, et al. Mechanistic insight into different adsorption of norfloxacin on microplastics in simulated natural water and real surface water. Environmental Pollution. 2021;284:117537. This study provides a fundamental understanding of the interactions between the MPs and NOR in MPs complicated contaminated water system.
Wang W, Wang J. Comparative evaluation of sorption kinetics and isotherms of pyrene onto microplastics. Chemosphere. 2018;193:567–73.
Velez JFM, et al. Considerations on the use of equilibrium models for the characterisation of HOC-microplastic interactions in vector studies. Chemosphere. 2018;210:359–65.
Briffa J, Sinagra E, Blundell R. Heavy metal pollution in the environment and their toxicological effects on humans. Heliyon. 2020;6(9):e04691.
Guo X, Wang J. Sorption of antibiotics onto aged microplastics in freshwater and seawater. Mar Pollut Bull. 2019;149:110511.
Hüffer T, Hofmann T. Sorption of non-polar organic compounds by micro-sized plastic particles in aqueous solution. Environ Pollut. 2016;214:194–201.
Lu Y, et al. Uptake and accumulation of polystyrene microplastics in zebrafish (Danio rerio) and toxic effects in liver. Environ Sci Technol. 2016;50(7):4054–60.
Brennecke D, et al. Microplastics as vector for heavy metal contamination from the marine environment. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci. 2016;178:189–95.
Yang Q, et al. A review of soil heavy metal pollution from industrial and agricultural regions in China: pollution and risk assessment. Sci Total Environ. 2018;642:690–700.
Ashton K, Holmes L, Turner A. Association of metals with plastic production pellets in the marine environment. Mar Pollut Bull. 2010;60(11):2050–5.
Godoy V, et al. The potential of microplastics as carriers of metals. Environ Pollut. 2019;255(Pt 3):113363.
Holmes LA, Turner A, Thompson RC. Interactions between trace metals and plastic production pellets under estuarine conditions. Mar Chem. 2014;167:25–32.
•• Mozafarjalali M, Hamidian AH, Sayadi MH. Microplastics as carriers of iron and copper nanoparticles in aqueous solution. Chemosphere. 2023;324:138332. This paper emphasizes the frequent consumption of microplastics and the entry of adsorbed metal nanoparticles with their potential consequences in the food chain.
•• Kumar R, et al. Coupled effects of microplastics and heavy metals on plants: uptake, bioaccumulation, and environmental health perspectives. Science of The Total Environment. 2022;836:155619. This paper outlines the environmental health opinions based on microplastic and heavy metals toxicity with proposed guideline for the coupled effects of heavy metals and microplastics on plants and humans.
Kim D, Chae Y, An YJ. Mixture toxicity of nickel and microplastics with different functional groups on Daphnia magna. Environ Sci Technol. 2017;51(21):12852–8.
• Zhang H, et al. Sorption of fluoroquinolones to nanoplastics as affected by surface functionalization and solution chemistry. Environmental Pollution. 2020;262:114347. This study indicates that surface-functionalized or unmodified nanoplastics exhibit distinct sorption behaviors towards environmental pollutants, indicating attention for solution.
Liu G, et al. Sorption behaviour and mechanism of hydrophilic organic chemicals to virgin and aged microplastics in freshwater and seawater. Environ Pollut. 2019;246:26–33.
•• Zhou Z, et al. Adsorption behaviour of Cu(II) and Cr(VI) on aged microplastics in antibiotics-heavy metals coexisting system. Chemosphere. 2022;291:132794. This paper specifically reported the interaction between binary pollutants and aging microplastics to clarify the risks of microplastics in the aqueous environment.
Rochman CM, et al. Rethinking microplastics as a diverse contaminant suite. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2019;38(4):703–11.
Khan NA, et al. Microplastics: occurrences, treatment methods, regulations and foreseen environmental impacts. Environ Res. 2022;215:114224.
Fan X, et al. Investigation on the adsorption and desorption behaviours of antibiotics by degradable MPs with or without UV ageing process. J Hazard Mater. 2021;401:123363.
Salehi M, et al. Investigation of the factors that influence lead accumulation onto polyethylene: implication for potable water plumbing pipes. J Hazard Mater. 2018;347:242–51.
Gao L, et al. Microplastics aged in various environmental media exhibited strong sorption to heavy metals in seawater. Mar Pollut Bull. 2021;169:112480.
