Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Home Composting for Onsite Treatment of Household Organic Solid Waste: A Review

  • Water Pollution (G Toor and L Nghiem, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Pollution Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Home composting is an effective way to treat household waste, but global uptake remains low because of insufficient recognition and technical limits. This review aims to promote the understanding, popularization, and application of home composting by summarizing the facilities, process performance, and product quality, and to sum up the crucial technical limits and potential solve methods.

Recent Findings

Home composting studies are carried out in 20–1200 L composters for 3–12 months with kitchen and garden feedstocks. During the process, emission amounts of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), and ammonia (NH3) are 0.002–2185 kg/Mg FW, 0.004–454 kg/Mg FW, and 0.025–972 kg/Mg FW, respectively. The thermophilic stage in home composting is insufficient for harmless requirement, while the home composting products could meet the standards for the use of organic fertilizer when the basic physical and chemical indicators, biological indicators, spectral indicators, and other indices are carried out in lab. Home composting products are non-toxic to plants and can promote plant growth. The crucial technical limits are caused by slow degradation of organic matter (OM), emission of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and a lack of maturity evaluation standard and directive for subsequent product utilization.

Summary

Suitable technology and evaluation standard could reduce gas emissions and improve maturity of home composting, which would provide an additional method for existing municipal waste management, therefore reducing the transportation and collection cost of household waste, and realizing the reduction, harmless, and resource recovery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nyambura SM, Jufei W, Hua L, et al. Microwave co-pyrolysis of kitchen food waste and rice straw for waste reduction and sustainable biohydrogen production: thermo-kinetic analysis and evolved gas analysis. Sustainable Energy Technol Assess. 2022;52.

  2. Ding Y, Zhao J, Liu J-W, et al. A review of China’s municipal solid waste (MSW) and comparison with international regions: management and technologies in treatment and resource utilization. J Clean Prod. 2021;293.

  3. Zan F, Iqbal A, Lu X, et al. “Food waste-wastewater-energy/resource” nexus: integrating food waste management with wastewater treatment towards urban sustainability. Water Res. 2022;211:118089.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Qi CAR, Yin RR, Gao XZ, et al. Development of solid-state anaerobic digestion and aerobic composting hybrid processes for organic solid waste treatment and resource recovery: a review. Curr Pollut Rep. 2022.

  5. Qi CR, Wang R, Jia SM, et al. Biochar amendment to advance contaminant removal in anaerobic digestion of organic solid wastes: a review. Bioresour Technol. 2021;341.

  6. Xu Z, Qi C, Zhang L, et al. Bacterial dynamics and functions for gaseous emissions and humification in response to aeration intensities during kitchen waste composting. Bioresour Technol. 2021;337:125369.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gao X, Xu Z, Li Y, et al. Bacterial dynamics for gaseous emission and humification in bio-augmented composting of kitchen waste. Sci Total Environ. 2021;801:149640.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Niles MT. Majority of rural residents compost food waste: policy and waste management implications for rural regions. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2020;3.

  9. Benyam A, Kinnear S, Rolfe J. Integrating community perspectives into domestic food waste prevention and diversion policies. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2018;134:174–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sulewski P, Kais K, Gołaś M, et al. Home bio-waste composting for the circular economy. Energies. 2021;14.

  11. Loan LTT, Takahashi Y, Nomura H, Yabe M. Modeling home composting behavior toward sustainable municipal organic waste management at the source in developing countries. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2019;140:65–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ueta K, Koizumi H. Reducing household waste: Japan learns from Germany. Environment. 2001;43:20–32.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Colón J, Cadena E, Pognani M, et al. Determination of the energy and environmental burdens associated with the biological treatment of source-separated Municipal Solid Wastes. Energy Environ Sci. 2012;5:5731–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Edgerton E, McKechnie J, Dunleavy K. Behavioral determinants of household participation in a home composting scheme. Environ Behav. 2009;41:151–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sarani NA, Kadir AA, Hassan MIH, et al. Home composting method for the treatment technologies of food waste: a review. Iop C Ser Earth Env. 2020;616.

