Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Refinement and Psychometric Evaluation of the Executive Skills Questionnaire-Revised

  • Published:
Contemporary School Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Executive functioning (EF) skills are vital for academic success. Along with the recent explosion of interventions targeting these skills comes the need for affordable, efficient, and ecologically valid measures for planning and tailoring interventions and monitoring outcomes. The current study describes the refinement and initial psychometric evaluation of the Executive Skills Questionnaire-Revised (ESQ-R), a self-report EF rating scale that integrates current scientific understanding of core EF processes with an ecologically valid understanding of EF skills (ESs) that is directly applicable to academic contexts and tasks and tied to available interventions. We describe reduction of an initial 61-item pool to a final 25-item version using a series of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses with 347 participants. Psychometric evidence for the 25-item version is promising, with excellent internal consistency (alpha = .91), adequate test-retest reliability for a small subsample (.70 with no effects of time delay on score variability), moderate correlations with other EF rating scales (.56–.74) and psychological symptom scales (.38–.55), and a significant correlation with academic engagement (− .40).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Funding

The authors received no external funding for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julia Englund Strait.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Julia Englund Strait, Ph.D., declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Peg Dawson, Ed.D., is a co-author of the original ESQ rating scales and the books where they appear.

Christine AP Walther, Ph.D., declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Gerald Gill Strait, Ph.D., declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Amy K. Barton declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Maryellen Brunson McClain, Ph.D., declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent and, when appropriate for age, parental consent and child assent were obtained for all individual participants included in the study in procedures approved by the university IRB (Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects or CPHS).

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Strait, J.E., Dawson, P., Walther, C.A.P. et al. Refinement and Psychometric Evaluation of the Executive Skills Questionnaire-Revised. Contemp School Psychol 24, 378–388 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-018-00224-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-018-00224-x

Keywords

Navigation