Vithanage M, et al. Mechanisms of antimony adsorption onto soybean stover-derived biochar in aqueous solutions. J Environ Manage. 2015;151:443–9.
Mao R, et al. Aging mechanism of microplastics with UV irradiation and its effects on the adsorption of heavy metals. J Hazard Mater. 2020;393:122515.
Razanajatovo RM, et al. Sorption and desorption of selected pharmaceuticals by polyethylene microplastics. Mar Pollut Bull. 2018;136:516–23.
Purwiyanto AIS, et al. Concentration and adsorption of Pb and Cu in microplastics: case study in aquatic environment. Mar Pollut Bull. 2020;158:111380.
Qi K, et al. Uptake of Pb(II) onto microplastic-associated biofilms in freshwater: adsorption and combined toxicity in comparison to natural solid substrates. J Hazard Mater. 2021;411:125115.
José S, Jordao L. Exploring the interaction between microplastics, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and biofilms in freshwater. Polycyclic Aromat Compd. 2022;42(5):2210–21.
Yu F, et al. Adsorption behaviour of organic pollutants and metals on micro/nanoplastics in the aquatic environment. Sci Total Environ. 2019;694:133643.
•• Ahechti M, et al. Metal adsorption by microplastics in aquatic environments under controlled conditions: exposure time, pH and salinity. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry. 2022;102(5):1118–25. This paper shows the differences in the adsorption behaviour of various metals for microplastics under varied conditions.
Zou J, et al. Adsorption of three bivalent metals by four chemical distinct microplastics. Chemosphere. 2020;248:126064.
Tang S, et al. Pb(II) uptake onto nylon microplastics: interaction mechanism and adsorption performance. J Hazard Mater. 2020;386:121960.
Xu B, et al. Microplastics play a minor role in tetracycline sorption in the presence of dissolved organic matter. Environ Pollut. 2018;240:87–94.
Li Y, et al. Adsorption behaviour of microplastics on the heavy metal Cr(VI) before and after ageing. Chemosphere. 2022;302:134865.
•• Tang S, et al. Interfacial interactions between collected nylon microplastics and three divalent metal ions (Cu(II), Ni(II), Zn(II)) in aqueous solutions. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2021;403:123548. This paper provides a clear theoretical basis for the behavior of nylon MPs as heavy metals carrier and highlights their environmental toxicity, which deserves to be addressed urgently.
Guo X, et al. Sorption properties of tylosin on four different microplastics. Chemosphere. 2018;209:240–5.
Holmes LA, Turner A, Thompson RC. Adsorption of trace metals to plastic resin pellets in the marine environment. Environ Pollut. 2012;160:42–8.
Barus BS, et al. Heavy metal adsorption and release on polystyrene particles at various salinities. Front Mar Sci. 2021;8:671802.
Dong Y, et al. As(III) adsorption onto different-sized polystyrene microplastic particles and its mechanism. Chemosphere. 2020;239: 124792.
Agboola OD, Benson NU. Physisorption and chemisorption mechanisms influencing micro (nano) plasticsorganic chemical contaminants interactions: a review. Front Environ Sci. 2021;9:678574.
Dong Y, et al. Adsorption mechanism of As(III) on polytetrafluoroethylene particles of different size. Environ Pollut. 2019;254:112950.
Lin Z, et al. Comparative analysis of kinetics and mechanisms for Pb(II) sorption onto three kinds of microplastics. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2021;208:111451.
Wegner A, et al. Effects of nanopolystyrene on the feeding behaviour of the blue mussel (Mytilus edulis L.). Environ Toxicol Chem. 2012;31(11):2490–7.
Abbasi S, et al. PET-microplastics as a vector for heavy metals in a simulated plant rhizosphere zone. Sci Total Environ. 2020;744:140984.
Ran S, et al. Effects of fulvic acid and humic acid from different sources on Hg methylation in soil and accumulation in rice. J Environ Sci. 2022;119:93–105.
Xu B, et al. The sorption kinetics and isotherms of sulfamethoxazole with polyethylene microplastics. Mar Pollut Bull. 2018;131:191–6.
Qiao R, et al. Combined effects of polystyrene microplastics and natural organic matter on the accumulation and toxicity of copper in zebrafish. Sci Total Environ. 2019;682:128–37.