  16. Andersen JK, Boldrin A, Christensen TH, Scheutz C. Greenhouse gas emissions from home composting of organic household waste. Waste Manag. 2010;30:2475–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Adhikari BK, Tremier A, Barrington S, et al. Gas emissions as influenced by home composting system configuration. J Environ Manage. 2013;116:163–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lleó T, Albacete E, Barrena R, et al. Home and vermicomposting as sustainable options for biowaste management. J Clean Prod. 2013;47:70–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ermolaev E, Sundberg C, Pell M, Jönsson H. Greenhouse gas emissions from home composting in practice. Biores Technol. 2014;151:174–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tatano F, Pagliaro G, Di Giovanni P, et al. Biowaste home composting: experimental process monitoring and quality control. Waste Manag. 2015;38:72–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Manu MK, Kumar R, Garg A. Performance assessment of improved composting system for food waste with varying aeration and use of microbial inoculum. Bioresour Technol. 2017;234:167–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Storino F, Menéndez S, Muro J, et al. Effect of feeding regime on composting in bins. Compost Science & Utilization. 2016;25:71–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Arrigoni JP, Paladino G, Garibaldi LA, Laos F. Inside the small-scale composting of kitchen and garden wastes: thermal performance and stratification effect in vertical compost bins. Waste Manag. 2018;76:284–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fan YV, Lee CT, Klemeš JJ, et al. Evaluation of effective microorganisms on home scale organic waste composting. J Environ Manage. 2018;216:41–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhou X, Yang J, Xu S, et al. Rapid in-situ composting of household food waste. Process Saf Environ Prot. 2020;141:259–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Vázquez MA, Plana R, Pérez C, Soto M. Development of technologies for local composting of food waste from universities. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17.

  27. Cafiero LM, Canditelli M, Musmeci F, et al. Assessment of disintegration of compostable bioplastic bags by management of electromechanical and static home composters. Sustainability. 2020;13.

  28. Manu MK, Kumar R, Garg A. Effect of Microbial inoculum and leachate circulation on the performance of rotary drum composter used for household wet biodegradable waste. Waste Biomass Valorization. 2021;12:6119–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ruzickova J, Raclavska H, Kucbel M, et al. The potential environmental risks of the utilization of composts from household food waste. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021;28:24663–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Sailesh N, Shinde V. Home composter domestic use composter. In: 2015 World Congress on Sustainable Technologies (WCST). IEEE; 2015. pp. 130–132.

  31. Gao X, Yang F, Yan Z, et al. Humification and maturation of kitchen waste during indoor composting by individual households. Sci Total Environ. 2022;814:152509.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. de Guardia A, Petiot C, Benoist JC, Druilhe C. Characterization and modelling of the heat transfers in a pilot-scale reactor during composting under forced aeration. Waste Manage. 2012;32:1091–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Prommuak C, Jarunglumlert T, Putmai N, et al. Comparative study on different turning device alignments for household food waste composters. Environ Prog Sustainable Energy. 2018;37:1954–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Papadopoulos AE, Stylianou MA, Michalopoulos CP, et al. Performance of a new household composter during in-home testing. Waste Manag. 2009;29:204–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Agapiou A, Vamvakari JP, Andrianopoulos A, Pappa A. Volatile emissions during storing of green food waste under different aeration conditions. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016;23:8890–901.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Illmer P, Schinner F. Compost turning - a central factor for a rapid and high-quality degradation in household composting. Biores Technol. 1997;59:157–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Bhave PP, Kulkarni BN. Effect of active and passive aeration on composting of household biodegradable wastes: a decentralized approach. Int J Recycl Org Waste Agric. 2019;8:335–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Smith SR, Jasim S. Small-scale home composting of biodegradable household waste: overview of key results from a 3-year research programme in West London. Waste Manag Res. 2009;27:941–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Kucbel M, Raclavska H, Ruzickova J, et al. Properties of composts from household food waste produced in automatic composters. J Environ Manage. 2019;236:657–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Mu D, Horowitz N, Casey M, Jones K. Environmental and economic analysis of an in-vessel food waste composting system at Kean University in the U.S. Waste Manag. 2017;59:476–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhang H, Lu P, Li G, et al. Effect of corn stalks addition on odors and leachate reduction during kitchen waste composting. Trans. CSAE. 2011;27:248–54.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Neugebauer M, Sołowiej P. The use of green waste to overcome the difficulty in small-scale composting of organic household waste. J Clean Prod. 2017;156:865–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Amlinger F, Peyr S, Cuhls C. Green house gas emissions from composting and mechanical biological treatment. Waste Manage Res. 2008;26:47–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Chan YC, Sinha RK, Weijin W. Emission of greenhouse gases from home aerobic composting, anaerobic digestion and vermicomposting of household wastes in Brisbane (Australia). Waste Manage Res. 2010;29:540–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Quirós R, Villalba G, Muñoz P, et al. Environmental assessment of two home composts with high and low gaseous emissions of the composting process. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2014;90:9–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Awasthi MK, Duan Y, Zhao J, et al. Greenhouse gases emission mitigation and utilization in composting and waste management industry: potentials and challenges. In: CO2 Separation, Purification and Conversion to Chemicals and Fuels. Edited by: Winter F, Agarwal RA, Hrdlicka J, Varjani S. 2019. pp. 19–37.

