Abstract
Students as Teachers programs are prevalent, though assessments within these programs are lacking. A workplace-based assessment for clinical teaching was developed to foster formative feedback and support learner growth. Feedback narratives were analyzed to identify student teaching behaviors and demonstrated the themes medical knowledge, professionalism, communication, and teaching skills, which were subcategorized as clinical relevance, learner stage appropriateness, use of evidence-based teaching strategies, learning environment, feedback-related, and time-appropriate. This analysis supports the use of the assessment form for student teachers in the clinical environment as students received construct-relevant feedback from various raters while teaching in multiple settings.
Data Availability
The datasets analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due the information pertaining to assessment of students within the curriculum but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Cohen A, Steinert Y, Ruano CE. Teaching medical students to teach: a narrative review and literature-informed recommendations for Student-as-Teacher curricula. Acad Med. 2022;97(6):909–22.
Fuchs MA, Schwartz AW, Caton JB, Gooding H, Richards JB. Defining Student-as-Teacher curricula in the absence of national guidelines: an innovative model. Acad Med. 2022;97(6):832–8.
Yeung C, Friesen F, Farr S, Law M, Albert L. Development and implementation of a longitudinal students as teachers program: participant satisfaction and implications for medical student teaching and learning. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17(1):28.
Marton GE, McCullough B, Ramnanan CJ. A review of teaching skills development programmes for medical students. Med Educ. 2015;49(2):149–60.
Henry D, West DC. The clinical learning environment and workplace-based assessment: frameworks, strategies, and implementation. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2019;66(4):839–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.2019.03.010. Epub 2019 May 15 PMID: 31230626.
Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. 2020. ACGME Common Core Program Requirements (Residency). 20 Jan 2021. https://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/PFAssets/ProgramRequirements/CPRResidency2020.pdf.
Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC). 2014. Core entrustable professional activities for entering residency: curriculum developers' guide. AAMC iCollaborative, Washington, DC. 20 Jan 2021. https://store.aamc.org/downloadable/download/sample/sample_id/63/%20.
Phinney LB, Fluet A, O’Brien BC, Seligman L, Hauer KE. Beyond checking boxes: exploring tensions with use of a workplace-based assessment tool for formative assessment in clerkships. Acad Med. 2022;97(10):1511–20. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004774.
Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–88.
Olmos-Vega FM, Stalmeijer RE, Varpio L, Kahlke R. A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 149. Med Teach. 2022;1–11.
Govaerts M, van der Vleuten CP. Validity in work-based assessment: expanding our horizons. Med Educ. 2013;47(12):1164–74.
Yudkowsky R, Park YS, Downing SM. Assessment in health professions education. 2nd ed. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge; 2020.
Gingerich A, Kogan J, Yeates P, Govaerts M, Holmboe E. Seeing the “black box” differently: assessor cognition from three research perspectives. Med Educ. 2014;48(11):1055–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.12546.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval
The authors of this paper received IRB exemption from Northwestern University, with no consent required to participate.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bockrath, R., Rodriguez, G., O’Brien, C.L. et al. Students as Teachers: Development and Implementation of a Workplace-Based Assessment. Med.Sci.Educ. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-024-02022-y
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-024-02022-y