Skip to main content
Log in

Treatment of Automotive Paint Wastewater Using Electroflotation: Kinetic Study, Influencing Factors and Data Analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Processes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A comprehensive laboratory experimental study was conducted on the application of electroflotation in removal of paint from automotive paint system. In 40 min testing time and under 44 A/m2 current density, the total suspended solids (TSS) removal rates ranged from 90.39 to 97.43%. The first and second-order rate constants were developed. The kinetics of the TSS removal from the automotive paint wastewater was best described with the second-order rate constants. Two statistical methods were applied to identify the key factors for electroflotation performance among the Initial TSS Concentration, Current Density, water pH, Zeta Potential and Electrical Conductivity. It was confirmed that in both methods, the Initial TSS Concentration and Current Density were the most significant variables. Further, through Response Surface Methodology and Stepwise Regression analysis, equations of the removal rate of TSS vs reaction time and applied current density were produced for different wastewater samples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adjeroud N, Dahmoune F, Merzouk B, Leclerc JP, Madani K (2015) Improvement of electrocoagulation–electroflotation treatment of effluent by addition of Opuntia ficus indica pad juice. Sep Purif Technol 144:168–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmadian M, Yousefi N, Van Ginkel SW, Zare MR, Rahimi S, Fatehizadeh A (2012) Kinetic study of slaughterhouse wastewater treatment by electrocoagulation using Fe electrodes. Water Sci Technol 66(4):754–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alam R, Shang JQ (2017) Removal of bitumen from mature oil sands tailings slurries by electro-flotation. J Water Process Eng 15:116–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • APHA, AWWA, WEF (1999) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington DC, USA

  • Araya-Farias M, Mondor M, Lamarche F, Tajchakavit S, Makhlouf J (2008) Clarification of apple juice by electroflotation. Innovative Food Sci Emerg Technol 9(3):320–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baierle F, John DK, Souza MP, Bjerk TR, Moraes MS, Hoeltz M, Rohlfes AL, Camargo ME, Corbellini VA, Schneider RC (2015) Biomass from microalgae separation by electroflotation with iron and aluminum spiral electrodes. Chem Eng J 267:274–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bande RM, Prasad B, Mishra IM, Wasewar KL (2008) Oil field effluent water treatment for safe disposal by electroflotation. Chem Eng J 137(3):503–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berthouex PM, Brown LC (2002) Statistics for environmental engineers. Lewis Publishers/CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar Raju G, Khangaonkar PR (1984) Electroflotation-a critical review. Trans Indian Inst Metals 37(1):59–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Essadki AH, Gourich B, Azzi M, Vial C, Delmas H (2010) Kinetic study of defluoridation of drinking water by electrocoagulation/electroflotation in a stirred tank reactor and in an external-loop airlift reactor. Chem Eng J 164(1):106–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geffen CA, Rothenberg S (2000) Suppliers and environmental innovation: the automotive paint process. Int J Oper Prod Manag 20(2):166–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez C, Sáez C, Cañizares P, Rodrigo MA (2016) Optimization of a combined electrocoagulation-electroflotation reactor. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(10):9700–9711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalyani KP, Balasubramanian N, Srinivasakannan C (2009) Decolorization and COD reduction of paper industrial effluent using electro-coagulation. Chem Eng J 151(1–3):97–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobya M, Demirbas E, Bayramoglu M, Sensoy MT (2011) Optimization of electrocoagulation process for the treatment of metal cutting wastewaters with response surface methodology. Water Air Soil Pollut 215(1–4):399–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyzas GZ, Matis KA (2016) Electroflotation process: a review. J Mol Liq 220:657–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matis KA (ed) (1994) Flotation science and engineering. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Murugananthan M, Raju GB, Prabhakar S (2004) Separation of pollutants from tannery effluents by electro flotation. Sep Purif Technol 40(1):69–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers RH, Montgomery DC, Anderson-Cook CM (2009) Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Ni C, Xie G, Jin M, Peng Y, Xia W (2016) The difference in flotation kinetics of various size fractions of bituminous coal between rougher and cleaner flotation processes. Powder Technol 292:210–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonato TCM, Schöntag JM, Burgardt T, Alves AADA, Broock WF, Dalsasso RL, Sens ML (2018) Combination of electroflotation process and down-flow granular filtration to treat wastewater contaminated with oil. Environ Technol 39(6):717–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OICA (2017) Production statistics. International Organization of Motor Vehicle Manufacturers. http://www.oica.net/production-statistics. Accessed 9 April 2018

  • Papasavva S, Kia S, Claya J, Gunther R (2001) Characterization of automotive paints: an environmental impact analysis. Prog Org Coat 43(1–3):193–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin X, Yang B, Gao F, Chen G (2012) Treatment of restaurant wastewater by pilot-scale electrocoagulation-electroflotation: optimization of operating conditions. J Environ Eng 139(7):1004–1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawlings JO, Pantula SG, Dickey DA (2001) Applied regression analysis: a research tool. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Salihoglu G, Salihoglu NK (2016) A review on paint sludge from automotive industries: generation, characteristics and management. J Environ Manag 169:223–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sridhar R, Sivakumar V, Immanuel VP, Maran JP (2012) Development of model for treatment of pulp and paper industry bleaching effluent using response surface methodology. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 31(4):558–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Liu J, Cao Y, Wang Y (2013) Effects of particle size on lignite reverse flotation kinetics in the presence of sodium chloride. Powder Technol 246:658–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao S, Huang G, Cheng G, Wang Y, Fu H (2014) Hardness, COD and turbidity removals from produced water by electrocoagulation pretreatment prior to reverse osmosis membranes. Desalination 344:454–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou J, Chen D, Jiang Y, Yang K, Wang H, Zhou J (2016) Removal of color caused by dissolved organic matter from groundwater by electroflotation-filtration continuous flow reactor and optimization by response surface methodology. Desalin Water Treat 57(2):754–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zorpas AA, Inglezakis VJ (2012) Automotive industry challenges in meeting EU 2015 environmental standard. Technol Soc 34(1):55–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the University of Western Ontario and the National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC). The experimental program was partially funded by Daimler Chrysler Co.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reza Mohtashami.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohtashami, R., Shang, J.Q. & Xu, Y. Treatment of Automotive Paint Wastewater Using Electroflotation: Kinetic Study, Influencing Factors and Data Analysis. Environ. Process. 5, 577–591 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-018-0324-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-018-0324-5

Keywords

Navigation