  47. López R, Cabeza IO, Giráldez I, Díaz MJ. Biofiltration of composting gases using different municipal solid waste-pruning residue composts: monitoring by using an electronic nose. Biores Technol. 2011;102:7984–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Andersen JK, Boldrin A, Christensen TH, Scheutz C. Home composting as an alternative treatment option for organic household waste in Denmark: an environmental assessment using life cycle assessment-modelling. Waste Manage. 2012;32:31–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Andersen JK, Boldrin A, Christensen TH, Scheutz C. Mass balances and life cycle inventory of home composting of organic waste. Waste Manag. 2011;31:1934–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Kim E, Lee J, Han G, Hwang S. Comprehensive analysis of microbial communities in full-scale mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digesters treating food waste-recycling wastewater. Bioresour Technol. 2018;259:442–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Solomon S, Carpenter M, Flach TA. Intermediate storage of carbon dioxide in geological formations: a technical perspective. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control. 2008;2:502–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Jiang T, Ma X, Tang Q, et al. Combined use of nitrification inhibitor and struvite crystallization to reduce the NH3 and N2O emissions during composting. Biores Technol. 2016;217:210–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Boldrin A, Andersen JK, Møller J, et al. Composting and compost utilization: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contributions. Waste Manage Res. 2009;27:800–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Dhamodharan K, Varma VS, Veluchamy C, et al. Emission of volatile organic compounds from composting: a review on assessment, treatment and perspectives. Sci Total Environ. 2019;695:133725.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Agapios A, Andreas V, Marinos S, et al. Waste aroma profile in the framework of food waste management through household composting. J Clean Prod. 2020;257.

  56. Boldrin A, Andersen JK, Christensen TH. Environmental assessment of garden waste management in the Municipality of Aarhus, Denmark. Waste Manag. 2011;31:1560–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Xu ZC, Ma Y, Li YM, et al. Comparison between cold plasma, ultrasonication, and alkaline hydrogen peroxide pretreatments of garden waste to enhance humification in subsequent composting with kitchen waste: performance and mechanisms. Bioresour Technol. 2022;354.

  58. Cerda A, Artola A, Font X, et al. Composting of food wastes: status and challenges. Bioresour Technol. 2018;248:57–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Lopez M, Huerta-Pujol O, Martinez-Farre FX, Soliva M. Approaching compost stability from Klason lignin modified method: chemical stability degree for OM and N quality assessment. Resour Conserv Recy. 2010;55:171–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Bernal MP, Sommer SG, Chadwick D, et al. Current approaches and future trends in compost quality criteria for agronomic, environmental, and human health benefits. ADV AGRON. 2017; 144: 143–233.

