Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Exploring Team-Based Teaching of Basic Sciences and Clinical Practice: Experiences of Pharmacy Students at a Malaysian Pharmacy School

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Medical Science Educator Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interdisciplinary learning combining foundational science concepts and clinical practice applications is important in many healthcare-related programmes, including pharmacy. The coherent, structured interdisciplinary curricula designed by specialists may not always be perceived as integrated by students. Team teaching, an education approach where two or more instructors share teaching responsibilities within a classroom setting, may help eliminate this perception. This study aims to explore whether team teaching can improve Asian students’ experience of learning in an undergraduate pharmacy programme in Malaysia. A single 2-h interactive lecture session was delivered using a team-based approach to year 4 undergraduate pharmacy students enrolled at the School of Pharmacy, Monash University Malaysia, from 2015 to 2017. All students who attended the team-based teaching lectures were provided with an anonymous link, which requested responses on their views towards team-based teaching. Fifty out of 104 participants from three different cohorts responded to the survey of this study. Over 75% of students reported that they learnt better with the team teaching approach compared to traditional lectures delivered by one lecturer and that the team teaching approach was superior to private study. About 60% of the participants agreed that the team-based teaching approach helped develop their information-synthesising and problem-solving skills. This study provides evidence for using team teaching for design and delivery in an Asian context. The approach was well received by the participants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of Data

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. World Health Organisation. The role of the pharmacist in the health-care system - preparing the future pharmacist: curricular development, report of a third WHO Consultative Group on the role of the pharmacist, Vancouver, Canada; 1997.

  2. Husband AK, Todd A, Fulton J. Integrating science and practice in pharmacy curricula. Am J Pharm Educ. 2014;78:63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Winch C, Clarke L. “Front-loaded” vocational education versus lifelong learning. A critique of current UK government policy. Oxf Rev Educ. 2003;29:239–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Guile D, Ahmed F. Modernising the pharmacy curriculum. London: LLAKES Centre, University of London; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Morral J, Culshaw M, Morral K, Conway B, Adams S, Adams A. Linking a pharmaceutical chemistry workshop to pharmacy practice. Sci Pharm. 2015;83:125–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tan C. Confucianism and education. In: Noblit G, editor. Oxford research encyclopedia of education. New York: Oxford University Press; 2017. pp. 1-18.

  7. Brooks AW, Schroeder J, Risen JL, Gino F, Galinsky AD, Norton MI, Schweitzer ME. Don’t stop believing: rituals improve performance by decreasing anxiety. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2016;137:71–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gonzales M. Pharmacists’ participation in team teaching program. Hosp Top. 1965;43:69–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bess JL. Teaching alone teaching together: transforming the structure of teams for teaching. 1st ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Parmelee D, Michaelsen LK, Cook S, Hudes PD. Team-based learning: a practical guide: AMEE guide no. 65. Med Teach. 2012;34:e275–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lam TP, Irwin M, Chow LWC, Chan P. Early introduction of clinical skills teaching in a medical curriculum – factors affecting students’ learning. Med Educ. 2002;36:233–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pancsofar N, Petroff JG. Teachers’ experiences with co-teaching as a model for inclusive education. Int J Incl Educ. 2016;20:1043–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Letterman MR, Dugan KB. Team teaching a cross-disciplinary honors course: preparation and development. Coll Teach. 2004;52:76–9.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brewer EW, Burgess DN. Professor’s role in motivating students to attend class. J Ind Teach Educ. 2005;42:23–47.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kolluru S, Roesch DM, de la Fuente AA. A multi-instructor, team-based, active-learning exercise to integrate basic and clinical sciences content. Am J Pharm Educ. 2012;76:33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Glaser BG. The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Soc Probl. 1965;12:436–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vygotsky LS. Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press; 1980.

  18. Karpicke JD. Retrieval-based learning: active retrieval promotes meaningful learning. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2012;21:157–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Punja D, Kalludi SN, Pai KM, Rao RK, Dhar M. Team-based learning as a teaching strategy for first-year medical students. Australas Med J. 2014;7:490–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sharma S, Ravikirti, Ali A, Takhelmayum R, Mahto M, Nair R. Co-teaching: exploring an alternative for integrated curriculum. J Natl Med Assoc. 2017;109:93–7.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Atwal A, Caldwell K. Nurses’ perceptions of multidisciplinary team work in acute health-care. Int J Nurs Pract. 2006;12:359–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Poulton BC, West MA. Effective multidisciplinary teamwork in primary health care. J Adv Nurs. 1993;18:918–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee SWH. Pharmacy student-led health education campaign initiative. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2019;11:292–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hartgerink J, Cramm J, Bakker T, Eijsden A, Mackenbach J, Nieboer A. The importance of multidisciplinary teamwork and team climate for relational coordination among teams delivering care to older patients. J Adv Nurs. 2014;70:791–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Burrell AR, Cavanagh M, Young S, Carter H. Team-based curriculum design as an agent of change. Teach High Educ. 2015;20:753–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all participants for their generous cooperation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kim San Tang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tang, K.S., Maher, S. & Lee, S.W.H. Exploring Team-Based Teaching of Basic Sciences and Clinical Practice: Experiences of Pharmacy Students at a Malaysian Pharmacy School. Med.Sci.Educ. 33, 83–89 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-022-01703-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-022-01703-w

Keywords

Navigation