Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Usage of Student-Created Anatomical Diagrams Shared on Social Media

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Medical Science Educator Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Social media (SoMe) is a resource for electronic materials in medical education, but has been particularly relevant for anatomy education due to the visual nature of the discipline. Although the distribution of expert/faculty-created anatomy content has been documented, the usefulness of novice/student-created content distributed via SoMe remains undetermined. To address this, original anatomical diagrams (n = 127) created by a novice educator were disseminated via the Anatomy Adventures Instagram account and evaluated for their usefulness. Audience engagement was evaluated using descriptive statistics, with a mean number of likes for all posts (n = 61) of 62.54 + 15.70. Statistically significant differences in the number of likes across content topics were assessed using a Kruskal–Wallis test (H(41.09) = 4, p < 0.005). An 11-item survey (10.6% response rate) explored the (1) population demographics, (2) diagram utility, and (3) suggestions for improvement. Responses were converted to percent frequencies and assessed with chi-square. Descriptive codes were applied to open-ended responses according to published methods. Of the 111 survey responses, 95% of participants were 18–30 years, with the majority of participants being medical students (69.3%), undergraduate/graduate students (16.2%), and fully employed (12.6%). Participants report using the diagrams to study for coursework or board examinations (54%), while non-medical use (42.4%) included leisure viewing or reviewing for their occupation. The usefulness of the diagrams was attributed to their (1) simplicity (43%), (2) style (24.6%), and (3) color-coding (12.3%) (p = 0.0025). These data indicate that Instagram may be utilized by novice educators to provide accurate and accessible resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D’Souza F, et al. Social media: medical educations double-edged sword. Future Healthc J. 2021;8(2):e307–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hennessy CM, et al. Social media and anatomy education: using Twitter to enhance the student learning experience in anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2016;9(6):505–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hennessy CM, et al. Social media guidelines for anatomists. Anat Sci Educ. 2020;13(4):527–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Santos VA, Barreira MP, Saad KR. Technological resources for teaching and learning about human anatomy in the medical course: systematic review of literature. Anat Sci Educ. 2022;15(2):403–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dissabandara LO, et al. Role of cadaveric dissections in modern medical curricula: a study on student perceptions. Anat Cell Biol. 2015;48(3):205–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pascoe MA. Web browsing habits of healthcare professions students in gross anatomy laboratory. Anat Sci Educ. 2020;13(4):520–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Khurana S, Chopra R, Khurana B. Automated processing of social media content for radiologists: applied deep learning to radiological content on twitter during COVID-19 pandemic. Emerg Radiol. 2021;28(3):477–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Choi-Lundberg DL, Cuellar WA, Williams AM. Online dissection audio-visual resources for human anatomy: undergraduate medical studentsusage and learning outcomes. Anat Sci Educ. 2016;9(6):545–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Barry DS, et al. Anatomy education for the YouTube generation. Anat Sci Educ. 2016;9(1):90–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pascoe MA. The effect of Snapchat on learner satisfaction and anatomical knowledge retention: preliminary observations. FASEB Bioadv. 2021;3(11):909–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fowler LR, et al. Sex education on TikTok: a content analysis of themes. Health Promot Pract. 2021; p. 15248399211031536.

  12. Attardi SM, et al. YouTube-based course orientation videos delivered prior to matriculation fail to alleviate medical student anxiety about anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2021.

  13. El Bialy S, Jalali A. Go Where the students are: a comparison of the use of social networking sites between medical students and medical educators. JMIR Med Educ. 2015;1(2): e7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Choi-Lundberg DL, et al. Medical student preferences for self-directed study resources in gross anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2016;9(2):150–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hennessy CM, Smith CF. Digital and social media in anatomy education. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1260:109–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chytas D. Use of social media in anatomy education: a narrative review of the literature. Ann Anat. 2019;221:165–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dua A, et al. Development of a novel peer-sharing application to supplement learning from cadaveric dissection. Anat Sci Educ. 2021;14(4):491–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. McMenamin PG, et al. Do we really need cadavers anymore to learn anatomy in undergraduate medicine? Med Teach. 2018;40(10):1020–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hennessy CM, et al. Social media guidelines: a review for health professionals and faculty members. Clin Teach. 2019;16(5):442–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Essig J, et al. InstaHisto: Utilizing Instagram as a medium for disseminating visual educational resources. Med Sci Educ. 2020;30(3):1035–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Olinger AB. Human gross anatomy. 1st ed. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer. 2015.

  22. Anatomy AAF. Social Media Use Policy. 2022. Available from: https://www.anatomy.org/AAA/About-AAA/Policies/Social-Media-Use.aspx. Accessed July 2020.

  23. Gosling JA. Human anatomy : color atlas and textbook. 6th ed. New York: Elsevier; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Moses KP. Atlas of clinical gross anatomy. 2nd ed. Philadephia, PA: Elsevier. 2013.

  25. Saldana J. The coding manual for qualiative researchers. Thousand Oaks. CA: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2016. p. 368.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Douglas NKM, et al. Reviewing the role of instagram in education: can a photo sharing application deliver benefits to medical and dental anatomy education? Med Sci Educ. 2019;29(4):1117–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nguyen VH, Lyden ER, Yoachim SD. Using Instagram as a tool to enhance anatomy learning at two US dental schools. J Dent Educ. 2021;85(9):1525–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chapman JA, Lee LMJ, Swailes NT. From scope to screen: the evolution of histology education. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1260:75–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Flynn L, Jalali A, Moreau KA. Learning theory and its application to the use of social media in medical education. Postgrad Med J. 2015;91(1080):556–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Goldie JG. Connectivism: a knowledge learning theory for the digital age? Med Teach. 2016;38(10):1064–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lewis JD, et al. Expanding opportunities for professional development: utilization of Twitter by early career women in academic medicine and science. JMIR Med Educ. 2018;4(2): e11140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer F. Dennis.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

The questionnaire and methodology for this study were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board at Kansas City University (protocol #1725741–1); informed consent was obtained from each participant prior to completing the survey.

Conflict of Interest

The authors report no financial interests to disclose. The corresponding author is the Chair of the Educational Affairs Committee for the American Association for Anatomy.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 372 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Motzko, M., Dennis, J.F. Usage of Student-Created Anatomical Diagrams Shared on Social Media. Med.Sci.Educ. 33, 191–204 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-023-01736-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-023-01736-9

Keywords

Navigation