  61. da Costa Ferreira AK, da Silva DN, da Costa Ferreira DA, et al. Monitoring of physical parameters in organic waste composting. J Agric Sci (Toronto). 2018;10:464–70.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Bohacz J. Lignocellulose-degrading enzymes, free-radical transformations during composting of lignocellulosic waste and biothermal phases in small-scale reactors. Sci Total Environ. 2017;580:744–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Xu Z, Qi C, Zhang L, et al. Regulating bacterial dynamics by lime addition to enhance kitchen waste composting. Bioresour Technol. 2021;341.

  64. Waqas M, Nizami AS, Aburiazaiza AS, et al. Optimization of food waste compost with the use of biochar. J Environ Manage. 2018;216:70–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Jiang T, Schuchardt F, Li G, et al. Effect of C/N ratio, aeration rate and moisture content on ammonia and greenhouse gas emission during the composting. J Environ Sci. 2011;23:1754–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Manu MK, Kumar R, Garg A. Decentralized composting of household wet biodegradable waste in plastic drums: effect of waste turning, microbial inoculum and bulking agent on product quality. J Clean Prod. 2019;226:233–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Margaritis M, Psarras K, Panaretou V, et al. Improvement of home composting process of food waste using different minerals. Waste Manag. 2018;73:87–100.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Amery F, Gerits F, Huygens J, et al. Influence of compost characteristics and compost:soil ratio on soil properties and growth of Vicia faba. Acta Hortic. 2021:271–280.

  69. Tesfaye B. Composition of different composts and vermicompost and effects of their application rates on growth parameters of pot grown tomato. Afr J Agric Res. 2017;12:1514–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Chen Y, Zhou C, Xu W. Fertilizer effects of composted materials from different sources on cultivating Impatiens balsamina L. in municipal solid waste management. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2017;25:5771–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Moharana PC, Biswas DR. Assessment of maturity indices of rock phosphate enriched composts using variable crop residues. Biores Technol. 2016;222:1–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Zhang JP, Zhang TT, Ying Y, Yao XH. Effects of different additives on the chemical composition and microbial diversity during composting of Camellia oleifera shell. Bioresour Technol. 2021;330.

  73. Tognetti C, Mazzarino MJ, Laos F. Cocomposting biosolids and municipal organic waste: effects of process management on stabilization and quality. Biol Fertil Soils. 2006;43:387–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Barrena R, Font X, Gabarrell X, Sánchez A. Home composting versus industrial composting: Influence of composting system on compost quality with focus on compost stability. Waste Manage. 2014;34:1109–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Xu Z, Ma Y, Li Y, et al. Comparison between cold plasma, ultrasonication, and alkaline hydrogen peroxide pretreatments of garden waste to enhance humification in subsequent composting with kitchen waste: performance and mechanisms. Biores Technol. 2022;354:127228–127228.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Mihai F-C, Ingrao C. Assessment of biowaste losses through unsound waste management practices in rural areas and the role of home composting. J Clean Prod. 2018;172:1631–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Lu HR, Qu X, El Hanandeh A. Towards a better environment - the municipal organic waste management in Brisbane: environmental life cycle and cost perspective. J Clean Prod. 2020;258.

  78. Parkinson R. Effect of turning regime and seasonal weather conditions on nitrogen and phosphorus losses during aerobic composting of cattle manure. Biores Technol. 2004;91:171–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Kamaruddin MA, Norashiddin FA, Idrus AFM, et al. A study on the effects of different microbial inoculants on the decomposition of organic waste by using semi passive aerated reactor. In: 2018.

