Skip to main content
Log in

The School Psychology Research Collaboration Conference: Examination of Scholarly Outcomes

  • Published:
Contemporary School Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although most junior faculty are expected to produce research, studies suggest that mentorship and support for promoting their research careers may be limited. Accordingly, in 2003, the School Psychology Research Collaboration Conference (SPRCC) was developed as an opportunity for early career scholars to establish scholarly networks and collaborate with peers and top researchers in the field of school psychology. The conference was intended to both facilitate important and collaborative research, while also enhancing the productivity among early career participants. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of the SPRCC on the research trajectories of 147 participants between 2003 and 2015. The findings indicate that SPRCC has positive research outcomes, especially for participants from institutions with the highest research activity, those with more publications prior to SPRCC, and males. Implications for the field and ideas for future research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychological Association. (1986). 1985–1986: Faculty salaries in graduate departments of psychology [Unpublished analysis]. Washington: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceci, S. J., Ginther, D. K., Kahn, S., & Williams, W. M. (2014). Women in academic science: A changing landscape. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 15, 75–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100614541236.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clopton, K. L., & Haselhuhn, C. W. (2009). School psychology trainer shortage in the USA: Current status and projections for the future. School Psychology International, 30, 24–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034308101848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M. D., Arean, P. A., Marshall, S. J., Lovett, M., & O’Sullivan, P. (2010). Does mentoring matter?: Results from a survey of faculty mentees at a large health sciences university. Medical Education Online, 15. https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v15i0.5063.

  • Gordon, R. (2012). On community in the midst of hierarchy (and hierarchy in the midst of community). In G. y. Muhs, N. Y. Flores, C. G. González, & A. P. Harris (Eds.), Presumed Incompetent: The intersections of race and class for women in academia. Boulder: University Press of Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grapin, S. L., Kranzler, J. H., & Daley, M. L. (2013). Scholarly productivity and impact of school psychology faculty in APA-accredited programs. Psychology in the Schools, 50, 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagedorn, L. S. (2001). Gender differences in faculty productivity, satisfaction, and salary: What really separates us? ERIC research reports no. ED464548. Retrieved on December 14, 2017 from http://eric.ed.gov/

  • Hamilton, K. (2005). Getting off the burnout track? Diverse Issues in Higher Education, 22, 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jimerson, S. R. (2002). Announcing a school psychology research collaboration conference, 2003. Communiqué, 30(8), 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jimerson S. R. & Abidin, R. (2000). Proposal for a National School Psychology Research Collaboration Conference: Submitted to the Society for the Study of School Psychology. Available from Jimerson@education.ucsb.edu

  • Jimerson, S. R., & Albers, C. A. (2007). The school psychology research collaboration conference: Reflections on the past, present, and future. School Psychologist, 61, 76–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jimerson, S. R., & VanDerHeyden, A. M. (2004). 2003 school psychology research collaboration conference: The importance of research in the future of school psychology. Communiqué, 32(5), 36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joy, S. (2006). What should I be doing, and where are they doing it? Scholarly productivity of academic psychologists. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 346–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, R., Floyd, R., & Erichsen, L. (2011). Strategies and attributes of highly productive scholars and contributors to the school psychology literature: Recommendations for increasing scholarly productivity. Journal of School Psychology, 49, 691–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, B., Dodson, J., & Johnson, S. (2014). Guiding the way: Mentoring graduate students and junior faculty for sustainable academic careers. SAGE Open, 4, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014558043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rush, C., & Wheeler, J. (2011). Enhancing junior faculty research productivity through multi-institution collaboration: Participants’ impressions of the School Psychology Research Collaboration Conference. The Journal of Canadian School Psychology, 26, 220–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0829573511413552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, E., & Blom-Hoffman, J. (2004). Mentoring, modeling, and money. The 3 Ms of producing academics. School Psychology Quarterly, 19, 365–381. https://doi.org/10.1521/scpq.19.4.365.53502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorcinelli, M. D. (1992). New and junior faculty stress: Research and responses. In M. D. Sorcinelli & A. E. Austin (Eds.), Developing new and junior faculty: New directions for teaching and learning, no. 50 (pp. 27–37). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, M. W., & Chan-Park, C. (2015). The research impact of school psychology faculty. Journal of School Psychology, 53, 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2015.03.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weisshaar, K. (2017). Publish and perish? An assessment of gender gaps in promotion to tenure in academia. Social Forces, 96, 529–560. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sox052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wicherski, M., Hamp, A., Christidis, P., & Stamm, K. (2014). 2013–2014: Faculty salaries in graduate departments of psychology. Retrieved from www.apa.org/workforce/publications/13-fac-sal/index.aspx

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the Society for the Study of School Psychology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bryn Harris.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The current study was supported by funds from the Society for the Study of School Psychology (SSSP).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Harris, B., Kilgus, S., Kilpatrick, K. et al. The School Psychology Research Collaboration Conference: Examination of Scholarly Outcomes. Contemp School Psychol 25, 515–525 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-020-00275-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-020-00275-z

Keywords

Navigation