Dong Y, et al. Adsorption of arsenite to polystyrene microplastics in the presence of humus. Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2020;22(12):2388–97.
•• Liu P, et al. Effect of aging on adsorption behaviour of polystyrene microplastics for pharmaceuticals: adsorption mechanism and role of aging intermediates. J Hazard Mater. 2020;384:121193. The paper highlights aging intermediates’ pivotal role in pharmaceutical accumulation on environmental microplastic samples during weathering.
Xu P, et al. Sorption of polybrominated diphenyl ethers by microplastics. Mar Pollut Bull. 2019;145:260–9.
Burrows SD, et al. Expanding exploration of dynamic microplastic surface characteristics and interactions. TrAC, Trends Anal Chem. 2020;130:115993.
Maity S, et al. Interaction of plastic particles with heavy metals and the resulting toxicological impacts: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2021;28(43):60291–307.
Cao Y, et al. A critical review on the interactions of microplastics with heavy metals: mechanism and their combined effect on organisms and humans. Sci Total Environ. 2021;788:147620.
Shi M, et al. Adsorption of heavy metals on biodegradable and conventional microplastics in the Pearl River Estuary. China Environmental Pollution. 2023;322:121158.
Hüffer T, Weniger A-K, Hofmann T. Sorption of organic compounds by aged polystyrene microplastic particles. Environ Pollut. 2018;236:218–25.
Han X, et al. Kinetics and size effects on adsorption of Cu (II), Cr (III), and Pb (II) onto polyethylene, polypropylene, and polyethylene terephthalate microplastic particles. Front Mar Sci. 2021;8:785146.
Barus BS, et al. Heavy metal adsorption and release on polystyrene particles at various salinities. Front Mar Sci. 2021;8: 671802.
Almeida CMR, Manjate E, Ramos S. Adsorption of Cd and Cu to different types of microplastics in estuarine salt marsh medium. Mar Pollut Bull. 2020;151:110797.
•• Hodson ME, et al. Plastic bag derived-microplastics as a vector for metal exposure in terrestrial invertebrates. Environmental Science & Technology. 2017;51(8):4714–21. This is a rare study investigating microplastics as vectors to increase metal exposure in earthworms, but that the associated risk is unlikely to be significant for essential metals such as Zn that are regulated by metabolic processes.
Liu S, et al. Investigation of the adsorption behaviour of Pb(II) onto natural-aged microplastics as affected by salt ions. J Hazard Mater. 2022;431:128643.
Nguyen T-B, et al. Adsorption of lead(II) onto PE microplastics as a function of particle size: influencing factors and adsorption mechanism. Chemosphere. 2022;304:135276.
Tang Z, et al. Oxygen-containing functional groups enhance uranium adsorption by aged polystyrene microplastics: Experimental and theoretical perspectives. Chem Eng J. 2023;465:142730.
Teuten EL, et al. Transport and release of chemicals from plastics to the environment and to wildlife. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2009;364(1526):2027–45.
Torres FG, et al. Sorption of chemical contaminants on degradable and non-degradable microplastics: recent progress and research trends. Sci Total Environ. 2021;757:143875.
Li J, et al. Comparing the influence of humic/fulvic acid and tannic acid on Cr(VI) adsorption onto polystyrene microplastics: evidence for the formation of Cr(OH)3 colloids. Chemosphere. 2022;307:135697.
Vlasova NM, Markitan OV. Complexation on the oxide surfaces: adsorption of biomolecules from aqueous solutions: a review. Theoret Exp Chem. 2022;58(1):1–14.
Sun Y, Li Y. Application of surface complexation modeling on adsorption of uranium at water-solid interface: a review. Environ Pollut. 2021;278:116861.
Gilli G, Gilli P. The nature of the hydrogen bond: outline of a comprehensive hydrogen bond theory. Vol. 23. Oxford university press; 2009.
Gao X, et al. Behaviours and influencing factors of the heavy metals adsorption onto microplastics: a review. J Clean Prod. 2021;319:128777.
Wang J, et al. Microplastics in the surface sediments from the Beijiang River littoral zone: composition, abundance, surface textures and interaction with heavy metals. Chemosphere. 2017;171:248–58.
Erni-Cassola G, et al. Distribution of plastic polymer types in the marine environment; a meta-analysis. J Hazard Mater. 2019;369:691–8.