  80. Ballardo C, del Carmen V-G, Sanchez A, et al. Adding value to home compost: biopesticide properties through Bacillus thuringiensis inoculation. Waste Manage. 2020;106:32–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Faverial J, Sierra J. Home composting of household biodegradable wastes under the tropical conditions of Guadeloupe (French Antilles). J Clean Prod. 2014;83:238–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Weglarz TC, Holsen LK, Ribbons RR, Hall DJ. Microbial diversity and nitrogen-metabolizing gene abundance in backyard food waste composting systems. J Appl Microbiol. 2018;125:1066–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Ames E, Cook N. Food becoming compost: encountering and negotiating disgust in household sustainability. Aust Geogr. 2020;51:325–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Liu MR, Tang ZH, Lin ZR, et al. Insight into the cadmium and zinc binding potential of humic acids derived from composts by EEM spectra combined with PARAFAC analysis. Open Chem. 2020;18:58–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Furukawa M, Misawa N, Moore JE. Recycling of domestic food waste: does food waste composting carry risk from total antimicrobial resistance (AMR)? Brit Food J. 2018;120:2710–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Yu P, Chen J, Li Y. Design of a domestic small solar composting box. Food & Machinery. 2018;34(121–125):200.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Wijetunga S, Karunarathne RSP. A sequential batch composter for the management of kitchen and garden waste in restaurants and guest houses. Trop Agric Res Ext. 2019;22:63–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Feng K, Meng H, Zhou H, et al. Research status and prospect of integrated aerobic fermentation equipment. J Agric Sci Technol (Beijing). 2018;20:69–79.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Xu Z, Ma Y, Zhang L, et al. Relating bacterial dynamics and functions to gaseous emissions during composting of kitchen and garden wastes. Sci Total Environ. 2021;767:144210.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Zhang B, Fan F, Guo C, et al. Evaluation of maturity and odor emissions in the process of combined composting of kitchen waste and garden waste. Appl Sci 2021;11.

  91. Chen H, Yang Y, Liu J, Xu C. Co-composting of garden wastes and kitchen wastes. Environment Engineering. 2012;30:81–4.

    Google Scholar 

  92. Yang F, Li G, Shi H, Wang Y. Effects of phosphogypsum and superphosphate on compost maturity and gaseous emissions during kitchen waste composting. Waste Manag. 2015;36:70–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Waqas M, Nizami AS, Aburiazaiza AS, et al. Untapped potential of zeolites in optimization of food waste composting. J Environ Manage. 2019;241:99–112.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Bai Y, Zhang L, Yin Z, Sun X. Beer lees and ceramsite amendments enhance the two-stage co-composting of green waste. Bioresour Technol. 2021;335.

  95. He Z, Lin H, Hao J, et al. Impact of vermiculite on ammonia emissions and organic matter decomposition of food waste during composting. Bioresour Technol. 2018;263:548–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Kaur A, Katyal P. Microbial interventions for composting of organic and lignocellulose waste. Appl Biochem Microbiol. 2021;57:127–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Caceres R, Coromina N, Malinska K, Marfa O. Evolution of process control parameters during extended co-composting of green waste and solid fraction of cattle slurry to obtain growing media. Bioresour Technol. 2015;179:398–406.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Gurusamy NN, Puffer N, de Jongh C, et al. Effect of initial moisture content and sample storage duration on compost stability using the ORG0020 dynamic respiration test. Waste Manage. 2021;125:215–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the 2115 Talent Development Program of China Agricultural University, the supervisor workstation project 20210505 (202105510310477), and National Key R & D Program of China (2018YFC1901000).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Beijing Key Laboratory of Farmland Soil Pollution Prevention and Remediation, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China

    Jingwen Cheng, Rongrong Yin, Wenhai Luo, Yanming Li, Lingxiao Wang & Ruixue Chang

  2. Organic Recycling Research Institute (SuZhou) of China Agriculture University, Suzhou, 215100, China

    Ruixue Chang

Authors
  1. Jingwen Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rongrong Yin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wenhai Luo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yanming Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lingxiao Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ruixue Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruixue Chang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any study with human and animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Water Pollution

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cheng, J., Yin, R., Luo, W. et al. Home Composting for Onsite Treatment of Household Organic Solid Waste: A Review. Curr Pollution Rep 8, 395–408 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-022-00233-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-022-00233-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation