Skip to main content
Log in

Planning Medical Education for 2042 — A Promise of Science and Sociology

  • Keynote Lecture
  • Published:
Medical Science Educator Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Adapted from Pangaro, JIAMSE, 2010

Availability of Data and Material

Not applicable.

Notes

  1. Please excuse this author’s allergy to the term “workplace”, which suggests a business context that is inconsistent with the ethical notion of a promise made to patients.

  2. Reporter-interpreter-manager/educator and entrustable professional activities.

References

  1. Finnerty EP, Chauvin S, Bonaminio G, Andrews M, Carroll RG, Pangaro LN. Flexner revisited: the role and value of the basic sciences in medical education. Acad Med. 2010;85(2):349–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pangaro L, ten Cate O. AMEE guide - frameworks for learner assessment in medicine (theories in medical education series). Med Teach. 2013;35:524–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pangaro L. Investing in descriptive evaluation: a vision for the future of assessment. Med Teach. 2000;22(5):478–81.

  4. Pellegrino ED. Toward a virtue-based normative ethics for the health professions. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1995;5(3):253–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Artino AR, Hemmer PA, Durning SJ. Using self-regulated learning theory to understand the beliefs, emotions, and behaviors of struggling medical students. Acad Med. 2011;86(10)S35–38.

  6. Harden RM. What is a spiral curriculum? Med Teach. 1999;21(2):141–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Romano C, Pangaro L. Commentary on responses to the question of the year in academic medicine, What is a Doctor and What is a Nurse? Acad Med. 2014;89(7):970–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Louis N. Pangaro.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

I agree to publication.

Conflict of Interest

The opinions and assertions expressed herein are the author’s and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Uniformed Services University or the Department of Defense. The author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is a recap of ideas in the IAMSE plenary talk of 6 June 2022.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pangaro, L.N. Planning Medical Education for 2042 — A Promise of Science and Sociology. Med.Sci.Educ. 32 (Suppl 1), 5–8 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-022-01656-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-022-01656-0

Navigation