Kumar R, et al. Micro(nano)plastics pollution and human health: how plastics can induce carcinogenesis to humans? Chemosphere. 2022;298:134267.
Schwabl P, et al. Detection of various microplastics in human stool: a prospective case series. Ann Intern Med. 2019;171(7):453–7.
Liu S, et al. Interactions between microplastics and heavy metals in aquatic environments: a review. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:652520. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.652520.
Zhong Y, et al. Competition adsorption of malachite green and rhodamine B on polyethylene and polyvinyl chloride microplastics in aqueous environment. Water Sci Technol. 2022;86(5):894–908.
• Stollberg N, et al. Uptake and absorption of fluoranthene from spiked microplastics into the digestive gland tissues of blue mussels. Mytilus edulis L Chemosphere. 2021;279:130480. The study demonstrated that under laboratory conditions M. edulis ingests PVC microplastics in a size spectrum ≤ 40 µm.
•• Atamanalp M, et al. Microplastics in tissues (brain, gill, muscle and gastrointestinal) of Mullus barbatus and Alosa immaculata. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 2021;81(3):460–9 The paper showed that MPs are quite high in all tissues regardless of fish species. Moreover, it has emerged that these two fish species are suitable for monitoring microplastics in the study area.
Hildebrandt L, et al. Microplastics as a Trojan horse for trace metals. Journal of Hazardous Materials Letters. 2021;2:100035.
Tong H, et al. Adsorption and desorption of triclosan on biodegradable polyhydroxybutyrate microplastics. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2021;40(1):72–8.
Maaghloud H, et al. Microplastic ingestion by Atlantic horse mackerel (Trachurus trachurus) in the north and central Moroccan Atlantic coast between Larache (35°30′N) and Boujdour (26°30′N). Environ Pollut. 2021;288:117781.
•• Jawad LA. Secondary microplastic ingestion by planktivorous fishes in the Sea of Oman. In: Jawad LA, editor. The Arabian Seas: biodiversity, environmental challenges and conservation measures. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021. p. 1247–54. This paper was the first to report on incidences of the presence of plastic material in the digestive tract of three planktivorous fish species collected from the Sea of Oman.
Rummel CD, et al. Plastic ingestion by pelagic and demersal fish from the North Sea and Baltic Sea. Mar Pollut Bull. 2016;102(1):134–41.
Fu D, et al. Aged microplastics polyvinyl chloride interact with copper and cause oxidative stress towards microalgae Chlorella vulgaris. Aquat Toxicol. 2019;216:105319.
Park JW, et al. Removal of microplastics via tannic acid-mediated coagulation and in vitro impact assessment. RSC Adv. 2021;11(6):3556–66.
Amelia D, et al. Effect of advanced oxidation process for chemical structure changes of polyethylene microplastics. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2022;52:2501–4.
Wang Z, Sedighi M, Lea-Langton A. Filtration of microplastic spheres by biochar: removal efficiency and immobilisation mechanisms. Water Res. 2020;184:116165.
Wu J, et al. Efficient removal of microplastics from aqueous solution by a novel magnetic biochar: performance, mechanism, and reusability. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2022;30(10):26914–28.
Kang J, et al. Degradation of cosmetic microplastics via functionalized carbon nanosprings. Matter. 2019;1(3):745–58.
Adeleye AT, et al. Photocatalytic remediation of methylene blue using hydrothermally synthesized H-Titania and Na-Titania nanotubes. Heliyon. 2022;8(12):e12610.
John KI, et al. Screening of Zeolites series: H-β/H-MOR/H-ZSM-5 as potential templates for photocatalyst heterostructure composites through photocatalytic degradation of tetracycline. J Mol Struct. 2023;1277:134852.
Uheida A, et al. Visible light photocatalytic degradation of polypropylene microplastics in a continuous water flow system. J Hazard Mater. 2021;406:124299.
Ariza-Tarazona MC, et al. New strategy for microplastic degradation: green photocatalysis using a protein-based porous N-TiO2 semiconductor. Ceram Int. 2019;45(7, Part B):9618–24.
John KI, et al. Oxygen deficiency induction and boundary layer modulation for improved adsorption performance of titania nanoparticles. Chem Pap. 2022;76(6):3829–40.
Igenepo John K, et al. Unravelling the effect of crystal dislocation density and microstrain of titanium dioxide nanoparticles on tetracycline removal performance. Chem Phys Lett. 2021;776:138725.
Adeleye AT, et al. Sustainable synthesis and applications of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) from biomass. Process Biochem. 2020;96:174–93.
Filiciotto L, Rothenberg G. Biodegradable plastics: standards, policies, and impacts. Chemsuschem. 2021;14(1):56–72.
Hossain R, et al. Full circle: challenges and prospects for plastic waste management in Australia to achieve circular economy. J Clean Prod. 2022;368:133127.
EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM). Presence of microplastics and nanoplastics in food, with particular focus on seafood. Efsa J. 2016;14(16):e04501.
Walker TR. (Micro)plastics and the UN sustainable development goals. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry. 2021;30:100497.
Kumar R, et al. Impacts of plastic pollution on ecosystem services, sustainable development goals, and need to focus on circular economy and policy interventions. Sustainability. 2021;13(17):9963.
Tournier V, et al. An engineered PET depolymerase to break down and recycle plastic bottles. Nature. 2020;580(7802):216–9.
Zhang P, et al. Single and combined effects of microplastics and roxithromycin on Daphnia magna. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2019;26(17):17010–20.
Dong J, et al. Combined biological effects of polystyrene microplastics and phenanthrene on Tubifex tubifex and microorganisms in wetland sediment. Chem Eng J. 2023;462:142260.
Tourinho PS, et al. Partitioning of chemical contaminants to microplastics: sorption mechanisms, environmental distribution and effects on toxicity and bioaccumulation. Environ Pollut. 2019;252:1246–56.
Lu S, et al. Impact of water chemistry on surface charge and aggregation of polystyrene microspheres suspensions. Sci Total Environ. 2018;630:951–9.
Yu S, et al. Aggregation kinetics of different surface-modified polystyrene nanoparticles in monovalent and divalent electrolytes. Environ Pollut. 2019;255:113302.
Nabi I, et al. Complete Photocatalytic mineralization of microplastic on TiO2 nanoparticle film. iScience. 2020;23(7):101326.
Vital-Grappin AD, et al. The role of the reactive species involved in the photocatalytic degradation of HDPE microplastics using C, N-TiO(2) powders. Polymers (Basel). 2021;13(7):999.
Park SY, Kim CG. Biodegradation of micro-polyethylene particles by bacterial colonization of a mixed microbial consortium isolated from a landfill site. Chemosphere. 2019;222:527–33.
Joshi G, et al. Unraveling the plastic degradation potentials of the plastisphere-associated marine bacterial consortium as a key player for the low-density polyethylene degradation. J Hazard Mater. 2022;425:128005.
Misra A, et al. Water purification and microplastics removal using magnetic polyoxometalate-supported ionic liquid phases (magPOM-SILPs). Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2020;59(4):1601–5.
Wan H, et al. Removal of polystyrene microplastics from aqueous solution using the metal–organic framework material of ZIF-67. Toxics. 2022;10(2):70.
Lapointe M, et al. Understanding and improving microplastic removal during water treatment: impact of coagulation and flocculation. Environ Sci Technol. 2020;54(14):8719–27.
Perren W, Wojtasik A, Cai Q. Removal of microbeads from wastewater using electrocoagulation. ACS Omega. 2018;3(3):3357–64.
Shen M, et al. Efficient removal of microplastics from wastewater by an electrocoagulation process. Chem Eng J. 2022;428: 131161.
Acknowledgements
The lead author gratefully acknowledges the support from the UNIPRS (Tuition Fees) and the UNRS Central Scholarship, funded by the University of Newcastle. The HDR allowance provided by the University of Newcastle is also highly appreciated.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Aderemi Timothy Adeleye: conceptualization, investigation, data curation, writing—original draft, visualization; Md Mezbaul Bahar: conceptualization, supervision, writing—review and editing, visualization; Mallavarapu Megharaj: conceptualization, supervision, writing—review and editing; Cheng Fang: supervision, writing—review and editing; Mohammad Mahmudur Rahman: conceptualization, supervision, writing—review and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Adeleye, A.T., Bahar, M.M., Megharaj, M. et al. The Unseen Threat of the Synergistic Effects of Microplastics and Heavy Metals in Aquatic Environments: A Critical Review. Curr Pollution Rep 10, 478–497 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-024-00298-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-024-00298-7